mozzaok wrote on Jul 13
th, 2008 at 8:54pm:
A two way street is not a realistic metaphor for the Israeli -Palestinian conflict. because one side believes that the other side should be wiped off the planet.
Mozz, everything in life IS a two way street. Two sides to a coin etc etc. Why does one side want the other side wiped off the face of the planet (I'm assuming by that you mean the Palestinians)? Why are they aggrieved so much that they feel such hatred? What was done to them? Whether the grievance is valid or not, it IS the other side of the street.
Meanwhile, it works the other way as well; I've seen countless news footages and docos where Israeli settlers produce the same type of hatred - that all Palestinians should be shot on sight; kill even the children because they will one day grow up and try and kill us etc. Again, why display such hatred? What caused it? Well, we know what caused it (mortar drops, bomb belts etc).
But here is the point of my post (@ 8.40pm), why do we know so MUCH about the bomb belts, and the mortar drops and very little about the Palestinian situation and point of view. There is a great imbalance of view point and opinion from the Western media - and its nearly all one way (Israeli). Check out other news outlets besides the CNN, NBC, FoxNews, Courier Mail, The Age etc. Here are a few suggestions, Jakarta Post, Asia News Network, The Strait Times, The Muslim Observer, and yes, Al-Jazeera Online. (People who believe that Asian countries don't see Australia as a racist country weren't reading the news from Asian newspapers.)
Western govt has harsh words and great indignation when harm is thrown into Israel but soft diplomatic words when Israel is the aggressor. There is talk of preemptive strike by Israel against Iran. What will happen when they do act? There will be diplomatic statements like "We appalled and disappointed in the path the Israeli govt has decided to adopt. We hope that they will return back to diplomatic talks on the roadmap to peace." That is all. Sanctions? Counter strike towards the aggressor? Highly unlikely. However, should Iran retaliate we know who the West will side with.
mozzaok wrote on Jul 13
th, 2008 at 8:54pm:
As long as they feel threatened by the whole muslim world, they will continue to arm themselves to the teeth, and fight mercilessly.
It's easy to say "I'm no fan of Israel" to wipe your hands clean and to appear unbiased. But its statement above that show where your leanings are - "the whole Muslim world"? Really? We all know of the cliché of the paranoid and hypersensitive Jew but should the world be hypersensitive on their behalf as well? Are you speaking for them or do you personally truly believe that the Muslim world is out to get them? I can understand why Israel may believe that (afterall, they're in the thick of it) but why does the rest of the world think so too? A few million radicals (yes Sprint, it's a big number) out of the few billion Muslims does not equate to the entire Muslim world.