AUShole
Full Member
 
Offline

OzPolitic
Posts: 159
WA
Gender:
|
If someone enters your house illegally, and has an expectation they could be shot, they will arm themselves accordingly. Applying the pro-gun argument, everyone will be entitled to arm themselves, so then all criminals will be forced to carry a gun to "defend" themselves against retaliation when they are illegally entering a property. Because a gun can inflict lethal force without being in immediate proximity of the target, a shoot first, think second mentality will ensue. The innocent occupant is likely to come off second best, because it is less likely they will have a loaded gun at hand, whereas the better prepared criminal is ready for action. Shoot first, think second... dead occupant.
In addition, if criminals don't have a gun, they will rob an easy target, such as the old lady who lives by herself.
By having a gun in the house, all you have done is raise the stakes of being killed in a home invasion, or moved the problem to those less able to defend themselves.
|