Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Does ausnats pic offend you?

NO - freedom of expression.    
  9 (81.8%)
yes - let me dictate.    
  2 (18.2%)




Total votes: 11
« Created by: DILLIGAF on: Feb 27th, 2007 at 9:23pm »

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 8
Send Topic Print
IRAQ (Read 36899 times)
ex-member DonaldTrump
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Oh mere mortals, open
your eyes!

Posts: 1995
Overseas
Gender: male
Re: Iraq: Are more military personnel necessary?
Reply #30 - Aug 13th, 2007 at 12:03am
 
Flip flopper Howard.
Back to top
 

Quote:
Tolerance is the virtue of men who no longer believe in anything
&&-- G.K. Chesterton
 
IP Logged
 
nemoforone(Guest)
Guest


WAR - US vs Iran from Iraq
Reply #31 - Mar 30th, 2007 at 4:46am
 
What about the possibility of pulling out of Iraq, letting Iran invade and lose resources fighting their own kind,
and then come in and mop up the dregs?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: WAR - US vs Iran from Iraq
Reply #32 - Mar 30th, 2007 at 7:37am
 
The US have been given the opportunity on a few occasions to communicate with Iran but have refused each opportunity.

The Democrats believe that reaching some sort of solution by having discussions with Iran would be helpful to the Iraq solution.

Conditions are only deteriorating in Iraq and before the rest of the Middle East is dragged into this war - the Americans need to find a middle ground.

Remember they are the ones who invaded Iraq illegally and it's many of their foreign policies in the Middle East causing the dissension.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie Nationalist
Ex Member
*****



Gender: male
Re: WAR - US vs Iran from Iraq
Reply #33 - Mar 30th, 2007 at 10:42am
 
Quote:
What about the possibility of pulling out of Iraq, letting Iran invade and lose resources fighting their own kind,
and then come in and mop up the dregs?


That is the worst thing that can happen.
Iran is a shite muslim country, and it is their intention to invade iraq later if the U.S does leave.
Iraq is 40% shite and 60% sunni. Imagine what will happen to the sunni's. (not that i care).
Iran will have no trouble walking in, they will lose very little resources and in fact gain more by taking the oil fields.

''come in and mop up the dregs''?
No. iran would be more powerful than ever.
Back to top
 
Total anti-marxist and anti-left wing. The Right is Right.&&&&&&
 
IP Logged
 
AUShole
Full Member
***
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 159
WA
Gender: male
Re: WAR - US vs Iran from Iraq
Reply #34 - Apr 1st, 2007 at 2:11pm
 
Quote:
That is the worst thing that can happen.

Agree. Mainly because they will continue the march west.

Quote:
Iraq is 40% shite and 60% sunni. Imagine what will happen to the sunni's. (not that i care).

Wrong. Shi'a 60%-65%, Sunni 32%-37%. See the CIA website for yourself.

Quote:
Iran will have no trouble walking in, they will lose very little resources and in fact gain more by taking the oil fields. 

Oil is of no value if it cannot be traded. Embargoes would be placed on all Iran in the event of an invasion.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AUShole
Full Member
***
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 159
WA
Gender: male
Re: WAR - US vs Iran from Iraq
Reply #35 - Apr 1st, 2007 at 2:15pm
 
mantra wrote on Mar 30th, 2007 at 7:37am:
The US have been given the opportunity on a few occasions to communicate with Iran but have refused each opportunity.


Are you talking about current events? The US have been negotiating (albeit indirectly) with Iran and Syria over the last few months.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53324
At my desk.
al-Qaeda vs Iran
Reply #36 - Jul 9th, 2007 at 12:02pm
 
This is an interesting development. It puts the US and Iran on the same side against the terrorists:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/World/alQaedalinked-group-threatens-Iran/2007/07/09/1183833378690.html

The leader of an al-Qaeda-linked group in Iraq has vowed to attack Iranians unless Iran cuts off its support for the Iraqi government within two months.

"We give the ... Persians in general, and leaders of Iran in particular, two months to withdraw their support and presence in Iraq," Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, leader of the self-styled Islamic State in Iraq, said in the 50-minute audiotape posted on Islamist website which has often carried al-Qaeda statements.

In the first such threat by his group, Baghdadi said that unless Iran meets his demands, the group will wage a "brutal war" against Iranians.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Online


OzPolitic

Posts: 41965
Gender: male
Re: WAR - US vs Iran from Iraq
Reply #37 - Jul 9th, 2007 at 1:24pm
 
Sounds like more of the same to me freediver .

Muslims murdering
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Online


OzPolitic

Posts: 41965
Gender: male
Iraq - Progress, reality and awareness
Reply #38 - May 16th, 2007 at 10:57am
 
Iraq makes progress on constitution plan
May 16, 2007 - 8:44AM
An Iraqi committee has agreed to send to parliament a plan to reform the constitution.
It's an important step towards implementing national reconciliation laws that Washington says are critical to ending violence.
Once-dominant Sunni Arabs, who make up the backbone of the insurgency, have long demanded changes to a constitution they say concedes too much power to majority Shi'ites and ethnic Kurds, who were persecuted under Saddam Hussein.
US President George W Bush, under pressure to show tangible progress in the four-year-old war, has piled pressure on Iraqi leaders to agree power-sharing legislation.
Such laws, which include sharing Iraq's vast oil wealth and ending a ban on former members of Saddam's party from public office, are particularly aimed at assuaging Sunnis Arabs and bringing them firmly into the US-backed political process.
White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe welcomed the move, but said: "There is more work to be done, but this step will help in the process of bringing all Iraqis together to help build a stable, secure and unified democracy."
In another sign of political progress, Sunni Vice-President Tareq al-Hashemi said the presidential council would soon send to parliament a draft proposal to allow thousands of ex-Baath party members to return to public jobs, another Sunni demand.
The council comprises Hashemi, President Jalal Talabani, a Kurd, and Shi'ite Vice-President Adel Abdul al-Mahdi.
Hashemi's Accordance Front had warned it might quit Shi'ite Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's government if Sunni grievances were ignored, but a visit by US Vice-President Dick Cheney to Iraq last week appears to have softened the Sunnis' stance.
The bills are likely to face fierce debate in parliament.
Sunni Arabs, meanwhile, fear federalism will allow Kurds in the north and Shi'ites in the south, where Iraq's oil reserves lie, to break away into their own states. Sunni Arabs live mostly in central and western Iraq, which is poor in oil.

Iraq 'a terrorist Disneyland' if US goes
From correspondents in London
May 16, 2007 04:34am
A US troop pullout from Iraq would leave the country as a potent launchpad for international terrorism and Washington would be forced to go back in within a couple of years, a leading al-Qaeda expert said overnight.
Rohan Gunaratna told a security conference at Lloyd's of London insurance market that Iraq, like Afghanistan in the 1990s, would become a "terrorist Disneyland" where al-Qaeda could build up its strength unchallenged.
If US, British and other coalition troops withdrew from Iraq in the next year, he said, "certainly the scale of attacks that would be mounted inside Iraq, and using Iraq as a launching pad to strike other Western countries - countries in Europe, North America - would become such that after two or three years, the US forces will have to go back to Iraq".
The Singapore-based academic and writer said the epicentre of international terrorism had already switched from Afghanistan to Iraq.
"In many ways, the terrorist threat has now shifted 1500 miles closer to Europe."
Republican President George W. Bush is locked in a standoff with a Democratic-led Congress over funding for the war in Iraq, now in its fifth year, in which more than 3400 American troops have been killed.
Democrats are pushing for a time frame for withdrawal, something the White House opposes as sending the wrong message to US forces, allies and enemies alike. Some Republicans are also questioning the war more publicly.
Britain, the leading US partner in Iraq, is scaling back its troops there, although the idea of an immediate pullout was rejected this week by Gordon Brown, the man expected to succeed Mr Bush's close ally Tony Blair as prime minister next month.
A former head of Britain's foreign intelligence service MI6 described Mr Gunaratna's analysis as convincing.
"Clearly al-Qaeda are focusing on Iraq now, and focusing on some sort of propaganda victory over the United States," Sir Richard Dearlove said.





Pollies want to ban Islamic minarets
correspondents in Zurich
May 15, 2007 08:08pm
A GROUP of right-wing politicians are gathering signatures to try to force a national vote on banning the construction of minarets in Switzerland, the leader of the campaign said today.
The planned building of minarets, the towers attached to mosques from which the Islamic call for prayer is issued, in small Swiss towns has sparked local protests.
A group of politicians from the Swiss National Party and Federal Democratic Union are seeking to prevent the construction of minarets in national law, saying they are a symbol of power and threaten law and order in Switzerland.
The campaign has to gather 100,000 signatures by November 2008 to force a national vote on the initiative which, if it gains a majority vote, would then be written into law.
"We have no doubt that we'll reach the goal," said Ulrich Schlueer, a Swiss National Party parliamentarian for Zurich who is heading the initiative. "We've now been collecting for a week and we've already got 10,000 signatures."
There are currently only two minarets in Switzerland, in Zurich and Geneva. The call to prayer is not made from these minarets.

Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
JJJ(Guest)
Guest


Re: Iraq - Progress, reality and awareness
Reply #39 - May 16th, 2007 at 11:28am
 
"Iraq 'a terrorist Disneyland' if US goes"

I was watching the Daily Show on the Comedy Channel a few days back, it's hosted by Jon Stewart and is a news parody show but it raises a few interesting points and i find it more reliable than ur mainstream news.

First of all, it bought footage of George W Bush prior to the Iraqi war saying we must invade Iraq and overthrow Saddam Hussein so to stop terrorists having a base of operations. It then bought footage of a recent press coverage where George W Bush is saying if we leave now the terrorists will have a base of operations. To which Jon Stewart noted:

"we needed to invade Iraq and overthrow Saddam Hussein to stop the terrorists from having a base of operations, which we did. however, we can't leave since leaving will mean that the terrorists will have a base of operations due to Saddam Hussein no longer being there".

Grin Grin Grin Grin - i think that's a fair point.

Jon Stewart also had an interview with a Middle Eastern expert from the CBS network called Reza Aslan, this guy mentioned that Al-Qaeda represents a minority of the total insurgency (only about 7%) and they are currently tolerated. He believes that now they are tolerated since they are fighting the US alongside the other insurgents, however if the US leaves then the Al-Qaeda insurgents will most likely be the first to be wiped out. That could be a solution  Wink

That view is different to this other Middle Eastern expert that's mentioned in the article posted, it gives the impression that Al-Qaeda's presence in Iraq is significant. either that, or they are labelling all insurgents as Al-Qaeda.

Pollies want to ban Islamic minarets

Why? I understand if they were making the call to prayer from those minarets, then u could argue that the noise is a nuisance. But that's not the case here.

Besides, how is that different from the towers u find on churches and synagogues?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Online


OzPolitic

Posts: 41965
Gender: male
Islam - the ongoing war
Reply #40 - May 16th, 2007 at 1:46pm
 
Islamists starved of funds


ISLAMIC extremists in Australia are being starved of money by an unprecedented crackdown on the secret flow of funds from Saudi Arabia.

ASIO and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade have quietly spearheaded the disruption of funding from Saudi charities and Saudi nationals, reducing it to only a trickle after concerns the money could be used to fund terror plots in Australia.
The Government's push has robbed local extremists of a traditional source of funding from a country that has invested more than $120 million into Australia's Islamic community since the 1970s.
Saudi Arabian money has been used to build mosques and schools in Australia but it has also helped to promote extreme Wahabist interpretations of Islam.
Saudi Arabia has been accused by the US Government of tacitly funding extremism via quasi-government charities that promote Wahabism.
Washington says Saudi government-sanctioned charities have secretly bankrolled the Indonesian terrorist group Jemaah Islamiah, responsible for killing 92 Australians in the two Bali bombings.
Despite this, Australia has won strong Saudi government backing for its crackdown here, with Riyadh instructing its embassy in Canberra to alert DFAT to any Saudi funds flowing into Australia.
Islamic sources claim less than $1million has flowed into Australia from Saudi Arabia in the past 12 months - barely one-fifth of estimated funding levels before the September 11 terror attacks of2001.
The Australian understands that ASIO has issued confidential reports opposing the proposed use of Saudi funds to build mosques in Belmore in Sydney in 2004 and the Park Holme mosque in Adelaide this year.
The ASIO assessments prompted DFAT to express concern to the Saudi Government, which promptly cut the flow of Saudi funds for the projects.
The "tip-off" agreement between the two countries was initiated by Foreign Minister Alexander Downer in 2004 after a visit to Saudi Arabia.
"As a result of my visit to Saudi Arabia, they introduced a new system of transparency,' Mr Downer told The Australian yesterday.
"Prior to that system we don't know what funding they provided so we can't compare what was done before with what is done now, but we do know that they now report (to us)."
Saudi Arabia's co-operation with Canberra on the issue of funding is part of its renewed global effort to rebut allegations that its charities are used as fronts to provide funding for extremists around the world.
"The Saudis have proved true to their word so far about consulting with us about Saudi funding proposals," one well-placed government official said.
However, Australian authorities remain wary about the possibility of private funds flowing into Australia without the knowledge of either government.
The Government carefully monitors the activities of Saudi diplomats in Australia, who are believed to directly pay the wages of selected imams in Australia.
One of these imams, Mohammed Swaiti, was removed this month as the spiritual head of Canberra's Abu Bakr Mosque amid claims he was too radical in his teachings.
In January, the reconstruction of Adelaide's Park Holme mosque was halted when planned Saudi funding was withdrawn by the Saudi Government after DFAT expressed concerns about the project.
The mosque is considered Adelaide's most radical prayer centre. It was frequented by an Australian Iraqi Kurd, Warya Kanie, who was captured in Baghdad in October and detained for engaging in anti-coalition activities.
Similarly, Saudi funding of Sydney's Belmore mosque was halted in 2004 after concerns were expressed about the mosque's links with radical sheik Abdul Salam Mohammed Zoud.
The Saudi embassy did not return calls from The Australian yesterday.



I wondered where terrorists get funding from. That is only the funds they tell us about.
JJJ - the above newsreport answers your queries.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
JJJ(Guest)
Guest


Re: Iraq - Progress, reality and awareness
Reply #41 - May 16th, 2007 at 1:53pm
 
sprintcyclist, that newsreport has nothing to do with my queries.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Online


OzPolitic

Posts: 41965
Gender: male
Re: Iraq - Progress, reality and awareness
Reply #42 - May 16th, 2007 at 11:30pm
 
Hi JJJ,
We see things differently.
You can poke fun at anything you want.  Isn't that a great feaure of a free society ?

Quite unlike an islamic country, where questions are crushed.
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
oceans_blue
Ex Member


Mahi militia 'will target prince Harry'.
Reply #43 - Apr 28th, 2007 at 9:05pm
 


Mahdi militia 'will target Prince Harry'
Print this page
Last Modified: 28 Apr 2007
Source: ITN


A special militia unit has been set up to track down and capture Prince Harry if he is sent to Iraq, a Shia commander has claimed.

article continues below...

Abu Mujtaba, a commander in the Mahdi army, said he had informers inside British bases who would leak information about Harry's arrival in the country.

He told a newspaper: "One of our aims is to capture Harry, we have people inside the British bases to inform us on when he will arrive.

"Not only us, the Mahdi army, that will try to capture him, but every person who hates the British and the Americans will try to get him, all the mujahideens in Iraq, the al-Qaeda, the Iranians all will try to get him."

The reports will provoke further debate about whether the Prince should be sent to Iraq, for his own safety and that of his comrades.

After one of the bloodiest months so far for British troops in Iraq, speculation has continued about whether Prince Harry's arrival there would increase the risk of attacks on his colleagues in the Blues and Royals.

His planned deployment next month comes after the death of 11 servicemen, including two on April 19 who were doing the same job the royal officer was expected to take up on his six-month tour.

Friends of the 22-year-old Prince said he would be "very disappointed" if he was not allowed to go but would stay with the Army."
---------------------------



This seems like madness to let him go in light of what they know.

There would have to be safety issues to be considered not just for Harry but the rest of the his section?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: Mahi militia 'will target prince Harry'.
Reply #44 - Apr 28th, 2007 at 9:58pm
 
It is madness - can we be sure that he really is being sent there?  Iraq is such a desperate, filthy and out of control civil war - all sides are blowing each other up and nobody is safe.

The insurgents would love to capture Harry.  They could demand anything they wanted - first and foremost - get the Americans out!

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 8
Send Topic Print