There aren't many people left who are still willing to defend Islam. Going against that trend is Greg, who has recently become obsessed with using misleading statics and blatant lies to defend Muslim terrorists from accusations that they are (shock, horror) worse than other terrorist groups who do not seek to cause mass casualties.

For the most part, Greg sticks to quoting statistics that equate 9/11 with attacks with no deaths or injuries. For example:


greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 15^th, 2018 at 3:48pm:

moses wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 3:46pm: The Europol report says: The main concern of Member States is jihadist terrorism Of the 12 trends identified in the latest TE-SAT, most related to jihadist terrorism. nearly all reported fatalities and most of the casualties were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks. "Ethno-nationalist and separatist terrorist attacks continue to far outnumber attacks carried out by violent extremists inspired by any other ideologies or motivations." Yes - that's exactly what the Europol report says.

In other words, he is afraid to offer any opinion, meaning, or interpretation - just quotes of exactly what is said. Greg has probably made 1000 posts very similar to the above in the past month, in response to a variety of questions and criticism.

When he does attempt to think for himself, it quickly gets very stupid, for example:


greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 6^th, 2018 at 4:16pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 6th, 2018 at 2:14pm: Nothing more than what it says Greg. It does not, for example, mean that Islamic terrorism is not the biggest terror problem in the world, which is something you also said, though you are ashamed to admit it now. Do you think you are solving some kind of problem by lying to people about the problem of Islamic terrorism? Ashamed?  Not at all. Islamic terrorism is not the biggest terror problem in the world. Islamic terrorism is not the biggest terror problem in the world. Islamic terrorism is not the biggest terror problem in the world. One more time?

His evidence for this is a website from the EU which states, among other things, that Muslim terrorists account for nearly all deaths and most of the casualties due to terrorism in the EU - despite Muslims making up less than 4% of the population. When they publish Greg's preferred statistics that treat all attacks as equal regardless of death toll, Muslims are still the standout, being the only identifiable religious, political or ideological group to get their own category.

So far, when asked to explain how causing nearly all deaths and most of the casualties even when Muslims make up just a tiny minority leads him to conclude that jihadism is not the biggest terror problem, Greg can only retreat to parroting the misleading statistics.

Greg is also too scared to offer an opinion on whether it is misleading to endlessly parrot statistics that equate 9/11 style attacks with other attacks that cause no deaths or injuries.

Here is an example of his tapdancing:


greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 15^th, 2018 at 1:16pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 12:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 12:51pm: freediver wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 12:48pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 7:40am: freediver wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 6:48am: Greg is now afraid to think for himself on this. All he can do is copy and paste misleading statistics. Are the stats accurate? A simple yes or no will suffice. I have no idea if they are accurate Greg. Do you think they are misleading, or are you too scared to have your own opinion? I believe them to be accurate (unless someone can prove otherwise). I don't find them misleading at all - it clearly shows that the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe are carried out by non-Muslims. Moreover, so does the 2017 report - only 9% of attacks are attributed to Jihadists in 2016. Do you think that statistics that equate 9/11 style attacks with attacks with no injuries are likely to be misleading? I'm sure Yadda would agree with me when I say that every attack by terrorists is a terrorist attack. Would you agree too, FD?

Here is Gandalf getting in on the act:


polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 15^th, 2018 at 2:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 1:14pm: freediver wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 12:57pm: Is 9/11 worse than a paint bomb? Take your time Greg. Think for yourself. What threat to freedom and democracy do you consider to be greater than Islam? Does the Europol report mention paint bombs? I must say, I didn't see that. Did a word search of the document and everything. What page number is that on? Oh deary me, so not paintbombing, not graffiti... FD what can you invent next - litterbugs? making faces?

So basically, this is what people who defend Islam now stoop to - defending mass murder as being equivalent to attacks with no deaths or injuries.

Poor old Greg and Grandalf, its all they can do now, the sinking ship comes to mind.

Hod the press! Gandalf has conceded that it "might" be misleading to equate 9/11 with an attack in which no-one is killed or injured.


polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 15^th, 2018 at 2:47pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 12:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 12:51pm: freediver wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 12:48pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 7:40am: freediver wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 6:48am: Greg is now afraid to think for himself on this. All he can do is copy and paste misleading statistics. Are the stats accurate? A simple yes or no will suffice. I have no idea if they are accurate Greg. Do you think they are misleading, or are you too scared to have your own opinion? I believe them to be accurate (unless someone can prove otherwise). I don't find them misleading at all - it clearly shows that the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe are carried out by non-Muslims. Moreover, so does the 2017 report - only 9% of attacks are attributed to Jihadists in 2016. Do you think that statistics that equate 9/11 style attacks with attacks with no injuries are likely to be misleading? Possibly FD. Similar to pretending that actual attacks using actual bombs, including vehicle borne ones are in fact graffiti and paint bombs - wouldn't you say?

LIES, DAMNED LIES AND STATISTICS.

IT'S A SPIRITUAL WAR AND PEOPLE LIKE GREGGY FULLY KNOW THAT!!

What lies, FD?

I'm curious.

The Europol report says that the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe are carried out by non-Muslims.

Are you calling them liars, FD?

Here's three of them:


Quote:

Islamic terrorism is not the biggest terror problem in the world. Islamic terrorism is not the biggest terror problem in the world. Islamic terrorism is not the biggest terror problem in the world.

Greg are you hoping to garner sympathy for Muslims by defending Muslim terrorists with misleading statistics?

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 15^th, 2018 at 8:29pm:

What lies, FD? I'm curious. The Europol report says that the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe are carried out by non-Muslims. Are you calling them liars, FD?

Waiting for your answer, FD.

Are Europol lying, or are you?

I'm still very curious.

This is what it takes to defend Islam.

freediver wrote on Oct 15^th, 2018 at 8:47pm:

This is what it takes to defend Islam.

Waiting for your answer, FD.

Are Europol lying, or are you?

I'm still very curious.

Gandalf must be proud to have you on board.

freediver wrote on Oct 15^th, 2018 at 8:48pm:

Gandalf must be proud to have you on board.

Is anyone proud of you, FD?

I'm curious.

freediver wrote on Oct 15^th, 2018 at 6:37pm:

There aren't many people left who are still willing to defend Islam.

That's because you've banned them all.... Coincidence?

:D :D :D :D :D :D

Auggie wrote on Oct 15^th, 2018 at 8:54pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 6:37pm: There aren't many people left who are still willing to defend Islam. That's because you've banned them all.... Coincidence? :D :D :D :D :D :D

Lol    ;D

Greg is standing up for Islamic terrorism again:


greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 10:04am:

issuevoter wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 9:39am: The SBS editorial policy is pro-Islam, and anti-European. Fun fact: the majority of terrorist attacks in Europe aren't Islamic. In fact, they only make up 16% of all attacks. For those who failed maths at school - which is probably most of you white-supremacist, Islamophobes - that means that 84% of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Islam. There ya go   ;)

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 15^th, 2018 at 8:48pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 8:47pm: This is what it takes to defend Islam. Waiting for your answer, FD. Are Europol lying, or are you? I'm still very curious.

Has FD answered you yet, Greggery?

It usually takes some time.

Karnal wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 11:43am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 8:48pm: freediver wrote on Oct 15th, 2018 at 8:47pm: This is what it takes to defend Islam. Waiting for your answer, FD. Are Europol lying, or are you? I'm still very curious. Has FD answered you yet, Greggery? It usually takes some time.

Not yet.

I'm sure he'll get back to me soon, though.

He's good like that.

Europol are absolutely correct when they point out that Muslim terrorists account for nearly all deaths and most of the casualties due to terrorism in the EU.

You are misrepresenting the situation by omitting this fact and equating an attack with no casualties with a mass-casualty attack. Of course, this sort of deception is expected from people who attempt to defend Islam.

Do you see how your cherry-picking of the Europol statistics is misleading?

More apologetics from Greg:


greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 11:36am:

The body count is extremely high for the Jihadist attacks, and I've never ignored that fact.

Yes you do Greg. You leave it out every time you mislead people with statistics and spineless apologetics, and for the most part you ignore questions put to you about it.

Why are you so desperate to mislead people about Islamic terrorism?

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 11:56am:

Europol are absolutely correct when they point out that Muslim terrorists account for nearly all deaths and most of the casualties due to terrorism in the EU. You are misrepresenting the situation by omitting this fact and equating an attack with no casualties with a mass-casualty attack. Of course, this sort of deception is expected from people who attempt to defend Islam. Do you see how your cherry-picking of the Europol statistics is misleading? More apologetics from Greg: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 11:36am: The body count is extremely high for the Jihadist attacks, and I've never ignored that fact. Yes you do Greg. You leave it out every time you mislead people with statistics and spineless apologetics, and for the most part you ignore questions put to you about it. Why are you so desperate to mislead people about Islamic terrorism?

Just to confirm:

84% of all attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism.

Is that correct, FD?

I'm curious.

Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time.

Karnal wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:21pm:

Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time.

Ah.

Did he say anything about graffiti?

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:23pm:

Karnal wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:21pm: Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time. Ah. Did he say anything about graffiti?

He did. He said if it glorifies the white race it's not graffiti, it's art. You ask him.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:23pm:

Karnal wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:21pm: Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time. Ah. Did he say anything about graffiti?

I am sure it can be mentioned again.  Scuttle off and find that FBI report you used, it was all in there.

Or is that report a little inconvenient for you now, an equivalency in choppy choppy murder and grafittee crime to high a hurdle for even an apologist cretin like yourself to leap over?

So that report was dropped. And now you have another one to cherry pick and ignore the inconvenient truths...like a body count.

Karnal wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:23pm: Karnal wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:21pm: Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time. Ah. Did he say anything about graffiti? He did. He said if it glorifies the white race it's not graffiti, it's art. You ask him.

Well, FD's always been an art lover.

Secret Wars wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:23pm: Karnal wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:21pm: Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time. Ah. Did he say anything about graffiti? I am sure it can be mentioned again.  Scuttle off and find that FBI report you used, it was all in there. Or is that report a little inconvenient for you now, an equivalency in choppy choppy murder and grafittee crime to high a hurdle for even an apologist cretin like yourself to leap over? So that report was dropped. And now you have another one to cherry pick and ignore the inconvenient truths...like a body count.

This is a Europol report, dear:

https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/main-reports/european-union-terrorism-situation-and-trend-report-2018-tesat-2018

It says that 84% of all terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism.

It makes no mention of graffiti though.

Wouldn't you agree?

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:33pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:23pm: Karnal wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:21pm: Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time. Ah. Did he say anything about graffiti? I am sure it can be mentioned again.  Scuttle off and find that FBI report you used, it was all in there. Or is that report a little inconvenient for you now, an equivalency in choppy choppy murder and grafittee crime to high a hurdle for even an apologist cretin like yourself to leap over? So that report was dropped. And now you have another one to cherry pick and ignore the inconvenient truths...like a body count. This is a Europol report, dear: https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/main-reports/european-union-terrorism-situation-and-trend-report-2018-tesat-2018 It says that 84% of all terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism. It makes no mention of graffiti though. Wouldn't you agree?

It's jaywalking now, can you believe these Islamic apologists?

So this is what it takes to defend Islam eh?

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:33pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:23pm: Karnal wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 12:21pm: Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time. Ah. Did he say anything about graffiti? I am sure it can be mentioned again.  Scuttle off and find that FBI report you used, it was all in there. Or is that report a little inconvenient for you now, an equivalency in choppy choppy murder and grafittee crime to high a hurdle for even an apologist cretin like yourself to leap over? So that report was dropped. And now you have another one to cherry pick and ignore the inconvenient truths...like a body count. This is a Europol report, dear: https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/main-reports/european-union-terrorism-situation-and-trend-report-2018-tesat-2018 It says that 84% of all terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism. It makes no mention of graffiti though. Wouldn't you agree?

SW, you there?

Did you find anything in the report about graffiti?

I'm curious.

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 1:41pm:

So this is what it takes to defend Islam eh?

I know. Abu once said that the white race needs to be completely extinguished - after the correct forms are submitted and authorised, of course. You've got this in the Wiki.

Now the apologists are comparing the deaths of billions of decent white people with jaywalking, can you believe it?

Typical.

Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying
to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them.

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:58pm:

Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them.

I'm not discussing casualties, Booby.

I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017).

And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

I'm curious.

Quote:

I'm not discussing casualties, Booby.

Of course not. That would make it harder for you to mislead people in defence of Islamic terrorists.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:02pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious.

Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity -
not Muslims.  ;D

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:24pm:

Quote: I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. Of course not. That would make it harder for you to mislead people in defence of Islamic terrorists.

I could go either way on this.  I am assuming Peccarry has not included the number who perished in 9/11 and he has dealt with it as a single event.  Well he is literally correct...it was an attack...a co-ordinated one....but still.....one.  A very well organised one.  So it counts as an attack.

The far more relevant point for me is that 9/11 was spawned in Saudi Arabia, the very Arab pricks whose toes Donald is sucking with billions.

If ever there was any part of Arabia I would attack, it would be the House of Saud.....big time.  I would wipe them out in a nano second and let the chips fall.

The Sauds attacked on 9/11...not Islam.

He has not included the death toll from any terrorist attacks. He is equating 9/11 with attacks in which not a single person died.

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 5:33pm:

He has not included the death toll from any terrorist attacks. He is equating 9/11 with attacks in which not a single person died.

You'll have to explain that.  Is it like Shintos attacking Pearl Harbour...and elsewhere in the Pacific?

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 5:33pm:

He has not included the death toll from any terrorist attacks. He is equating 9/11 with attacks in which not a single person died.

No comment on the House of Saud, Effendi?

Read the opening post Aussie.

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 5:45pm:

Read the opening post Aussie.

I'm never too keen to read your quote bombs....in a new Thread you start dredging up posts made by people in other Threads.  You congregate them in a new Thread Title taking them out of the context in which they were posted.  It is a trademark of yours Effendi.


Quote:

So basically, this is what people who defend Islam now stoop to - defending mass murder as being equivalent to attacks with no deaths or injuries.

Has anyone said that 9/11 was not mass murder? Of course it was...and I place the blame where it lies...right inside the House of Saud.  Zero to do with Islam.

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D

The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 5:33pm:

He has not included the death toll from any terrorist attacks. He is equating 9/11 with attacks in which not a single person died.

I have not included the death toll from terrorist attacks, because I am not discussing death tolls.

I am discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe in 2017.

And, the vast majority of violent terrorist attacks in Europe in 2017 were not carried out by Jihadists.

So, the question is why do you refuse to acknowledge the 84% of violent terrorist attacks that have nothing to do with Jihadism?

Is some terrorism okay with you?

I'm curious.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:24pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

Greggy,
we can all see through your weak argument.
I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention.

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention.

The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Is that correct, Bobby?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:24pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

it is hard to ignore stats  greg.... but do you stats well us HOW MANY DEATHS   each violent group is responsible for.?

to me thats more important than... what and why..

I cant make any sense of any group or person that wants to murder en mass.....

perhaps you have an answer.. you seem to know a lot about stats..

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:35pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Bobby? A simple yes or no will suffice.

Bobby: yes or no?

Gotta watch out for those violent water bomb and paint attacks. That's what we should be concerned about.

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention.

The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Is that correct, Bobby?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:47pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Bobby? A simple yes or no will suffice.

How many people did the Islamists kill compared to the skinheads Pecca? Post those stats  and I'll take your argument seriously

Greggy,
the answer is no because the overwhelming number of tragic deaths are caused by Muslims.

Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:47pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention. How many people did the Islamists kill compared to the skinheads Pecca? Post those stats  and I'll take your argument seriously. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Bobby? A simple yes or no will suffice.

The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Is that correct, Mr Hammer?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:52pm:

Greggy, the answer is no because the overwhelming number of tragic deaths are caused by Muslims.

You're wrong.

I suggest you read the report again.

It says that Jihadists are only responsible for 16% of attacks.

So, why are you ignoring the other 84%?

Why are you an apologist for terrorism?

Are you a right-wing terrorist, Bobby?

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:52pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:47pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention. How many people did the Islamists kill compared to the skinheads Pecca? Post those stats  and I'll take your argument seriously. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Bobby? A simple yes or no will suffice. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Mr Hammer? A simple yes or no will suffice.

Islamic terrorism is a bit different to many other groups who commit terrorism. Most it's non lethal tactics, many it's targeted killings. Islamists want to kill anybody and everybody . Old people , children, black,  white and purple. That's why people take it very seriously. This isn't spray painting slogans pecca.

Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:52pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:47pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention. How many people did the Islamists kill compared to the skinheads Pecca? Post those stats  and I'll take your argument seriously. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Bobby? A simple yes or no will suffice. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Mr Hammer? A simple yes or no will suffice. Islamic terrorism is a bit different to many other groups who commit terrorism. Most it's non lethal tactics, many it's targeted killings. Islamists want to kill anybody and everybody . Old people , children, black,  white and purple. That's why people take it very seriously. This isn't spray painting slogans pecca.

Why are you talking about spray painting slogans?

That's not what I'm discussing.

I'm discussing the total number of terrorist attacks.

And, the Europol report shows that 84% of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism.

First the subject is changed to casualties, and now it's changed to spray painting.

This is what you do every single time you're proven wrong.

You're so predictable.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 7:00pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:52pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:47pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention. How many people did the Islamists kill compared to the skinheads Pecca? Post those stats  and I'll take your argument seriously. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Bobby? A simple yes or no will suffice. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Mr Hammer? A simple yes or no will suffice. Islamic terrorism is a bit different to many other groups who commit terrorism. Most it's non lethal tactics, many it's targeted killings. Islamists want to kill anybody and everybody . Old people , children, black,  white and purple. That's why people take it very seriously. This isn't spray painting slogans pecca. Why are you talking about spray painting slogans? That's not what I'm discussing. I'm discussing the total number of terrorist attacks. And, the Europol report shows that 84% of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. First the subject is changed to casualties, and now it's changed to spray painting. This is what you do every single time you're proven wrong. You're so predictable.

A scumbag jihadist splattered 90 people in France with a truck Pecca. That's why I find your argument so infantile.

Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 7:05pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:00pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:52pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:47pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention. How many people did the Islamists kill compared to the skinheads Pecca? Post those stats  and I'll take your argument seriously. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Bobby? A simple yes or no will suffice. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Mr Hammer? A simple yes or no will suffice. Islamic terrorism is a bit different to many other groups who commit terrorism. Most it's non lethal tactics, many it's targeted killings. Islamists want to kill anybody and everybody . Old people , children, black,  white and purple. That's why people take it very seriously. This isn't spray painting slogans pecca. Why are you talking about spray painting slogans? That's not what I'm discussing. I'm discussing the total number of terrorist attacks. And, the Europol report shows that 84% of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. First the subject is changed to casualties, and now it's changed to spray painting. This is what you do every single time you're proven wrong. You're so predictable. A scumbag jihadist splattered 90 people in France with a truck Pecca. That's why I find your argument so infantile.

It's not an argument - I'm just stating the facts: the vast majority of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism.

Now, why did you change the subject to spray painting?

I'm curious.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 7:06pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:05pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:00pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:52pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:47pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention. How many people did the Islamists kill compared to the skinheads Pecca? Post those stats  and I'll take your argument seriously. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Bobby? A simple yes or no will suffice. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Mr Hammer? A simple yes or no will suffice. Islamic terrorism is a bit different to many other groups who commit terrorism. Most it's non lethal tactics, many it's targeted killings. Islamists want to kill anybody and everybody . Old people , children, black,  white and purple. That's why people take it very seriously. This isn't spray painting slogans pecca. Why are you talking about spray painting slogans? That's not what I'm discussing. I'm discussing the total number of terrorist attacks. And, the Europol report shows that 84% of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. First the subject is changed to casualties, and now it's changed to spray painting. This is what you do every single time you're proven wrong. You're so predictable. A scumbag jihadist splattered 90 people in France with a truck Pecca. That's why I find your argument so infantile. It's not an argument - I'm just stating the facts: the vast majority of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. Now, why did you change the subject to spray painting? I'm curious.

When the neo Nazis rundown 90 people in a truck,  shoot up pop and rock concerts while  bringing down  two skyscrapers killing thousands of people  then I'll lump them all together like you do.

Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 7:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:06pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:05pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:00pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:52pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:47pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention. How many people did the Islamists kill compared to the skinheads Pecca? Post those stats  and I'll take your argument seriously. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Bobby? A simple yes or no will suffice. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Mr Hammer? A simple yes or no will suffice. Islamic terrorism is a bit different to many other groups who commit terrorism. Most it's non lethal tactics, many it's targeted killings. Islamists want to kill anybody and everybody . Old people , children, black,  white and purple. That's why people take it very seriously. This isn't spray painting slogans pecca. Why are you talking about spray painting slogans? That's not what I'm discussing. I'm discussing the total number of terrorist attacks. And, the Europol report shows that 84% of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. First the subject is changed to casualties, and now it's changed to spray painting. This is what you do every single time you're proven wrong. You're so predictable. A scumbag jihadist splattered 90 people in France with a truck Pecca. That's why I find your argument so infantile. It's not an argument - I'm just stating the facts: the vast majority of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. Now, why did you change the subject to spray painting? I'm curious. When the neo Nazis rundown 90 people in a truck,  shoot up pop and rock concerts while  bringing down  two skyscrapers killing thousands of people  then I'll lump them all together like you do.

Apologist.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 7:49pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:06pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:05pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:00pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:52pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:47pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention. How many people did the Islamists kill compared to the skinheads Pecca? Post those stats  and I'll take your argument seriously. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Bobby? A simple yes or no will suffice. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Mr Hammer? A simple yes or no will suffice. Islamic terrorism is a bit different to many other groups who commit terrorism. Most it's non lethal tactics, many it's targeted killings. Islamists want to kill anybody and everybody . Old people , children, black,  white and purple. That's why people take it very seriously. This isn't spray painting slogans pecca. Why are you talking about spray painting slogans? That's not what I'm discussing. I'm discussing the total number of terrorist attacks. And, the Europol report shows that 84% of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. First the subject is changed to casualties, and now it's changed to spray painting. This is what you do every single time you're proven wrong. You're so predictable. A scumbag jihadist splattered 90 people in France with a truck Pecca. That's why I find your argument so infantile. It's not an argument - I'm just stating the facts: the vast majority of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. Now, why did you change the subject to spray painting? I'm curious. When the neo Nazis rundown 90 people in a truck,  shoot up pop and rock concerts while  bringing down  two skyscrapers killing thousands of people  then I'll lump them all together like you do. Apologist.

Slovenian.

Frank wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 7:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:49pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:06pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:05pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:00pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:52pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:47pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention. How many people did the Islamists kill compared to the skinheads Pecca? Post those stats  and I'll take your argument seriously. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Bobby? A simple yes or no will suffice. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Mr Hammer? A simple yes or no will suffice. Islamic terrorism is a bit different to many other groups who commit terrorism. Most it's non lethal tactics, many it's targeted killings. Islamists want to kill anybody and everybody . Old people , children, black,  white and purple. That's why people take it very seriously. This isn't spray painting slogans pecca. Why are you talking about spray painting slogans? That's not what I'm discussing. I'm discussing the total number of terrorist attacks. And, the Europol report shows that 84% of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. First the subject is changed to casualties, and now it's changed to spray painting. This is what you do every single time you're proven wrong. You're so predictable. A scumbag jihadist splattered 90 people in France with a truck Pecca. That's why I find your argument so infantile. It's not an argument - I'm just stating the facts: the vast majority of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. Now, why did you change the subject to spray painting? I'm curious. When the neo Nazis rundown 90 people in a truck,  shoot up pop and rock concerts while  bringing down  two skyscrapers killing thousands of people  then I'll lump them all together like you do. Apologist. Slovenian.

Now now, if it wasn't for your Slovenian ethno-nationalist terrorists, there would be no state of Slovenia.

Just a bunch of jolly Yugos.

Could we say the same for the Danes? How about the Aussies?

Which terrorist group do you belong to, old boy?

Frank wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 7:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:49pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:06pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:05pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:00pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:52pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:47pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention. How many people did the Islamists kill compared to the skinheads Pecca? Post those stats  and I'll take your argument seriously. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Bobby? A simple yes or no will suffice. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Mr Hammer? A simple yes or no will suffice. Islamic terrorism is a bit different to many other groups who commit terrorism. Most it's non lethal tactics, many it's targeted killings. Islamists want to kill anybody and everybody . Old people , children, black,  white and purple. That's why people take it very seriously. This isn't spray painting slogans pecca. Why are you talking about spray painting slogans? That's not what I'm discussing. I'm discussing the total number of terrorist attacks. And, the Europol report shows that 84% of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. First the subject is changed to casualties, and now it's changed to spray painting. This is what you do every single time you're proven wrong. You're so predictable. A scumbag jihadist splattered 90 people in France with a truck Pecca. That's why I find your argument so infantile. It's not an argument - I'm just stating the facts: the vast majority of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. Now, why did you change the subject to spray painting? I'm curious. When the neo Nazis rundown 90 people in a truck,  shoot up pop and rock concerts while  bringing down  two skyscrapers killing thousands of people  then I'll lump them all together like you do. Apologist. Slovenian.

You love the alleged child rapist's Slovenian hooker, though.

Funny that.

Karnal wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 8:26pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:56pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:49pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:06pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:05pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:00pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:52pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:47pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention. How many people did the Islamists kill compared to the skinheads Pecca? Post those stats  and I'll take your argument seriously. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Bobby? A simple yes or no will suffice. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Mr Hammer? A simple yes or no will suffice. Islamic terrorism is a bit different to many other groups who commit terrorism. Most it's non lethal tactics, many it's targeted killings. Islamists want to kill anybody and everybody . Old people , children, black,  white and purple. That's why people take it very seriously. This isn't spray painting slogans pecca. Why are you talking about spray painting slogans? That's not what I'm discussing. I'm discussing the total number of terrorist attacks. And, the Europol report shows that 84% of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. First the subject is changed to casualties, and now it's changed to spray painting. This is what you do every single time you're proven wrong. You're so predictable. A scumbag jihadist splattered 90 people in France with a truck Pecca. That's why I find your argument so infantile. It's not an argument - I'm just stating the facts: the vast majority of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. Now, why did you change the subject to spray painting? I'm curious. When the neo Nazis rundown 90 people in a truck,  shoot up pop and rock concerts while  bringing down  two skyscrapers killing thousands of people  then I'll lump them all together like you do. Apologist. Slovenian. Now now, if it wasn't for your Slovenian ethno-nationalist terrorists, there would be no state of Slovenia. Just a bunch of jolly Yugos. Could we say the same for the Danes? How about the Aussies? Which terrorist group do you belong to, old boy?

Soren, I believe belongs to that bunch of splitters, the Danes Downunder Front for the Liberation of Australia, Karnal.  That is when he isn't receiving his medication...   ::)

Greg why are you so eager to defend Islamic terrorists with misleading statistics?

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 9:51pm:

Greg why are you so eager to defend Islamic terrorists with misleading statistics?

You haven't proved they are misleading, FD.  Until you prove to us that EuroPol has been naughty and telling porky-pies, you're just (as per usual) taking bullshit, throwing mud in the hope that some of it will stick.  Greg has been playing you like a fiddle and you haven't proved a thing yet.  Keep trying, it's amusing, watching you dance to his tune.    ::) ::)

Brian do you have an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism?

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 9:48pm:

Karnal wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 8:26pm: Frank wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:56pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:49pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:06pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:05pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 7:00pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:57pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:52pm: Mr Hammer wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:47pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 6:24pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:24pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 4:02pm: Bobby. wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 3:58pm: Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them. I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017). And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? I'm curious. Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity - not Muslims.  ;D The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified? Greggy, we can all see through your weak argument. I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention. How many people did the Islamists kill compared to the skinheads Pecca? Post those stats  and I'll take your argument seriously. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Bobby? A simple yes or no will suffice. The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism. Is that correct, Mr Hammer? A simple yes or no will suffice. Islamic terrorism is a bit different to many other groups who commit terrorism. Most it's non lethal tactics, many it's targeted killings. Islamists want to kill anybody and everybody . Old people , children, black,  white and purple. That's why people take it very seriously. This isn't spray painting slogans pecca. Why are you talking about spray painting slogans? That's not what I'm discussing. I'm discussing the total number of terrorist attacks. And, the Europol report shows that 84% of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. First the subject is changed to casualties, and now it's changed to spray painting. This is what you do every single time you're proven wrong. You're so predictable. A scumbag jihadist splattered 90 people in France with a truck Pecca. That's why I find your argument so infantile. It's not an argument - I'm just stating the facts: the vast majority of terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism. Now, why did you change the subject to spray painting? I'm curious. When the neo Nazis rundown 90 people in a truck,  shoot up pop and rock concerts while  bringing down  two skyscrapers killing thousands of people  then I'll lump them all together like you do. Apologist. Slovenian. Now now, if it wasn't for your Slovenian ethno-nationalist terrorists, there would be no state of Slovenia. Just a bunch of jolly Yugos. Could we say the same for the Danes? How about the Aussies? Which terrorist group do you belong to, old boy? Soren, I believe belongs to that bunch of splitters, the Danes Downunder Front for the Liberation of Australia, Karnal.  That is when he isn't receiving his medication...   ::)

Well, I hope he's in their marvellous terrorist organisation.

You know, the pacifist one. Unlike the Muselman.

You gotta forgive GregPecker Freediver.
He is a premature ejaculation for the Moslem sympathy.
They don't deserve any sympathy atm as they will soon do to the French, what the German's did to the Jews.
It's gonna be a genocide - live on Fox!

Once the Messiah for Islam comes out of France - the Moslems will relinquish all 'Empire/Military' existence and put down their weapons, etc.

After this, we might feel sorry for the Moslems - because it will be Italy's turn to give up the Holy Ghost of Christianity and it will turn on the unarmed Moslems with absolute genocide, hunting them down and endeavouring to wipe them from the earth. Afterall - Italy's (MAFIA) will think its doing the planet a justice to justify its own atrocity.

The Moslems will plea to Allah to save them and while all the world (except one nation) ignore their plight.
...at this time, GregPecs would probably change and hate them  ::)  ;D

Only Israel (ironic huh?  ;)) will come to save the Moslems from total destruction and attack Italy and destroy its Vatican to dust!

The process hasn't ended.
The last passage is the British one.
For Britain will have to face up to a United Islam + Israel front (IstarI) and well, I bet you can't guess who is going to win that one  ;)

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 10:00pm:

freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 9:51pm: Greg why are you so eager to defend Islamic terrorists with misleading statistics? You haven't proved they are misleading, FD.  Until you prove to us that EuroPol has been naughty and telling porky-pies, you're just (as per usual) taking bullshit, throwing mud in the hope that some of it will stick.  Greg has been playing you like a fiddle and you haven't proved a thing yet.  Keep trying, it's amusing, watching you dance to his tune.    ::) ::)

"misleading"   ;D

Those statistics are as accurate as one can get.


http://doodah.net/bgb/KennyBaker2.jpg

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 10:02am:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:00pm: freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 9:51pm: Greg why are you so eager to defend Islamic terrorists with misleading statistics? You haven't proved they are misleading, FD.  Until you prove to us that EuroPol has been naughty and telling porky-pies, you're just (as per usual) taking bullshit, throwing mud in the hope that some of it will stick.  Greg has been playing you like a fiddle and you haven't proved a thing yet.  Keep trying, it's amusing, watching you dance to his tune.    ::) ::) "misleading"   ;D Those statistics are as accurate as one can get.

Oh dear.

Quote:

Europol's reports do not provide a breakdown of the proportion of attacks that have been completed or the type of damage inflicted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_Europe

Next line:

"According to these data the vast majority of terrorist attacks in the EU between 2006 and 2013 are affiliated with ethno-national or separatist motives".

Lol   ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 10:02am:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:00pm: freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 9:51pm: Greg why are you so eager to defend Islamic terrorists with misleading statistics? You haven't proved they are misleading, FD.  Until you prove to us that EuroPol has been naughty and telling porky-pies, you're just (as per usual) taking bullshit, throwing mud in the hope that some of it will stick.  Greg has been playing you like a fiddle and you haven't proved a thing yet.  Keep trying, it's amusing, watching you dance to his tune.    ::) ::) "misleading"   ;D Those statistics are as accurate as one can get. http://doodah.net/bgb/KennyBaker2.jpg

I did not say they weren't accurate. I said they were misleading. Again, not sure how to dumb this down any further for you.

Why are you so eager to defend Islamic terrorism with misleading statistics?


Quote:

Europol's reports do not provide a breakdown of the proportion of attacks that have been completed or the type of damage inflicted.

Except to point out that Islamic terrorism is by far the biggest problem, causing nearly all deaths and most casualties.

"In 2017, British intelligence MI5 said that Northern Ireland is the most concentrated area of terrorist activity "probably anywhere in Europe", with weekly threats from dissident Irish republicans".

;)

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 10:20am:

"In 2017, British intelligence MI5 said that Northern Ireland is the most concentrated area of terrorist activity "probably anywhere in Europe", with weekly threats from dissident Irish republicans". ;)

Except to point out that Islamic terrorism is by far the biggest problem,
causing nearly all deaths and most casualties.

Bobby. wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 10:24am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:20am: "In 2017, British intelligence MI5 said that Northern Ireland is the most concentrated area of terrorist activity "probably anywhere in Europe", with weekly threats from dissident Irish republicans". ;) Except to point out that Islamic terrorism is by far the biggest problem, causing nearly all deaths and most casualties.

I'm not talking about casualties, Booby - I'm talking about the total number of attacks.

Jihadist = 16%

All others = 84%

84 is a much bigger number than 16, Booby.

https://openschoolbag.shopcadacdn.com/sites/files/openschoolbag/imagecache/bs2016_big/productimg/201709/iq_maths_for_preschoolers_book_2.jpg

Greggy - you're disingenuous and you know it - you troll.

Bobby. wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 10:36am:

Greggy - you're disingenuous and you know it - you troll.

Which is the bigger number, Bobby:

84, or 16?

https://pics.me.me/mgse1-nbt-7-l-1-bobby-has-four-dimes-amy-has-30-1437462.png

Take your time.

Year 9 maths, innit.

Karnal wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 11:23am:

Year 9 maths, innit.

Looks like Bobby didn't get that far.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 10:28am:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:24am: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:20am: "In 2017, British intelligence MI5 said that Northern Ireland is the most concentrated area of terrorist activity "probably anywhere in Europe", with weekly threats from dissident Irish republicans". ;) Except to point out that Islamic terrorism is by far the biggest problem, causing nearly all deaths and most casualties. I'm not talking about casualties, Booby - I'm talking about the total number of attacks. Jihadist = 16% All others = 84% 84 is a much bigger number than 16, Booby. https://openschoolbag.shopcadacdn.com/sites/files/openschoolbag/imagecache/bs2016_big/productimg/201709/iq_maths_for_preschoolers_book_2.jpg

Greg why are you so keen to defend Islamic terrorism with misleading statistics?

freediver wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 11:43am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:28am: Bobby. wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:24am: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:20am: "In 2017, British intelligence MI5 said that Northern Ireland is the most concentrated area of terrorist activity "probably anywhere in Europe", with weekly threats from dissident Irish republicans". ;) Except to point out that Islamic terrorism is by far the biggest problem, causing nearly all deaths and most casualties. I'm not talking about casualties, Booby - I'm talking about the total number of attacks. Jihadist = 16% All others = 84% 84 is a much bigger number than 16, Booby. https://openschoolbag.shopcadacdn.com/sites/files/openschoolbag/imagecache/bs2016_big/productimg/201709/iq_maths_for_preschoolers_book_2.jpg Greg why are you so keen to defend Islamic terrorism with misleading statistics?

You asked him that in the other thread, FD. Greggery asked you why you're so keen to defend the ethno-nationalists. You didn't answer.

Do you want to have a crack here?

Do you think Muslims are giving terrorists a bad name?

freediver wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 11:52am:

Do you think Muslims are giving terrorists a bad name?

Don't want to say, eh?

But a compelling question nevertheless. We apologists see terrorists giving Muslims a bad name.

You see Muslims giving your white supremacists a bad name by making them look weak.

With this in mind, FD, we don't need to ask. We know why you're so keen to defend ethno-nationalists and white supremacists.

Sometimes a question is just a question, innit.

Sometimes a question is an answer.

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 10:12pm:

Brian do you have an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism?

Two points, FD.  The first is, you have not proved that the statistics Greg has quoted are "misleading".  The second is that you have not shown how Greg is using these statistics to "mislead".

Get back to us with your answer to those two questions and I might be interested in discussing this further.  Simply throwing mud is pointless however most of what you do is pointless, isn't it?  Tsk, tsk.   ::)

Karnal wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 11:05pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 9:48pm: Soren, I believe belongs to that bunch of splitters, the Danes Downunder Front for the Liberation of Australia, Karnal.  That is when he isn't receiving his medication...   ::) Well, I hope he's in their marvellous terrorist organisation. You know, the pacifist one. Unlike the Muselman.

I reckon the Danes gave up being aggressive when they stop sending out those Viking ships.  You know the ones?  Full o' naked Berserkers...   Not that I think Soren should be allowed to strip off.   It'd scared the horses in the streets if he was let lose naked...   ::)

I think the IRA and the American Public with Guns have till got a long way to go, if they think they can compete with the Moslems at TERRORISM.

And if the Moslems finally get their 'Messiah' (who dies for the sins of France-Euro) and lay down their weapons and Empire ways... where would it leave the IRA & American Public?

Don't you love that scene in Hunger Games where they storm the powers that be with a 'Suicide Bomber' - ahh, the Rebels. Not as good as you think, unlike the evil Imperialists run by Darth Vader. ;)

Jasin wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 3:26pm:

I think the IRA and the American Public with Guns have till got a long way to go, if they think they can compete with the Moslems at TERRORISM. And if the Moslems finally get their 'Messiah' (who dies for the sins of France-Euro) and lay down their weapons and Empire ways... where would it leave the IRA & American Public? Don't you love that scene in Hunger Games where they storm the powers that be with a 'Suicide Bomber' - ahh, the Rebels. Not as good as you think, unlike the evil Imperialists run by Darth Vader. ;)

"In 2017, British intelligence MI5 said that Northern Ireland is the most concentrated area of terrorist activity "probably anywhere in Europe", with weekly threats from dissident Irish republicans".

Lol   ;D

A fact of psychology is:

People endorse whichever position reinforces their connection to others with whom they share important commitments.

People who condemn islamic terrorism therefore certify the following as being the most pertinent facts.

EUROPOL TERRORISM

Terrorism

The overall terrorist threat to the security of the EU remains acute.

The main concern of Member States is jihadist terrorism and the closely related phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters who travel to and from conflict zones.

Recent attacks in the EU demonstrate the intent and capability of jihadist terrorists to inflict mass casualties on urban populations in an effort to induce a high state of well-publicised terror.

The carefully planned attacks continue to demonstrate the elevated threat to the EU from an extremist minority, operationally based in the Middle East, combined with a network of people born and raised in the EU, often radicalised within a short space of time, who have proven willing and able to act as facilitators and active accomplices in terrorism.

Of the 12 trends identified in the latest TE-SAT, most related to jihadist terrorism. While there was a large number of terrorist attacks not connected with jihadism, the latter accounts for the most serious forms of terrorist activity as nearly all reported fatalities and most of the casualties were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.

muslim terrorists are the main threat, muslim terrorists cause the most deaths and injuries, the muslim jihadist is the reason the threat level is acute in Europe.

Now jump to the other side the apologists and supporters of islamic terror, all endorse facts which reinforce their position they push a fact that other forms of terrorism outnumber islamic terrorism.

They are desperate to slither around the truth that islamic terrorism is the most deadly form, deliberately committed by muslims to inflict the most number of injuries and deaths of innocent men women and children (including babies in prams).

Just depends which side of the fence you're on as to which fact you are going to promote.

I'm absolutely certain I'm on the right side.

moses wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 4:32pm:

A fact of psychology is: People endorse whichever position reinforces their connection to others with whom they share important commitments. People who condemn islamic terrorism therefore certify the following as being the most pertinent facts. EUROPOL TERRORISM Terrorism The overall terrorist threat to the security of the EU remains acute. The main concern of Member States is jihadist terrorism and the closely related phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters who travel to and from conflict zones. Recent attacks in the EU demonstrate the intent and capability of jihadist terrorists to inflict mass casualties on urban populations in an effort to induce a high state of well-publicised terror. The carefully planned attacks continue to demonstrate the elevated threat to the EU from an extremist minority, operationally based in the Middle East, combined with a network of people born and raised in the EU, often radicalised within a short space of time, who have proven willing and able to act as facilitators and active accomplices in terrorism. Of the 12 trends identified in the latest TE-SAT, most related to jihadist terrorism. While there was a large number of terrorist attacks not connected with jihadism, the latter accounts for the most serious forms of terrorist activity as nearly all reported fatalities and most of the casualties were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks. muslim terrorists are the main threat, muslim terrorists cause the most deaths and injuries, the muslim jihadist is the reason the threat level is acute in Europe. Now jump to the other side the apologists and supporters of islamic terror, all endorse facts which reinforce their position they push a fact that other forms of terrorism outnumber islamic terrorism. They are desperate to slither around the truth that islamic terrorism is the most deadly form, deliberately committed by muslims to inflict the most number of injuries and deaths of innocent men women and children (including babies in prams). Just depends which side of the fence you're on as to which fact you are going to promote. I'm absolutely certain I'm on the right side.

No no, now jump to the next page of the report, which contrasts FD's favourite form of terrorism with the Jihadists.

You left that part out, Moses.

TRENDS

The report addresses terrorism in all its forms, namely:

Jihadist terrorism

Ethno-nationalist and separatist terrorism

Left-wing and anarchist terrorism

Right-wing terrorism

Single-issue terrorism.

Of the 12 trends identified in the latest TE-SAT, most related to jihadist terrorism.

nearly all reported fatalities and most of the casualties were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.

My position is rock solid muslim terrorist are the highest threat in Europe.

moses wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 4:53pm:

TRENDS The report addresses terrorism in all its forms, namely: Jihadist terrorism Ethno-nationalist and separatist terrorism Left-wing and anarchist terrorism Right-wing terrorism Single-issue terrorism. Of the 12 trends identified in the latest TE-SAT, most related to jihadist terrorism. nearly all reported fatalities and most of the casualties were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks. My position is rock solid muslim terrorist are the highest threat in Europe.

Of the 12 trends identified in the latest TE-SAT, most related to jihadist terrorism. While there was a large number of terrorist attacks not connected with jihadism, the latter accounts for the most serious forms of terrorist activity as nearly all reported fatalities and most of the casualties were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.

The Manchester jihad attack is a terrorist attack and a pie in the face of some Eurocrat is also a 'terrorist' attack.

That's what Turd faps to.

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 1:49pm:

freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:12pm: Brian do you have an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism? Two points, FD.  The first is, you have not proved that the statistics Greg has quoted are "misleading".  The second is that you have not shown how Greg is using these statistics to "mislead". Get back to us with your answer to those two questions and I might be interested in discussing this further.  Simply throwing mud is pointless however most of what you do is pointless, isn't it?  Tsk, tsk.   ::)

So that is a no? You are afraid to have your own opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics to defend Islamic terrorism unless I give it to you?

moses wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 4:32pm:

A fact of psychology is: People endorse whichever position reinforces their connection to others with whom they share important commitments. People who condemn islamic terrorism therefore certify the following as being the most pertinent facts. EUROPOL TERRORISM Terrorism The overall terrorist threat to the security of the EU remains acute. The main concern of Member States is jihadist terrorism and the closely related phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters who travel to and from conflict zones. Recent attacks in the EU demonstrate the intent and capability of jihadist terrorists to inflict mass casualties on urban populations in an effort to induce a high state of well-publicised terror. The carefully planned attacks continue to demonstrate the elevated threat to the EU from an extremist minority, operationally based in the Middle East, combined with a network of people born and raised in the EU, often radicalised within a short space of time, who have proven willing and able to act as facilitators and active accomplices in terrorism. Of the 12 trends identified in the latest TE-SAT, most related to jihadist terrorism. While there was a large number of terrorist attacks not connected with jihadism, the latter accounts for the most serious forms of terrorist activity as nearly all reported fatalities and most of the casualties were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks. muslim terrorists are the main threat, muslim terrorists cause the most deaths and injuries, the muslim jihadist is the reason the threat level is acute in Europe. Now jump to the other side the apologists and supporters of islamic terror, all endorse facts which reinforce their position they push a fact that other forms of terrorism outnumber islamic terrorism. They are desperate to slither around the truth that islamic terrorism is the most deadly form, deliberately committed by muslims to inflict the most number of injuries and deaths of innocent men women and children (including babies in prams). Just depends which side of the fence you're on as to which fact you are going to promote. I'm absolutely certain I'm on the right side.

The side of non-Jihadist terrorists?

The Europol report shows that the vast majority of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism, moses.

Why do you continually defend the 84% of terrorists who aren't Muslims?

I'm curious.

freediver wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 5:46pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 1:49pm: freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:12pm: Brian do you have an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism? Two points, FD.  The first is, you have not proved that the statistics Greg has quoted are "misleading".  The second is that you have not shown how Greg is using these statistics to "mislead". Get back to us with your answer to those two questions and I might be interested in discussing this further.  Simply throwing mud is pointless however most of what you do is pointless, isn't it?  Tsk, tsk.   ::) So that is a no? You are afraid to have your own opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics to defend Islamic terrorism unless I give it to you?

That's a question.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 6:49pm:

moses wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 4:32pm: A fact of psychology is: People endorse whichever position reinforces their connection to others with whom they share important commitments. People who condemn islamic terrorism therefore certify the following as being the most pertinent facts. EUROPOL TERRORISM Terrorism The overall terrorist threat to the security of the EU remains acute. The main concern of Member States is jihadist terrorism and the closely related phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters who travel to and from conflict zones. Recent attacks in the EU demonstrate the intent and capability of jihadist terrorists to inflict mass casualties on urban populations in an effort to induce a high state of well-publicised terror. The carefully planned attacks continue to demonstrate the elevated threat to the EU from an extremist minority, operationally based in the Middle East, combined with a network of people born and raised in the EU, often radicalised within a short space of time, who have proven willing and able to act as facilitators and active accomplices in terrorism. Of the 12 trends identified in the latest TE-SAT, most related to jihadist terrorism. While there was a large number of terrorist attacks not connected with jihadism, the latter accounts for the most serious forms of terrorist activity as nearly all reported fatalities and most of the casualties were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks. muslim terrorists are the main threat, muslim terrorists cause the most deaths and injuries, the muslim jihadist is the reason the threat level is acute in Europe. Now jump to the other side the apologists and supporters of islamic terror, all endorse facts which reinforce their position they push a fact that other forms of terrorism outnumber islamic terrorism. They are desperate to slither around the truth that islamic terrorism is the most deadly form, deliberately committed by muslims to inflict the most number of injuries and deaths of innocent men women and children (including babies in prams). Just depends which side of the fence you're on as to which fact you are going to promote. I'm absolutely certain I'm on the right side. The side of non-Jihadist terrorists? The Europol report shows that the vast majority of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism, moses. Why do you continually defend the 84% of terrorists who aren't Muslims? I'm curious.

Because Moses is a white supremacist virtue-signaller. He doesn't give a hoot about the Muselman. His aim is to ban the tinted races. Your Muselman is merely first cab off the rank, an easy mark.

Why do you think FD started this board in the first place? Friendly discussion? Civilised debate? Sustainable fishing and carbon taxes?

FD wanted a benign version of Stormfront. Surprisingly enough, a number of members have gone straight to the source and migrated there.

After all, why bother reading between FD's lines and watching him squirm and stutter and evade? Just come out with it.

The tinted races are ever so offensive.

freediver wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 5:46pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 1:49pm: freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:12pm: Brian do you have an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism? Two points, FD.  The first is, you have not proved that the statistics Greg has quoted are "misleading".  The second is that you have not shown how Greg is using these statistics to "mislead". Get back to us with your answer to those two questions and I might be interested in discussing this further.  Simply throwing mud is pointless however most of what you do is pointless, isn't it?  Tsk, tsk.   ::) So that is a no? You are afraid to have your own opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics to defend Islamic terrorism unless I give it to you?

Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Poor, poor, FD.  Unwilling to answer questions?  Tsk, tsk, how typical of a stirring troll, hey?   Get back to us when you're willing to come out from under your bridge.    ::) ::)

1. The statistics are misleading because the report makes in abundantly and repeatedly clear that Islamic jihadi terrorism is the biggest, most significant and most resource-intensive terrorist threat in Europe (and indeed around the world wherever Muslims are present).

2. Turd is using the numerical count of events that are classified as 'terrorist' related incidents and he tries to mislead about the truth of the above point.

Bwian, you are as thick and deceptive and stupid and way out of your depth as Turd, Arssie and the rest of the 'yeah-but' mail order fools. To F Orf with bells on is a new year resolution you should all make.

Frank wrote on Dec 31^st, 2018 at 9:44pm:

1. The statistics are misleading because the report makes in abundantly and repeatedly clear that Islamic jihadi terrorism is the biggest, most significant and most resource-intensive terrorist threat in Europe (and indeed around the world wherever Muslims are present). 2. Turd is using the numerical count of events that are classified as 'terrorist' related incidents and he tries to mislead about the truth of the above point. Bwian, you are as thick and deceptive and stupid and way out of your depth as Turd, Arssie and the rest of the 'yeah-but' mail order fools. To F Orf with bells on is a new year resolution you should all make.

And a happy new year to you, Soren.  :)

1. Greg has made no misrepresentation of the statistics that he has presented, as far as I am aware.  He has made a simple statement ("most Terrorism in Europe is not Jihadist in nature") which is factually true.   You and other Islamophobes refuse to accept what the EurPol report has claimed for reasons based, I suspect on your Islamophobia.

2. This has not been "misleading" at all.  You believe Islam is the greatest Terrorist threat and refuse to accept any information that refutes that point, even if it is from official EuroPol reports.   Greg has been factually correct, "most Terrorism in Europe is not Jihadist in nature".   Now you and FD and other Islamophobes can either swallow reality or you can keep on your own Jihad against Muslims or in other words, you can look even sillier than you presently do.    ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 8:17am:

Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:44pm: 1. The statistics are misleading because the report makes in abundantly and repeatedly clear that Islamic jihadi terrorism is the biggest, most significant and most resource-intensive terrorist threat in Europe (and indeed around the world wherever Muslims are present). 2. Turd is using the numerical count of events that are classified as 'terrorist' related incidents and he tries to mislead about the truth of the above point. Bwian, you are as thick and deceptive and stupid and way out of your depth as Turd, Arssie and the rest of the 'yeah-but' mail order fools. To F Orf with bells on is a new year resolution you should all make. And a happy new year to you, Soren.  :) 1. Greg has made no misrepresentation of the statistics that he has presented, as far as I am aware.  He has made a simple statement ("most Terrorism in Europe is not Jihadist in nature") which is factually true.   You and other Islamophobes refuse to accept what the EurPol report has claimed for reasons based, I suspect on your Islamophobia. 2. This has not been "misleading" at all.  You believe Islam is the greatest Terrorist threat and refuse to accept any information that refutes that point, even if it is from official EuroPol reports.   Greg has been factually correct, "most Terrorism in Europe is not Jihadist in nature".   Now you and FD and other Islamophobes can either swallow reality or you can keep on your own Jihad against Muslims or in other words, you can look even sillier than you presently do.    ::)

Brian you appear unable to distinguish between misleading and "factually incorrect". Are you having trouble comprehending the question, or are you just afraid of your own opinion? Why do apologists for Islamic terrorism inevitably take on the slipperyness of the Muslims they are defending?

Do you have an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism?

freediver wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 8:26am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 8:17am: Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:44pm: 1. The statistics are misleading because the report makes in abundantly and repeatedly clear that Islamic jihadi terrorism is the biggest, most significant and most resource-intensive terrorist threat in Europe (and indeed around the world wherever Muslims are present). 2. Turd is using the numerical count of events that are classified as 'terrorist' related incidents and he tries to mislead about the truth of the above point. Bwian, you are as thick and deceptive and stupid and way out of your depth as Turd, Arssie and the rest of the 'yeah-but' mail order fools. To F Orf with bells on is a new year resolution you should all make. And a happy new year to you, Soren.  :) 1. Greg has made no misrepresentation of the statistics that he has presented, as far as I am aware.  He has made a simple statement ("most Terrorism in Europe is not Jihadist in nature") which is factually true.   You and other Islamophobes refuse to accept what the EurPol report has claimed for reasons based, I suspect on your Islamophobia. 2. This has not been "misleading" at all.  You believe Islam is the greatest Terrorist threat and refuse to accept any information that refutes that point, even if it is from official EuroPol reports.   Greg has been factually correct, "most Terrorism in Europe is not Jihadist in nature".   Now you and FD and other Islamophobes can either swallow reality or you can keep on your own Jihad against Muslims or in other words, you can look even sillier than you presently do.    ::) Brian you appear unable to distinguish between misleading and "factually incorrect". Are you having trouble comprehending the question, or are you just afraid of your own opinion? Why do apologists for Islamic terrorism inevitably take on the slipperyness of the Muslims they are defending? Do you have an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism?

Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  More questions.  When you answer mine, FD, I may answer yours.  OK?  Now run along, back to the little kiddies' playground...   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 9:31am:

freediver wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 8:26am: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 8:17am: Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:44pm: 1. The statistics are misleading because the report makes in abundantly and repeatedly clear that Islamic jihadi terrorism is the biggest, most significant and most resource-intensive terrorist threat in Europe (and indeed around the world wherever Muslims are present). 2. Turd is using the numerical count of events that are classified as 'terrorist' related incidents and he tries to mislead about the truth of the above point. Bwian, you are as thick and deceptive and stupid and way out of your depth as Turd, Arssie and the rest of the 'yeah-but' mail order fools. To F Orf with bells on is a new year resolution you should all make. And a happy new year to you, Soren.  :) 1. Greg has made no misrepresentation of the statistics that he has presented, as far as I am aware.  He has made a simple statement ("most Terrorism in Europe is not Jihadist in nature") which is factually true.   You and other Islamophobes refuse to accept what the EurPol report has claimed for reasons based, I suspect on your Islamophobia. 2. This has not been "misleading" at all.  You believe Islam is the greatest Terrorist threat and refuse to accept any information that refutes that point, even if it is from official EuroPol reports.   Greg has been factually correct, "most Terrorism in Europe is not Jihadist in nature".   Now you and FD and other Islamophobes can either swallow reality or you can keep on your own Jihad against Muslims or in other words, you can look even sillier than you presently do.    ::) Brian you appear unable to distinguish between misleading and "factually incorrect". Are you having trouble comprehending the question, or are you just afraid of your own opinion? Why do apologists for Islamic terrorism inevitably take on the slipperyness of the Muslims they are defending? Do you have an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism? Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  More questions.  When you answer mine, FD, I may answer yours.  OK?  Now run along, back to the little kiddies' playground...   ::)

So you *might* reveal to us whether you are brave enough to form your own opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism?

Although the total number of jihadist terrorist attacks decreased from 17 in 2015 to 13 attacks in 2016, of which 6 were linked to the so-called Islamic State (IS), 135 of the 142 victims of terrorist attacks in 2016 were killed in the 13 jihadist attacks.

https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-foiled-and-completed-attacks-1002-arrests-and-142-victims-died

135 of the 142 dead were killed by jihadists and you cockwombles keep insisting that you are not deliberately misrepresenting the report by parrotting an irrelevant statistics merely to deflect attention from the scale of these murders for Allah.

freediver wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 10:15am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 9:31am: freediver wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 8:26am: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 8:17am: Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:44pm: 1. The statistics are misleading because the report makes in abundantly and repeatedly clear that Islamic jihadi terrorism is the biggest, most significant and most resource-intensive terrorist threat in Europe (and indeed around the world wherever Muslims are present). 2. Turd is using the numerical count of events that are classified as 'terrorist' related incidents and he tries to mislead about the truth of the above point. Bwian, you are as thick and deceptive and stupid and way out of your depth as Turd, Arssie and the rest of the 'yeah-but' mail order fools. To F Orf with bells on is a new year resolution you should all make. And a happy new year to you, Soren.  :) 1. Greg has made no misrepresentation of the statistics that he has presented, as far as I am aware.  He has made a simple statement ("most Terrorism in Europe is not Jihadist in nature") which is factually true.   You and other Islamophobes refuse to accept what the EurPol report has claimed for reasons based, I suspect on your Islamophobia. 2. This has not been "misleading" at all.  You believe Islam is the greatest Terrorist threat and refuse to accept any information that refutes that point, even if it is from official EuroPol reports.   Greg has been factually correct, "most Terrorism in Europe is not Jihadist in nature".   Now you and FD and other Islamophobes can either swallow reality or you can keep on your own Jihad against Muslims or in other words, you can look even sillier than you presently do.    ::) Brian you appear unable to distinguish between misleading and "factually incorrect". Are you having trouble comprehending the question, or are you just afraid of your own opinion? Why do apologists for Islamic terrorism inevitably take on the slipperyness of the Muslims they are defending? Do you have an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism? Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  More questions.  When you answer mine, FD, I may answer yours.  OK?  Now run along, back to the little kiddies' playground...   ::) So you *might* reveal to us whether you are brave enough to form your own opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism?

You won't know until you answer my questions, Freediver, now will you?   ::)

Frank wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 10:48am:

Although the total number of jihadist terrorist attacks decreased from 17 in 2015 to 13 attacks in 2016, of which 6 were linked to the so-called Islamic State (IS), 135 of the 142 victims of terrorist attacks in 2016 were killed in the 13 jihadist attacks. https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-foiled-and-completed-attacks-1002-arrests-and-142-victims-died 135 of the 142 dead were killed by jihadists and you cockwombles keep insisting that you are not deliberately misrepresenting the report by parrotting an irrelevant statistics merely to deflect attention from the scale of these murders for Allah.

I am unsure who you're talking to, Soren?  I have made no such claims.  I have merely defended Greg from what appears, on the surface, to be unwarranted attacks against the EuroPol statistics.  Until you address the reality that more non-Jihadist attacks occurred than Jihadist attacks, you're just whistling dixie, Soren.  A not unusual situation for you, as we all know but still the truth of what you're doing...   ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 11:40am:

Frank wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 10:48am: Although the total number of jihadist terrorist attacks decreased from 17 in 2015 to 13 attacks in 2016, of which 6 were linked to the so-called Islamic State (IS), 135 of the 142 victims of terrorist attacks in 2016 were killed in the 13 jihadist attacks. https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-foiled-and-completed-attacks-1002-arrests-and-142-victims-died 135 of the 142 dead were killed by jihadists and you cockwombles keep insisting that you are not deliberately misrepresenting the report by parrotting an irrelevant statistics merely to deflect attention from the scale of these murders for Allah. I am unsure who you're talking to, Soren?  I have made no such claims.  I have merely defended Greg from what appears, on the surface, to be unwarranted attacks against the EuroPol statistics.  Until you address the reality that more non-Jihadist attacks occurred than Jihadist attacks, you're just whistling dixie, Soren.  A not unusual situation for you, as we all know but still the truth of what you're doing...   ::)

As the report shows, jihad is by far the most deadly terrorist threat, dwarfing all others put together by an immense margin. That's  not islamophobia or whistling dixie, cockwomble, thats reality - the thing you have been unmoored from for far too long.

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 11:37am:

freediver wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 10:15am: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 9:31am: freediver wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 8:26am: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 8:17am: Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:44pm: 1. The statistics are misleading because the report makes in abundantly and repeatedly clear that Islamic jihadi terrorism is the biggest, most significant and most resource-intensive terrorist threat in Europe (and indeed around the world wherever Muslims are present). 2. Turd is using the numerical count of events that are classified as 'terrorist' related incidents and he tries to mislead about the truth of the above point. Bwian, you are as thick and deceptive and stupid and way out of your depth as Turd, Arssie and the rest of the 'yeah-but' mail order fools. To F Orf with bells on is a new year resolution you should all make. And a happy new year to you, Soren.  :) 1. Greg has made no misrepresentation of the statistics that he has presented, as far as I am aware.  He has made a simple statement ("most Terrorism in Europe is not Jihadist in nature") which is factually true.   You and other Islamophobes refuse to accept what the EurPol report has claimed for reasons based, I suspect on your Islamophobia. 2. This has not been "misleading" at all.  You believe Islam is the greatest Terrorist threat and refuse to accept any information that refutes that point, even if it is from official EuroPol reports.   Greg has been factually correct, "most Terrorism in Europe is not Jihadist in nature".   Now you and FD and other Islamophobes can either swallow reality or you can keep on your own Jihad against Muslims or in other words, you can look even sillier than you presently do.    ::) Brian you appear unable to distinguish between misleading and "factually incorrect". Are you having trouble comprehending the question, or are you just afraid of your own opinion? Why do apologists for Islamic terrorism inevitably take on the slipperyness of the Muslims they are defending? Do you have an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism? Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  More questions.  When you answer mine, FD, I may answer yours.  OK?  Now run along, back to the little kiddies' playground...   ::) So you *might* reveal to us whether you are brave enough to form your own opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism? You won't know until you answer my questions, Freediver, now will you?   ::)

I know you are afraid of your own opinion on the matter.

Frank wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 12:04pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 11:40am: Frank wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 10:48am: Although the total number of jihadist terrorist attacks decreased from 17 in 2015 to 13 attacks in 2016, of which 6 were linked to the so-called Islamic State (IS), 135 of the 142 victims of terrorist attacks in 2016 were killed in the 13 jihadist attacks. https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-foiled-and-completed-attacks-1002-arrests-and-142-victims-died 135 of the 142 dead were killed by jihadists and you cockwombles keep insisting that you are not deliberately misrepresenting the report by parrotting an irrelevant statistics merely to deflect attention from the scale of these murders for Allah. I am unsure who you're talking to, Soren?  I have made no such claims.  I have merely defended Greg from what appears, on the surface, to be unwarranted attacks against the EuroPol statistics.  Until you address the reality that more non-Jihadist attacks occurred than Jihadist attacks, you're just whistling dixie, Soren.  A not unusual situation for you, as we all know but still the truth of what you're doing...   ::) As the report shows, jihad is by far the most deadly terrorist treat, dwarfing all others put together by an immense margin. That's  not islamophobia or whistling dixie, cockwomble, thats reality - the thing you have been unmoored from for far too long.

You're using misleading statistics to hide the truth.

The vast majority of all terrorist attacks in Europe are not carried out by Jihadists.

Why do you continue to defend the people who are carrying out 84% of all attacks?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 1:58pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 12:04pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 11:40am: Frank wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 10:48am: Although the total number of jihadist terrorist attacks decreased from 17 in 2015 to 13 attacks in 2016, of which 6 were linked to the so-called Islamic State (IS), 135 of the 142 victims of terrorist attacks in 2016 were killed in the 13 jihadist attacks. https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-foiled-and-completed-attacks-1002-arrests-and-142-victims-died 135 of the 142 dead were killed by jihadists and you cockwombles keep insisting that you are not deliberately misrepresenting the report by parrotting an irrelevant statistics merely to deflect attention from the scale of these murders for Allah. I am unsure who you're talking to, Soren?  I have made no such claims.  I have merely defended Greg from what appears, on the surface, to be unwarranted attacks against the EuroPol statistics.  Until you address the reality that more non-Jihadist attacks occurred than Jihadist attacks, you're just whistling dixie, Soren.  A not unusual situation for you, as we all know but still the truth of what you're doing...   ::) As the report shows, jihad is by far the most deadly terrorist treat, dwarfing all others put together by an immense margin. That's  not islamophobia or whistling dixie, cockwomble, thats reality - the thing you have been unmoored from for far too long. You're using misleading statistics to hide the truth. The vast majority of all terrorist attacks in Europe are not carried out by Jihadists. Why do you continue to defend the people who are carrying out 84% of all attacks?

They are near-harmless compared to the jihadi death toll,  Turdy Mcwankpuffin.

Frank wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 2:01pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 1:58pm: Frank wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 12:04pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 11:40am: Frank wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 10:48am: Although the total number of jihadist terrorist attacks decreased from 17 in 2015 to 13 attacks in 2016, of which 6 were linked to the so-called Islamic State (IS), 135 of the 142 victims of terrorist attacks in 2016 were killed in the 13 jihadist attacks. https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-foiled-and-completed-attacks-1002-arrests-and-142-victims-died 135 of the 142 dead were killed by jihadists and you cockwombles keep insisting that you are not deliberately misrepresenting the report by parrotting an irrelevant statistics merely to deflect attention from the scale of these murders for Allah. I am unsure who you're talking to, Soren?  I have made no such claims.  I have merely defended Greg from what appears, on the surface, to be unwarranted attacks against the EuroPol statistics.  Until you address the reality that more non-Jihadist attacks occurred than Jihadist attacks, you're just whistling dixie, Soren.  A not unusual situation for you, as we all know but still the truth of what you're doing...   ::) As the report shows, jihad is by far the most deadly terrorist treat, dwarfing all others put together by an immense margin. That's  not islamophobia or whistling dixie, cockwomble, thats reality - the thing you have been unmoored from for far too long. You're using misleading statistics to hide the truth. The vast majority of all terrorist attacks in Europe are not carried out by Jihadists. Why do you continue to defend the people who are carrying out 84% of all attacks? They are near-harmless compared to the jihadi death toll,  Turdy Mcwankpuffin.

There we have it, folks: a frank admission from the apologist.

I suspect he'll keep using misleading statistics, though.

Frank wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 12:04pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 11:40am: Frank wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 10:48am: Although the total number of jihadist terrorist attacks decreased from 17 in 2015 to 13 attacks in 2016, of which 6 were linked to the so-called Islamic State (IS), 135 of the 142 victims of terrorist attacks in 2016 were killed in the 13 jihadist attacks. https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-foiled-and-completed-attacks-1002-arrests-and-142-victims-died 135 of the 142 dead were killed by jihadists and you cockwombles keep insisting that you are not deliberately misrepresenting the report by parrotting an irrelevant statistics merely to deflect attention from the scale of these murders for Allah. I am unsure who you're talking to, Soren?  I have made no such claims.  I have merely defended Greg from what appears, on the surface, to be unwarranted attacks against the EuroPol statistics.  Until you address the reality that more non-Jihadist attacks occurred than Jihadist attacks, you're just whistling dixie, Soren.  A not unusual situation for you, as we all know but still the truth of what you're doing...   ::) As the report shows, jihad is by far the most deadly terrorist threat, dwarfing all others put together by an immense margin. That's  not islamophobia or whistling dixie, cockwomble, thats reality - the thing you have been unmoored from for far too long.

It may be the more deadly threat BUT and it is a big BUT, Soren, it happens less often - which is the point that Greg has made, using the EuroPol statistics.  You appear unwilling to accept or recognise that Greg is arguing frequency, not deadliness.  You really are being quite foolish, as are all the Islamophobes.   Such silly billies.   ::)

freediver wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 1:47pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 11:37am: freediver wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 10:15am: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 9:31am: freediver wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 8:26am: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 8:17am: Frank wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 9:44pm: 1. The statistics are misleading because the report makes in abundantly and repeatedly clear that Islamic jihadi terrorism is the biggest, most significant and most resource-intensive terrorist threat in Europe (and indeed around the world wherever Muslims are present). 2. Turd is using the numerical count of events that are classified as 'terrorist' related incidents and he tries to mislead about the truth of the above point. Bwian, you are as thick and deceptive and stupid and way out of your depth as Turd, Arssie and the rest of the 'yeah-but' mail order fools. To F Orf with bells on is a new year resolution you should all make. And a happy new year to you, Soren.  :) 1. Greg has made no misrepresentation of the statistics that he has presented, as far as I am aware.  He has made a simple statement ("most Terrorism in Europe is not Jihadist in nature") which is factually true.   You and other Islamophobes refuse to accept what the EurPol report has claimed for reasons based, I suspect on your Islamophobia. 2. This has not been "misleading" at all.  You believe Islam is the greatest Terrorist threat and refuse to accept any information that refutes that point, even if it is from official EuroPol reports.   Greg has been factually correct, "most Terrorism in Europe is not Jihadist in nature".   Now you and FD and other Islamophobes can either swallow reality or you can keep on your own Jihad against Muslims or in other words, you can look even sillier than you presently do.    ::) Brian you appear unable to distinguish between misleading and "factually incorrect". Are you having trouble comprehending the question, or are you just afraid of your own opinion? Why do apologists for Islamic terrorism inevitably take on the slipperyness of the Muslims they are defending? Do you have an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism? Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  More questions.  When you answer mine, FD, I may answer yours.  OK?  Now run along, back to the little kiddies' playground...   ::) So you *might* reveal to us whether you are brave enough to form your own opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism? You won't know until you answer my questions, Freediver, now will you?   ::) I know you are afraid of your own opinion on the matter.

I fear nothing of the sort, FD.  When you answer my questions, I may answer yours.  Will you?  No, it appears you're the one who is afraid of his own opinion...    ::)

gpeck reply 89 wrote


Quote:

The side of non-Jihadist terrorists? The Europol report shows that the vast majority of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism, moses. Why do you continually defend the 84% of terrorists who aren't Muslims? I'm curious

The terrorist threat level in Europe is acute.

The vast majority of terrorist attacks do not use the slaughtering of innumerable innocent men women and children as the modus operandi.

There is only one type of terrorism which is the main concern and slaughters the highest number of innocent men women and children.

islamic terrorism.

So we have:

Threat level: Acute.

Main concern: Jihadist terrorism (muslim terrorism)

Number of Deaths / casualities: Nearly all reported fatalities and most of the casualties were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.

Seems very clear to me that the mix islam / muslims / terrorism is the major threat to Europe. (or has Europol got it wrong?)

Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Still arguing at cross-purposes, Moses?  Greg is arguing frequency, you are, like all the Islamophobes, arguing deadliness.  Two completely different things.  Don't you think it's time you realised that?  Or has your Islamophobia prevented you from thinking clearly and arguing to a real outcome?  Mmmm?    ::) ::)

Hey there forky tongue, just repeating Europol figures:

Threat level: Acute.

Main concern: Jihadist terrorism (muslim terrorism)

Number of Deaths / casualties: Nearly all reported fatalities and most of the casualties were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.

Seems very clear to me that the mix islam / muslims / terrorism is the major threat to Europe. (or has Europol got it wrong?) 
   

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 3:21pm:

Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Still arguing at cross-purposes, Moses?  Greg is arguing frequency, you are, like all the Islamophobes, arguing deadliness.  Two completely different things.  Don't you think it's time you realised that?  Or has your Islamophobia prevented you from thinking clearly and arguing to a real outcome?  Mmmm?    ::) ::)

So now its Islamophobia to point out, as Europol reports do, that Islamic jihad is far more deadly than all other terorist acts put together, unmoored cockwomble?
https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-foiled-and-completed-attacks-1002-arrests-and-142-victims-died 

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 2:20pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 12:04pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 11:40am: Frank wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 10:48am: Although the total number of jihadist terrorist attacks decreased from 17 in 2015 to 13 attacks in 2016, of which 6 were linked to the so-called Islamic State (IS), 135 of the 142 victims of terrorist attacks in 2016 were killed in the 13 jihadist attacks. https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-foiled-and-completed-attacks-1002-arrests-and-142-victims-died 135 of the 142 dead were killed by jihadists and you cockwombles keep insisting that you are not deliberately misrepresenting the report by parrotting an irrelevant statistics merely to deflect attention from the scale of these murders for Allah. I am unsure who you're talking to, Soren?  I have made no such claims.  I have merely defended Greg from what appears, on the surface, to be unwarranted attacks against the EuroPol statistics.  Until you address the reality that more non-Jihadist attacks occurred than Jihadist attacks, you're just whistling dixie, Soren.  A not unusual situation for you, as we all know but still the truth of what you're doing...   ::) As the report shows, jihad is by far the most deadly terrorist threat, dwarfing all others put together by an immense margin. That's  not islamophobia or whistling dixie, cockwomble, thats reality - the thing you have been unmoored from for far too long. It may be the more deadly threat BUT and it is a big BUT, Soren, it happens less often - which is the point that Greg has made, using the EuroPol statistics.  You appear unwilling to accept or recognise that Greg is arguing frequency, not deadliness.  You really are being quite foolish, as are all the Islamophobes.   Such silly billies.   ::)

Mass murder happens much less often than posting incitement to terrorism, wankpuffin, but it is much more serious and its consequences are actually deadly. That is why everyone, from Europol to Interpol and ASIO and all the rest regard Islamic jihad a much, much more serious concern than Paddy muttering darkly into his Guinness somewhere in the bowels of Ireland or a Kurd plotting against some Turk or a hirsute Greek drinking too much ouzo and not shaving for three days.


To grimace and gesticulate about numbers without paying attention to consequences of actions is the usual wanky idiocy that you and your alter ego, Turdy McNobsocket perpetrate on the innocent public here at Ozpolitic every day. THAT IS your terrorism, militant faarkwittery.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 2:09pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 2:01pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 1:58pm: Frank wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 12:04pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 11:40am: Frank wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 10:48am: Although the total number of jihadist terrorist attacks decreased from 17 in 2015 to 13 attacks in 2016, of which 6 were linked to the so-called Islamic State (IS), 135 of the 142 victims of terrorist attacks in 2016 were killed in the 13 jihadist attacks. https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-foiled-and-completed-attacks-1002-arrests-and-142-victims-died 135 of the 142 dead were killed by jihadists and you cockwombles keep insisting that you are not deliberately misrepresenting the report by parrotting an irrelevant statistics merely to deflect attention from the scale of these murders for Allah. I am unsure who you're talking to, Soren?  I have made no such claims.  I have merely defended Greg from what appears, on the surface, to be unwarranted attacks against the EuroPol statistics.  Until you address the reality that more non-Jihadist attacks occurred than Jihadist attacks, you're just whistling dixie, Soren.  A not unusual situation for you, as we all know but still the truth of what you're doing...   ::) As the report shows, jihad is by far the most deadly terrorist treat, dwarfing all others put together by an immense margin. That's  not islamophobia or whistling dixie, cockwomble, thats reality - the thing you have been unmoored from for far too long. You're using misleading statistics to hide the truth. The vast majority of all terrorist attacks in Europe are not carried out by Jihadists. Why do you continue to defend the people who are carrying out 84% of all attacks? They are near-harmless compared to the jihadi death toll,  Turdy Mcwankpuffin. There we have it, folks: a frank admission from the apologist. I suspect he'll keep using misleading statistics, though.

You have rubbed your pizzle raw by now, Turd, apply some lotion and have a lie down.

Frank wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 3:55pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 3:21pm: Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Still arguing at cross-purposes, Moses?  Greg is arguing frequency, you are, like all the Islamophobes, arguing deadliness.  Two completely different things.  Don't you think it's time you realised that?  Or has your Islamophobia prevented you from thinking clearly and arguing to a real outcome?  Mmmm?    ::) ::) So now its Islamophobia to point out, as Europol reports do, that Islamic jihad is far more deadly than all other terorist acts put together, unmoored cockwomble? https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-foiled-and-completed-attacks-1002-arrests-and-142-victims-died

You're using misleading statistics to hide the truth.

The vast majority of all terrorist attacks in Europe are not carried out by Jihadists.

Why do you continue to defend the people who are carrying out 84% of all attacks?

Old boy, why did you move from a white European backwater to a thriving multicultural city in the Asia-Pacific?

Wanted to convert us to white European backwaterism, did you?

How did that go?

Karnal wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 7:06pm:

Old boy, why did you move from a white European backwater to a thriving multicultural city in the Asia-Pacific? Wanted to convert us to white European backwaterism, did you? How did that go?

Clap hands, here comes Wankpuffin with his Paki crap.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 6:52pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 3:55pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 3:21pm: Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Still arguing at cross-purposes, Moses?  Greg is arguing frequency, you are, like all the Islamophobes, arguing deadliness.  Two completely different things.  Don't you think it's time you realised that?  Or has your Islamophobia prevented you from thinking clearly and arguing to a real outcome?  Mmmm?    ::) ::) So now its Islamophobia to point out, as Europol reports do, that Islamic jihad is far more deadly than all other terorist acts put together, unmoored cockwomble? https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-foiled-and-completed-attacks-1002-arrests-and-142-victims-died  You're using misleading statistics to hide the truth. The vast majority of all terrorist attacks in Europe are not carried out by Jihadists. Why do you continue to defend the people who are carrying out 84% of all attacks?

Mass murder happens much less often than posting incitement to terrorism, wankpuffin, but it is much more serious and its consequences are actually deadly. That is why everyone, from Europol to Interpol and ASIO and all the rest regard Islamic jihad a much, much more serious concern than Paddy muttering darkly into his Guinness somewhere in the bowels of Ireland or a Kurd plotting against some Turk or a hirsute Greek drinking too much ouzo and not shaving for three days.


To grimace and gesticulate about numbers without paying attention to consequences of actions is the usual wanky idiocy that you and your alter ego, Turdy McNobsocket perpetrate on the innocent public here at Ozpolitic every day. THAT IS your terrorism, militant faarkwittery.

Frank wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 8:48pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 6:52pm: Frank wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 3:55pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 3:21pm: Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Still arguing at cross-purposes, Moses?  Greg is arguing frequency, you are, like all the Islamophobes, arguing deadliness.  Two completely different things.  Don't you think it's time you realised that?  Or has your Islamophobia prevented you from thinking clearly and arguing to a real outcome?  Mmmm?    ::) ::) So now its Islamophobia to point out, as Europol reports do, that Islamic jihad is far more deadly than all other terorist acts put together, unmoored cockwomble? https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-foiled-and-completed-attacks-1002-arrests-and-142-victims-died  You're using misleading statistics to hide the truth. The vast majority of all terrorist attacks in Europe are not carried out by Jihadists. Why do you continue to defend the people who are carrying out 84% of all attacks? Mass murder happens much less often than posting incitement to terrorism, wankpuffin, but it is much more serious and its consequences are actually deadly. That is why everyone, from Europol to Interpol and ASIO and all the rest regard Islamic jihad a much, much more serious concern than Paddy muttering darkly into his Guinness somewhere in the bowels of Ireland or a Kurd plotting against some Turk or a hirsute Greek drinking too much ouzo and not shaving for three days. To grimace and gesticulate about numbers without paying attention to consequences of actions is the usual wanky idiocy that you and your alter ego, Turdy McNobsocket perpetrate on the innocent public here at Ozpolitic every day. THAT IS your terrorism, militant faarkwittery.

You're using misleading statistics to hide the truth.

The vast majority of all terrorist attacks in Europe are not carried out by Jihadists.

Why do you continue to defend the people who are carrying out 84% of all attacks?

Frank wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 8:47pm:

Karnal wrote on Jan 1st, 2019 at 7:06pm: Old boy, why did you move from a white European backwater to a thriving multicultural city in the Asia-Pacific? Wanted to convert us to white European backwaterism, did you? How did that go? Clap hands, here comes Wankpuffin with his Paki crap.

No no, I'd really like to know.

Did you confuse us with a Lutheran mission in the South Pacific?

New Guinea, perhaps?