The Porkies Register - Revision history

Freediver at 11:13, 9 January 2018

2018-01-09T11:13:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:13, 9 January 2018
Line 5:		Line 5:
	It shouldn't need explaining why accurately citing facts in a discussion is ''in and of itself'' important. Those who are willing to resort to misinformation and outright lies, either through ignorance or deliberate deceit, by default have a compromised argument - '''''regardless''''' of how little difference those mistruths may seem to make on the overall argument. Apart from anything else, it hurts the reputation of the people making those arguments, and just like the boy who cried wolf, when accurate facts to incriminate Islam are presented by the same side, the claim will naturally be viewed with suspicion.		It shouldn't need explaining why accurately citing facts in a discussion is ''in and of itself'' important. Those who are willing to resort to misinformation and outright lies, either through ignorance or deliberate deceit, by default have a compromised argument - '''''regardless''''' of how little difference those mistruths may seem to make on the overall argument. Apart from anything else, it hurts the reputation of the people making those arguments, and just like the boy who cried wolf, when accurate facts to incriminate Islam are presented by the same side, the claim will naturally be viewed with suspicion.

	Misrepresenting the Quran: [[~~Muslims_Promote_Genocide~~#~~Denialism~~]]		Misrepresenting the Quran: [[Deception_of_Non-Muslims#Lying_about_the_Quran]]

	Misrepresenting the Bible: [[Deception_of_Non-Muslims#Lying_about_other_religions]]		Misrepresenting the Bible: [[Deception_of_Non-Muslims#Lying_about_other_religions]]

Freediver at 10:33, 4 April 2017

2017-04-04T10:33:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:33, 4 April 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Misrepresenting the Bible: [[Deception_of_Non-Muslims#Lying_about_other_religions]]		Misrepresenting the Bible: [[Deception_of_Non-Muslims#Lying_about_other_religions]]

			Misrepresenting the Torah: [[Muslims_Promote_Genocide#Jewish_Law]]

	Justifying and misrepresenting Muhammad's genocide of Jews: [[Muslims_Promote_Genocide]]		Justifying and misrepresenting Muhammad's genocide of Jews: [[Muslims_Promote_Genocide]]

			[[Deception_of_Non-Muslims]]

Freediver at 11:18, 2 April 2017

2017-04-02T11:18:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:18, 2 April 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:

	It shouldn't need explaining why accurately citing facts in a discussion is ''in and of itself'' important. Those who are willing to resort to misinformation and outright lies, either through ignorance or deliberate deceit, by default have a compromised argument - '''''regardless''''' of how little difference those mistruths may seem to make on the overall argument. Apart from anything else, it hurts the reputation of the people making those arguments, and just like the boy who cried wolf, when accurate facts to incriminate Islam are presented by the same side, the claim will naturally be viewed with suspicion.		It shouldn't need explaining why accurately citing facts in a discussion is ''in and of itself'' important. Those who are willing to resort to misinformation and outright lies, either through ignorance or deliberate deceit, by default have a compromised argument - '''''regardless''''' of how little difference those mistruths may seem to make on the overall argument. Apart from anything else, it hurts the reputation of the people making those arguments, and just like the boy who cried wolf, when accurate facts to incriminate Islam are presented by the same side, the claim will naturally be viewed with suspicion.

			Misrepresenting the Quran: [[Muslims_Promote_Genocide#Denialism]]

			Misrepresenting the Bible: [[Deception_of_Non-Muslims#Lying_about_other_religions]]

			Justifying and misrepresenting Muhammad's genocide of Jews: [[Muslims_Promote_Genocide]]

Freediver at 11:07, 30 March 2017

2017-03-30T11:07:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 30 March 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Islam]]		[[Islam]]

	In discussing such a serious and emotionally-charged topic as Islamic extremism, it cannot be overemphasised how important facts are. Many Islam-critics seem to be unable to understand this, and take the attitude that there are so many facts to condemn Islam, that the lies don't fundamentally make any difference to the "truth" of Islam. Of course we get the usual indulgences of logical fallacies to explain them away, especially the tried and trusted "its up to you to disprove its not a lie" [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/48#48]. Some even go so far as to hold Islam responsible for the perpetuation of lies against Islam [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/62#62].		In discussing such a serious and emotionally-charged topic as Islamic extremism, it cannot be overemphasised how important facts are. Many Islam-critics seem to be unable to understand this, and take the attitude that there are so many facts to condemn Islam, that the lies don't fundamentally make any difference to the "truth" of Islam. Of course we get the usual indulgences of logical fallacies to explain them away, especially the tried and trusted "its up to you to disprove its not a lie" [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1438922302/65#65][http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/48#48]. Some even go so far as to hold Islam responsible for the perpetuation of lies against Islam [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/62#62].

	It shouldn't need explaining why accurately citing facts in a discussion is ''in and of itself'' important. Those who are willing to resort to misinformation and outright lies, either through ignorance or deliberate deceit, by default have a compromised argument - '''''regardless''''' of how little difference those mistruths may seem to make on the overall argument. Apart from anything else, it hurts the reputation of the people making those arguments, and just like the boy who cried wolf, when accurate facts to incriminate Islam are presented by the same side, the claim will naturally be viewed with suspicion.		It shouldn't need explaining why accurately citing facts in a discussion is ''in and of itself'' important. Those who are willing to resort to misinformation and outright lies, either through ignorance or deliberate deceit, by default have a compromised argument - '''''regardless''''' of how little difference those mistruths may seem to make on the overall argument. Apart from anything else, it hurts the reputation of the people making those arguments, and just like the boy who cried wolf, when accurate facts to incriminate Islam are presented by the same side, the claim will naturally be viewed with suspicion.

Freediver at 11:03, 30 March 2017

2017-03-30T11:03:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:03, 30 March 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[Islam]]

	In discussing such a serious and emotionally-charged topic as Islamic extremism, it cannot be overemphasised how important facts are. Many Islam-critics seem to be unable to understand this, and take the attitude that there are so many facts to condemn Islam, that the lies don't fundamentally make any difference to the "truth" of Islam. Of course we get the usual indulgences of logical fallacies to explain them away, especially the tried and trusted "its up to you to disprove its not a lie" [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/48#48]. Some even go so far as to hold Islam responsible for the perpetuation of lies against Islam [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/62#62].		In discussing such a serious and emotionally-charged topic as Islamic extremism, it cannot be overemphasised how important facts are. Many Islam-critics seem to be unable to understand this, and take the attitude that there are so many facts to condemn Islam, that the lies don't fundamentally make any difference to the "truth" of Islam. Of course we get the usual indulgences of logical fallacies to explain them away, especially the tried and trusted "its up to you to disprove its not a lie" [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/48#48]. Some even go so far as to hold Islam responsible for the perpetuation of lies against Islam [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/62#62].

	It shouldn't need explaining why accurately citing facts in a discussion is ''in and of itself'' important. Those who are willing to resort to misinformation and outright lies, either through ignorance or deliberate deceit, by default have a compromised argument - '''''regardless''''' of how little difference those mistruths may seem to make on the overall argument. Apart from anything else, it hurts the reputation of the people making those arguments, and just like the boy who cried wolf, when accurate facts to incriminate Islam are presented by the same side, the claim will naturally be viewed with suspicion.		It shouldn't need explaining why accurately citing facts in a discussion is ''in and of itself'' important. Those who are willing to resort to misinformation and outright lies, either through ignorance or deliberate deceit, by default have a compromised argument - '''''regardless''''' of how little difference those mistruths may seem to make on the overall argument. Apart from anything else, it hurts the reputation of the people making those arguments, and just like the boy who cried wolf, when accurate facts to incriminate Islam are presented by the same side, the claim will naturally be viewed with suspicion.

Dennis Funster at 06:07, 16 July 2016

2016-07-16T06:07:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:07, 16 July 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In discussing such a serious and emotionally-charged topic as Islamic extremism, it cannot be overemphasised how important facts are. Many Islam-critics seem to be unable to understand this, and take the attitude that there are so many facts to condemn Islam, that the lies don't fundamentally make any difference to the "truth" of Islam. Of course we get the usual indulgences of logical fallacies to explain them away, especially the tried and trusted "its up to you to disprove its not a lie" [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/48#48]. Some even go so far as to hold Islam responsible for the perpetuation of lies against Islam [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/62#62].		In discussing such a serious and emotionally-charged topic as Islamic extremism, it cannot be overemphasised how important facts are. Many Islam-critics seem to be unable to understand this, and take the attitude that there are so many facts to condemn Islam, that the lies don't fundamentally make any difference to the "truth" of Islam. Of course we get the usual indulgences of logical fallacies to explain them away, especially the tried and trusted "its up to you to disprove its not a lie" [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/48#48]. Some even go so far as to hold Islam responsible for the perpetuation of lies against Islam [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/62#62].

	It shouldn't need explaining why accurately citing facts in a discussion is ''in and of itself'' important. Those who are willing to resort to misinformation and outright lies, either through ignorance or deliberate deceit, by default have a compromised argument - '''''regardless''''' of how little difference those mistruths may seem to make on the overall argument.		It shouldn't need explaining why accurately citing facts in a discussion is ''in and of itself'' important. Those who are willing to resort to misinformation and outright lies, either through ignorance or deliberate deceit, by default have a compromised argument - '''''regardless''''' of how little difference those mistruths may seem to make on the overall argument. Apart from anything else, it hurts the reputation of the people making those arguments, and just like the boy who cried wolf, when accurate facts to incriminate Islam are presented by the same side, the claim will naturally be viewed with suspicion.

Dennis Funster at 06:05, 16 July 2016

2016-07-16T06:05:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:05, 16 July 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In discussing such a serious and emotionally-charged topic as Islamic extremism, it cannot be overemphasised how important facts are. Many Islam-critics seem to be unable to understand this, and take the attitude that there are so many facts to condemn Islam, that the lies don't fundamentally make any difference to the "truth" of Islam. Of course we get the usual indulgences of logical fallacies to explain them away, especially the tried and trusted "its up to you to disprove its not a lie" [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/48#48]. Some even go so far as to hold Islam responsible for the perpetuation of lies against Islam [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/62#62].		In discussing such a serious and emotionally-charged topic as Islamic extremism, it cannot be overemphasised how important facts are. Many Islam-critics seem to be unable to understand this, and take the attitude that there are so many facts to condemn Islam, that the lies don't fundamentally make any difference to the "truth" of Islam. Of course we get the usual indulgences of logical fallacies to explain them away, especially the tried and trusted "its up to you to disprove its not a lie" [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/48#48]. Some even go so far as to hold Islam responsible for the perpetuation of lies against Islam [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/62#62].

			It shouldn't need explaining why accurately citing facts in a discussion is ''in and of itself'' important. Those who are willing to resort to misinformation and outright lies, either through ignorance or deliberate deceit, by default have a compromised argument - '''''regardless''''' of how little difference those mistruths may seem to make on the overall argument.

Dennis Funster: New page: In discussing such a serious and emotionally-charged topic as Islamic extremism, it cannot be overemphasised how important facts are. Many Islam-critics seem to be unable to understand thi...

2016-07-16T05:45:53Z

New page: In discussing such a serious and emotionally-charged topic as Islamic extremism, it cannot be overemphasised how important facts are. Many Islam-critics seem to be unable to understand thi...

New page

In discussing such a serious and emotionally-charged topic as Islamic extremism, it cannot be overemphasised how important facts are. Many Islam-critics seem to be unable to understand this, and take the attitude that there are so many facts to condemn Islam, that the lies don't fundamentally make any difference to the "truth" of Islam. Of course we get the usual indulgences of logical fallacies to explain them away, especially the tried and trusted "its up to you to disprove its not a lie" [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/48#48]. Some even go so far as to hold Islam responsible for the perpetuation of lies against Islam [http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1372681303/62#62].