It seems likely.
Follow the money.

Who was the guy who funded Epstein after he emerged from jail as a sex offender with no cash?

How did he get 3 jets and a full surveillance mansion in NY  and 2 islands.

Enter Les Wexner.
The owner of Victoria's secret.
Even leaving aside how this business could be leveraged to induce the powerful men to come to " network".
Les was a totally committed Zionist.

AND he signs over the whole business to Epstein just after Epstein release.

Epstein becomes his full power of attorney.
He gives Epstein 350 million for financial advice, despite Epstein never doing a trade.

Other Jews including trumps best mate and trade secretary Howard lutnick give Epstein real estate in NY for pennies.
Lutnick another ideological jew.

Once we add in father Maxwell's fortune which was never disclosed. Ghillanes brother being deputy head of mossad, it seems so likely.

And why does every politician in Washington seem to be pro Israel?.  I mean good on Israel for securing its safety but it seems pretty blatant that powerful people do NOT step out of line.


And who else might threaten mossad?

Maybe some tech bros, and social media companies, maybe some scientists and maybe some Saudi princes, maybe some Hollywood types and streaming companies.


And who invites these groups to an island resort to network. Picks them up in a private jet and then exerts influence over them.

Notice that the Saudis just recognised the state of Israel.
Notice Netflix won't publish anything on Gaza.
Note Leonardo is on the record as ONLY  dating Victoria's secret models.


Note none of this is going to be released.
You think mossad don't have some control over the information flow in Washington

Big Donger wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 6:55am:



I have NO DOUBT mossad have stuff on Trump and the Clinton's.

Good grief, they would be derelict in their duties not to

And wall Street guys, tech bros.



Hi Facebook. this is mossad on the phone. You posted some stuff about Gaza. We,d like that taken down.

Hi Hollywood star, no trash talking Israel at the academy awards. There's a good boy.

Hi wall Street guy, we'd really appreciate you funding this new iron dome company. There's a good boy.

Big Donger wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 7:47am:



Karnal is forgiven for spreading lies about Trump:


https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-says-he-turned-down-invitation-epsteins-i...

Quote:

Big Donger wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 8:21am:



What are you babbling about?   

forgiven

namaste

Big Donger wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 8:29am:



MOSSAD is a secret service so no one knows what they are up to -

any more than the CIA and every other secret, clandestine Govt organisation.

Deep State.

So let's say it is Mossad.

What then?

What does it change?

Do we forgive Clinton or Trump if they sexually exploited children because it was a clandestine honeypot?

What's the endgame here Scoot?

For writer who broke Epstein case, a rumored Mossad link is worth digging into
Reporter Julie K. Brown isn’t convinced the accused sex trafficker took his own life, and says associate Robert Maxwell may not have been the only one tied to Israeli intelligence
By JP O’ Malley
26 July 2021

https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-writer-who-broke-epstein-case-a-rumored-mossad...



Even the ABC is talking about it
https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/if-youre-listening/was-jeffrey-epstein-a-mossad-agent/105591934


Robert Maxwell Was a Mossad asset. Ghislaine was his favourite child. The yacht he died on was named Lady Ghislaine. He 'fell off the yacht', like Epstein hanged himself sitting down while BOTH guards slept and the video monitoring malfunctioned.

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 12:18pm:


You've still not explained why any of this matters.

You've brought this up originally after Trump was linked to the Epstein files which document the abuse of children.

You can't just pretend all that matters is Victoria's Secret models.

What is wrong with you..?!

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 1:20pm:


You brought this up first here,

Is Trump Suppressing The Epstein Files?

In an attempt to sanitise the links between Trump and Epstein.

You were making excuses for that whole disgusting, seedy underbelly.

And your defence is that I have TDS?

By that logic, you're more than simply depending paedophiles...

It's unforgivable.  And the worst part is, you don't seem to have a problem with it since you've started a whole new thread in the same vein.

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 3:15pm:




Are you talking about this sort of intelligence?

Excuse me while I have another good laugh.



Thanks, I feel better now.

Epstein died in 2019. Maxwell was tried and found guilty in 2021, sentenced in 2022.  Maxwell's trial covered the period after 2015. Epstein was first publicly accused in 2007.  Trump banned Epstein from his circle about two years earlier.

If Trump had been implicated the Biden admininstration would have released the details. Nothing could have prevented them from doing so. Except that there wasn't anything to imlicate Trump. After all, they impeached him twice and threw endless and various criminal charges at him? Why not sink him with Epstein and Maxwel when they had the power?

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 3:15pm:



My Kanga is not well:

SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 4:40pm:

I wouldn't take Biden's word for it, not are we talking about anything like that, silly little teapot.

We are talking about evidence in criminal trials.

Pull your finger outs gweggy creep's arse and focus.

SadKangaroo wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 5:09pm:



So why didn't they release any Trump -implicating details while Trump's political opponents were in power?? They hounded him with all sorts of criminal charges, and impeached him twice.
Why didn't they stitch him up over Epstein?

Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa gweggy creep's arse.

Big Donger wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 7:28pm:



The tap-dancing is not up to scratch, grimacing paki.
No bananas, no 10 rupee.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 7:35pm:

No good?




In Australia, there isn't a single, nationally consistent minimum working age. While most states and territories have laws regulating child employment, the specific minimum age varies by location and may also depend on the type of work. Generally, 13 or 14 is the age for casual or part-time work

Frank wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 5:34pm:


I could only speculate.

I wonder, though, why it matters?  Is it not the right thing to do, release the files, no matter who did or didn't release them before you?

If I had to speculate, I know that the justice system controlled access to sealed documents, not the White House. Many of the files were court‑sealed and only became public after legal processes concluded in early 2024.  That would have been right in the middle of the election cycle.

Now I know from a MAGA and Republican point of view, weaponising that would not have required a second thought.  But given we've seen the Democrats, much to their own detriment, act with a certain level of decorum and "following the rules", both tradition and legal, perhaps they decided that releasing the file during the campaign would do more harm than good to the victims?

I know you would immediately dismiss whatever was in the files if they were released under Biden.  Perhaps people like you were a consideration in the decision also?

Hell, you still to this day claim Trump's felony convictions were political.  And if they had released the files and Trump one, he would have escaped justice just like he did for those convictions.

So what changed?  Why the desire for the release of the files now?

Trump campaigned on releasing them, his team said they had them and were reviewing them for release, there were photo ops with right wing influences holding binders of the phase one of the files for release and many people within Trump's circles said they'd be released and vindicate everything they'd been saying about the Democrats and Elites "on the list".

All of that happened entirely without any Democrats, that was all Trump or his people and their supporters.

Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover.

After everything he said he would do around them and all the conspiracies about his enemies in the files and the vindication his base were certain they'd get with the release, everyone but the most loyal and braindead of his supporters want the files released and those with evidence of abusing children within brought to justice, left, right or President.

It's only those braindead Trump supporters, much like yourself, who have chosen to align themselves with these predators, all because they cannot admit they may have been wrong in supporting those predators all this time.

So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why?

Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse.

Frank wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 7:47pm:


Children massaging fat old men in a spa?

Nah, no good.

No good at all.

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 11:37am:


"... the justice system controlled access to sealed documents, not the White House. Many of the files were court‑sealed and only became public after legal processes concluded in early 2024."

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 11:39am:

No longer?

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 11:57am:


So just to clarify, are you suggesting that Trump's potential involvement in the Epstein child trafficking network shouldn't be scrutinised or disclosed because there are other examples of systemic abuse elsewhere?

You brought up an unrelated situation in the UK, seemingly to minimise or distract from what we're discussing, allegations of elite-level child abuse in the United States, potentially involving the president.

Your comment raises a serious concern: are you trying to deflect from Trump's accountability by shifting the focus to a different ethnic group in a different country?

If you genuinely believe these crimes are heinous, then surely you'd want full transparency and justice in all cases, regardless of the political or diplomatic fallout. Otherwise, it starts to look like you're not actually interested in protecting children, but in protecting political idols.

Protecting paedophiles.

I see why you've been so reluctant to answer questions now...  Wow.

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 1:47pm:


The previous administration didn't spend 4 years saying they would release the files.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:00pm:




Keep your creepy fantasies to yourself creeper

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:12pm:


At least you agree that behaviour is creepy.

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 11:57am:



Exactly right frank. 1400 white teenage runaways taken in a drugged by a Muslim sex ring in rotheram.wiki will inform you if you want to read about true evil. And police powerless because cretins like bwian screamed islamophobia.

Now roo , for the 20 th time, frank is 100 % correct. Biden team had all the Epstein and Maxwell investigations and if there was a shred of evidence incriminating Trump , it would have come out.
It didn't.
Please apologize to frank for saying he is defending pedophiles.
Disgraceful allegation 

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:22pm:


Don't get us wrong, nobody seriously thinks Trump will release the files. His entire political survival hinges on suppressing inconvenient truths. But that doesn't mean the files shouldn't be released.

The disturbing part isn't just his inaction, it's your defence of it. Instead of demanding transparency, you're bending over backwards to excuse why it won't happen. You're not arguing for justice, you're running interference for a man neck-deep in scandal.

And whether you like it or not, that makes you part of the problem. Another apologist. Another defender of paedophiles.

SadKangaroo wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:27pm:



What inconvenient truths are being suppressed here by the Biden and Trump administrations, teapot?

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 3:40pm:


Who the child abusers are.

I don't think it's unreasonable to want them all brought to justice.

SadKangaroo wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 4:19pm:

You are an unmoored, disgraceful, slanderous idiot.

Who are tye pedophiles that are defended here? Who is defending them?

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:13pm:


No

It's not the democrats fault trump is a criminal.

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:22pm:



even if you said it 200 times, it still wouldn't be right

SadKangaroo wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 7:48pm:




Why must the left lie.
Find the post where I downplayed Epstein crimes as him befriending homeless girls


Why must the left lie.

Try to be honest debaters like me and frank

An apology would be a good way to reduce your smug hypocrisy.

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 8:04pm:


The mere fact that you refer to it as "befriending homeless girls" when it was actually exploiting, raped, and trafficking them, is disgusting.

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 8:07pm:



when will you stop defending and making excuses for pedophiles? do you abuse your horses as well ? a bit Kinky are you?

John Smith wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 8:28pm:

Changing posts like this gets people banned, you know, thick *ucking eejit.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 9:23pm:

Nobody is more repulsive and despicable than you, revolting clammy wanker.
You stand alone, stinking, revolting shhit.

Your parents look down on you and retch. Like we all do.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 9:23pm:


Now now, Greggery, no one has the right to not be offended, no?

SO UNFAIR !!!

SadKangaroo wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 7:14am:


You left out C, Sad. They disagwee with the very pwemise.

D. Whatabout Hillary's emails?

E. Fwank forgets what E is for, and

F. Why must the left lie?

SadKangaroo wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 7:14am:


No answer.

That says a lot.

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 9:20pm:


Yes, I know

Frank wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 11:40pm:


I genuinely appreciate you not ignoring the question and providing what any reasonable person would expect is the only real possible answer to it.

Thank you.

To answer your follow-up, why would anyone still support Trump if he were in the Epstein files and there was proof he abused children?

Let's be frank, the same reasons you do now.  You choose to ignore the inconvenient truths.

And we're not talking about how he eats a burrito bowl, or his choice of wearing a tan suit.

Here is a short list of the things you currently ignore about Trump to continue to support him, in just this area alone:

- Over two dozen public allegations of sexual assault or misconduct,
- His own recorded admission to grabbing women without consent,
- The lawsuit alleging he raped a 13-year-old at an Epstein-hosted party,
- The repeated sexualisation of minors, including his comments about his own daughter,
- The credible claims that Epstein recruited girls from Mar-a-Lago, which Trump oversaw and recently admitted to,
- His sycophantic treatment of Ghislaine Maxwell, even after her conviction,
- His outright lies about the Epstein files being fake, missing, or non-existent,
- The appointment of loyalists like Kash Patel to mislead the public about what's in those files,
- His dodging of questions from the press, refusal to declassify or release the files as promised,
- His use of congressional allies to block transparency efforts, shut down votes, and kill subpoenas.

You already support him despite all of that.

You've ignored overwhelming red flags, legal, moral, and personal, because the cult of personality is stronger than the facts.

You ask, ‘Why would anyone?' while refusing even to pause and question your own loyalties in the face of damning patterns.

So don't pretend it's unthinkable. You've already shown it's entirely thinkable and in practice what you're doing now.

Do you honestly expect any of us to believe that anything in the Epstein files would change your mind?

And if so, what would it take?  What burden of evidence would need to be known or even released from the Epstein files to change your mind?

August 15th is going to be an interesting day.

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 11:01am:



Game set and match Frank.


As if roo can argue that they would have tried to protect Trump.

Part of trying to help the lefties with TDS is to get them to admit to their addiction.
Only then can we help them walk the path to legitimate self respect and honest self appraisal.
A difficult task, but logical thinking , such as your post , may be the first step.
They are our fellow human beings and we must remain compassionate as they take baby steps towards better mental health

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 11:01am:


This has been explained to you before, Frannie.

The courts wouldn't have granted their requests to release the details.

Stop defending paedophiles and rapists.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 12:58pm:



Well, if so -  what's changed since? When? How?

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 1:15pm:


A dictator who doesn't follow court orders is in the White House now.