Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 17
Send Topic Print
Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target (Read 5603 times)
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 24238
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #15 - Jun 9th, 2024 at 6:59pm
 
freediver wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 10:57am:
Now I get it. They signed up to a 2030 deadline. So in 2024 they announced they could get nuclear reactors built in 5 years. It's not their fault if no-one believes them.


Nuclear generators could be built within a few years, if there was a committment to such power generators.
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 24238
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #16 - Jun 9th, 2024 at 7:02pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 10:52am:
Mr potato Head will never learn. A large reason the teals decimated the libs in the last election was due to their inaction on climate change. Mr Potato Head won't even win his seat if this is the route he chooses.


Mr Potato Head was not the reason behind the last federal election defeat of the coalition. Scott "Smuggo" Morrison was. If we did not see the sociopathy of Scott Morrison in his prime ministerialship, the Liberals would have won the last election. Nobody gives a damn about the bs climate change initiatives. They give a damn, though, if the politicians are acting like dickheads. Albo would be feeling the pressure of losing the next election.
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17182
Gender: male
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #17 - Jun 9th, 2024 at 7:04pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 6:35pm:
So you don't want to say which energy provider didn't cost for batteries when deciding to invest in nuclear or renewable .


It is your claim that everyone knows. Your claim, your proof. Wink

John Smith wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 6:35pm:
It must be a secret they only shared with you.


No, You are the one saying everyone knows, therefore you must know. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19917
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #18 - Jun 10th, 2024 at 9:35am
 
UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 6:57pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 10:44am:
Of course it's unachievable, for the coalition. They don't want to achieve it. They have just been lying to voters for the last 20 years claiming to take climate change seriously.


If they figure out a way to make car emissions down to zero, you could see 45% carbon emission drop. Otherwise, it seems near impossible for this emissions reduction to take place inside 6 years.


Do you mean like electric vehicles dickhead???

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19917
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #19 - Jun 10th, 2024 at 9:39am
 
UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 6:59pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 10:57am:
Now I get it. They signed up to a 2030 deadline. So in 2024 they announced they could get nuclear reactors built in 5 years. It's not their fault if no-one believes them.


Nuclear generators could be built within a few years, if there was a committment to such power generators.


Do you have a link to support this claim....Australia needs to lift the ban on nuclear energy before any planning or construction can begin....Were do you get your timeline that supports your bullshit???

Huh Huh Huh
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48814
At my desk.
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #20 - Jun 10th, 2024 at 9:46am
 
UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 6:59pm:
freediver wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 10:57am:
Now I get it. They signed up to a 2030 deadline. So in 2024 they announced they could get nuclear reactors built in 5 years. It's not their fault if no-one believes them.


Nuclear generators could be built within a few years, if there was a committment to such power generators.


If they approached it with religious zeal perhaps. But not a modern religion. I am thinking something aztec with a lot of corpses lying around. Also lots of money. Pretty much all of it. This seems to be the coalition's approach. Leave everything to the last minute, do a few backflips, then try to ruin the economy doing what they promised they would in the most expensive and dangerous way possible, then do another backflip and just break their promises.

Meanwhile we have investors with billions of dollars available to put into our energy future who are holding back because the government is doing a headless chook routine.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9585
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #21 - Jun 10th, 2024 at 12:21pm
 
Interesting.

Newspoll has the two major parties at 50-50 in the latest poll and Dutton gaining on Albo as Preferred PM.

Perhaps the Coalition has figured out that anything that gets Chris Bowen on TV more often boosts the Coalition vote?  Grin
Back to top
 

The 2025 election could be a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57851
Here
Gender: male
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #22 - Jun 10th, 2024 at 12:27pm
 
Quote:
Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target


It would be news if they didn't. there is no surprise here at all.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 73969
Gender: male
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #23 - Jun 10th, 2024 at 5:18pm
 
UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 7:02pm:
John Smith wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 10:52am:
Mr potato Head will never learn. A large reason the teals decimated the libs in the last election was due to their inaction on climate change. Mr Potato Head won't even win his seat if this is the route he chooses.


Mr Potato Head was not the reason behind the last federal election defeat of the coalition. Scott "Smuggo" Morrison was. If we did not see the sociopathy of Scott Morrison in his prime ministerialship, the Liberals would have won the last election. Nobody gives a damn about the bs climate change initiatives. They give a damn, though, if the politicians are acting like dickheads. Albo would be feeling the pressure of losing the next election.


It was the libs ignoring global warming that got the teals in, regardless of who was leader,  it was the libs policies.  Continuing to ignore global warming could very well see Mr potato head lose his seat
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 73969
Gender: male
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #24 - Jun 10th, 2024 at 5:19pm
 
lee wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 7:04pm:
John Smith wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 6:35pm:
So you don't want to say which energy provider didn't cost for batteries when deciding to invest in nuclear or renewable .


It is your claim that everyone knows. Your claim, your proof. Wink

John Smith wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 6:35pm:
It must be a secret they only shared with you.


No, You are the one saying everyone knows, therefore you must know. Roll Eyes


Not surprisingly you run from your argument  Grin Grin
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17182
Gender: male
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #25 - Jun 10th, 2024 at 5:28pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jun 10th, 2024 at 5:19pm:
Not surprisingly you run from your argument



Not surprisingly you can't back up your assertion. It was your argument. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin  "Everyone knows" Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 73969
Gender: male
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #26 - Jun 10th, 2024 at 5:34pm
 
lee wrote on Jun 10th, 2024 at 5:28pm:
John Smith wrote on Jun 10th, 2024 at 5:19pm:
Not surprisingly you run from your argument



Not surprisingly you can't back up your assertion. It was your argument. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin  "Everyone knows" Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin



What assertion? I asked you if you thought the energy providers didn't consider the costs of batteries. There's nothing asserted, it's asking you for your opinion.  That you ran away from a straight answer can only be because you don't even believe your crappy excuses.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17182
Gender: male
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #27 - Jun 10th, 2024 at 6:12pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jun 10th, 2024 at 5:34pm:
What assertion?
.

John Smith wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 5:52pm:
Everyone else,  including those in the energy industry,  disagrees with you.


So tell me who these "everyones" are. You must have the information, you are so sure you are right. But just don't want to commit. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

John Smith wrote on Jun 10th, 2024 at 5:34pm:
There's nothing asserted, it's asking you for your opinion.


My opinion is that it will cost vastly more than Lazard's calculations of how many hours of storage are needed. Wink

John Smith wrote on Jun 10th, 2024 at 5:34pm:
That you ran away from a straight answer can only be because you don't even believe your crappy excuses.



You are the one saying that the energy companies have done the sums. Show them.

John Smith wrote on Jun 9th, 2024 at 6:35pm:
So you don't want to say which energy provider didn't cost for batteries when deciding to invest in nuclear or renewable . It must be a secret they only shared with you.  I understand.  We won't tell anyone



So the secret is you don't know. Thanks for that.

Well there is this I found -

"Federal energy minister Chris Bowen said on Friday that his department is preparing to launch the first CIS tender for WA’s wholeslae energy market (WEM) in June, with an indicative target of 500MW of four-hour equivalent (2 GWh) “clean dispatchable capacity.” "

https://reneweconomy.com.au/bowen-takes-capacity-tender-out-west-in-search-of-2g...

500MW of 4 hour equivalent is 5 times larger that Lazard's equivalent. Hornsdale battery at 100MW cost about $100million dollars and WA is only a small proportion of the National figure.

Of course feel free to supply better figures on how little it will cost. Wink

"Australian government seeks to deliver 4.2 GWh of battery energy storage"


...


"ARENA said with a total project value of about $1.8 billion and a combined capacity of 2.0 GW/4.2 GWh the projects represent a ten-fold increase in grid-forming electricity storage capacity currently operational in the NEM."
https://www.pv-magazine.com/2022/12/19/australian-government-seeks-to-deliver-4-...

That's 400 times larger.

I haven't seen any figures of needed storage from any energy suppliers.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 10th, 2024 at 6:21pm by lee »  
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 43869
Gender: male
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #28 - Jun 10th, 2024 at 6:31pm
 
Oh, no!! Thicko Smiff is trying to argue facts with Lee!!

Come on thicko, keep showing off just how amazingly stupid you are. Keep at it, bozo, there are a coupla garlic flavoured concrete cannolis in it for ya. Atta boy!  🤣🤣🤣




Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 73969
Gender: male
Re: Coalition To Dump Australia's Climate Target
Reply #29 - Jun 10th, 2024 at 7:17pm
 
Quote:
So tell me who these "everyones" are


Every energy supply company.  Absolutely none are investing in nuclear.

Quote:
My opinion is that it will cost vastly more than Lazard's calculations of how many hours of storage


You should contact all the energy companies and tell them they are all wrong.  That only you have the correct costings. There's no reason why they shouldn't get a laugh too
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 17
Send Topic Print