Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print
australian universities want n16gers too now (Read 2900 times)
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 40109
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #75 - Jun 2nd, 2024 at 10:40pm
 
JC Denton wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 10:25pm:
holy sh1t

white = indigenous european person


ffs

you literally said "dna proved someone to be white" which means that it identified them to be genetically an indigenous european person, part of the west-eurasian european population cluster more specifically. that is what it means and it runs contrary to the rest of the bullsh1t you post about human population groups


DNA proved they were white, does not equate to everybody being European which is what you are claiming I said.  Time you learnt to speak the King's English my man.  You are speaking Racist gibberish.  What it means is that it proved one woman was White according to the South African Apartheid regulations, not everybody.  As I have said, the evidence is more that the majority of humanity comes from African stock originally.  Europeans became white in their effort to more easily absorb Vitamin D from sunlight, which Africans did not need to do to the same extent.  Europeans are the mutants.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.† Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† †Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
JC Denton
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5423
Gender: female
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #76 - Jun 2nd, 2024 at 11:18pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 10:40pm:
JC Denton wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 10:25pm:
holy sh1t

white = indigenous european person


ffs

you literally said "dna proved someone to be white" which means that it identified them to be genetically an indigenous european person, part of the west-eurasian european population cluster more specifically. that is what it means and it runs contrary to the rest of the bullsh1t you post about human population groups


DNA proved they were white, does not equate to everybody being European which is what you are claiming I said.† Time you learnt to speak the King's English my man.† You are speaking Racist gibberish.† What it means is that it proved one woman was White according to the South African Apartheid regulations, not everybody.† As I have said, the evidence is more that the majority of humanity comes from African stock originally.† Europeans became white in their effort to more easily absorb Vitamin D from sunlight, which Africans did not need to do to the same extent.† Europeans are the mutants.† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


'DNA proved them to be white',† white as used here is synonymous with 'indigenous european person', meaning DNA identified them to a person of european ancestry, demonstrating that human sub-populations (known in archaic terminology as 'races') do in fact exist, and can be ascertained on the basis of genetic evidence alone

though in the instance of the person you were referring to in the post, no DNA evidence did not prove them to be european because there was no DNA test actually taken, but the post you made completely contradicted your own b.s and was an obvious slip, that's why i keep bringing it up. it's a gotcha and more than anything demonstrates to me you have a very tenuous grasp of the points that you regurgitate mindlessly so often

that is the relevance of this ffs
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 2nd, 2024 at 11:25pm by JC Denton »  
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 42596
Gender: male
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #77 - Jun 3rd, 2024 at 10:48am
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 10:40pm:
JC Denton wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 10:25pm:
holy sh1t

white = indigenous european person


ffs

you literally said "dna proved someone to be white" which means that it identified them to be genetically an indigenous european person, part of the west-eurasian european population cluster more specifically. that is what it means and it runs contrary to the rest of the bullsh1t you post about human population groups


DNA proved they were white, does not equate to everybody being European which is what you are claiming I said.† Time you learnt to speak the King's English my man.† You are speaking Racist gibberish.† What it means is that it proved one woman was White according to the South African Apartheid regulations, not everybody.† As I have said, the evidence is more that the majority of humanity comes from African stock originally.† Europeans became white in their effort to more easily absorb Vitamin D from sunlight, which Africans did not need to do to the same extent.† Europeans are the mutants.† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

White is a race, like black, dickheaddle.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I canít go on like this.
Vladimir: Thatís what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 42596
Gender: male
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #78 - Jun 3rd, 2024 at 10:57am
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 4:11pm:
Frank wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 4:06pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 1:36pm:
JC Denton wrote on Jun 1st, 2024 at 10:54pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 1st, 2024 at 10:50pm:
JC Denton wrote on Jun 1st, 2024 at 10:49pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 1st, 2024 at 10:49pm:
North Africans look more like Middle Eastern people than Caucasian.


i said caucasoid not caucasian


Basically the same meaning.

no

in classical human taxonomy caucasian is the european sub branch of caucasoid, which roughly equates to what we would (in more modern parlance) refer to as the human population cluster of west-eurasians, which includes both europeans and middle eastern north africans


Taxonomy has been overturned by the discovery and mapping of the Human Genome.† There is no DNA difference between an African and a European or an Asian or an Indigenous Australian at a gross level.† They are all members of the only real race that exists, the Human one, they can all interbreed and are the same Genetically.† Their only differences are minor ones based on external appearance.† Racists harp on the differences as something other than environmental consequences.† Fools like you who refuse to recognise Genetics as a modern science and cling to old, ancient beliefs like phrenology.† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† †Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

So what do these words MEAN:

Aboriginal

Anglo Saxon, Celtic

White European

Black African

Arab


If you need explanation, consult a dictionary, Soren.† I'm sorry your education has been so lacking in such basic definitions.† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

You mean DNA is totally irrelevant to the meaning of these words.

Yet you keep talking about DNA when talking about blacks, whites, aborigines as if DNA was relevant to understanding these markers.

Why ARE you so stupid, Bbwian?
Back to top
 

Estragon: I canít go on like this.
Vladimir: Thatís what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 40109
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #79 - Jun 3rd, 2024 at 2:00pm
 
Frank wrote on Jun 3rd, 2024 at 10:57am:
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 4:11pm:
Frank wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 4:06pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 1:36pm:
JC Denton wrote on Jun 1st, 2024 at 10:54pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 1st, 2024 at 10:50pm:
JC Denton wrote on Jun 1st, 2024 at 10:49pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 1st, 2024 at 10:49pm:
North Africans look more like Middle Eastern people than Caucasian.


i said caucasoid not caucasian


Basically the same meaning.

no

in classical human taxonomy caucasian is the european sub branch of caucasoid, which roughly equates to what we would (in more modern parlance) refer to as the human population cluster of west-eurasians, which includes both europeans and middle eastern north africans


Taxonomy has been overturned by the discovery and mapping of the Human Genome.† There is no DNA difference between an African and a European or an Asian or an Indigenous Australian at a gross level.† They are all members of the only real race that exists, the Human one, they can all interbreed and are the same Genetically.† Their only differences are minor ones based on external appearance.† Racists harp on the differences as something other than environmental consequences.† Fools like you who refuse to recognise Genetics as a modern science and cling to old, ancient beliefs like phrenology.† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† †Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

So what do these words MEAN:

Aboriginal

Anglo Saxon, Celtic

White European

Black African

Arab


If you need explanation, consult a dictionary, Soren.† I'm sorry your education has been so lacking in such basic definitions.† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

You mean DNA is totally irrelevant to the meaning of these words.


Those words were coined before the discovery of DNA, Soren.  Their meanings are being modified as I speak. I just wish you'd learn something rather than rely on old words the way you do.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.† Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† †Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
JC Denton
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5423
Gender: female
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #80 - Jun 3rd, 2024 at 5:19pm
 
no they arent, they largely mean what they always meant as genetic evidence has confirmed them to conceptually reflect the general understanding of what they were prior to what anyone knew what dna was
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 42596
Gender: male
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #81 - Jun 3rd, 2024 at 5:35pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 3rd, 2024 at 2:00pm:
Frank wrote on Jun 3rd, 2024 at 10:57am:
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 4:11pm:
Frank wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 4:06pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 1:36pm:
JC Denton wrote on Jun 1st, 2024 at 10:54pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 1st, 2024 at 10:50pm:
JC Denton wrote on Jun 1st, 2024 at 10:49pm:
UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 1st, 2024 at 10:49pm:
North Africans look more like Middle Eastern people than Caucasian.


i said caucasoid not caucasian


Basically the same meaning.

no

in classical human taxonomy caucasian is the european sub branch of caucasoid, which roughly equates to what we would (in more modern parlance) refer to as the human population cluster of west-eurasians, which includes both europeans and middle eastern north africans


Taxonomy has been overturned by the discovery and mapping of the Human Genome.† There is no DNA difference between an African and a European or an Asian or an Indigenous Australian at a gross level.† They are all members of the only real race that exists, the Human one, they can all interbreed and are the same Genetically.† Their only differences are minor ones based on external appearance.† Racists harp on the differences as something other than environmental consequences.† Fools like you who refuse to recognise Genetics as a modern science and cling to old, ancient beliefs like phrenology.† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† †Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

So what do these words MEAN:

Aboriginal

Anglo Saxon, Celtic

White European

Black African

Arab


If you need explanation, consult a dictionary, Soren.† I'm sorry your education has been so lacking in such basic definitions.† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

You mean DNA is totally irrelevant to the meaning of these words.


Those words were coined before the discovery of DNA, Soren.† Their meanings are being modified as I speak. I just wish you'd learn something rather than rely on old words the way you do.† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† †Roll Eyes Roll Eyes




You mean DNA is totally irrelevant to the meaning of these words.† Yet you keep talking about DNA when talking about blacks, whites, aborigines as if DNA was relevant to understanding these markers.

Why ARE you so stupid, Bbwian?  What is the "new, post-dna discovery " meaning  of black,  African, white,  European, Aboriginal, Anglo Saxon, Celtic,  Asian, Indian, Arab, etc??

Back to top
 

Estragon: I canít go on like this.
Vladimir: Thatís what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 40109
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #82 - Jun 3rd, 2024 at 8:41pm
 
...
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.† Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† †Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Legend

Posts: 23146
Rockhampton, Q
Gender: male
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #83 - Jun 4th, 2024 at 3:15pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 2nd, 2024 at 10:40pm:
DNA proved they were white, does not equate to everybody being European which is what you are claiming I said.† Time you learnt to speak the King's English my man.† You are speaking Racist gibberish.† What it means is that it proved one woman was White according to the South African Apartheid regulations, not everybody.† As I have said, the evidence is more that the majority of humanity comes from African stock originally.† Europeans became white in their effort to more easily absorb Vitamin D from sunlight, which Africans did not need to do to the same extent.† Europeans are the mutants.† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Maybe I am off-topic here. But if someone is proven to have European DNA, does their ancestry have at least some European origin?

And I would say that the term would be "evolution" not "mutation".
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 42596
Gender: male
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #84 - Jun 4th, 2024 at 4:06pm
 
White people's ancestry is European, wherever they may be in the world.

This is totally obvious and unremarkable, like Aboriginals having ancesrors from pre1788 Australia.

Bbwiyawn is just playing silly old buggers, as always.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I canít go on like this.
Vladimir: Thatís what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 44797
Gender: male
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #85 - Jun 4th, 2024 at 4:49pm
 
Ultimately our ancestry is African, Franko!

A tiny bit of our ancestry is even Neanderthal or Denisovan, pre Homo sapiens species.
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you donít like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Legend

Posts: 23146
Rockhampton, Q
Gender: male
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #86 - Jun 4th, 2024 at 4:59pm
 
Homo erectus georgicus people lived in Georgia 1.8 million years ago. Should we start saying that modern humans also came from Eastern Europe?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 42596
Gender: male
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #87 - Jun 4th, 2024 at 4:59pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Jun 4th, 2024 at 4:49pm:
Ultimately our ancestry is African, Franko!

A tiny bit of our ancestry is even Neanderthal or Denisovan, pre Homo sapiens species.

And so you are a black African, then, like, say, Nelson Mandela or Idi Amin.



Back to top
 

Estragon: I canít go on like this.
Vladimir: Thatís what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 40109
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #88 - Jun 4th, 2024 at 5:55pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Jun 4th, 2024 at 4:49pm:
Ultimately our ancestry is African, Franko!

A tiny bit of our ancestry is even Neanderthal or Denisovan, pre Homo sapiens species.


Which is rather like the point I made several posts ago.  Soren would never, however admit that he once had black ancestors.   Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.† Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† †Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 40109
Re: australian universities want n16gers too now
Reply #89 - Jun 4th, 2024 at 5:56pm
 
Frank wrote on Jun 4th, 2024 at 4:59pm:
Jovial Monk wrote on Jun 4th, 2024 at 4:49pm:
Ultimately our ancestry is African, Franko!

A tiny bit of our ancestry is even Neanderthal or Denisovan, pre Homo sapiens species.

And so you are a black African, then, like, say, Nelson Mandela or Idi Amin.


See. Soren would hate to admit he once had black ancestors.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.† Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?† Tsk, tsk, tsk...† †Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print