Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 5
th, 2011 at 4:10pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Apr 5
th, 2011 at 2:55pm:
Yet another CC debate with no climate scientist.
Plenty of opinions but no science.
havent you figured it out yet smithy its all about M.O.N.E.Y.
they are running out of ways to T.A.X. us...
it all sounds very warm and fuzzy saying it will cut carbon lol.. I wonder who we will depend on to PROVE that to us... Swan or Garnaut?..
even Garnaut said it would take a thousand years..shows how much faith he has in the science. What Flannery said:
Quote:"If the world as a whole cut all emissions tomorrow, the average temperature of the planet's not going to drop for several hundred years, perhaps over 1000 years."
What Abbott thought he heard:
Quote:"It will not make a difference for 1000 years," the Opposition Leader told parliament."
It does not take a genius to figure out that the point at which it 'makes a difference' is not the same as the point at which temperatures stop climbing and begin to drop.
There are vastly different scenarious that could involve anything from a very gradual rise over the next few centuries to a runaway heating effect.
Even more troubling is the number of people leaping at this with glee thinking they are suddenly onto something, even after it has been explained to them how
Abbott misunderstood a rather simple statement. The media liason people always tell scientists to stop and think about how any statement to the media could be misinterpreted, but there is a limit to how idiot proof we can expect our scientists to make their public statements.