It seems likely.
Follow the money.

Who was the guy who funded Epstein after he emerged from jail as a sex offender with no cash?

How did he get 3 jets and a full surveillance mansion in NY  and 2 islands.

Enter Les Wexner.
The owner of Victoria's secret.
Even leaving aside how this business could be leveraged to induce the powerful men to come to " network".
Les was a totally committed Zionist.

AND he signs over the whole business to Epstein just after Epstein release.

Epstein becomes his full power of attorney.
He gives Epstein 350 million for financial advice, despite Epstein never doing a trade.

Other Jews including trumps best mate and trade secretary Howard lutnick give Epstein real estate in NY for pennies.
Lutnick another ideological jew.

Once we add in father Maxwell's fortune which was never disclosed. Ghillanes brother being deputy head of mossad, it seems so likely.

And why does every politician in Washington seem to be pro Israel?.  I mean good on Israel for securing its safety but it seems pretty blatant that powerful people do NOT step out of line.


And who else might threaten mossad?

Maybe some tech bros, and social media companies, maybe some scientists and maybe some Saudi princes, maybe some Hollywood types and streaming companies.


And who invites these groups to an island resort to network. Picks them up in a private jet and then exerts influence over them.

Notice that the Saudis just recognised the state of Israel.
Notice Netflix won't publish anything on Gaza.
Note Leonardo is on the record as ONLY  dating Victoria's secret models.


Note none of this is going to be released.
You think mossad don't have some control over the information flow in Washington

I see. It's all starting to make sense.

And in return for such internecine financial chicanery and DEEP STATE spookery, what does the big fella do in return?

Hands US foreign policy over to Bibi, bombs Iran and deports every foreign student in the US for writing an essay critical of Israel.

Art of the deal, innit. What kind of man?

Not so much a man as a God...

Melanias purse wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 6:55am:

I see. It's all starting to make sense. And in return for such internecine financial chicanery, what does the big fella do in return? Hands US foreign policy over to Bibi, bombs Iran and deports every foreign student in the US for writing an essay critical of Israel. What kind of man? Not so much a man as a God...

I have NO DOUBT mossad have stuff on Trump and the Clinton's.

Good grief, they would be derelict in their duties not to

And wall Street guys, tech bros.



Hi Facebook. this is mossad on the phone. You posted some stuff about Gaza. We,d like that taken down.

Hi Hollywood star, no trash talking Israel at the academy awards. There's a good boy.

Hi wall Street guy, we'd really appreciate you funding this new iron dome company. There's a good boy.

Your agenda is cunningly displayed by the fact that you even bothered to mention the Clintons, who retired from politics nine years ago.

You're now so desperate you want to play whatabout-that with the Joos?

Strange. You were never an anti-Semite before, but these are the lengths you'll go to protect your DL. These are troubled times indeed.

You're now happy to turn into a rabid Mossad conspiracist merely to take some heat off your DL, but do you know?

You'll ditch this thread like all the others. You're just grasping at straws to divert the blame. You know exactly what your DL got up to on Epstein Island, and it's not pretty.

After all, you gave us your take on the Clintons, who merely flew on the plane. Sheesh, even poor old Bill Gates, who accepted a few Epstein dollars to fight malaria.

Your DL is in this one up to his neck. As soon as you accept this reality, we'll give your fantasies on Mossad the airing they deserve. Until then, enjoy.

DRAIN THE SWAMP !!!

Melanias purse wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 7:47am:

You know exactly what your DL got up to on Epstein Island, and it's not pretty.

Karnal is forgiven for spreading lies about Trump:


https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-says-he-turned-down-invitation-epsteins-island-2025-07-28/


Quote:

Trump flew with Epstein aboard his plane at least six times, according to logs for flights spanning from 1991 through 2005. None of those trips were to Epstein's private island.

Bobby. wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 8:00am:

Melanias purse wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 7:47am: You know exactly what your DL got up to on Epstein Island, and it's not pretty. Karnal is forgiven for spreading lies about Trump: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-says-he-turned-down-invitation-epsteins-island-2025-07-28/ Quote: Trump flew with Epstein aboard his plane at least six times, according to logs for flights spanning from 1991 through 2005. None of those trips were to Epstein's private island.

Oh? You denied he flew on the plane for a good three years, you silly old thing. Now you're fessing up?

Why must the left lie?

Melanias purse wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 8:21am:

Bobby. wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:00am: Melanias purse wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 7:47am: You know exactly what your DL got up to on Epstein Island, and it's not pretty. Karnal is forgiven for spreading lies about Trump: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-says-he-turned-down-invitation-epsteins-island-2025-07-28/ Quote: Trump flew with Epstein aboard his plane at least six times, according to logs for flights spanning from 1991 through 2005. None of those trips were to Epstein's private island. Oh? You denied he flew on the plane for a good three years, you silly old thing. Now you're fessing up? After a ten second Google search? Why must the left lie?

What are you babbling about?   :-/

forgiven

namaste

Bobby. wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 8:24am:

Melanias purse wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:21am: Bobby. wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:00am: Melanias purse wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 7:47am: You know exactly what your DL got up to on Epstein Island, and it's not pretty. Karnal is forgiven for spreading lies about Trump: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-says-he-turned-down-invitation-epsteins-island-2025-07-28/ Quote: Trump flew with Epstein aboard his plane at least six times, according to logs for flights spanning from 1991 through 2005. None of those trips were to Epstein's private island. Oh? You denied he flew on the plane for a good three years, you silly old thing. Now you're fessing up? After a ten second Google search? Why must the left lie? What are you babbling about?   :-/ forgiven namaste

Trying to buy time, are you?

What do you think of Aquascoot's take on Mossad?

Melanias purse wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 8:29am:

Trying to buy time, are you? What do you think of Aquascoot's take on Mossad?

MOSSAD is a secret service so no one knows what they are up to -

any more than the CIA and every other secret, clandestine Govt organisation.

Deep State.

What on earth are you on about karnal?

I'm not trying to defend Trump  ::)

If Trump wasn't at a Victoria's secret party thrown by Epstein who was HANDED control of this billion dollar company. I'd call him a wuss for not going.
Same goes for Bill.

now run along and check it out.
Was Epstein given 100s of millions of dollars by the owner of Victoria's secret and the financial power of attorney over the company?

The wall Street journal reported on it.

It's not a conspiracy theory.
It's one of the VERY FEW facts on the public record.

So let's say it is Mossad.

What then?

What does it change?

Do we forgive Clinton or Trump if they sexually exploited children because it was a clandestine honeypot?

What's the endgame here Scoot?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 10:53am:

So let's say it is Mossad. What then? What does it change? Do we forgive Clinton or Trump if they sexually exploited children because it was a clandestine honeypot? What's the endgame here Scoot?

Not sure Victoria's secret models are children.

It is possible for Epstein to have different clients or lists if you think he wrote them all down.
But the guy kept virtually no records.


He may have had pedophile clients. Disgusting , disgraceful, throw the book at them.

But males nearly all find women in their early 20s the most attractive.
That goes for 13 yo boys, 30 yo , 50 yo, 80 yo

Some like macron like older women

Epstein may have had a MILF list.


But please explain a billion dollar company being handed over to a broke sex offender with no training in finances.
Unless the ultra Orthodox business owner was doing it for a higher purpose.


Go get some random broke sex offender fresh out of prison in Australia and see if any billion dollar businesses want to grant him financial power of attorney.


And go Google Les wexner and Epstein and confirm for yourself courtesy of articles from the wall st journal and the New York times that this happened.


Check out the 100s of millions given by Black and by the CEO of Apollo finance.
Check out the price that Epstein paid Howard lutnik a committed Zionist for the Manhattan mansion.
Check out how many Saudis live next door.
Interesting fact.
It's right next door to a house owned by the Clinton's.
This is all on the public record

For writer who broke Epstein case, a rumored Mossad link is worth digging into
Reporter Julie K. Brown isn’t convinced the accused sex trafficker took his own life, and says associate Robert Maxwell may not have been the only one tied to Israeli intelligence
By JP O’ Malley
26 July 2021

https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-writer-who-broke-epstein-case-a-rumored-mossad-link-is-worth-digging-into/



Even the ABC is talking about it
https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/if-youre-listening/was-jeffrey-epstein-a-mossad-agent/105591934


Robert Maxwell Was a Mossad asset. Ghislaine was his favourite child. The yacht he died on was named Lady Ghislaine. He 'fell off the yacht', like Epstein hanged himself sitting down while BOTH guards slept and the video monitoring malfunctioned.

Frank wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 12:23pm:

For writer who broke Epstein case, a rumored Mossad link is worth digging into Reporter Julie K. Brown isn’t convinced the accused sex trafficker took his own life, and says associate Robert Maxwell may not have been the only one tied to Israeli intelligence By JP O’ Malley 26 July 2021 https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-writer-who-broke-epstein-case-a-rumored-mossad-link-is-worth-digging-into/ Even the ABC is talking about it https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/if-youre-listening/was-jeffrey-epstein-a-mossad-agent/105591934 Robert Maxwell Was a Mossad asset. Ghislaine was his favourite child. The yacht he died on was named Lady Ghislaine. He 'fell off the yacht', like Epstein hanged himself sitting down while BOTH guards slept and the video monitoring malfunctioned.

Seems likely frank.


I know our resident creeps like to show disrespect to the first lady but I saw a guy on sam harris raise another interesting theory.

He confirmed malenia did have a lot of first hand knowledge of child sex trafficking.
And she was repulsed by it.
And she was repulsed by Epstein and she is the reason , Trump cut ties in 2012.
Now the whole world knows Trump cheats, but it's hard to deny he loves his kids and they do seem mature and they do seem to admire their dad.
So gweggy disgusting comments about malenia and Ivanka are not only a disgrace but completely and utterly wrong and doubly reprehensible.
And still no lefties will call him or creepy karnal on it

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 12:18pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 10:53am: So let's say it is Mossad. What then? What does it change? Do we forgive Clinton or Trump if they sexually exploited children because it was a clandestine honeypot? What's the endgame here Scoot? Not sure Victoria's secret models are children. It is possible for Epstein to have different clients or lists if you think he wrote them all down. But the guy kept virtually no records. He may have had pedophile clients. Disgusting , disgraceful, throw the book at them. But males nearly all find women in their early 20s the most attractive. That goes for 13 yo boys, 30 yo , 50 yo, 80 yo Some like macron like older women Epstein may have had a MILF list. But please explain a billion dollar company being handed over to a broke sex offender with no training in finances. Unless the ultra Orthodox business owner was doing it for a higher purpose. Go get some random broke sex offender fresh out of prison in Australia and see if any billion dollar businesses want to grant him financial power of attorney. And go Google Les wexner and Epstein and confirm for yourself courtesy of articles from the wall st journal and the New York times that this happened. Check out the 100s of millions given by Black and by the CEO of Apollo finance. Check out the price that Epstein paid Howard lutnik a committed Zionist for the Manhattan mansion. Check out how many Saudis live next door. Interesting fact. It's right next door to a house owned by the Clinton's. This is all on the public record

You've still not explained why any of this matters.

You've brought this up originally after Trump was linked to the Epstein files which document the abuse of children.

You can't just pretend all that matters is Victoria's Secret models.

What is wrong with you..?!

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 12:49pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 12:18pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 10:53am: So let's say it is Mossad. What then? What does it change? Do we forgive Clinton or Trump if they sexually exploited children because it was a clandestine honeypot? What's the endgame here Scoot? Not sure Victoria's secret models are children. It is possible for Epstein to have different clients or lists if you think he wrote them all down. But the guy kept virtually no records. He may have had pedophile clients. Disgusting , disgraceful, throw the book at them. But males nearly all find women in their early 20s the most attractive. That goes for 13 yo boys, 30 yo , 50 yo, 80 yo Some like macron like older women Epstein may have had a MILF list. But please explain a billion dollar company being handed over to a broke sex offender with no training in finances. Unless the ultra Orthodox business owner was doing it for a higher purpose. Go get some random broke sex offender fresh out of prison in Australia and see if any billion dollar businesses want to grant him financial power of attorney. And go Google Les wexner and Epstein and confirm for yourself courtesy of articles from the wall st journal and the New York times that this happened. Check out the 100s of millions given by Black and by the CEO of Apollo finance. Check out the price that Epstein paid Howard lutnik a committed Zionist for the Manhattan mansion. Check out how many Saudis live next door. Interesting fact. It's right next door to a house owned by the Clinton's. This is all on the public record You've still not explained why any of this matters. You've brought this up originally after Trump was linked to the Epstein files which document the abuse of children. You can't just pretend all that matters is Victoria's Secret models. What is wrong with you..?!

What is wrong with you.
All you care about is TRUMP
You have zero interest in who bankrolled Epstein to buy 3 jets including one that could carry 150 passengers.
Zerointerest in who bankrolled him to buy 7 mansions.

Clearly children were being abused and he was part of a huge network funding it and protecting it.

Trump is a tiny bit player.
If you want to protect kids, you wouldn't be asking why " any of this matters".

Who funded and protected it matters.

Though I suppose all that matters to you is virtue signalling about Trump to creepy gweg and karmal.

What is wrong with you .
Don't answer
TDS  :'(

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 1:20pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 12:49pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 12:18pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 10:53am: So let's say it is Mossad. What then? What does it change? Do we forgive Clinton or Trump if they sexually exploited children because it was a clandestine honeypot? What's the endgame here Scoot? Not sure Victoria's secret models are children. It is possible for Epstein to have different clients or lists if you think he wrote them all down. But the guy kept virtually no records. He may have had pedophile clients. Disgusting , disgraceful, throw the book at them. But males nearly all find women in their early 20s the most attractive. That goes for 13 yo boys, 30 yo , 50 yo, 80 yo Some like macron like older women Epstein may have had a MILF list. But please explain a billion dollar company being handed over to a broke sex offender with no training in finances. Unless the ultra Orthodox business owner was doing it for a higher purpose. Go get some random broke sex offender fresh out of prison in Australia and see if any billion dollar businesses want to grant him financial power of attorney. And go Google Les wexner and Epstein and confirm for yourself courtesy of articles from the wall st journal and the New York times that this happened. Check out the 100s of millions given by Black and by the CEO of Apollo finance. Check out the price that Epstein paid Howard lutnik a committed Zionist for the Manhattan mansion. Check out how many Saudis live next door. Interesting fact. It's right next door to a house owned by the Clinton's. This is all on the public record You've still not explained why any of this matters. You've brought this up originally after Trump was linked to the Epstein files which document the abuse of children. You can't just pretend all that matters is Victoria's Secret models. What is wrong with you..?! What is wrong with you. All you care about is TRUMP You have zero interest in who bankrolled Epstein to buy 3 jets including one that could carry 150 passengers. Zerointerest in who bankrolled him to buy 7 mansions. Clearly children were being abused and he was part of a huge network funding it and protecting it. Trump is a tiny bit player. If you want to protect kids, you wouldn't be asking why " any of this matters". Who funded and protected it matters. Though I suppose all that matters to you is virtue signalling about Trump to creepy gweg and karmal. What is wrong with you . Don't answer TDS  :'(

You brought this up first here,

Is Trump Suppressing The Epstein Files?

In an attempt to sanitise the links between Trump and Epstein.

You were making excuses for that whole disgusting, seedy underbelly.

And your defence is that I have TDS?

By that logic, you're more than simply depending paedophiles...

It's unforgivable.  And the worst part is, you don't seem to have a problem with it since you've started a whole new thread in the same vein.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 1:42pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 1:20pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 12:49pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 12:18pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 10:53am: So let's say it is Mossad. What then? What does it change? Do we forgive Clinton or Trump if they sexually exploited children because it was a clandestine honeypot? What's the endgame here Scoot? Not sure Victoria's secret models are children. It is possible for Epstein to have different clients or lists if you think he wrote them all down. But the guy kept virtually no records. He may have had pedophile clients. Disgusting , disgraceful, throw the book at them. But males nearly all find women in their early 20s the most attractive. That goes for 13 yo boys, 30 yo , 50 yo, 80 yo Some like macron like older women Epstein may have had a MILF list. But please explain a billion dollar company being handed over to a broke sex offender with no training in finances. Unless the ultra Orthodox business owner was doing it for a higher purpose. Go get some random broke sex offender fresh out of prison in Australia and see if any billion dollar businesses want to grant him financial power of attorney. And go Google Les wexner and Epstein and confirm for yourself courtesy of articles from the wall st journal and the New York times that this happened. Check out the 100s of millions given by Black and by the CEO of Apollo finance. Check out the price that Epstein paid Howard lutnik a committed Zionist for the Manhattan mansion. Check out how many Saudis live next door. Interesting fact. It's right next door to a house owned by the Clinton's. This is all on the public record You've still not explained why any of this matters. You've brought this up originally after Trump was linked to the Epstein files which document the abuse of children. You can't just pretend all that matters is Victoria's Secret models. What is wrong with you..?! What is wrong with you. All you care about is TRUMP You have zero interest in who bankrolled Epstein to buy 3 jets including one that could carry 150 passengers. Zerointerest in who bankrolled him to buy 7 mansions. Clearly children were being abused and he was part of a huge network funding it and protecting it. Trump is a tiny bit player. If you want to protect kids, you wouldn't be asking why " any of this matters". Who funded and protected it matters. Though I suppose all that matters to you is virtue signalling about Trump to creepy gweg and karmal. What is wrong with you . Don't answer TDS  :'( You brought this up first here, Is Trump Suppressing The Epstein Files? In an attempt to sanitise the links between Trump and Epstein. You were making excuses for that whole disgusting, seedy underbelly. And your defence is that I have TDS? By that logic, you're more than simply depending paedophiles... It's unforgivable.  And the worst part is, you don't seem to have a problem with it since you've started a whole new thread in the same vein.

You're dumber then John Smith.
I didn't think it possible.
Either that or you're psychotic
What on earth are you on about.


Try hanging out with logical intelligent people like me and frank.
Clearly creepy kooks like pecca and karmal are rotting your 🧠

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 3:15pm:

Try hanging out with logical intelligent people like me and frank.

;D ;D ;D

Are you talking about this sort of intelligence?

Excuse me while I have another good laugh.

;D ;D ;D

Thanks, I feel better now.

:)

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 3:15pm:

You're dumber then John Smith. I didn't think it possible. Either that or you're psychotic What on earth are you on about. Try hanging out with logical intelligent people like me and frank. Clearly creepy kooks like pecca and karmal are rotting your 🧠

Just keep ignoring the question of why any of this nonesense you're posting actually matters and just continue down the Frannie path of personal attacks as your cover.

Even if Mossad was involved, those who ate the honey should still be brought to justice, right?

You're more transparent than you realise.

Epstein died in 2019. Maxwell was tried and found guilty in 2021, sentenced in 2022.  Maxwell's trial covered the period after 2015. Epstein was first publicly accused in 2007.  Trump banned Epstein from his circle about two years earlier.

If Trump had been implicated the Biden admininstration would have released the details. Nothing could have prevented them from doing so. Except that there wasn't anything to imlicate Trump. After all, they impeached him twice and threw endless and various criminal charges at him? Why not sink him with Epstein and Maxwel when they had the power?

Frank wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 4:30pm:

Epstein died in 2019. Maxwell was tried and found guilty in 2021, sentenced in 2022.  Maxwell's trial covered the period after 2015. Epstein was first publicly accused in 2007.  Trump banned Epstein from his circle about two years earlier. If Trump had been implicated the Biden admininstration would have released the details. Nothing could have prevented them from doing so. Except that there wasn't anything to imlicate Trump. After all, they impeached him twice and threw endless and various criminal charges at him? Why not sink him with Epstein and Maxwel when they had the power?

Would you have believed Biden if he did?

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 3:15pm:

You're dumber then John Smith. I didn't think it possible. Either that or you're psychotic What on earth are you on about. Try hanging out with logical intelligent people like me and frank. Clearly creepy kooks like pecca and karmal are rotting your 🧠

My Kanga is not well:


https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/159/104/733/original/e97cdd42a04f2070.jpg

Bobby. wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 4:50pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 3:15pm: You're dumber then John Smith. I didn't think it possible. Either that or you're psychotic What on earth are you on about. Try hanging out with logical intelligent people like me and frank. Clearly creepy kooks like pecca and karmal are rotting your 🧠 My Kanga is not well: https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/159/104/733/original/e97cdd42a04f2070.jpg

You'll get so personal when backed into a corner...

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 4:40pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 4:30pm: Epstein died in 2019. Maxwell was tried and found guilty in 2021, sentenced in 2022.  Maxwell's trial covered the period after 2015. Epstein was first publicly accused in 2007.  Trump banned Epstein from his circle about two years earlier. If Trump had been implicated the Biden admininstration would have released the details. Nothing could have prevented them from doing so. Except that there wasn't anything to imlicate Trump. After all, they impeached him twice and threw endless and various criminal charges at him? Why not sink him with Epstein and Maxwel when they had the power? Would you have believed Biden if he did?

I wouldn't take Biden's word for it, not are we talking about anything like that, silly little teapot.

We are talking about evidence in criminal trials.

Pull your finger outs gweggy creep's arse and focus.

Frank wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 5:07pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 4:40pm: Frank wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 4:30pm: Epstein died in 2019. Maxwell was tried and found guilty in 2021, sentenced in 2022.  Maxwell's trial covered the period after 2015. Epstein was first publicly accused in 2007.  Trump banned Epstein from his circle about two years earlier. If Trump had been implicated the Biden admininstration would have released the details. Nothing could have prevented them from doing so. Except that there wasn't anything to imlicate Trump. After all, they impeached him twice and threw endless and various criminal charges at him? Why not sink him with Epstein and Maxwel when they had the power? Would you have believed Biden if he did? I wouldn't take Biden's word for it, not are we talking about anything like that, silly little teapot. We are talking about evidence in criminal trials. Pull your finger outs gweggy creep's arse and focus.

That's the perfect answer and it confirms exactly why the Epstein files need to be released.

Glad you're finally on side.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 5:09pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 5:07pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 4:40pm: Frank wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 4:30pm: Epstein died in 2019. Maxwell was tried and found guilty in 2021, sentenced in 2022.  Maxwell's trial covered the period after 2015. Epstein was first publicly accused in 2007.  Trump banned Epstein from his circle about two years earlier. If Trump had been implicated the Biden admininstration would have released the details. Nothing could have prevented them from doing so. Except that there wasn't anything to imlicate Trump. After all, they impeached him twice and threw endless and various criminal charges at him? Why not sink him with Epstein and Maxwel when they had the power? Would you have believed Biden if he did? I wouldn't take Biden's word for it, not are we talking about anything like that, silly little teapot. We are talking about evidence in criminal trials. Pull your finger outs gweggy creep's arse and focus. That's the perfect answer and it confirms exactly why the Epstein files need to be released. Glad you're finally on side.

So why didn't they release any Trump -implicating details while Trump's political opponents were in power?? They hounded him with all sorts of criminal charges, and impeached him twice.
Why didn't they stitch him up over Epstein?

Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa gweggy creep's arse.

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 12:33pm:

Frank wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 12:23pm: For writer who broke Epstein case, a rumored Mossad link is worth digging into Reporter Julie K. Brown isn’t convinced the accused sex trafficker took his own life, and says associate Robert Maxwell may not have been the only one tied to Israeli intelligence By JP O’ Malley 26 July 2021 https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-writer-who-broke-epstein-case-a-rumored-mossad-link-is-worth-digging-into/ Even the ABC is talking about it https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/if-youre-listening/was-jeffrey-epstein-a-mossad-agent/105591934 Robert Maxwell Was a Mossad asset. Ghislaine was his favourite child. The yacht he died on was named Lady Ghislaine. He 'fell off the yacht', like Epstein hanged himself sitting down while BOTH guards slept and the video monitoring malfunctioned. Seems likely frank. I know our resident creeps like to show disrespect to the first lady but I saw a guy on sam harris raise another interesting theory. He confirmed malenia did have a lot of first hand knowledge of child sex trafficking. And she was repulsed by it. And she was repulsed by Epstein and she is the reason , Trump cut ties in 2012. Now the whole world knows Trump cheats, but it's hard to deny he loves his kids and they do seem mature and they do seem to admire their dad. So gweggy disgusting comments about malenia and Ivanka are not only a disgrace but completely and utterly wrong and doubly reprehensible. And still no lefties will call him or creepy karnal on it

Jared and Ivanka won't have anything to do with him, Eric and Donny can't get a job anywhere else and Melania wears wide brimmed hats to keep him from kissing her in public.

Still, we got to your real reasons for starting this thread, so good show.

Back to the big fella. You can't get enough, no?

Melanias purse wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 7:28pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 12:33pm: Frank wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 12:23pm: For writer who broke Epstein case, a rumored Mossad link is worth digging into Reporter Julie K. Brown isn’t convinced the accused sex trafficker took his own life, and says associate Robert Maxwell may not have been the only one tied to Israeli intelligence By JP O’ Malley 26 July 2021 https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-writer-who-broke-epstein-case-a-rumored-mossad-link-is-worth-digging-into/ Even the ABC is talking about it https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/if-youre-listening/was-jeffrey-epstein-a-mossad-agent/105591934 Robert Maxwell Was a Mossad asset. Ghislaine was his favourite child. The yacht he died on was named Lady Ghislaine. He 'fell off the yacht', like Epstein hanged himself sitting down while BOTH guards slept and the video monitoring malfunctioned. Seems likely frank. I know our resident creeps like to show disrespect to the first lady but I saw a guy on sam harris raise another interesting theory. He confirmed malenia did have a lot of first hand knowledge of child sex trafficking. And she was repulsed by it. And she was repulsed by Epstein and she is the reason , Trump cut ties in 2012. Now the whole world knows Trump cheats, but it's hard to deny he loves his kids and they do seem mature and they do seem to admire their dad. So gweggy disgusting comments about malenia and Ivanka are not only a disgrace but completely and utterly wrong and doubly reprehensible. And still no lefties will call him or creepy karnal on it Jared and Ivanka won't have anything to do with him, Eric and Donny can't get a job anywhere else and Melania wears wide brimmed hats to keep him from kissing her in public. Still, we got to your real reasons for starting this thread, so good show. Back to the big fella. You can't get enough, no?

The tap-dancing is not up to scratch, grimacing paki.
No bananas, no 10 rupee.

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 12:33pm:

He confirmed malenia did have a lot of first hand knowledge of child sex trafficking. And she was repulsed by it. And she was repulsed by Epstein and she is the reason , Trump cut ties in 2012.

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/569/cpsprodpb/3760/live/19eacef0-6477-11f0-8a1d-ab1c0c4a7e9f.jpg

Trump cut ties with Epstein because he poached his staff.

In particular, the children he had working in the Mar-a-Lago spa.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 7:35pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 12:33pm: He confirmed malenia did have a lot of first hand knowledge of child sex trafficking. And she was repulsed by it. And she was repulsed by Epstein and she is the reason , Trump cut ties in 2012. https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/569/cpsprodpb/3760/live/19eacef0-6477-11f0-8a1d-ab1c0c4a7e9f.jpg Trump cut ties with Epstein because he poached his staff. In particular, the children he had working in the Mar-a-Lago spa.

No good?




In Australia, there isn't a single, nationally consistent minimum working age. While most states and territories have laws regulating child employment, the specific minimum age varies by location and may also depend on the type of work. Generally, 13 or 14 is the age for casual or part-time work

The old boy's right, Greggery. What's wrong with hiring a few Lolitas to hang around the pool looking cute?

They must have enjoyed doing it, or they wouldn't keep turning up to work. They made some valuable connections too, truth be told. The big fella just didn't like anybody else stealing them.

He made sure they all signed non disclosure agreements too, as you do.

Frank wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 5:34pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 5:09pm: Frank wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 5:07pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 4:40pm: Frank wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 4:30pm: Epstein died in 2019. Maxwell was tried and found guilty in 2021, sentenced in 2022.  Maxwell's trial covered the period after 2015. Epstein was first publicly accused in 2007.  Trump banned Epstein from his circle about two years earlier. If Trump had been implicated the Biden admininstration would have released the details. Nothing could have prevented them from doing so. Except that there wasn't anything to imlicate Trump. After all, they impeached him twice and threw endless and various criminal charges at him? Why not sink him with Epstein and Maxwel when they had the power? Would you have believed Biden if he did? I wouldn't take Biden's word for it, not are we talking about anything like that, silly little teapot. We are talking about evidence in criminal trials. Pull your finger outs gweggy creep's arse and focus. That's the perfect answer and it confirms exactly why the Epstein files need to be released. Glad you're finally on side. So why didn't they release any Trump -implicating details while Trump's political opponents were in power?? They hounded him with all sorts of criminal charges, and impeached him twice. Why didn't they stitch him up over Epstein? Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa gweggy creep's arse.

I could only speculate.

I wonder, though, why it matters?  Is it not the right thing to do, release the files, no matter who did or didn't release them before you?

If I had to speculate, I know that the justice system controlled access to sealed documents, not the White House. Many of the files were court‑sealed and only became public after legal processes concluded in early 2024.  That would have been right in the middle of the election cycle.

Now I know from a MAGA and Republican point of view, weaponising that would not have required a second thought.  But given we've seen the Democrats, much to their own detriment, act with a certain level of decorum and "following the rules", both tradition and legal, perhaps they decided that releasing the file during the campaign would do more harm than good to the victims?

I know you would immediately dismiss whatever was in the files if they were released under Biden.  Perhaps people like you were a consideration in the decision also?

Hell, you still to this day claim Trump's felony convictions were political.  And if they had released the files and Trump one, he would have escaped justice just like he did for those convictions.

So what changed?  Why the desire for the release of the files now?

Trump campaigned on releasing them, his team said they had them and were reviewing them for release, there were photo ops with right wing influences holding binders of the phase one of the files for release and many people within Trump's circles said they'd be released and vindicate everything they'd been saying about the Democrats and Elites "on the list".

All of that happened entirely without any Democrats, that was all Trump or his people and their supporters.

Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover.

After everything he said he would do around them and all the conspiracies about his enemies in the files and the vindication his base were certain they'd get with the release, everyone but the most loyal and braindead of his supporters want the files released and those with evidence of abusing children within brought to justice, left, right or President.

It's only those braindead Trump supporters, much like yourself, who have chosen to align themselves with these predators, all because they cannot admit they may have been wrong in supporting those predators all this time.

So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why?

Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/53/da/a2/53daa23a726fe6fc52934216b151d5ba.gif

Frank wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 7:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 7:35pm: aquascoot wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 12:33pm: He confirmed malenia did have a lot of first hand knowledge of child sex trafficking. And she was repulsed by it. And she was repulsed by Epstein and she is the reason , Trump cut ties in 2012. https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/569/cpsprodpb/3760/live/19eacef0-6477-11f0-8a1d-ab1c0c4a7e9f.jpg Trump cut ties with Epstein because he poached his staff. In particular, the children he had working in the Mar-a-Lago spa. No good?

Children massaging fat old men in a spa?

Nah, no good.

No good at all.

Quote:

Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover.

If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges.
Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short?


Ockham's razor.



Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister.

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 11:37am:

Quote: Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover. If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges. Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short? Ockham's razor.

"... the justice system controlled access to sealed documents, not the White House. Many of the files were court‑sealed and only became public after legal processes concluded in early 2024."

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 11:37am:

Quote: Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover. If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges. Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short? Ockham's razor. Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister.

Frank, where's the good faith discussion?

I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return.

Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions.


ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 8:03pm:

So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why? Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse.

Thanks.

And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 11:39am:

Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am: Quote: Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover. If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges. Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short? Ockham's razor. "... the justice system controlled access to sealed documents, not the White House. Many of the files were court‑sealed and only became public after legal processes concluded in early 2024."

No longer?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 11:45am:

Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am: Quote: Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover. If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges. Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short? Ockham's razor. Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister. Frank, where's the good faith discussion? I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return. Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions. ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm: So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why? Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse. Thanks. And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from.

I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't,

Either because they are sealed to protect victims
And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc.

Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects.

Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics.

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 11:57am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:45am: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am: Quote: Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover. If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges. Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short? Ockham's razor. Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister. Frank, where's the good faith discussion? I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return. Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions. ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm: So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why? Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse. Thanks. And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from. I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't, Either because they are sealed to protect victims And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc. Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects. Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics.

So just to clarify, are you suggesting that Trump's potential involvement in the Epstein child trafficking network shouldn't be scrutinised or disclosed because there are other examples of systemic abuse elsewhere?

You brought up an unrelated situation in the UK, seemingly to minimise or distract from what we're discussing, allegations of elite-level child abuse in the United States, potentially involving the president.

Your comment raises a serious concern: are you trying to deflect from Trump's accountability by shifting the focus to a different ethnic group in a different country?

If you genuinely believe these crimes are heinous, then surely you'd want full transparency and justice in all cases, regardless of the political or diplomatic fallout. Otherwise, it starts to look like you're not actually interested in protecting children, but in protecting political idols.

Protecting paedophiles.

I see why you've been so reluctant to answer questions now...  Wow.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 1:05pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:57am: ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:45am: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am: Quote: Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover. If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges. Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short? Ockham's razor. Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister. Frank, where's the good faith discussion? I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return. Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions. ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm: So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why? Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse. Thanks. And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from. I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't, Either because they are sealed to protect victims And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc. Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects. Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics. So just to clarify, are you suggesting that Trump's potential involvement in the Epstein child trafficking network shouldn't be scrutinised or disclosed because there are other examples of systemic abuse elsewhere? You brought up an unrelated situation in the UK, seemingly to minimise or distract from what we're discussing, allegations of elite-level child abuse in the United States, potentially involving the president. Your comment raises a serious concern: are you trying to deflect from Trump's accountability by shifting the focus to a different ethnic group in a different country? If you genuinely believe these crimes are heinous, then surely you'd want full transparency and justice in all cases, regardless of the political or diplomatic fallout. Otherwise, it starts to look like you're not actually interested in protecting children, but in protecting political idols. Protecting paedophiles. I see why you've been so reluctant to answer questions now...  Wow.

I don't think for a moment that Trump is a pedophile or that there is anything in those files to incriminate him.
He said he's never been to the island  - the point of that island is that it is OUTSIDE US jurisdiction.  Being a passenger on a private plane within the US doesn't signify anything.

I don't know why this administration is not releasing the files. I guess it is the same reason the previous admin didn't - which cannot be that they wanted to protect Trump, so that cannot be the reason now either.

If there is dirt on Trump the previous administration would have aired it. There wouldn't be a second Trump presidency because they would have used anything incriminating in those docs.

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 1:47pm:

I don't know why this administration is not releasing the files. I guess it is the same reason the previous admin didn't -

The previous administration didn't spend 4 years saying they would release the files. :D

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 1:47pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:05pm: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:57am: ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:45am: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am: Quote: Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover. If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges. Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short? Ockham's razor. Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister. Frank, where's the good faith discussion? I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return. Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions. ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm: So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why? Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse. Thanks. And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from. I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't, Either because they are sealed to protect victims And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc. Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects. Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics. So just to clarify, are you suggesting that Trump's potential involvement in the Epstein child trafficking network shouldn't be scrutinised or disclosed because there are other examples of systemic abuse elsewhere? You brought up an unrelated situation in the UK, seemingly to minimise or distract from what we're discussing, allegations of elite-level child abuse in the United States, potentially involving the president. Your comment raises a serious concern: are you trying to deflect from Trump's accountability by shifting the focus to a different ethnic group in a different country? If you genuinely believe these crimes are heinous, then surely you'd want full transparency and justice in all cases, regardless of the political or diplomatic fallout. Otherwise, it starts to look like you're not actually interested in protecting children, but in protecting political idols. Protecting paedophiles. I see why you've been so reluctant to answer questions now...  Wow. I don't think for a moment that Trump is a pedophile ...

Grooming 10-year-olds and watching 14-year-olds get undressed seems normal to you?

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:00pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:47pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:05pm: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:57am: ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:45am: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am: Quote: Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover. If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges. Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short? Ockham's razor. Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister. Frank, where's the good faith discussion? I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return. Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions. ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm: So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why? Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse. Thanks. And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from. I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't, Either because they are sealed to protect victims And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc. Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects. Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics. So just to clarify, are you suggesting that Trump's potential involvement in the Epstein child trafficking network shouldn't be scrutinised or disclosed because there are other examples of systemic abuse elsewhere? You brought up an unrelated situation in the UK, seemingly to minimise or distract from what we're discussing, allegations of elite-level child abuse in the United States, potentially involving the president. Your comment raises a serious concern: are you trying to deflect from Trump's accountability by shifting the focus to a different ethnic group in a different country? If you genuinely believe these crimes are heinous, then surely you'd want full transparency and justice in all cases, regardless of the political or diplomatic fallout. Otherwise, it starts to look like you're not actually interested in protecting children, but in protecting political idols. Protecting paedophiles. I see why you've been so reluctant to answer questions now...  Wow. I don't think for a moment that Trump is a pedophile ... Grooming 10-year-olds and watching 14-year-olds get undressed seems normal to you?

Keep your creepy fantasies to yourself creeper

John Smith wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 1:53pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:47pm: I don't know why this administration is not releasing the files. I guess it is the same reason the previous admin didn't - The previous administration didn't spend 4 years saying they would release the files. :D

Because there is no dirt on Trump in them.

They DID spend 8 years hounding him with all sorts of legal cases. Never with these files.
None of which achieved the Dems' goal of preventing Trump's reelection.

Please explain.

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:12pm:

Keep your creepy fantasies to yourself creeper

At least you agree that behaviour is creepy.

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:13pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:47pm: I don't know why this administration is not releasing the files. I guess it is the same reason the previous admin didn't - The previous administration didn't spend 4 years saying they would release the files. :D Because there is no dirt on Trump in them. They DID spend 8 years hounding him with all sorts of legal cases. Never with these files. None of which achieved the Dems' goal of preventing Trump's reelection. Please explain.

So let's release them. Even the lawyer representing Epstein's victims agrees, he supports full disclosure, with redactions only for those victims who wish to remain anonymous. That's the sensible, humane, and just position.

It's a win–win. Transparency, justice, and respect for victims' privacy.

And since your only concern appears to be protecting victim identities, and not shielding anyone named Trump, you should be loudly calling for Trump to sign the executive order and make the files public.

Unless of course, your supposed concern was just a fig leaf for obstruction.

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 11:57am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:45am: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am: Quote: Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover. If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges. Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short? Ockham's razor. Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister. Frank, where's the good faith discussion? I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return. Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions. ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm: So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why? Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse. Thanks. And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from. I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't, Either because they are sealed to protect victims And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc. Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects. Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics.

Exactly right frank. 1400 white teenage runaways taken in a drugged by a Muslim sex ring in rotheram.wiki will inform you if you want to read about true evil. And police powerless because cretins like bwian screamed islamophobia.

Now roo , for the 20 th time, frank is 100 % correct. Biden team had all the Epstein and Maxwell investigations and if there was a shred of evidence incriminating Trump , it would have come out.
It didn't.
Please apologize to frank for saying he is defending pedophiles.
Disgraceful allegation  :-[ :-[ :-[

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:17pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:13pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:47pm: I don't know why this administration is not releasing the files. I guess it is the same reason the previous admin didn't - The previous administration didn't spend 4 years saying they would release the files. :D Because there is no dirt on Trump in them. They DID spend 8 years hounding him with all sorts of legal cases. Never with these files. None of which achieved the Dems' goal of preventing Trump's reelection. Please explain. So let's release them. Even the lawyer representing Epstein's victims agrees, he supports full disclosure, with redactions only for those victims who wish to remain anonymous. That's the sensible, humane, and just position. It's a win–win. Transparency, justice, and respect for victims' privacy. And since your only concern appears to be protecting victim identities, and not shielding anyone named Trump, you should be loudly calling for Trump to sign the executive order and make the files public. Unless of course, your supposed concern was just a fig leaf for obstruction.

For the 20 th time, of this is part of an intelligence operation, ITS NOT GOING TO BE RELEASED

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:22pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:13pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:47pm: I don't know why this administration is not releasing the files. I guess it is the same reason the previous admin didn't - The previous administration didn't spend 4 years saying they would release the files. :D Because there is no dirt on Trump in them. They DID spend 8 years hounding him with all sorts of legal cases. Never with these files. None of which achieved the Dems' goal of preventing Trump's reelection. Please explain. So let's release them. Even the lawyer representing Epstein's victims agrees, he supports full disclosure, with redactions only for those victims who wish to remain anonymous. That's the sensible, humane, and just position. It's a win–win. Transparency, justice, and respect for victims' privacy. And since your only concern appears to be protecting victim identities, and not shielding anyone named Trump, you should be loudly calling for Trump to sign the executive order and make the files public. Unless of course, your supposed concern was just a fig leaf for obstruction. For the 20 th time, of this is part of an intelligence operation, ITS NOT GOING TO BE RELEASED

Don't get us wrong, nobody seriously thinks Trump will release the files. His entire political survival hinges on suppressing inconvenient truths. But that doesn't mean the files shouldn't be released.

The disturbing part isn't just his inaction, it's your defence of it. Instead of demanding transparency, you're bending over backwards to excuse why it won't happen. You're not arguing for justice, you're running interference for a man neck-deep in scandal.

And whether you like it or not, that makes you part of the problem. Another apologist. Another defender of paedophiles.

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:22pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:17pm: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:13pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:47pm: I don't know why this administration is not releasing the files. I guess it is the same reason the previous admin didn't - The previous administration didn't spend 4 years saying they would release the files. :D Because there is no dirt on Trump in them. They DID spend 8 years hounding him with all sorts of legal cases. Never with these files. None of which achieved the Dems' goal of preventing Trump's reelection. Please explain. So let's release them. Even the lawyer representing Epstein's victims agrees, he supports full disclosure, with redactions only for those victims who wish to remain anonymous. That's the sensible, humane, and just position. It's a win–win. Transparency, justice, and respect for victims' privacy. And since your only concern appears to be protecting victim identities, and not shielding anyone named Trump, you should be loudly calling for Trump to sign the executive order and make the files public. Unless of course, your supposed concern was just a fig leaf for obstruction. For the 20 th time, of this is part of an intelligence operation, ITS NOT GOING TO BE RELEASED

So why all the lies?

Why did they say they had the client list on their desk and that they'd release it?

Why all the lies about Epstein's cell?

Why not just tell the truth?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:27pm:

Don't get us wrong, nobody seriously thinks Trump will release the files. His entire political survival hinges on suppressing inconvenient truths.

What inconvenient truths are being suppressed here by the Biden and Trump administrations, teapot?

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:20pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:57am: ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:45am: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am: [quote]Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover. If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges. Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short? Ockham's razor. Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister. Frank, where's the good faith discussion? I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return. Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions. ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm: So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why? Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse. Thanks. And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from. I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't, Either because they are sealed to protect victims And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc. Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects. Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics.

Exactly right frank. 1400 white teenage runaways taken in a drugged by a Muslim sex ring in rotheram.wiki will inform you if you want to read about true evil. And police powerless because cretins like bwian screamed islamophobia.

Now roo , for the 20 th time, frank is 100 % correct. Biden team had all the Epstein and Maxwell investigations and if there was a shred of evidence incriminating Trump , it would have come out.
It didn't.
Please apologize to frank for saying he is defending pedophiles.
Disgraceful allegation  :-[ :-[ :-[/quote]

I won't apologise to him, because he, like you, IS defending paedophiles.

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 3:40pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:27pm: Don't get us wrong, nobody seriously thinks Trump will release the files. His entire political survival hinges on suppressing inconvenient truths. What inconvenient truths are being suppressed here by the Biden and Trump administrations, teapot?

Who the child abusers are.

I don't think it's unreasonable to want them all brought to justice.

https://eclectech.co.uk/stuff/kettle.gif

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 4:19pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:20pm: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:57am: ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:45am: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am: [quote]Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover. If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges. Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short? Ockham's razor. Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister. Frank, where's the good faith discussion? I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return. Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions. ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm: So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why? Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse. Thanks. And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from. I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't, Either because they are sealed to protect victims And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc. Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects. Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics. Exactly right frank. 1400 white teenage runaways taken in a drugged by a Muslim sex ring in rotheram.wiki will inform you if you want to read about true evil. And police powerless because cretins like bwian screamed islamophobia. Now roo , for the 20 th time, frank is 100 % correct. Biden team had all the Epstein and Maxwell investigations and if there was a shred of evidence incriminating Trump , it would have come out. It didn't. Please apologize to frank for saying he is defending pedophiles. Disgraceful allegation  :-[ :-[ :-[/quote] I won't apologise to him, because he, like you, IS defending paedophiles.

Disgraceful allegation

You should be banned

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 4:19pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:20pm: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:57am: ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:45am: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am: [quote]Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover. If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges. Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short? Ockham's razor. Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister. Frank, where's the good faith discussion? I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return. Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions. ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm: So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why? Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse. Thanks. And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from. I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't, Either because they are sealed to protect victims And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc. Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects. Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics. Exactly right frank. 1400 white teenage runaways taken in a drugged by a Muslim sex ring in rotheram.wiki will inform you if you want to read about true evil. And police powerless because cretins like bwian screamed islamophobia. Now roo , for the 20 th time, frank is 100 % correct. Biden team had all the Epstein and Maxwell investigations and if there was a shred of evidence incriminating Trump , it would have come out. It didn't. Please apologize to frank for saying he is defending pedophiles. Disgraceful allegation  :-[ :-[ :-[/quote] I won't apologise to him, because he, like you, IS defending paedophiles.

You are an unmoored, disgraceful, slanderous idiot.

Who are tye pedophiles that are defended here? Who is defending them?

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:13pm:

Because there is no dirt on Trump in them.

If there was no dirt on trump, there is nothing to stop Trump keeping his word


but something tells me he won't, and you'll just keep making excuses :D

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:13pm:

They DID spend 8 years hounding him with all sorts of legal cases.

No

It's not the democrats fault trump is a criminal.

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:12pm:

Keep your creepy fantasies to yourself creeper

Don't you think it's a bit rich you calling anyone a creeper after you claimed it was normal for rich high status men to sleep with children  :D :D :D :D

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:22pm:

For the 20 th time, of this is part of an intelligence operation, ITS NOT GOING TO BE RELEASED

even if you said it 200 times, it still wouldn't be right

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 5:20pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 4:19pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:20pm: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:57am: ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:45am: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am: [quote]Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover. If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges. Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short? Ockham's razor. Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister. Frank, where's the good faith discussion? I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return. Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions. ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm: So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why? Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse. Thanks. And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from. I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't, Either because they are sealed to protect victims And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc. Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects. Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics. Exactly right frank. 1400 white teenage runaways taken in a drugged by a Muslim sex ring in rotheram.wiki will inform you if you want to read about true evil. And police powerless because cretins like bwian screamed islamophobia. Now roo , for the 20 th time, frank is 100 % correct. Biden team had all the Epstein and Maxwell investigations and if there was a shred of evidence incriminating Trump , it would have come out. It didn't. Please apologize to frank for saying he is defending pedophiles. Disgraceful allegation  :-[ :-[ :-[/quote] I won't apologise to him, because he, like you, IS defending paedophiles. You are an unmoored, disgraceful, slanderous idiot. Who are tye pedophiles that are defended here? Who is defending them?

Epstein for one.

Scoot's desperate attempts to rebrand himself as "not a child abuse apologist" because of his unwavering loyalty to Trump are as pathetic as they are transparent.

He's now downplaying Epstein's crimes by claiming the girls were just "homeless teens he befriended", or that what happened on the island was nothing more than elite parties, not the documented trafficking and child abuse.  Another way he's been doing this is by pointing to children being drugged and gang raped elsewhere as if that excuses what happened on the island.

And you're no better, grasping at any distraction to sanitise what happened. Your latest rhetorical sleight of hand was to point the finger at "Pakis in Britain", as if invoking a different set of monstrous crimes somehow exonerates Epstein and his network of wealthy predators.

Get angry at me if you must, but the record is clear and your conduct is indefensible. While I've been consistent in calling for all abusers, no matter how rich, powerful, or politically aligned, to face justice, you've been tirelessly working to muddy the waters, offering up excuses and minimisations.

You're not exposing hypocrisy. You are the hypocrisy.

I have nothing to apologise for, my conscience is clear.

Stop defending paedophiles.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 7:48pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 5:20pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 4:19pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:20pm: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:57am: ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:45am: Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am: [quote]Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover. If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges. Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short? Ockham's razor. Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister. Frank, where's the good faith discussion? I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return. Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions. ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm: So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why? Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse. Thanks. And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from. I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't, Either because they are sealed to protect victims And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc. Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects. Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics. Exactly right frank. 1400 white teenage runaways taken in a drugged by a Muslim sex ring in rotheram.wiki will inform you if you want to read about true evil. And police powerless because cretins like bwian screamed islamophobia. Now roo , for the 20 th time, frank is 100 % correct. Biden team had all the Epstein and Maxwell investigations and if there was a shred of evidence incriminating Trump , it would have come out. It didn't. Please apologize to frank for saying he is defending pedophiles. Disgraceful allegation  :-[ :-[ :-[/quote] I won't apologise to him, because he, like you, IS defending paedophiles. You are an unmoored, disgraceful, slanderous idiot. Who are tye pedophiles that are defended here? Who is defending them? Epstein for one. Scoot's desperate attempts to rebrand himself as "not a child abuse apologist" because of his unwavering loyalty to Trump are as pathetic as they are transparent. He's now downplaying Epstein's crimes by claiming the girls were just "homeless teens he befriended", or that what happened on the island was nothing more than elite parties, not the documented trafficking and child abuse.  Another way he's been doing this is by pointing to children being drugged and gang raped elsewhere as if that excuses what happened on the island. And you're no better, grasping at any distraction to sanitise what happened. Your latest rhetorical sleight of hand was to point the finger at "Pakis in Britain", as if invoking a different set of monstrous crimes somehow exonerates Epstein and his network of wealthy predators. Get angry at me if you must, but the record is clear and your conduct is indefensible. While I've been consistent in calling for all abusers, no matter how rich, powerful, or politically aligned, to face justice, you've been tirelessly working to muddy the waters, offering up excuses and minimisations. You're not exposing hypocrisy. You are the hypocrisy. I have nothing to apologise for, my conscience is clear. Stop defending paedophiles.

Why must the left lie.
Find the post where I downplayed Epstein crimes as him befriending homeless girls


Why must the left lie.

Try to be honest debaters like me and frank

An apology would be a good way to reduce your smug hypocrisy.

John Smith wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 6:53pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:22pm: For the 20 th time, of this is part of an intelligence operation, ITS NOT GOING TO BE RELEASED even if you said it 200 times, it still wouldn't be right

John , please, you are a bad influence on roo.
Every time he reads one of your posts he loses 10 IQ Points .
He is starting rival you .
I didn't think it possible but he may claim the wooden spoon from you

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 8:04pm:

Why must the left lie. Find the post where I downplayed Epstein crimes as him befriending homeless girls Why must the left lie. Try to be honest debaters like me and frank An apology would be a good way to reduce your smug hypocrisy.

The mere fact that you refer to it as "befriending homeless girls" when it was actually exploiting, raped, and trafficking them, is disgusting.

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 8:04pm:

Try to be honest masdebaters like me and frank

::)

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 8:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 6:53pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:22pm: For the 20 th time, of this is part of an intelligence operation, ITS NOT GOING TO BE RELEASED even if you said it 200 times, it still wouldn't be right John , please, you are a bad influence on roo. Every time he reads one of your posts he loses 10 IQ Points . He is starting rival you . I didn't think it possible but he may claim the wooden spoon from you

when will you stop defending and making excuses for pedophiles? do you abuse your horses as well ? a bit Kinky are you?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 8:25pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 8:04pm: Why must the left lie. Find the post where I downplayed Epstein crimes as him befriending homeless girls Why must the left lie. Try to be honest debaters like me and frank An apology would be a good way to reduce your smug hypocrisy. The mere fact that you refer to it as "befriending homeless girls" when it was actually exploiting, raped, and trafficking them, is disgusting.

befriending homeless, children asking to be raped just to be in a rich mans orbit, girls wanting to be abused by superior men .. there's no excuse horseboy won't try ::)

John Smith wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 8:28pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 8:04pm: Try to be honest masdebaters like me and frank ::)

Changing posts like this gets people banned, you know, thick *ucking eejit.

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 9:20pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 8:28pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 8:04pm: Try to be honest masdebaters like me and frank ::) Changing po...

::)

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 9:23pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 9:20pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 8:28pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 8:04pm: Try to be honest masdebaters like me and frank ::) Changing po... ::)

Nobody is more repulsive and despicable than you, revolting clammy wanker.
You stand alone, stinking, revolting shhit.

Your parents look down on you and retch. Like we all do.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 8:25pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 8:04pm: Why must the left lie. Find the post where I downplayed Epstein crimes as him befriending homeless girls Why must the left lie. Try to be honest debaters like me and frank An apology would be a good way to reduce your smug hypocrisy. The mere fact that you refer to it as "befriending homeless girls" when it was actually exploiting, raped, and trafficking them, is disgusting.

Downplaying Epstein and the big fella's crimes as a bit of good, clean fun's pretty naughty too, wouldn't you say?

What's disgusting is demanding an apology from those who quote your own words back to you.

Aquascoot spent months demanding the arrest of one Bill, the old dog, Clinton. Now his DL's cover's been blown, he's had a change of heart. Just a bit of harmless kiddie-fiddling, they all do it, nothing to see here.

Oh, and look over there - it's the Joos !!!!

Do try to be an honest debater, Sad, just like Aquascoot and poor old Franny.

WITCH HUNT !!!

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 9:23pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 9:20pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 8:28pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 8:04pm: Try to be honest masdebaters like me and frank ::) Changing po... ::)

Now now, Greggery, no one has the right to not be offended, no?

SO UNFAIR !!!

We can clear this up right now, Frank and Scoot,

IF Trump were in the Epstein files and there was proof he sexually abused children, would you still defend him?

Would you:

A.) Continue to excuse it under the guise of Presidential immunity, support some Orwellian self‑pardon or any other excuse?

B.) Or would you, for once, show a shred of principle and demand he be brought to justice like any other predator?

A or B?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 7:14am:

We can clear this up right now, Frank and Scoot, IF Trump were in the Epstein files and there was proof he sexually abused children, would you still defend him? Would you: A.) Continue to excuse it under the guise of Presidential immunity, support some Orwellian self‑pardon or any other excuse? B.) Or would you, for once, show a shred of principle and demand he be brought to justice like any other predator? A or B?

You left out C, Sad. They disagwee with the very pwemise.

D. Whatabout Hillary's emails?

E. Fwank forgets what E is for, and

F. Why must the left lie?

Melanias purse wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 7:25am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 2nd, 2025 at 7:14am: We can clear this up right now, Frank and Scoot, IF Trump were in the Epstein files and there was proof he sexually abused children, would you still defend him? Would you: A.) Continue to excuse it under the guise of Presidential immunity, support some Orwellian self‑pardon or any other excuse? B.) Or would you, for once, show a shred of principle and demand he be brought to justice like any other predator? A or B? You left out C, Sad. They disagwee with the very pwemise. D. Whatabout Hillary's emails? E. Fwank forgets what E is for, and F. Why must the left lie?

Possibly, but this shouldn't be a hard question for them to answer, especially if they're adamant that they're not defending paedophiles.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 7:14am:

We can clear this up right now, Frank and Scoot, IF Trump were in the Epstein files and there was proof he sexually abused children, would you still defend him? Would you: A.) Continue to excuse it under the guise of Presidential immunity, support some Orwellian self‑pardon or any other excuse? B.) Or would you, for once, show a shred of principle and demand he be brought to justice like any other predator? A or B?

No answer.

That says a lot.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 7:14am:

We can clear this up right now, Frank and Scoot, IF Trump were in the Epstein files and there was proof he sexually abused children, would you still defend him?

Of course not. Why would anyone??

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 9:20pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 8:28pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 8:04pm: Try to be honest masdebaters like me and frank ::) Changing posts like this gets people banned, you know I'm a thick *ucking eejit.

Yes, I know

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 7:14am:

We can clear this up right now, Frank and Scoot, IF Trump were in the Epstein files and there was proof he sexually abused children, would you still defend him? Would you: A.) Continue to excuse it under the guise of Presidential immunity, support some Orwellian self‑pardon or any other excuse? B.) Or would you, for once, show a shred of principle and demand he be brought to justice like any other predator? A or B?

I haven't read past this post yet, but I'm betting they run :D

Frank wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 11:40pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 2nd, 2025 at 7:14am: We can clear this up right now, Frank and Scoot, IF Trump were in the Epstein files and there was proof he sexually abused children, would you still defend him? Of course not. Why would anyone??

I genuinely appreciate you not ignoring the question and providing what any reasonable person would expect is the only real possible answer to it.

Thank you.

To answer your follow-up, why would anyone still support Trump if he were in the Epstein files and there was proof he abused children?

Let's be frank, the same reasons you do now.  You choose to ignore the inconvenient truths.

And we're not talking about how he eats a burrito bowl, or his choice of wearing a tan suit.

Here is a short list of the things you currently ignore about Trump to continue to support him, in just this area alone:

- Over two dozen public allegations of sexual assault or misconduct,
- His own recorded admission to grabbing women without consent,
- The lawsuit alleging he raped a 13-year-old at an Epstein-hosted party,
- The repeated sexualisation of minors, including his comments about his own daughter,
- The credible claims that Epstein recruited girls from Mar-a-Lago, which Trump oversaw and recently admitted to,
- His sycophantic treatment of Ghislaine Maxwell, even after her conviction,
- His outright lies about the Epstein files being fake, missing, or non-existent,
- The appointment of loyalists like Kash Patel to mislead the public about what's in those files,
- His dodging of questions from the press, refusal to declassify or release the files as promised,
- His use of congressional allies to block transparency efforts, shut down votes, and kill subpoenas.

You already support him despite all of that.

You've ignored overwhelming red flags, legal, moral, and personal, because the cult of personality is stronger than the facts.

You ask, ‘Why would anyone?' while refusing even to pause and question your own loyalties in the face of damning patterns.

So don't pretend it's unthinkable. You've already shown it's entirely thinkable and in practice what you're doing now.

Do you honestly expect any of us to believe that anything in the Epstein files would change your mind?

And if so, what would it take?  What burden of evidence would need to be known or even released from the Epstein files to change your mind?

August 15th is going to be an interesting day.

Quote:

To answer your follow-up, why would anyone still support Trump if he were in the Epstein files and there was proof he abused children?

Biden/Harris/Pelosi would have released such details years ago.

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 11:01am:

Quote: To answer your follow-up, why would anyone still support Trump if he were in the Epstein files and there was proof he abused children? Biden/Harris/Pelosi would have released such details years ago.

Game set and match Frank.


As if roo can argue that they would have tried to protect Trump.

Part of trying to help the lefties with TDS is to get them to admit to their addiction.
Only then can we help them walk the path to legitimate self respect and honest self appraisal.
A difficult task, but logical thinking , such as your post , may be the first step.
They are our fellow human beings and we must remain compassionate as they take baby steps towards better mental health

Stop defending paedophiles.

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 11:01am:

Quote: To answer your follow-up, why would anyone still support Trump if he were in the Epstein files and there was proof he abused children? Biden/Harris/Pelosi would have released such details years ago.

This has been explained to you before, Frannie.

The courts wouldn't have granted their requests to release the details.

Stop defending paedophiles and rapists.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 12:58pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 11:01am: Quote: To answer your follow-up, why would anyone still support Trump if he were in the Epstein files and there was proof he abused children? Biden/Harris/Pelosi would have released such details years ago. This has been explained to you before, Frannie. The courts wouldn't have granted their requests to release the details. Stop defending paedophiles and rapists.

Trump is innocent.

Stop condemning an innocent man.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 12:58pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 11:01am: Quote: To answer your follow-up, why would anyone still support Trump if he were in the Epstein files and there was proof he abused children? Biden/Harris/Pelosi would have released such details years ago. This has been explained to you before, Frannie. The courts wouldn't have granted their requests to release the details.

Well, if so -  what's changed since? When? How?

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 1:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 12:58pm: Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 11:01am: Quote: To answer your follow-up, why would anyone still support Trump if he were in the Epstein files and there was proof he abused children? Biden/Harris/Pelosi would have released such details years ago. This has been explained to you before, Frannie. The courts wouldn't have granted their requests to release the details. Well, if so -  what's changed since? When? How?

a farkwit who doesn't care what the courts say won the oval office after spending 4 years saying he WOULD release the files

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 1:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 12:58pm: Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 11:01am: Quote: To answer your follow-up, why would anyone still support Trump if he were in the Epstein files and there was proof he abused children? Biden/Harris/Pelosi would have released such details years ago. This has been explained to you before, Frannie. The courts wouldn't have granted their requests to release the details. Well, if so -  what's changed since?

A dictator who doesn't follow court orders is in the White House now.

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 12:53pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 11:01am: Quote: To answer your follow-up, why would anyone still support Trump if he were in the Epstein files and there was proof he abused children? Biden/Harris/Pelosi would have released such details years ago. Game set and match Frank. As if roo can argue that they would have tried to protect Trump. Part of trying to help the lefties with TDS is to get them to admit to their addiction. Only then can we help them walk the path to legitimate self respect and honest self appraisal. A difficult task, but logical thinking , such as your post , may be the first step. They are our fellow human beings and we must remain compassionate as they take baby steps towards better mental health

If Trump isn't in the files, release them.

The only reason to keep hiding them, especially when multiple reports suggest Trump is all over them, is precisely because he's in them. Release the files. Prove his innocence.

You know, like he demanded of Obama and his birth certificate. If it was good enough for Trump to hound someone else over, then it's good enough for him to be held to the same standard. Otherwise, it's just another example of his pathological hypocrisy.

Legally, sure, he's entitled to the presumption of innocence in a court of law. But in the court of public opinion? He's a paedophile and a child rapist. There is no other coherent explanation for the obsessive secrecy, the endless lies, the projection, the distractions, including the current attempt to provoke war with Russia.

This is a man who's spent his life abusing women, sexualising his own daughter, and boasting about his close friendship with Epstein, a convicted child trafficker. Where there's smoke, there's usually fire. And in Trump's case, it's an inferno that stinks of predation and guilt.

He campaigned on releasing the files. He lied. Then lied again. Now he's suppressing the evidence, manipulating video that he claims is "raw footage", while his supporters run cover and pretend it's all just a leftie delusion.

Let's be blunt: when you defend this, when you try to sanitise the crimes of Epstein and Maxwell, you're not some neutral observer. You're aligning yourself with predators. You're standing against victims. You're advertising, loudly, that you'd rather defend child rapists than seek justice for those they destroyed.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2025 at 7:14am:

We can clear this up right now, Frank and Scoot, IF Trump were in the Epstein files and there was proof he sexually abused children, would you still defend him? Would you: A.) Continue to excuse it under the guise of Presidential immunity, support some Orwellian self‑pardon or any other excuse? B.) Or would you, for once, show a shred of principle and demand he be brought to justice like any other predator? A or B?

Would you care to answer Scoot?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 4:46pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 2nd, 2025 at 7:14am: We can clear this up right now, Frank and Scoot, IF Trump were in the Epstein files and there was proof he sexually abused children, would you still defend him? Would you: A.) Continue to excuse it under the guise of Presidential immunity, support some Orwellian self‑pardon or any other excuse? B.) Or would you, for once, show a shred of principle and demand he be brought to justice like any other predator? A or B? Would you care to answer Scoot?

If there was proof Trump had sex with children he deserves death.
What a disgusting piece of scum that would make him.

Now , where's your proof.
It's a disgusting thing to say without proof.

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 5:39pm:

Now , where's your proof.

what would you consider sufficient proof? these were kids and you can't honestly expect video footage of it happening to show up.

John Smith wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 5:43pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 5:39pm: Now , where's your proof. what would you consider sufficient proof? these were kids and you can't honestly expect video footage of it happening to show up.

Proof would be if gweggy said it happened.
That seems to be the current standard of proof on ozpol :-?

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 5:43pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 5:39pm: Now , where's your proof. what would you consider sufficient proof? these were kids and you can't honestly expect video footage of it happening to show up. Proof would be if gweggy said it happened. That seems to be the current standard of proof on ozpol :-?

Gee, how'd i know you would run away :D :D

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 5:39pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 4:46pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 2nd, 2025 at 7:14am: We can clear this up right now, Frank and Scoot, IF Trump were in the Epstein files and there was proof he sexually abused children, would you still defend him? Would you: A.) Continue to excuse it under the guise of Presidential immunity, support some Orwellian self‑pardon or any other excuse? B.) Or would you, for once, show a shred of principle and demand he be brought to justice like any other predator? A or B? Would you care to answer Scoot? If there was proof Trump had sex with children he deserves death. What a disgusting piece of scum that would make him. Now , where's your proof. It's a disgusting thing to say without proof.

Asking you if you'd want Trump to face justice if it turned out he had abused children is disgusting, but him saying:

– "If Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her."
– "She does have a very nice figure... If she weren't my daughter..."
– Agreeing when Howard Stern said, "Can I call your daughter a piece of ass?"
– Telling a 10-year-old girl, "I am going to be dating her in ten years."
– Bragging about walking into dressing rooms of teenage pageant contestants while they were undressed, saying, "I'm inspecting... they're standing there with no clothes."
– Multiple contestants from Miss Teen USA confirming that Trump entered dressing rooms while girls as young as 15 were changing.
– Boasting on tape, "Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything."

Not only is none of that disgusting to you, but it's worth getting behind?

Spare me the faux outrage Scoot.  Pretend to clutch your pears with someone more gullible than me.

So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20.

Is that pedophillia Skippy.

Spare me the fake outrage.  ::)

Actually spare me the virtue signalling.

Most men find 20 yo women attractive.

If you have a fat unattractive intimate partner, don't take it out on Trump.

If like gweg and karnal you don't even HAVE an intimate partner

Don't tell us you know several men who have slept with Melania , sorry,  "the whore" and her vagina smelt like a tuna that had been in the sun for a week.

I think we can all see who has a messed up way of dealing with women

Maybe the left could get the plank out of their own eye before noticing the splinter in Trump's.

Disgraceful hypocrisy  :'( :'(

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:36pm:

So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. Is that pedophillia Skippy. Spare me the fake outrage.

so you look at 10 yr olds and decide you're going to date them when they're older?  :D :D :D :D

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:36pm:

Most men find 20 yo women attractive.

She was TEN YEARS OLD you dumbfuck

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:19pm:

Asking you if you'd want Trump to face justice if it turned out he had abused children is disgusting, but him saying: – "If Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her." – "She does have a very nice figure... If she weren't my daughter..." – Agreeing when Howard Stern said, "Can I call your daughter a piece of ass?" – Telling a 10-year-old girl, "I am going to be dating her in ten years." – Bragging about walking into dressing rooms of teenage pageant contestants while they were undressed, saying, "I'm inspecting... they're standing there with no clothes." – Multiple contestants from Miss Teen USA confirming that Trump entered dressing rooms while girls as young as 15 were changing. – Boasting on tape, "Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything." Not only is none of that disgusting to you, but it's worth getting behind? Spare me the faux outrage Scoot.  Pretend to clutch your pears with someone more gullible than me.

Kanga,
when you hang a man you better look at him:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZTe-_yqmhQ

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:36pm:

So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20.

He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her.

Stop defending monsters.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:52pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters.

I wonder if horseboy thinks the same thing when he see's a 10yr old? ::)

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:52pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters.

He likes 20 yos.
Monica Lewinsky age.
Pedophillia ?


Why must the left lie and lie and lie

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:52pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters.

Greggy,
when you hang a man you better look at him.

John Smith wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. I wonder if horseboy thinks the same thing when he see's a 10yr old? ::)

Aisha was 6 when Mohammed 'looked at her', and 9 when he started raping her.

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. He likes 20 yos. Monica Lewinsky age. Pedophillia ?

He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her.

Stop defending monsters.

John Smith wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:56pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. I wonder if horseboy thinks the same thing when he see's a 10yr old? ::)

Why are the left so creepy.
Keep your dark fantasies to yourself creeper

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. He likes 20 yos. Monica Lewinsky age. Pedophillia ? Why must the left lie and lie and lie

do you often look at 10yr olds and decide you want to screw them when they're 20yrs old?

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:59pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. He likes 20 yos. Monica Lewinsky age. Pedophillia ? He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters.

YOU think about rape 24/7 for decades.
YOU post about the odour of women you have never met vagina

Stop BEING a monster


Creeper

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:59pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:56pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. I wonder if horseboy thinks the same thing when he see's a 10yr old? ::) Why are the left so creepy. Keep your dark fantasies to yourself creeper

creepy is looking at a 10yr old and deciding you want to screw her when she's older. Why do you defend that sort of creepiness?

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 7:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:59pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. He likes 20 yos. Monica Lewinsky age. Pedophillia ? He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. YOU think about rape 24/7 for decades. YOU post about the odour of women you have never met vagina Stop BEING a monster Creeper

;D ;D

keep trying dumbarse, only one of you looks like a creep....... and it's ain't Greg :D :D

John Smith wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 7:00pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. He likes 20 yos. Monica Lewinsky age. Pedophillia ? Why must the left lie and lie and lie do you often look at 10yr olds and decide you want to screw them when they're 20yrs old?

I have a very hot partner.
But I can see by the way you are triggered , you are probably guilty of such dark thoughts

Disturbing

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:59pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:56pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. I wonder if horseboy thinks the same thing when he see's a 10yr old? ::) Aisha was 6 when Mohammed 'looked at her', and 9 when he started raping her.

Now Mohammed has 1.5 billion adoring followers and emulators. You mongs are cool with all that.

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 6:59pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:56pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. I wonder if horseboy thinks the same thing when he see's a 10yr old? ::) Aisha was 6 when Mohammed 'looked at her', and 9 when he started raping her.

and that's an excuse for Horseboy doing it?

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 7:04pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:59pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:56pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. I wonder if horseboy thinks the same thing when he see's a 10yr old? ::) Aisha was 6 when Mohammed 'looked at her', and 9 when he started raping her. Now Mohammed has 1.5 billion adoring followers and emulators. You mongs are cool with all that.

I see, so you think molesting kids makes you popular? First mohammed, now Trump. Who else is trying to be popular do you think Frank?

John Smith wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 7:08pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 7:04pm: Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:59pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:56pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. I wonder if horseboy thinks the same thing when he see's a 10yr old? ::) Aisha was 6 when Mohammed 'looked at her', and 9 when he started raping her. Now Mohammed has 1.5 billion adoring followers and emulators. You mongs are cool with all that. I see, so you think molesting kids makes you popular? First mohammed, now Trump. Who else is trying to be popular do you think Frank?

So Mohammed is popular with Muslims because he was a kiddie fiddler and a looting, murdering robbery baron?

I thought so but glad to see you coming around, thicko.

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 7:10pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 7:08pm: Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 7:04pm: Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:59pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:56pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. I wonder if horseboy thinks the same thing when he see's a 10yr old? ::) Aisha was 6 when Mohammed 'looked at her', and 9 when he started raping her. Now Mohammed has 1.5 billion adoring followers and emulators. You mongs are cool with all that. I see, so you think molesting kids makes you popular? First mohammed, now Trump. Who else is trying to be popular do you think Frank? So Mohammed is popular with Muslims because he was a kiddie fiddler and a looting, murdering robbery baron? I thought so but glad to see you coming around, thicko.

you'll have to ask them why he's popular with them Frankie. Just like I'm asking you is that why you are such a fan of Trump? Care to answer?

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 7:10pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 7:08pm: Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 7:04pm: Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:59pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:56pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. I wonder if horseboy thinks the same thing when he see's a 10yr old? ::) Aisha was 6 when Mohammed 'looked at her', and 9 when he started raping her. Now Mohammed has 1.5 billion adoring followers and emulators. You mongs are cool with all that. I see, so you think molesting kids makes you popular? First mohammed, now Trump. Who else is trying to be popular do you think Frank? So Mohammed is popular with Muslims because he was a kiddie fiddler and a looting, murdering robbery baron?

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/976/cpsprodpb/79ED/production/_96131213_71dda52d-f164-4b61-988e-d6661490fa47.jpg

John Smith wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 7:13pm:

Just like I'm asking you is that why you are such a fan of Trump? Care to answer?

I like that he is very effectively pushing back against pwoggy madness on every front.

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 8:06pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 7:13pm: Just like I'm asking you is that why you are such a fan of Trump? Care to answer? I like that he is very effectively pushing back against pwoggy madness on every front.

probably the same reason lots of muslims like mohammed. And like them, you use your politics to excuse kiddy fiddlers ::)

Frank wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 7:04pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:59pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:56pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. I wonder if horseboy thinks the same thing when he see's a 10yr old? ::) Aisha was 6 when Mohammed 'looked at her', and 9 when he started raping her. Now Mohammed has 1.5 billion adoring followers and emulators. You mongs are cool with all that.

How about that. They're all as bad as each other, is it?

The old boy gives the big fella the all-clear. For political reasons.

Moh did it too, no?

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 7:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:59pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:58pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. He likes 20 yos. Monica Lewinsky age. Pedophillia ? He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. YOU think about rape 24/7 for decades. YOU post about the odour of women you have never met vagina Stop BEING a monster Creeper

Now now, dear. You're educating us, remember?


aquascoot wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 12:53pm:

They are our fellow human beings and we must remain compassionate as they take baby steps towards better mental health

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 7:03pm:

I have a very hot partner.

Aquascoot's right, leftards. He's had Mrs Scoot put on meds and he's found himself a very hot partner.

The pretty young thing won the wet T shirt competition at the Hog's Breath Tavern three times in a row. She's a hard little worker too, a real goer.

Aquascoot's thinking of sponsoring her brothers to come down from Manila. They may be able to help move some of that Amway stock Mrs Scoot couldn't sell.

Sad? Your intimate partner might be interested in the herbal weight loss supplements.

Lose weight now ask me how, no?

John Smith wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 7:08pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 7:04pm: Frank wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:59pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:56pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:52pm: aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 6:36pm: So he wants to date a 10 yo when she hits 20. He looked at a 10-year-old, and the first thing he thought of was when he could have sex with her. Stop defending monsters. I wonder if horseboy thinks the same thing when he see's a 10yr old? ::) Aisha was 6 when Mohammed 'looked at her', and 9 when he started raping her. Now Mohammed has 1.5 billion adoring followers and emulators. You mongs are cool with all that. I see, so you think molesting kids makes you popular? First mohammed, now Trump. Who else is trying to be popular do you think Frank?

Not good at math are you.

Frank points out Muhammed wife was 9....pedophillia.


I point out Trump, Clinton, Leo de caprio ,   Harrison Ford like 20 yos....not pedophillia.

Did anyone call Bill a pedophile ?

Good luck to him

Don't be jealous because 20 yos aren't attracted to you.

Jealousy is a curse.
:'( :'(

Melanias purse wrote on Aug 3^rd, 2025 at 10:28pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 3rd, 2025 at 7:03pm: I have a very hot partner. Aquascoot's right, leftards. He's had Mrs Scoot put on meds and he's found himself a very hot partner. The pretty young thing won the wet T shirt competition at the Hog's Breath Tavern three times in a row. She's a hard little worker too, a real goer. Aquascoot's thinking of sponsoring her brothers to come down from Manila. They may be able to help move some of that Amway stock Mrs Scoot couldn't sell. Sad? Your intimate partner might be interested in the herbal weight loss supplements. Lose weight now ask me how, no?

My partner is hot.
So is malenia.


It's interesting you and Greg feel the need to debase hot women

Probably jealousy.
You would probably both key some successful guys car .

Now , let me be of assistance.
You don't have to be jealous.

If you could be fun, be creative, be the source of good emotions, learn to project your voice, be great socially, you could walk into a social situation and create attraction.

Be unstifled, free associating, riffing, controlling the vibe.

Maintaining frame.

It's funny because I went thru a rough patch financially way back.
And I asked my wife did she ever think of leaving.

God no , she said
You remained up beat, light hearted and optimistic.

Then she said something telling
If you had been a little cry baby and got depressed about it and let it affect you, things might have been different.


Frame control, karnal, frame control.

Always act like you can handle this, you've got this covered. You know what your doing and they will be attracted to you.
Act like a crying child and they will think you are another child they have to care for.
Nothing is more unattractive to a woman then a man full of self pity .

https://youtu.be/PIJgH8QEo-Y