The Comparison of Mean IQ in Muslim and Non-Muslim Countries
Donald I. Templer

Abstract

The present research found that the Muslim country mean IQ of 81 is half a standard deviation below the mean IQ of non-Muslim nations and is not related to strength of Muslim culture as defined by the percentage of Muslims in the country. The mean IQ of 84 in Arab countries is not associated with per capita income and is incompatible with the intellectual achievements of the golden age of the Muslim Empire. Possible explanations for this decline include hybridization with sub-Saharan Africans, dysgenic decrease in the more educated Muslims employing birth control as suggested by Meisenberg, the Muslim religion not fostering critical thinking, and the intellectual contributions being both exaggerated and made by non-Muslims.

http://donalditempler.com/assets/templer_8.pdf



Given the mean IQ is 81 highlights the problems of communication, learning ability and ability for rational reason. Bear that in mind when conversing or getting one too upset.

At a guess I'd say the mean IQ of the muslim apologist would be around 81 as well or possibly less.

So as a rule of thumb  when conversing with muslims or apologists keep it simple.

With all due respect, James. That's a load of crap. It couldn't be any higher than 50.

"Muslim's have a mean IQ of 81"

Still more than James and Mr Hammer combined.

Peccer exercising his apologist IQ of 81 or less ;D

Noam Chomsky:


"Surely people differ in their biologically determined qualities. The world would be too horrible to contemplate if they did not. But discovery of a correlation between some of these qualities is of no scientific interest and of no social significance, except to racists, sexists and the like. Those who argue that there is a correlation between race and IQ and those who deny this claim are contributing to racism and other disorders, because what they are saying is based on the assumption that the answer to the question makes a difference; it does not, except to racists, sexists and the like."


Is Chomsky saying that intelligence makes no difference? But if intelligence is important, why does it not matter how it is distributed between populations?


Why doesn't the discovery of correlation between some qualities matter, scientifically or socially?

I blame Consanguinity.

Oh yes and Muslims

Inbreeding is the cause!

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 6:05pm:

Inbreeding is the cause!

Ah.

Did Mr Hammer senior breed with James' sister?

Donald Templer. A known racialist. Widely discredited by his peers.


With Concerns about Darwinist Racialism in Mind, National Review Cleans House

"It was a conference held by a white racialist group, American Renaissance, last month in Tennessee. You can click on this link and see some of the participants. As Rich noted, Weissberg had turned up at the meeting to discuss strategies for successfully "repackaging" white nationalism. Needless to say, once someone has descended to such garbage, you can't have him around anymore.

Beyond that, Weissberg himself isn't terribly interesting -- but a look at the American Renaissance website does offer a reminder of the key role that Darwinian thinking continues to play among a fringe of racialist pseudo-conservatives.

The 2012 conference, as I said, leaned heavily on this theme. Leading the program was eugenics advocate Richard Lynn. The American Renaissance site helpfully gives us the gist of his presentation.

He briefly summarizes the field of eugenics since Francis Galton coined the term in 1883, noting that the West has now had six generations of dysgenic fertility that has led to a decline in genetic IQ of about one point per generation. Improvements in nutrition have increased tested IQ, thus masking the genetic decline, but this is a one-time environmental boost that has run its course. Eugenics is the obvious solution, but it is notoriously difficult to accomplish. If we in the West do not have the will to stop dysgenic reproduction or dysgenic immigration, Prof. Lynn predicts "the torch of civilization will pass from the Europeans to the Chinese."
There was someone called Donald Templer on "The Geographic Distribution of Intelligence: Evolution, Migration and Dysgenics." Templer specializes in "race and intelligence, and racial brain shape."
There was a French visitor, Guillaume Faye with his "charmingly accented English," praising "the biological substrate" that gives hope for "world-wide white racial consciousness."

http://www.evolutionnews.org/2012/04/with_concerns_a058711.html

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 5:19pm:

Possible explanations for this decline include hybridization with sub-Saharan Africans, dysgenic decrease in the more educated Muslims employing birth control as suggested by Meisenberg, the Muslim religion not fostering critical thinking, and the intellectual contributions being both exaggerated and made by non-Muslims.

The arab world was utterly devastated by the mongols.  Their repopulation in the last 800 years has included widespread inbreeding - this has become known as a "cultural practice" but it simply reflected necessity.  Their gene pool just doesn't have the depth to thrive otherwise. 
A lower average intelligence than other peoples who didnt face such a crisis is to be expected,  how much lower is the question.

Do muslims read the Koran more than Christians read the bible ?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 6:07pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:05pm: Inbreeding is the cause! Ah. Did Mr Hammer senior breed with James' sister?

Did your dad breed with the local bitch..

Mmm Errr Dog?

No disrespect meant to who ever!

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 5:56pm:

With all due respect, James. That's a load of crap. It couldn't be any higher than 50.

Sorry James, I agree with hammer

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 6:20pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:07pm: Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:05pm: Inbreeding is the cause! Ah. Did Mr Hammer senior breed with James' sister? Did your dad breed with the local bitch..

I don't believe he's ever met your wife.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 6:25pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:07pm: Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:05pm: Inbreeding is the cause! Ah. Did Mr Hammer senior breed with James' sister? Did your dad breed with the local bitch.. I don't believe he's ever met your wife.

No not that bitch!

The one with a big fat arse and a dope for a son!

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 6:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:25pm: Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:07pm: Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:05pm: Inbreeding is the cause! Ah. Did Mr Hammer senior breed with James' sister? Did your dad breed with the local bitch.. I don't believe he's ever met your wife. No not that bitch! The one with a big fat arse and a dope for a son!

He hasn't met your mother either.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 6:48pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:25pm: Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:07pm: Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:05pm: Inbreeding is the cause! Ah. Did Mr Hammer senior breed with James' sister? Did your dad breed with the local bitch.. I don't believe he's ever met your wife. No not that bitch! The one with a big fat arse and a dope for a son! He hasn't met your mother either.

Sorry no second prizes!

Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 6:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:48pm: Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:43pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:25pm: Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:07pm: Redmond Neck wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 6:05pm: Inbreeding is the cause! Ah. Did Mr Hammer senior breed with James' sister? Did your dad breed with the local bitch.. I don't believe he's ever met your wife. No not that bitch! The one with a big fat arse and a dope for a son! He hasn't met your mother either. Sorry.

I'm sure he's not.

Basically, they need to READ MORE.

Printing was banned by Islamic authorities because they believed the Koran would be dishonoured by appearing out of a machine. As a result, Arabs did not acquire printing presses until the 18th century.
http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/2009/03/07/printing-banned-by-islam/

AND

Greece annually translates five times more books from English than the entire Arab world, and currently, 65 million Arab adults are illiterate. These sobering statistics are thanks to the U.N.’s first Arab Human Development Report published back in 2002 which I found in Thomas Friedman’s recent Op-Ed in the New York Times.

AND

The oil wealth is matched by social backwardness, and the only other region of the world with an income level lower than ours is sub-Saharan Africa. Productivity is decreasing, scientific research is virtually nonexistent, the region is suffering a brain drain, and illiteracy afflicts half of Arab women. The report was only diplo-matic concerning implicit criticisms of extremist Islamist movements as a cause of the culture of backwardness and absence of fertile ground for democ-racy. Interestingly, the report found that the total number of books translated into Arabic yearly is no more than 330, or one-fifth of those translated in a small country like Greece.

Indeed, the total number of books translated into Arabic during the 1,000 years since the age of Caliph Al-Ma’moun [a ninth-century Arab ruler who was a patron of cultural interaction between Arab, Persian, and Greek scholars—WPR] to this day is less than those translated in Spain in one year. The report noted that Arab rulers stay in office all their lives and create dynasties that inherit power, and the peoples are unable to institute change.

To be clear, I don't believe in eugenics. I believe culture is the problem.

Must see TV :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEt1vc4aVKk

It was nice to see mothra exercise her 81 or less with a professor google event.

Good post Gordy.

Muslim's have a mean IQ of 81

ANyone who would make or support such a statement can't have an IQ above 18

Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 6:22pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 5:56pm: With all due respect, James. That's a load of crap. It couldn't be any higher than 50. Sorry James, I agree with hammer

Fair call Sprint - it is possible a kafir was accidentally slipped into the data thus raising the average.

An IQ of 50 or less would explain all the "matty"'s and "Ban Them" , "I'm Curios", "No?" posts and the inability to understand a local intelligent German Gentleman who posts in the simplest terms he can for them with great patience.

 

Has anyone noticed how GP always hijacks the threads he does not agree with?

Generally reducing a topical subject down to an infantile slanging match.

Personal insults generally targeting a persons sexuality or sick twisted insults.

I wonder at the obtuse maze that passes for his mind.

Sad.

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:35pm:

It was nice to see mothra exercise her 81% or less with a professor google event. Good post Gordy.

Percent?

LOL

That's gold!

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:36pm:

Muslim's have a mean IQ of 81 ANyone who would make or support such a statement can't have an IQ above 18

Hence the Apologists IQ of 81 or less. I know you know what I mean. ;)

See gregs posts if you are confused. ;D

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:45pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:36pm: Muslim's have a mean IQ of 81 ANyone who would make or support such a statement can't have an IQ above 18 Hence the Apologists IQ of 81% or less. I know you know what I mean. ;)

Percent?

This is too funny   ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:45pm:

Percent? This is too funny   Grin

like i said


John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:36pm:

ANyone who would make or support such a statement can't have an IQ above 18

:D :D :D :D :D

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:45pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:45pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:36pm: Muslim's have a mean IQ of 81 ANyone who would make or support such a statement can't have an IQ above 18 Hence the Apologists IQ of 81% or less. I know you know what I mean. ;) Percent? This is too funny   ;D

Actually I am impressed I was waiting to see who would pick that, greg you have now reached mid range for your group say an IQ of 30 - 40 .

Well Done ..

Valkie wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:44pm:

Has anyone noticed how GP always hijacks the threads he does not agree with? Generally reducing a topical subject down to an infantile slanging match. Personal insults generally targeting a persons sexuality or sick twisted insults. I wonder at the obtuse maze that passes for his mind. Sad.

is there a rule against that? If he has to put up with crap from Islamaphonbes, they can put up with crap from him

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:48pm:

Actually I am impressed I was waiting to see who would pick that, ..

you expect anyone to believe that?  :D :D :D

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:47pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:45pm: Percent? This is too funny   Grin like i said John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:36pm: ANyone who would make or support such a statement can't have an IQ above 18 :D :D :D :D :D

He thinks the score is a percentage.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_0dfqFRfXq4/VG-h4RSRPCI/AAAAAAAAFSg/yvBk70M2TTw/s1600/TWEET%2BBLOG%2BLAUGHING%2BMORE.gif

Too, too funny.

The mean IQ of 81 for the apologist explains a lot of the simple understanding and repetitive posts both John and Greg make and explains the child like behavior that one feels when interacting with them.

In many cases the apologist has even a lower IQ .

DANG, unfortunate for you guys......

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:49pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:48pm: Actually I am impressed I was waiting to see who would pick that, .. you expect anyone to believe that?  :D :D :D

He said it twice!

Oh my Lord, I haven't laughed so hard for ages.

James: "I scored 81% in my IQ test"   LOL

http://40.media.tumblr.com/4233abb8ea8d3c563d67c8fead4ae7cc/tumblr_mzqq2jdjZB1qb5gkjo3_400.png

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:49pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:48pm: Actually I am impressed I was waiting to see who would pick that, .. you expect anyone to believe that?  :D :D :D

No I don't expect you to get much at all. Worked like a charm though.

Gobble Gobble ;D ;D ;D

It's like shooting fish in a Barrel Peccar. Now swim for me ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:52pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:49pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:48pm: Actually I am impressed I was waiting to see who would pick that, .. you expect anyone to believe that?  :D :D :D He said it twice! Oh my Lord, I haven't laughed so hard for ages. James: "I scored 81% in my IQ test"   LOL http://40.media.tumblr.com/4233abb8ea8d3c563d67c8fead4ae7cc/tumblr_mzqq2jdjZB1qb5gkjo3_400.png

IQ Isn't a percentage peccar or didn't you know that ;D .

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:49pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:48pm: Actually I am impressed I was waiting to see who would pick that, .. you expect anyone to believe that?  :D :D :D

Twice!  He said it twice!    ;D

Dear o dear o dear: he'll never live this one down.

"81%"    ;D


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_2Pdx_7wtXlE/SKHavO7PMcI/AAAAAAAAAYg/fmQ2_24eQic/s400/simplejack.jpg

Valkie wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:44pm:

Has anyone noticed how GP always hijacks the threads he does not agree with? Generally reducing a topical subject down to an infantile slanging match. Personal insults generally targeting a persons sexuality or sick twisted insults. I wonder at the obtuse maze that passes for his mind. Sad.

He has a low IQ he is incapable of debate.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:56pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:49pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:48pm: Actually I am impressed I was waiting to see who would pick that, .. you expect anyone to believe that?  :D :D :D Twice!  He said it twice!    ;D Dear o dear o dear: he'll never live this one down. "81%"    ;D http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_2Pdx_7wtXlE/SKHavO7PMcI/AAAAAAAAAYg/fmQ2_24eQic/s400/simplejack.jpg

Took you're long enough. ;D ;D ;D

Your slow aint ya dear ;D

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:52pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:49pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:48pm: Actually I am impressed I was waiting to see who would pick that, .. you expect anyone to believe that?  :D :D :D No I don't expect you to get much at all. Worked like a charm though. Gobble Gobble ;D ;D ;D It's like shooting fish in a Barrel Peccar. Now swim for me ;D

what percentage is your IQ again?  :D :D :D :D

Anyways as much as I enjoy stirring up apologists with low IQ's like greg and john time to get some more information in hear to explain the Low Muslim and Muslim Apologist Mean.

Swim John Swim .... ;D ;D ;D

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:57pm:

He has a low IQ he is incapable of debate.

yet he knows IQ isn't measured as a percentage and you don't ... what does that say about your IQ? Are we sub zero yet?

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:49pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:48pm: Actually I am impressed I was waiting to see who would pick that, .. you expect anyone to believe that?  :D :D :D

"81%"    LOL

And now he's gone back and edited the two posts in a futile attempt to cover his tracks.

http://memesvault.com/wp-content/uploads/Laughing-Animated-Gif-15.gif

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:00pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:49pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:48pm: Actually I am impressed I was waiting to see who would pick that, .. you expect anyone to believe that?  :D :D :D "81%"    LOL And now he's gone back and edited the two posts in a futile attempt to cover his tracks. http://memesvault.com/wp-content/uploads/Laughing-Animated-Gif-15.gif

No I did it to watch you post that , want me to change them back after all I am dealing with your IQ of 30% ;D ;D

With John's IQ of 20" I really don't know how he gets around. ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:00pm:

And now he's gone back and edited the two posts in a futile attempt to cover his tracks.

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/1065625/man-laughing-o.gif

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:59pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:52pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:49pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:48pm: Actually I am impressed I was waiting to see who would pick that, .. you expect anyone to believe that?  :D :D :D No I don't expect you to get much at all. Worked like a charm though. Gobble Gobble ;D ;D ;D It's like shooting fish in a Barrel Peccar. Now swim for me ;D what percentage is your IQ again?  :D :D :D :D

http://memesvault.com/wp-content/uploads/Hysterical-Laughing-Gif-16.gif

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:03pm:

With John's IQ of 20" I really don't know how he gets around. ;D

you must have run out of fingers

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:59pm:

Anyways as much as I enjoy stirring up apologists with low IQ's like greg and john time to get some more information in hear to explain the Low Muslim and Muslim Apologist Mean. Swim John Swim .... ;D ;D ;D

In "hear"?

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:04pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 7:59pm: Anyways as much as I enjoy stirring up apologists with low IQ's like greg and john time to get some more information in hear to explain the Low Muslim and Muslim Apologist Mean. Swim John Swim .... ;D ;D ;D In "hear"?

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_0dfqFRfXq4/VG-h4RSRPCI/AAAAAAAAFSg/yvBk70M2TTw/s1600/TWEET%2BBLOG%2BLAUGHING%2BMORE.gif

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:04pm:

In "hear"?

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/1065625/man-laughing-o.gif



you'd best quit while you're behind James, you're making Muslims look like outright geniuses  ;D ;D ;D

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:04pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:03pm: With John's IQ of 20" I really don't know how he gets around. ;D you must have run out of fingers

Sorry john, my bad I meant to say Johns IQ of 20mm. The weener IQ ;D ... Still against mothra you are styling so its not all bad.

Always nice to see mothra exercise such a hi IQ the extravagance is amazing. ;D

Greg you better do your hair , mother mothra's here for you darl. ;)

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:07pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:04pm: In "hear"? http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/1065625/man-laughing-o.gif you'd best quit while you're behind James, you're making Muslims look like outright geniuses  ;D ;D ;D

Is that as funny as this?

Productivity is decreasing, scientific research is virtually nonexistent, the region is suffering a brain drain, and illiteracy afflicts half of Arab women

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:07pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:04pm: In "hear"? http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/1065625/man-laughing-o.gif you'd best quit while you're behind James, you're making Muslims look like outright geniuses  ;D ;D ;D

You really are slow aren't you.

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

Greg you better do your hair

No chance of that happening.

I can't stop laughing, Mr "81% hear".

https://i2.wp.com/cdn1.sbnation.com/imported_assets/1576793/tumblr_lvv0x0BAky1qii6tmo1_500.gif

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:11pm:

You really are slow aren't you.

and still I look like a genius when compared to you. ..... what does that make you? ;D ;D ;D

https://cairnsnews.org/2015/09/30/muslims-suffer-insanity-low-iq-recessive-disorders-from-1400-years-inbreeding/

Biological fallout from 50 generations of first cousin marriages

from a Lockheed employee in Saudi Arabia.

During the pilot transition program with the KV-107 and C-130 with Lockheed, we found that most Saudi pilot trainees had very limited night vision, even on the brightest of moonlit nights.

Their training retention rate was minimal including maintenance personnel. Some had dim memories and had to be constantly reminded of things that were told to them the day before. An American, British or any other western instructor is burned out pretty quick. It actually took Muslim C-130 pilots years before they could fly in the dark safely and then would be reluctant to leave the lights of a city.

Ask any Marine, Air Force or Army guy who’s been trying to train Iraqis, and especially Afghans. Islam is not only a religion; it’s a way of life all the way around. Yet another set of revealing facts about Muslim beliefs and traditions and ways of life. 1400 years of inbreeding.

Nikolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first cousins. This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.

This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world, since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.

The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health. According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.

The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries: 67% in Saudi Arabia, 64% in Jordan, and Kuwait, 63% in Sudan, 60% in Iraq, and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.

According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.

The risks of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher, and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher. Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.

Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as "retarded," increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages. (Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)

In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army. Sennels says, "The ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world." He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.

In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book. Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. "A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies."

Only nine Muslims have ever won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the "Peace Prize." According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research measured by articles per million inhabitants.

In Denmark, Sennels’ native country, Muslim children are grossly over represented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background. Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of schoolchildren with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant dropout rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.

Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of patients in Denmark’s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background. The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, "One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole."

Sennels concludes: There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims’ religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. This has produced overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.

Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims.

Simple Judeo-Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous ideology.

These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques.

GordyL wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:07pm: mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:04pm: In "hear"? http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/1065625/man-laughing-o.gif you'd best quit while you're behind James, you're making Muslims look like outright geniuses  ;D ;D ;D Is that as funny as this? Productivity is decreasing, scientific research is virtually nonexistent, the region is suffering a brain drain, and illiteracy afflicts half of Arab women

The women are in the worst position of all being dominated by low IQ men. Then they breed. It just forces the IQ down and down.

Ooooh lookie. Mr percentage is plagiarising again.

Perhaps he didn't "hear" us when we tried to educate him about that?

Greeeeeeg mothra wants you on PM, again.

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:13pm:

Biological fallout from 50 generations of first cousin marriages

from the looks of it, I'd say James ancestors have been marrying first cousins since he birth of Christ. :o

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:16pm:

Ooooh lookie. Mr percentage is plagiarising again. Perhaps he didn't "hear" us when we tried to educate him about that?

The URL is at the top EINSTEIN. Not the sharpest tool in the shed are you with your low apologist IQ.

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:16pm:

Ooooh lookie. Mr percentage is plagiarising again. Perhaps he didn't "hear" us when we tried to educate him about that?

He's trying to flood the thread with text so that the page flips over, thus covering up his "81% hear" debacle.

Well, I'll be back in the morning to remind everyone what happened.

Time to go for dinner & drinks in my multicultural suburb now, though.

Have a pleasant evening everyone.

Incapable of debate John ?

Your IQ to low ? ;D

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:19pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:16pm: Ooooh lookie. Mr percentage is plagiarising again. Perhaps he didn't "hear" us when we tried to educate him about that? The URL is at the top EINSTEIN. Not the sharpest tool in the shed are you with your low apologist IQ.

Good of you to add it AFTER you were called on it.

You're learning James. You just went up a whole percentage point.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:20pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:16pm: Ooooh lookie. Mr percentage is plagiarising again. Perhaps he didn't "hear" us when we tried to educate him about that? He's trying to flood the thread with text so that the page flips over, thus covering up his "81% hear" debacle. Well, I'll be back in the morning to remind everyone what happened. Time to go for dinner & drinks in my multicultural suburb now, though. Have a pleasant evening everyone.

Bon Appetit

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:21pm:

Incapable of debate John ? Your IQ to low ? ;D

Gold!

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:20pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:16pm: Ooooh lookie. Mr percentage is plagiarising again. Perhaps he didn't "hear" us when we tried to educate him about that? He's trying to flood the thread with text so that the page flips over, thus covering up his "81% hear" debacle. Well, I'll be back in the morning to remind everyone what happened. Time to go for dinner & drinks in my multicultural suburb now, though. Have a pleasant evening everyone.

Have a good one.

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:21pm:

Incapable of debate John ? Your IQ to low ? ;D

you've put up nothing that warrants debate .... if you think anyone with half a brain would pay an iota of attention to that clap trap you've been plagerising, you're wrong.

But you probably would have realised that on your own if your IQ had been higher. :D :D :D

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:22pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:21pm: Incapable of debate John ? Your IQ to low ? ;D Gold!

It's  a gift that keeps giving.  ;D

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:22pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:21pm: Incapable of debate John ? Your IQ to low ? ;D Gold! It's  a gift that keeps giving.  ;D

and he has the audacity to comment on the IQ of others  :D :D :D

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:21pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:19pm: mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:16pm: Ooooh lookie. Mr percentage is plagiarising again. Perhaps he didn't "hear" us when we tried to educate him about that? The URL is at the top EINSTEIN. Not the sharpest tool in the shed are you with your low apologist IQ. Good of you to add it AFTER you were called on it. You're learning James. You just went up a whole percentage point.

FAIL!

Nice try no cigar bubblehead.

On your bike THE POST WAS NOT EDITED at all you are a liar.

Is that all you can do run around being a fool ?

One day you will learn how to debate. I guess we might see it in our lifetime.

You better get on PM or greg will be logged out or didn't you get an invite to his multicultural party ? ;D ;D ;D

Maybe Johns more your intellect ;D ;D ;D .

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:25pm:

FAIL! Nice try BUT no cigar bubbleheadbubble head. On your bike, THE POST WAS NOT EDITED at all, you are a liar. Is that all you can do, run around being a fool ? One day you will might learn how to debate. I guess we might see it in our lifetime. You better get on PM or gGreg will be logged out, or didn't you get an invite to his multicultural party ? Grin Grin Grin Maybe John's more your intellect. Grin Grin Grin .

you can thank me later

]
Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:25pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:21pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:19pm: mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:16pm: Ooooh lookie. Mr percentage is plagiarising again. Perhaps he didn't "hear" us when we tried to educate him about that? The URL is at the top EINSTEIN. Not the sharpest tool in the shed are you with your low apologist IQ. Good of you to add it AFTER you were called on it. You're learning James. You just went up a whole percentage point. FAIL! Nice try no cigar, bubblehead. On your bike.THE POST WAS NOT EDITED at all. You are a liar. Is that all you can do? Run around being a fool ? One day you will learn how to debate. I guess we might see it in our lifetime. You better get on PM or greg will be logged out. Or didn't you get an invite to his multicultural party ? ;D ;D ;D Maybe Johns more your intellectual equal ;D ;D ;D .

There. Free lesson in grammar. I fixed it for you.

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:29pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:25pm: FAIL! Nice try BUT no cigar bubbleheadbubble head. On your bike, THE POST WAS NOT EDITED at all, you are a liar. Is that all you can do, run around being a fool ? One day you will might learn how to debate. I guess we might see it in our lifetime. You better get on PM or gGreg will be logged out, or didn't you get an invite to his multicultural party ? Grin Grin Grin Maybe John's more your intellect. Grin Grin Grin . you can thank me later

LOL. Snap.  ;D

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:23pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:21pm: Incapable of debate John ? Your IQ to low ? ;D you've put up nothing that warrants debate .... if you think anyone with half a brain would pay an iota of attention to that clap trap you've been plagerising, you're wrong. But you probably would have realised that on your own if your IQ had been higher. :D :D :D

I haven't plagiarized anything and you are right, there is nothing to debate.

Bubblehead mothra turns up and pretends I plagiarized something and you gobble it up like a good little puppy. Think for yourself for goodness sakes it makes you look weak.

You can't falter statistics. Not to mention they were right. A cursory look at your posts in here indicates that you have a low IQ. Deal with champ.

You come, you make a fool of yourself then you snigger like you are brighter than mothra. Mate and yet you still are incapable of debate just like that imbecile greg and his evil bride mothra.

If your not here to debate why are you here then john ?

Enlighten us all....

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:31pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:21pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:19pm: mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:16pm: Ooooh lookie. Mr percentage is plagiarising again. Perhaps he didn't "hear" us when we tried to educate him about that? The URL is at the top EINSTEIN. Not the sharpest tool in the shed are you with your low apologist IQ. Good of you to add it AFTER you were called on it. You're learning James. You just went up a whole percentage point. FAIL! Nice try no cigar, bubblehead. On your bike.THE POST WAS NOT EDITED at all. You are a liar. Is that all you can do? Run around being a fool ? One day you will learn how to debate. I guess we might see it in our lifetime. You better get on PM or greg will be logged out. Or didn't you get an invite to his multicultural party ? ;D ;D ;D Maybe Johns more your intellectual equal ;D ;D ;D .

There. Free lesson in grammar. I fixed it for you.
[/quote]


For the record.

Incorrect Bubblehead, no wonder you come across as the village idiot any time you post.

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:32pm:

I haven't plagiarized anything and you are right, there is nothing to debate. Bubblehead Bubble head mMothra turns up and pretends I plagiarized something and you gobble it up like a good little puppy. Think for yourself for goodness sakes. iIt makes you look weak. You can't falter statistics.  Not to mention they were right. A cursory look at your posts in here indicates that you have a low IQ. Deal with it champ. You come, you make a fool of yourself, then you snigger like you are brighter than mMothra. Mate and yet you still are incapable of debate just like that imbecile gGreg and his evil bride mMothra. If you're not here to debate, why are you here then jJohn ? Enlighten us all....please

You probably shouldn't have picked a topic on IQ's :D :D :D

GRAVE FACTS:Islamic Doctrine

The Muslim Islamic Practice of Marrying "Close Cousins - Often Sisters" and Results"

GRAVE FACT:
The practice of marrying close relatives, even first cousins and often sisters - was sanctioned by Muhammad himself, and has been their practice for 50 generations (over 1,400 years) in the Muslim world.

Becasue of the large Islamic Immigrant population in Denmark, a Danish Doctor is perhaps the first westerner who has researched this little-known problem in the Muslim world and published the disastrous consequences of Muslim inbreeding.

The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture seems to have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health.


GRAVE FACTS:
The doctor reveals, approximately half of all Muslims in the world are inbred.

> In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%.

> Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and

> in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.

> It is about 67% in Saudi Arabia,

> 64% in Jordan and Kuwait,

> 63% in Sudan,

> 60% in Iraq,

> and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.


GRAVE FACT:
According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders.


GRAVE FACT:
Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.


GRAVE FACT:
The risk of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher.


GRAVE FACT:
Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.


GRAVE FACT:
Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of close-relative marriages:

> lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that

> social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies.


GRAVE FACT:
The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages.

Similar effects were seen in the ancient Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time. Twenty states in the U.S. allow first cousins to marry, but first cousin marriages remain rare in America, and the problem comes with generation after generation of first cousin marriage, which flushes recessive gene malformations to the surface.


GRAVE FACT:
In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.


GRAVE FACT:
Sennels says that “the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world.”


GRAVE FACT:
He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.


GRAVE FACT:
In the last 1,200 years years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year.


GRAVE FACT:
Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.

Dr. Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. “A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies.”


GRAVE FACT:
Only nine Muslims have every won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the “Peace Prize.”


GRAVE FACT:
According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants).


GRAVE FACT:
In Denmark, Sennels’ native country, Muslim children are grossly overrepresented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background.


GRAVE FACT:
Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system.


GRAVE FACT:
The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.


GRAVE FACT:
Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness.


GRAVE FACT:
The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of the patients in Denmark’s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background.

The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, “One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.”


GRAVE FACT:
Sennels concludes: There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims.

Because Muslims' religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. (This has produced) overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.


GRAVE FACT:
Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims.

Simple Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous religion. These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques in the U.S.

Let’s hope America wakes up before a blind naivete about the reality of Islam destroys what remains of our Christian culture and our domestic tranquility.

===

The Word of God FORBIDS the practice of marrying close relatives, and has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian Law of God since the days of Moses, that is 1500 years before Jesus Christ our Saviour!

This practice of inbreeding will likely never go away in the Muslim world since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.

===

Information courtesy of presented from Dr. Nicolai Sennels. a Danish Doctor

John if you want to keep trolling like a dickhead you will be banned. I appreciate that you're a bit of a joker and all but you do act like you have a low IQ.

If you have something to add or discuss or debate by all means but you're getting long in the tooth now.

It's not really that hard.

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:40pm:

John if you want to keep trolling like a dickhead you will be banned.

ohhh, I'm scared now. Especially with your IQ  :D :D :D


Good luck with that, dopey! :-*

You forgot the url again.

http://arthistoryteachingresources.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/bart-simpson-plagiarize.png

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:42pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:40pm: John if you want to keep trolling like a dickhead you will be banned. ohhh, I'm scared now. Especially with your IQ  :D :D :D Good luck with that, dopey! :-*

No probs have it your way Einstein.

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:43pm:

You forgot the url again. http://arthistoryteachingresources.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/bart-simpson-plagiarize.png

The author was quoted Dopey.

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:44pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:43pm: You forgot the url again. http://arthistoryteachingresources.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/bart-simpson-plagiarize.png The author was quoted you royal IDIOT.

You didn't cite your reference. A copy and paste should be able to be viewed in context, Mr. Percentage.

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:43pm:

You forgot the url again. http://arthistoryteachingresources.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/bart-simpson-plagiarize.png

$10 says he'll add it in then come back and say it was there all along!  ;D ;D ;D

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:45pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:43pm: You forgot the url again. http://arthistoryteachingresources.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/bart-simpson-plagiarize.png $10 says he'll add it in then come back and say it was there all along!  ;D ;D ;D

He's doing a whole lot of editing tonight. Maybe he'll go up a percentage point or two in the process?

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:39pm:

GRAVE FACTS:Islamic Doctrine The Muslim Islamic Practice of Marrying "Close Cousins - Often Sisters" and Results" GRAVE FACT: The practice of marrying close relatives, even first cousins and often sisters - was sanctioned by Muhammad himself, and has been their practice for 50 generations (over 1,400 years) in the Muslim world. Becasue of the large Islamic Immigrant population in Denmark, a Danish Doctor is perhaps the first westerner who has researched this little-known problem in the Muslim world and published the disastrous consequences of Muslim inbreeding. The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture seems to have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health. GRAVE FACTS: The doctor reveals, approximately half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. > In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. > Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and > in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%. > It is about 67% in Saudi Arabia, > 64% in Jordan and Kuwait, > 63% in Sudan, > 60% in Iraq, > and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. GRAVE FACT: According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. GRAVE FACT: Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects. GRAVE FACT: The risk of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher. GRAVE FACT: Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor. GRAVE FACT: Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of close-relative marriages: > lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that > social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. GRAVE FACT: The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages. Similar effects were seen in the ancient Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time. Twenty states in the U.S. allow first cousins to marry, but first cousin marriages remain rare in America, and the problem comes with generation after generation of first cousin marriage, which flushes recessive gene malformations to the surface. GRAVE FACT: In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army. GRAVE FACT: Sennels says that “the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world.” GRAVE FACT: He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does. GRAVE FACT: In the last 1,200 years years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. GRAVE FACT: Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book. Dr. Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. “A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies.” GRAVE FACT: Only nine Muslims have every won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the “Peace Prize.” GRAVE FACT: According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants). GRAVE FACT: In Denmark, Sennels’ native country, Muslim children are grossly overrepresented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background. GRAVE FACT: Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. GRAVE FACT: The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born. GRAVE FACT: Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. GRAVE FACT: The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of the patients in Denmark’s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background.

they are dirty filthy inbred intolerant violent repressive muslims.

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:43pm:

No probs have it your way Einstein.

let me know when to start worrying

Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:47pm:

they are dirty filthy inbred intolerant violent repressive

gee ....sounds familiar

THE COST OF ISLAMIC INCEST

http://pickeringpost.com/kyola/resources/articles/945700_507440312643465_173664844_n.jpg

Editor’s note: Several days ago, an interview with Nicolai Sennels on Muslim inbreeding was published but taken down soon after at the request of the author, as it was decided that several themes needed to be buffered by more evidence and research. The final product ended up working best as an article by Nicolai Sennels himself, which is presented below].

By Nicolai Sennels:

A tragic phenomenon which is taking a terrible toll on everyone involved.

There is a dire phenomenon rising in Europe that is crippling entire societies and yet the continent sleeps, refusing not only to confront the destructive elephant in the room, but also to admit its very existence.

The troubling reality being referred to is the widespread practice of Muslim inbreeding and the birth defects and social ills that it spawns.

The tragic effect of the Left’s control of the boundaries of debate is that any discussion about vital issues such as these marks an individual as an “Islamophobe” and a “racist."

A person who dares to point at the pathology of inbreeding in the Muslim community is accused of whipping up hatred against Muslim people.

But all of this could not be further from the truth. To fight against inbreeding anywhere is to defend humanity and to defend innocent babies from birth defects.

Fighting against this Islamic practice stems from a pro-Muslim calling, since identifying destructive ideologies and practices in Islam enables the protection of the Muslim people from harm.

Massive inbreeding among Muslims has been going on since their prophet allowed first-cousin marriages more than 50 generations (1,400 years) ago. For many Muslims, therefore, intermarriage is regarded as being part of their religion.

In many Muslim communities, it is a source of social status to marry one’s daughter or son to his or her cousin. Intermarriage also ensures that wealth is kept within the family.

Islam’s strict authoritarianism plays a large role as well: keeping daughters and sons close gives families more power to control and decide their choices and lifestyles.
Westerners have a historical tradition of being ready to fight and die for their country.

Muslims, on the other hand, are bound together less by patriotism, but mainly by family relations and religion.
Intermarrying to protect the family and community from outside non-Islamic influence is much more important to Muslims living in a Western nation than integrating into that nation and supporting it.

Today, 70% of all Pakistanis are inbred and in Turkey the amount is between 25-30% (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 “More stillbirths among immigrants“).

A rough estimate reveals that close to half of everybody living in the Arab world is inbred.

A large percentage of the parents that are blood related come from families where intermarriage has been a tradition for generations.

A BBC investigation in Britain several years ago revealed that at least 55% of the Pakistani community in Britain was married to a first cousin.

The Times of India affirmed that “this is thought to be linked to the probability that a British Pakistani family is at least 13 times more likely than the general population to have children with recessive genetic disorders.”

The BBC’s research also discovered that while British Pakistanis accounted for just 3.4% of all births in Britain, they accounted for 30% of all British children with recessive disorders and a higher rate of infant mortality.

It is not a surprise, therefore, that, in response to this evidence, a Labour Party MP has called for a ban on first-cousin marriage.

Medical evidence shows that one of the negative consequences of inbreeding is a 100% increase in the risk of stillbirths.

One study comparing Norwegians and Pakistanis shows the risk that the child dies during labour increases by 50%. The risk of death due to autosomal recessive disorders — e.g., cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy — is 18 times higher.

Risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher. Mental health is also at risk: the probability of depression is higher in communities where consanguine marriages are also high.

The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of mental and physical retardation and schizophrenic illness.
And then there are the findings on intelligence. Research shows that if one’s parents are cousins, intelligence goes down 10-16 IQ points. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70 (criterion for being “retarded”) increases 400% among children from cousin marriages.

An academic paper published in the Indian National Science Academy found that “the onset of various social profiles like visual fixation, social smile, sound seizures, oral expression and hand-grasping are significantly delayed among the new-born inbred babies.”

Another study found that Indian Muslim schoolboys whose parents were first cousins tested significantly lower than boys whose parents were unrelated in a non-verbal test on intelligence.

It is estimated that one third of all handicapped people in Copenhagen have a foreign background and 64% of school children in Denmark with Arabic parents are illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system.

The same study concludes that in reading ability, mathematics, and science, the pattern is the same: “The bilingual (largely Muslim) immigrants’ skills are exceedingly poor compared to their Danish classmates.”

These problems within Islam bring many detriments to Western countries. Expenses related to mentally and physically handicapped Muslim immigrants, for instance, severely drain the budgets and resources of our societies.
Denmark, for example: One third of the budget for the country’s schools is spent on children with special needs. Muslim children are grossly over-represented among these children.

More than half of all children in schools for children with mental and physical handicaps in Copenhagen are foreigners — of whom Muslims are by far the largest group. One study concludes that “foreigners inbreeding costs our municipalities millions” because of the many handicapped children and adults.

What must our role be as a humanitarian society to this rising crisis?

We know that the greatest concern among pregnant women and their husbands is for their child to be healthy.
It is not difficult to imagine the sorrow and stress among interrelated couples who are forced to marry and pressured to have children.

Is it not our duty to fight for the rights of these human beings subjected to such Barbaric and inhuman predicaments?

What is it we can do?

Denmark is a pioneering example of where to begin: In order to counter forced marriages, the country does not allow Danish citizens to marry foreigners younger than 24 years old.

It also offers non-Western immigrants up to 15,000 Euros or 20,000 Dollars to emigrate back to their countries of origin.

Immigrants who are not Danish citizens are banished from Denmark if they commit violent crimes. The state does not support families economically for having more than the country’s average amount of children.

This prevents foreigners from coming to Denmark who have plans to have a lot of children and live off the State’s child support system.

The country also denies resident permits to foreigners who are marrying their cousin in Denmark.

Right now, the country is working on a complete halt to immigration from countries that are not oriented towards Western values (mainly Muslim countries).

No more intermarriage
We must simply forbid intermarriage among first cousins. Doing so will not only help slow down all the terrible consequences of inbreeding, but also prevent Muslims who insist on practising this damaging practice from moving to our countries.

Let us keep in mind that Muslims are the first — though maybe not the biggest — victims of Islam.
As long as we know that our motivation is to help them, then our conscience is clear in the face of the Left’s accusations that we are somehow “anti-Muslim” when we show our concern about Muslim babies who are born with mental and physical defects — and about their parents who endure endless suffering and worry.

In fact, it is the Left’s callous silence on this issue (and on so many others) that exposes who is truly “anti-Muslim.”
As long as we stick to facts, have a compassionate motivation, and are still able to be brave, we can be certain that not only are we right to reach out to protect Muslim people, but that in doing so we are also protecting ourselves from destroying our own basic humanistic and Western values while struggling against anti-human and aggressive practices and ideologies.

Is Racism Just a Form of Stupidity?
Wray Herbert

I think that a lot of us are shying away from an obvious truth, that the kind of blatant racial prejudice we are witnessing in Ferguson, Missouri, has everything to do with stupidity.

I’m talking about low intelligence, lack of mental ability, cognitive rigidity. The Ferguson racists may be a lot of other things—hateful, insecure—but let’s not sugar-coat what most fair-minded thinkers believe in their hearts: A person of intelligence cannot embrace such authoritarian and racist views.

Intelligence is a scientific concept, something scientists can measure, and have for a long time.  And interestingly, this connection between stupidity and prejudice once seemed obvious to social scientists as well. Early theorists suggested a link between low mental ability and prejudicial thinking, and gathered some strongly suggestive evidence to support that view. But there were some knotty methodological and statistical problems that hampered this early line of study, not to mention a huge wave of political correctness, and it was largely abandoned.

But not entirely. A small cadre of psychological scientists have continued over the years to explore the controversial connection between low intelligence and prejudice, and at this point they have overcome most of the methodological barricades, allowing them to rigorously analyze and answer this important societal question. Two of these researchers—Kristof Dhont of Ghent University, Belgium, and Gordon Hodson of Brock University, in Canada—have been studying the idea and synthesizing the work of others, and they summarize the fruits of this ongoing project in a forthcoming issue of the journal Current Directions in Psychological Science. The short answer is yes—there is a clear, predictable and causal link between low intelligence and prejudice, including racism.

Let’s not stop there, however. It’s important, when dealing with such a controversial topic, to get down into the evidentiary weeds a bit. One of the problems plaguing the early research was that the results were confounded by other possible causes, like financial status and class and education. That is, it could have been these things, and not intelligence per se, that led to prejudice. Scientists had trouble sorting all this out. Scientists also didn’t have longitudinal data—data gathered on the same subjects over time—so they could not address the important issue of cause and effect. Plus their study samples were not representative of the population. But scientists have over time solved these problems, and the key finding has held up: Empirical evidence has consistently linked low intelligence with prejudice.

Importantly, scientists have measured intelligence in a variety of ways, and the main conclusion always holds up. In one study of white children, for example, some were less able to see that a short wide glass holds the same amount of water as a taller skinnier glass. This ability is known as “conservation” in the jargon of the field, and it’s widely considered an important mental ability. In this study, the kids who lacked this ability also held more negative views of black children. Other researchers conducted an ambitious meta-analysis—a statistical aggregation of findings from many studies—and this also documented a link between cognitive style and ability, on the one hand, and authoritarian attitudes on the other.

Longitudinal studies provide some of the most convincing evidence. One such study looked at general intelligence in 10- and 11-year-old kids, and then re-studied those kids as adults two decades later—and found a clear connection between low intelligence and subsequent racism and sexism. Similarly, higher intelligence in childhood has been shown to predict less racism in adulthood. These analyses strongly suggest that low intelligence actually leads to hateful attitudes later on.

This is just a sampling of the accruing evidence on this point, all of which points to another puzzling question: Why? Why would verbal ability and math skills and other cognitive assets translate, over the years, into such hateful attitudes?

Dhont and Hodson believe they have an answer to this, again one based on rigorous abundant evidence. Their theory is that right-wing ideologies attract people with lower mental abilities because they minimize the complexity of the world. Right-wing ideologies offer well-structured and ordered views of society, views that preserve traditions and norms, so they are especially attractive to those who are threatened by change and want to avoid uncertainty and ambiguity. Conversely, smart people are more capable of grasping a world of nuance, fluidity and relativity.

The empirical evidence supports this link, too. Low intelligence and “low effort thinking” are strongly linked to right-wing attitudes, including authoritarianism and conservative politics. And again, there appears to be a demonstrable causal link: Studies have found, for example, that children with poor mental skills grow up to be strongly right-wing adults.

There is a final link in the chain of causality, according to Dhont and Hodson. Considerable evidence shows that conservative ideology predicts all sorts of prejudice—against ethnic and racial minorities, the disadvantaged, any outgroup. Indeed, right wingers are much more likely to see outgroups as a threat to traditional values and social order, resulting in heightened prejudice. Dhont and Hodson tested and confirmed this mediation model: Lower childhood intelligence clearly predicts right-wing ideology and attitude, which in turn predicts prejudice in adulthood.

The scientists elaborate on this idea in the Current Directions article: Intelligence and thinking determine how people assess threats in the world. Those with lower ability—reasoning skills, processing speed, and so forth—prefer simple and predictable answers, because that is what they are capable of processing. Any uncertainty is threatening, and they respond to such threats by trying to preserve what is familiar and safe, the status quo. These conservative reactions are basic and normal—they reduce anxiety—but over time they harden into more stable and pervasive world views, which include stereotypical thinking, avoidance, prejudicial attitudes and over discrimination.

The weight of evidence is hard to ignore, yet according to these scientists, it is conspicuously absent from contemporary theories of prejudice. They believe that it’s time for psychological scientists to stop ignoring the evidence—that in fact the field will benefit from open discussion of these controversial findings. The country might as well, and the events in Ferguson may well trigger that discussion.


http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/were-only-human/is-racism-just-a-form-of-stupidity.html

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:51pm:

Is Racism Just a Form of Stupidity?

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Inkt2o9rBlY/VgvuIGSOrMI/AAAAAAAAAzQ/GqQ9tJ7oMJE/s320/hallelujah.png

Sprintcyclist wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:47pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:39pm: GRAVE FACTS:Islamic Doctrine The Muslim Islamic Practice of Marrying "Close Cousins - Often Sisters" and Results" GRAVE FACT: The practice of marrying close relatives, even first cousins and often sisters - was sanctioned by Muhammad himself, and has been their practice for 50 generations (over 1,400 years) in the Muslim world. Becasue of the large Islamic Immigrant population in Denmark, a Danish Doctor is perhaps the first westerner who has researched this little-known problem in the Muslim world and published the disastrous consequences of Muslim inbreeding. The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture seems to have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health. GRAVE FACTS: The doctor reveals, approximately half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. > In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. > Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and > in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%. > It is about 67% in Saudi Arabia, > 64% in Jordan and Kuwait, > 63% in Sudan, > 60% in Iraq, > and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. GRAVE FACT: According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. GRAVE FACT: Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects. GRAVE FACT: The risk of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher. GRAVE FACT: Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor. GRAVE FACT: Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of close-relative marriages: > lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that > social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. GRAVE FACT: The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages. Similar effects were seen in the ancient Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time. Twenty states in the U.S. allow first cousins to marry, but first cousin marriages remain rare in America, and the problem comes with generation after generation of first cousin marriage, which flushes recessive gene malformations to the surface. GRAVE FACT: In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army. GRAVE FACT: Sennels says that “the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world.” GRAVE FACT: He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does. GRAVE FACT: In the last 1,200 years years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. GRAVE FACT: Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book. Dr. Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. “A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies.” GRAVE FACT: Only nine Muslims have every won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the “Peace Prize.” GRAVE FACT: According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants). GRAVE FACT: In Denmark, Sennels’ native country, Muslim children are grossly overrepresented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background. GRAVE FACT: Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. GRAVE FACT: The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born. GRAVE FACT: Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. GRAVE FACT: The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of the patients in Denmark’s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background. they are dirty filthy inbred intolerant violent repressive muslims.

You are certainly right.

Friends of intellectual giants John Smith, Greg and Mothra.
The mind boggles.

ahh ... you're using caps for names now James .... maybe it's not to late for you  ;D ;D ;D

At the end of the day the whole incest thing started by Mohammed was because he wanted to pork his young relatives lets face it. So the story goes, he simply made his degenerate fetish law. The sicko simply made it law.

Now generations of intellectually impaired people and families result from one man being a degenerate..Not to mention the bullshit islam makes these impaired people do.

"LOW IQ" IS THE NEW MUSLIM TERRORIST DEFENSE

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/250925/low-iq-new-muslim-terrorist-defense-daniel-greenfield

http://www.frontpagemag.com/sites/default/files/uploads/2015/02/24E1EE1400000578-2918756-image-a-6_1421792877088.jpg

Forget airborne PTSD or poverty. Here's a great new terrorist defense. Imran Khawaja was an ISIS Jihadist who liked guns and severed heads. Non-Muslim severed heads. (via Religion of Peace)

In one section of footage, played before a hushed court, Mr Altman said Khawaja could be seen picking up severed heads from the back of a flatbed truck and saying: 'Heads. Kuffar (non-Muslims). Disgusting.'

Khawaja, who has close ties to 'executioner' Jihadi John, faked his own death to sneak back into the UK and is now facing years behind bars.

His death was widely reported - but on the same day Khawaja was arrested by specialist counter-terrorism officers at Dover with his cousin Tahir Bhatti, 45.

Khawaja, who also had the nicknames 'Barbie,' Imz,' 'Iron, and 'Cashew,' was a senior member of terrorist group Rayat Al Taweed (The Banner of Divine Unity).

'Following his departure, during messaging with his sister over different messaging platforms, Khawaja made it clear that he was in Syria for Jihad, that this was the path he had chosen, and that he wished to die as a martyr', said Mr Altman.

Khawaja told his sister, Azmeena, that he had travelled to the Middle East 'for Allah...first.'

'He told her he was happier than he had been in the UK, which was 'Shaitan dirty (devil dirty),' Mr Altman said.

'He told her he had no time to waste; that he knew Islam and Jihad 'is my way' and he could not sit and argue with his family 'who don't practice dis deen (religion).'

He later added: 'Jihad will remain fresh and green as long as raindrops fall from the sky.'


His lawyer's defense? Stupidity.


In his defence Henry Blaxland QC said the jihadi 'poster boy' had a low IQ - the lowest 12% of the population.


--------------

Ten bucks the lawyer was a muslim.  ;D ;D ;D

Why are you spamming this thread with off topic racism posts mothra. :D
Here's a thought for you Einstein. I bet this one stumps you. Islam is not race. Shocking I know ::)

You learn something new each day.

Do some research on the topic at hand then come back.

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:12pm:

Why are you spamming this thread with off topic racism posts mothra. :D Here's a thought for you Einstein. I bet this one stumps you. Islam is not race. Shocking I know ::) You learn something new each day. Do some research on the topic at hand then come back.

You're talking about Muslim countries, Wonder Boy.

That's a few percentage points off, i'm afraid.

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:16pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:12pm: Why are you spamming this thread with off topic racism posts mothra. :D Here's a thought for you Einstein. I bet this one stumps you. Islam is not race. Shocking I know ::) You learn something new each day. Do some research on the topic at hand then come back. You're talking about Muslim countries, Wonder Boy. That's a few percentage points off, i'm afraid.

;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

Still not talking about races DUMB DUMB. Would you like to try again. Maybe make a fool out of yourself one more time ?

Go right ahead, all aboard.

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:21pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:16pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:12pm: Why are you spamming this thread with off topic racism posts mothra. :D Here's a thought for you Einstein. I bet this one stumps you. Islam is not race. Shocking I know ::) You learn something new each day. Do some research on the topic at hand then come back. You're talking about Muslim countries, Wonder Boy. That's a few percentage points off, i'm afraid. ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D Still not talking about races DUMB DUMB. Would you like to try again. Maybe make a fool out of yourself one more time ? Go right ahead, all aboard.

The (cough) "study" (cough) you cited refers to Muslim majority countries. That's racism, i;m afraid.

The author of the (cough) "study" (cough) is a notable racist.


http://www.relatably.com/m/img/stupid-memes/3306583.jpg

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:25pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:21pm: mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:16pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:12pm: Why are you spamming this thread with off topic racism posts mothra. :D Here's a thought for you Einstein. I bet this one stumps you. Islam is not race. Shocking I know ::) You learn something new each day. Do some research on the topic at hand then come back. You're talking about Muslim countries, Wonder Boy. That's a few percentage points off, i'm afraid. ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D Still not talking about races DUMB DUMB. Would you like to try again. Maybe make a fool out of yourself one more time ? Go right ahead, all aboard. The (cough) "study" (cough) you cited refers to Muslim majority countries. That's racism, i;m afraid. The author of the (cough) "study" (cough) is a notable racist. http://www.relatably.com/m/img/stupid-memes/3306583.jpg

Please make another post ISLAM IS NOT A RACE nor is a COUNTRY .

;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

Please make another post....after all you are doing so well at your intellectual level.

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:21pm:

Still not talking about races DUMB DUMB. Would you like to try again. Maybe make a fool out of yourself one more time ?

farrrk but you are an idiot!

Islam is NOT a RACE

A Country is NOT a RACE

An ISLAMIC Country is not a RACE.

Someone tell grandma mothra please. ;D ;D ;D

Oh john you're all upset grandma mothra made a fool of herself.

Tissue ?

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:32pm:

Oh john you're all upset grandma mothra made a fool of herself. Tissue ?

even the village idiots in Afghanistan have a higher IQ than you ;D ;D ;D

Grandma?  That;s the best you can do?


http://www.relatably.com/m/img/stupid-memes/Stupidity-And-Beyond.jpg

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:32pm:

Oh john you're all upset grandma mothra made a fool of herself. Tissue ?

did she? or did you? You realise you don't get to determine who was made a fool off, right?

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:34pm:

[quote author=James link=1460704746/108#108 date=1460719950]Oh john you're all upset grandma mothra made a fool of herself. Tissue ?

did she? or did you? You realise you don't get to determine who was made a fool off, right?[/quote


He did. Often and abundantly.

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:33pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:32pm: Oh john you're all upset grandma mothra made a fool of herself. Tissue ? even the village idiots in Afghanistan have a higher IQ than you ;D ;D ;D

No surprises that you said that, they have an even higher IQ than you.

Do you have anything on topic to discuss maybe something that can show us your intellectual prowess. Maybe a debate even. Wow now there's a thought John. Are you capable ?

I think not.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/67/0f/83/670f8315534376e205c39ec6fca29fac.jpg

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:36pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:34pm: [quote author=James link=1460704746/108#108 date=1460719950]Oh john you're all upset grandma mothra made a fool of herself. Tissue ? did she? or did you? You realise you don't get to determine who was made a fool off, right?[/quote He did. Often and abundantly.

Islam is NOT a RACE

A Country is NOT a RACE

An ISLAMIC Country is not a RACE.

Shock horror mothra , let in SINK IN ;D ;D ;D

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:36pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:34pm: [quote author=James link=1460704746/108#108 date=1460719950]Oh john you're all upset grandma mothra made a fool of herself. Tissue ? did she? or did you? You realise you don't get to determine who was made a fool off, right?[/quote He did. Often and abundantly.

I'm still laughing at the 81%  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

It's a mothra John Smith, Pecca John Smith or Mothra Pecca gang up boredom extravaganza. BORING!!!!

666

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:39pm:

It's a mothra John Smith, Pecca John Smith or Mothra Pecca gang up boredom extravaganza. BORING!!!!

ohh good, you're here

James needs your help ... actually, he could do with anyone's help. He's not having a good run of it tonight

GordyL wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:07pm: mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 8:04pm: In "hear"? http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/1065625/man-laughing-o.gif you'd best quit while you're behind James, you're making Muslims look like outright geniuses  ;D ;D ;D Is that as funny as this? Productivity is decreasing, scientific research is virtually nonexistent, the region is suffering a brain drain, and illiteracy afflicts half of Arab women

You’re not racist, Gordy. Some of your best wives are Arabs, no?

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:34pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:32pm: Oh john you're all upset grandma mothra made a fool of herself. Tissue ? did she? or did you? You realise you don't get to determine who was made a fool off, right?

I am not sure what planet you are on. Then again given your low IQ hmmm. If someone like mothra bangs on that Countries are RACES and Islam is a RACE and starts posting racist literature. Clearly one is in a position to highlight the fact she made a fool of herself. Its a simple determination made by oneself. Much like the post you just made. You made a fool of yourself yet again.

You learn something new every day dontcha john. ;)

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:44pm:

I am not sure what planet you are on. Then again given your low IQ hmmm. If someone like mothra bangs on that Countries are RACES and Islam is a RACE and starts posting racist literature. Clearly one is in a position to highlight the fact she made a fool of herself. Its a simple determination made by oneself. Much like the post you just made. You made a fool of yourself yet again. You learn something new every day dontcha john. Wink

true ... I didn't know IQ's were measured as a percentage  ;D ;D ;D ;D

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:39pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:36pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:34pm: [quote author=James link=1460704746/108#108 date=1460719950]Oh john you're all upset grandma mothra made a fool of herself. Tissue ? did she? or did you? You realise you don't get to determine who was made a fool off, right?[/quote He did. Often and abundantly. I'm still laughing at the 81%  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Given your intellect no surprises there john.

I am still laughing at Islam being a race.  ;D ;D ;D

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:46pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:39pm: mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:36pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:34pm: [quote author=James link=1460704746/108#108 date=1460719950]Oh john you're all upset grandma mothra made a fool of herself. Tissue ? did she? or did you? You realise you don't get to determine who was made a fool off, right?[/quote He did. Often and abundantly. I'm still laughing at the 81%  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Given your intellect no surprises there john. I am still laughing at Islam being a race.  ;D ;D ;D

Except that no one said it was.  :D :D :D

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:31pm:

Islam is NOT a RACE A Country is NOT a RACE An ISLAMIC Country is not a RACE. Someone tell grandma mothra please. ;D ;D ;D

You’re not racist, Matty. Some of your best friends have IQs of 81 or less, no?

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:45pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:44pm: I am not sure what planet you are on. Then again given your low IQ hmmm. If someone like mothra bangs on that Countries are RACES and Islam is a RACE and starts posting racist literature. Clearly one is in a position to highlight the fact she made a fool of herself. Its a simple determination made by oneself. Much like the post you just made. You made a fool of yourself yet again. You learn something new every day dontcha john. Wink true ... I didn't know IQ's were measured as a percentage  ;D ;D ;D ;D

They aren't, the only reason you do know they are not is greg pointed it out to you ;D ;D ;D .

Islam is still not a race ;D ;D ;D

Mattyfisk wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:46pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:31pm: Islam is NOT a RACE A Country is NOT a RACE An ISLAMIC Country is not a RACE. Someone tell grandma mothra please. ;D ;D ;D You’re not racist, Matty. Some of your best friends have IQs of 81 or less, no?

Ahhh now here's a real matty and <=81 IQ to boot. Even he can work out islam is not a race mothra and john. Take note.

Cesterete them.

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:44pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:34pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:32pm: Oh john you're all upset grandma mothra made a fool of herself. Tissue ? did she? or did you? You realise you don't get to determine who was made a fool off, right? I am not sure what planet you are on. Then again given your low IQ hmmm. If someone like mothra bangs on that Countries are RACES and Islam is a RACE and starts posting racist literature. Clearly one is in a position to highlight the fact she made a fool of herself. Its a simple determination made by oneself. Much like the post you just made. You made a fool of yourself yet again. You learn something new every day dontcha john. ;)

I posted racist literature?

I said Muslims were a race?

Try again, Wonder Boy, You're shedding percentages fast.

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:46pm:

Except that no one said it was.  :D :D :D

Mothra did she said an Islamic Country was a race.

Nice try no cigar matey . I am still laughing at that ;D ;D ;D

So roll your eyes faster and see where they go. ;D

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:51pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:44pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:34pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:32pm: Oh john you're all upset grandma mothra made a fool of herself. Tissue ? did she? or did you? You realise you don't get to determine who was made a fool off, right? I am not sure what planet you are on. Then again given your low IQ hmmm. If someone like mothra bangs on that Countries are RACES and Islam is a RACE and starts posting racist literature. Clearly one is in a position to highlight the fact she made a fool of herself. Its a simple determination made by oneself. Much like the post you just made. You made a fool of yourself yet again. You learn something new every day dontcha john. ;) I posted racist literature? I said Muslims were a race? Try again, Wonder Boy, You're shedding percentages fast.

Yes you did fruitcake. You said an Islamic country was a RACE , Wonder Tard

;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:16pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:12pm: Why are you spamming this thread with off topic racism posts mothra. :D Here's a thought for you Einstein. I bet this one stumps you. Islam is not race. Shocking I know ::) You learn something new each day. Do some research on the topic at hand then come back. You're talking about Muslim countries, Wonder Boy. That's a few percentage points off, i'm afraid.

Yep that's right mothra muslim countries NOT races ;D ;D ;D

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:53pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:51pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:44pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:34pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:32pm: Oh john you're all upset grandma mothra made a fool of herself. Tissue ? did she? or did you? You realise you don't get to determine who was made a fool off, right? I am not sure what planet you are on. Then again given your low IQ hmmm. If someone like mothra bangs on that Countries are RACES and Islam is a RACE and starts posting racist literature. Clearly one is in a position to highlight the fact she made a fool of herself. Its a simple determination made by oneself. Much like the post you just made. You made a fool of yourself yet again. You learn something new every day dontcha john. ;) I posted racist literature? I said Muslims were a race? Try again, Wonder Boy, You're shedding percentages fast. Yes you did fruitcake. You said an Islamic country was a RACE , Wonder Tard ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

No. I didn't. Focus. I said Muslim  majority countries were comprised of races.


Or are you confused because you are actually arguing that even in the West, Muslims have IQ's of 81?

That's not what the article you started this thread with says.

Poor James. You're not having a good night, are you?

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:55pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:16pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:12pm: Why are you spamming this thread with off topic racism posts mothra. :D Here's a thought for you Einstein. I bet this one stumps you. Islam is not race. Shocking I know ::) You learn something new each day. Do some research on the topic at hand then come back. You're talking about Muslim countries, Wonder Boy. That's a few percentage points off, i'm afraid. Yep that's right mothra muslim countries NOT races ;D ;D ;D

;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

Nope muslim countries are still not a Race mothra ;D

Mothra on racism = You're talking about Muslim countries, Wonder Boy.

Yep that's right Wonder Tard Muslim countries.

Hey wait a minute, Muslims aren't a race, countries aren't a Race.

;D ;D ;D

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/editor/?tip_bar=getStarted

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:58pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:53pm: mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:51pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:44pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:34pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:32pm: Oh john you're all upset grandma mothra made a fool of herself. Tissue ? did she? or did you? You realise you don't get to determine who was made a fool off, right? I am not sure what planet you are on. Then again given your low IQ hmmm. If someone like mothra bangs on that Countries are RACES and Islam is a RACE and starts posting racist literature. Clearly one is in a position to highlight the fact she made a fool of herself. Its a simple determination made by oneself. Much like the post you just made. You made a fool of yourself yet again. You learn something new every day dontcha john. ;) I posted racist literature? I said Muslims were a race? Try again, Wonder Boy, You're shedding percentages fast. Yes you did fruitcake. You said an Islamic country was a RACE , Wonder Tard ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D No. I didn't. Focus. I said Muslim  majority countries were comprised of races. Or are you confused because you are actually arguing that even in the West, Muslims have IQ's of 81? That's not what the article you started this thread with says. Poor James. You're not having a good night, are you?

FOCUS ON THIS

;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

Bahahahahahahaha

I am having a great night.

You said "Muslim  majority countries were comprised of races" No you didn't. ;D ;D ;D

You said Muslim Countries.

Squirm all you like its all there BAHAHAHA ;D

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/600x315/2d/64/8b/2d648b84c6ffdde345a6a435a01adda8.jpg

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:25pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:21pm: mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:16pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:12pm: Why are you spamming this thread with off topic racism posts mothra. :D Here's a thought for you Einstein. I bet this one stumps you. Islam is not race. Shocking I know ::) You learn something new each day. Do some research on the topic at hand then come back. You're talking about Muslim countries, Wonder Boy. That's a few percentage points off, i'm afraid. ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D Still not talking about races DUMB DUMB. Would you like to try again. Maybe make a fool out of yourself one more time ? Go right ahead, all aboard. The (cough) "study" (cough) you cited refers to Muslim majority countries. That's racism, i;m afraid. The author of the (cough) "study" (cough) is a notable racist.

Now Focus that single braincell.

No thats NOT racism mothra that's a muslim majority country.

Islam is still NOT (cough) (cough) a race and a muslim majority COUNTRY is still not a RACE its a (cough) (cough) country dear.

;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D

Nice try to use the author as an excuse too. Noted ;D

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/bc/d0/4c/bcd04c51539705dc7de4fcb1cb4243a9.jpg

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/64223767.jpg

http://thestagnantfilipino.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Missing-Brains.jpg

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:11pm:

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/bc/d0/4c/bcd04c51539705dc7de4fcb1cb4243a9.jpg

I agree your level of stupidity is astounding.

Make another post please.

Intelligence Study Links Low I.Q. To Prejudice, Racism, Conservatism'

The Huffington Post  |  By      Rebecca Searles


Are racists dumb? Do conservatives tend to be less intelligent than liberals? A provocative new study from Brock University in Ontario suggests the answer to both questions may be a qualified yes.

The study, published in Psychological Science, showed that people who score low on I.Q. tests in childhood are more likely to develop prejudiced beliefs and socially conservative politics in adulthood.

I.Q., or intelligence quotient, is a score determined by standardized tests, but whether the tests truly reveal intelligence remains a topic of hot debate among psychologists.

Dr. Gordon Hodson, a professor of psychology at the university and the study's lead author, said the finding represented evidence of a vicious cycle: People of low intelligence gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, which stress resistance to change and, in turn, prejudice, he told LiveScience.

Why might less intelligent people be drawn to conservative ideologies? Because such ideologies feature "structure and order" that make it easier to comprehend a complicated world, Dodson said. "Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice," he added.

Dr. Brian Nosek, a University of Virginia psychologist, echoed those sentiments.

"Reality is complicated and messy," he told The Huffington Post in an email. "Ideologies get rid of the messiness and impose a simpler solution. So, it may not be surprising that people with less cognitive capacity will be attracted to simplifying ideologies."


http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/intelligence-study-links-prejudice_n_1237796.html?section=australia

Why are you spamming off topic  posts here ?

Are you incapable of on topic debate.

You do realize Islam is NOT a Race.

Maybe you don't.

Well you do now.

I am more than happy to help you lift your clearly low IQ level.

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:14pm:

http://thestagnantfilipino.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Missing-Brains.jpg

Wow all this because you made a fool of yourself.

For telling you Islam is not a RACE ;D ;D ;D

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 9:47pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:45pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:44pm: I am not sure what planet you are on. Then again given your low IQ hmmm. If someone like mothra bangs on that Countries are RACES and Islam is a RACE and starts posting racist literature. Clearly one is in a position to highlight the fact she made a fool of herself. Its a simple determination made by oneself. Much like the post you just made. You made a fool of yourself yet again. You learn something new every day dontcha john. Wink true ... I didn't know IQ's were measured as a percentage  ;D ;D ;D ;D They aren't, the only reason you do know they are not is greg pointed it out to you ;D ;D ;D . Islam is still not a race ;D ;D ;D

Only one of us used percentages when referring to IQ dopey, I'll let you guess which one.  :D :D

You can hope your attempts to detract by going on about race will work for some, but as far as I'm concerned, it's semantics. In my opinion there is no difference between an racist and a Islamaphobe. ;)

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:32pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 10:14pm: http://thestagnantfilipino.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Missing-Brains.jpg Wow all this because you made a fool of yourself. For telling you Islam is not a RACE ;D ;D ;D

Except i never said Islam was a race.

You're looking kinda desperate Wonder Boy.

Never mind. You probably won't remember any of this in the morning.

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:34pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:47pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:45pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:44pm: I am not sure what planet you are on. Then again given your low IQ hmmm. If someone like mothra bangs on that Countries are RACES and Islam is a RACE and starts posting racist literature. Clearly one is in a position to highlight the fact she made a fool of herself. Its a simple determination made by oneself. Much like the post you just made. You made a fool of yourself yet again. You learn something new every day dontcha john. Wink true ... I didn't know IQ's were measured as a percentage  ;D ;D ;D ;D They aren't, the only reason you do know they are not is greg pointed it out to you ;D ;D ;D . Islam is still not a race ;D ;D ;D Only one of us used percentages when referring to IQ dopey, I'll let you guess which one.  :D :D You can hope your attempts to detract by going on about race will work for some, but as far as I'm concerned, it's semantics. In my opinion there is no difference between an racist and a Islamaphobe. ;)

I don't think he even understands his own OP.

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:34pm:

Only one of us used percentages when referring to IQ dopey, I'll let you guess which one.  :D :D

I am not dopy you are. If you can't take a joke then cool I never thought it would cut so deep.


John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:34pm:

You can hope your attempts to detract by going on about race will work for some, but as far as I'm concerned, it's semantics. In my opinion there is no difference between an racist and a Islamaphobe. ;)

With your IQ level no doubt that is the case. Then of course reality makes an utter fool out of you every time.

I don't really care if you make up words.

It's your reputation as being illiterate not mine.

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:36pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 10:34pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:47pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:45pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 9:44pm: I am not sure what planet you are on. Then again given your low IQ hmmm. If someone like mothra bangs on that Countries are RACES and Islam is a RACE and starts posting racist literature. Clearly one is in a position to highlight the fact she made a fool of herself. Its a simple determination made by oneself. Much like the post you just made. You made a fool of yourself yet again. You learn something new every day dontcha john. Wink true ... I didn't know IQ's were measured as a percentage  ;D ;D ;D ;D They aren't, the only reason you do know they are not is greg pointed it out to you ;D ;D ;D . Islam is still not a race ;D ;D ;D Only one of us used percentages when referring to IQ dopey, I'll let you guess which one.  :D :D You can hope your attempts to detract by going on about race will work for some, but as far as I'm concerned, it's semantics. In my opinion there is no difference between an racist and a Islamaphobe. ;) I don't think he even understands his own OP.

You clearly didn't and don't. Another question why ride the coat tales of others aren't you happy making a big enough of a fool of yourself trying to portray Islam as a Race all by yourself.

This isn't the lonely thing again is it pet ?

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:34pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 10:32pm: mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 10:14pm: http://thestagnantfilipino.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Missing-Brains.jpg Wow all this because you made a fool of yourself. For telling you Islam is not a RACE ;D ;D ;D Except i never said Islam was a race. You're looking kinda desperate Wonder Boy. Never mind. You probably won't remember any of this in the morning.

You said Islamic Country was a race.

You were wrong pettle ;D ;D ;D

Islam is NOT a RACE. If you didn't mean Islam you would have said Country and guess what. Thats still NOT a race pettle.

You are a fool that keeps making a fool of itself.

Please make another post.

You're easily confused, aren't you Wonder Boy?


http://memesvault.com/wp-content/uploads/Confused-Baby-Meme-Blank-01.jpg

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:47pm:

You're easily confused, aren't you Wonder Boy? http://memesvault.com/wp-content/uploads/Confused-Baby-Meme-Blank-01.jpg

No just amazed at how thick and lonely you are.

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:50pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 10:47pm: You're easily confused, aren't you Wonder Boy? http://memesvault.com/wp-content/uploads/Confused-Baby-Meme-Blank-01.jpg No just amazed at how thick and lonely you are.

Does it help you to think that Wonder Boy? And that's i'm old? And having a clandestine affair with Greg?

You seem to spend a lot of time thinking about me. Stop it. You're not my type.

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:40pm:

I am not dopy you are. If you can't take a joke then cool I never thought it would cut so deep.

joke? then why edit it ........... still trying i see  ;D ;D ;D


Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:40pm:

With your IQ level no doubt that is the case. Then of course reality makes an utter fool out of you every time. I don't really care if you make up words. It's your reputation as being illiterate not mine.

that's the way ... after looking so stupid all night, you cling to that one little glimmer of hope that you have remaining



I think you've managed to single handedly bring 'stupid' to a whole new level tonight James. It doesn't happen often, but somehow  you managed it to do it tonight. :D :D :D

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:57pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 10:50pm: mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 10:47pm: You're easily confused, aren't you Wonder Boy? http://memesvault.com/wp-content/uploads/Confused-Baby-Meme-Blank-01.jpg No just amazed at how thick and lonely you are. Does it help you to think that Wonder Boy? And that's i'm old? And having a clandestine affair with Greg? You seem to spend a lot of time thinking about me. Stop it. You're not my type.

You are lonely, you sit up all night posting nonsense to who ever will have you. That's a fact nothing to do with me.

Secondly greg wouldn't have you anyways that's just banter to piss greg off when you chase him around don't take it to heart. It usually gets rid of him. Thank goodness.

I hate to tell you this but I don't think of you at all. I just put up with you like everyone else on this forum has too.

I think its bloody obvious I am not your type I am quiet younger than you for starters. Even if you were young enough to be a cougar you would be too high maintenance anyway. Probably why you're alone now.

Anyways : -

Islam is still NOT a Race
A Country is still NOT a Race
An Islamic majority Country is still NOT a Race

Get over it, name calling just makes you look even more stupid. It may turn john or greg on I guess. For me it just shows you are upset.

The way you clearly get upset over age issues indicates you are in fact elderly. That's your hang up not mine. As far as I am concerned you are a dirty old lefty man who wants to be a comic hero.

https://memecrunch.com/meme/2250I/methinks-thou-doth-protest-too-much/image.jpg?w=555&c=1

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/56313379.jpg[

John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:57pm:

joke? then why edit it ........... still trying i see  ;D ;D ;D

For this exact reason ;D ;D ;D

To get a rise.

Clearly the post had been quoted yes.
So no point modifying it right.

(this is basic math)

So if you want to stir up a retard what do you do.
You go modify it so when he checks he chucks yet another spaz.

and here you are...chucking a spaz.

Priceless. ;D ;D ;D

No other reason.



John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:57pm:

that's the way ... after looking so stupid all night, you cling to that one little glimmer of hope that you have remaining

Yet here you are with a pooey nappy yet again. ::)


John Smith wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 10:57pm:

I think you've managed to single handedly bring 'stupid' to a whole new level tonight James. It doesn't happen often, but somehow  you managed it to do it tonight. :D :D :D

It didn't take much. Just one simple % sign and attracting mothra to post and let mother mothra take its course to bring stupid to a whole new level.

Well done I must say. ;D

See all nutter mothra can do is post memes , no intellect just a google to try and make fun of someone. Any retard can do that. Right ?

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 11:11pm:

https://memecrunch.com/meme/2250I/methinks-thou-doth-protest-too-much/image.jpg?w=555&c=1

Here let me fix that for you retard.

https://memecrunch.com/meme/2250I/methinks-thou-doth-protest-too-much/image.jpg

[quote author=mothra link=1460704746/159#159 date=1460725995] https://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/56313379.jpg[/quote]

And I'll do this one free of charge too.

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/56313379.jpg



We can't have people miss out on your highly intellectual memes now can we mothra.

Please excuse me for a few minutes they are so damn funny I have to go and have a big laugh. :D

Sir James wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 11:06pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 10:57pm: Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 10:50pm: mothra wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 10:47pm: You're easily confused, aren't you Wonder Boy? http://memesvault.com/wp-content/uploads/Confused-Baby-Meme-Blank-01.jpg No just amazed at how thick and lonely you are. Does it help you to think that Wonder Boy? And that's i'm old? And having a clandestine affair with Greg? You seem to spend a lot of time thinking about me. Stop it. You're not my type. You are lonely, you sit up all night posting nonsense to who ever will have you. That's a fact nothing to do with me. Secondly greg wouldn't have you anyways that's just banter to piss greg off when you chase him around don't take it to heart. It usually gets rid of him. Thank goodness. I hate to tell you this but I don't think of you at all. I just put up with you like everyone else on this forum has too. I think its bloody obvious I am not your type I am quiet younger than you for starters. Even if you were young enough to be a cougar you would be too high maintenance anyway. Probably why you're alone now. Anyways : - Islam is still NOT a Race A Country is still NOT a Race An Islamic majority Country is still NOT a Race Get over it, name calling just makes you look even more stupid. It may turn john or greg on I guess. For me it just shows you are upset. The way you clearly get upset over age issues indicates you are in fact elderly. That's your hang up not mine. As far as I am concerned you are a dirty old lefty man who wants to be a comic hero.

Good to see you "don't think of me at all", Wonder Boy .... LOL   ;D


I;ve really got up your nose, haven't i? Diddums.

mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 11:21pm:

Good to see you "don't think of me at all", Wonder Boy .... LOL   ;D

Nice to see I have got so far up you nose you need to make out I think about you.

Now that's way cool.

PS. I like Wonder Boy sounds like a cool Super Hero.


mothra wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 11:21pm:

I;ve really got up your nose, haven't i? Diddums.

Now folks this is the part of the evening where grammar goes out the window and mothra tells you in desperation how well she has done and that you have been challenged by her. A woman and you don't like that. Then projects you are upset and yes she's up your nose with all the boogers right where she wants to be.

Memes flying hard and strong between projections.

Yes folks this is where you stare with amazement at the post shake your head rolling your eyes trying to picture exactly what is sitting at the other end.

No mothra you're not up my nose but I am certainly up yours. ;D ;D ;D

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/67876809.jpg

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/67876937.jpg

Anyways back on topic : -

The Comparison of Mean IQ in Muslim and Non-Muslim Countries
Donald I. Templer

Abstract

The present research found that the Muslim country mean IQ of 81 is half a standard deviation below the mean IQ of non-Muslim nations and is not related to strength of Muslim culture as defined by the percentage of Muslims in the country. The mean IQ of 84 in Arab countries is not associated with per capita income and is incompatible with the intellectual achievements of the golden age of the Muslim Empire. Possible explanations for this decline include hybridization with sub-Saharan Africans, dysgenic decrease in the more educated Muslims employing birth control as suggested by Meisenberg, the Muslim religion not fostering critical thinking, and the intellectual contributions being both exaggerated and made by non-Muslims.

http://donalditempler.com/assets/templer_8.pdf



Given the mean IQ is 81 highlights the problems of communication, learning ability and ability for rational reason. Bear that in mind when conversing or getting one too upset.

At a guess I'd say the mean IQ of the muslim apologist would be around 81 as well or possibly less.

So as a rule of thumb  when conversing with muslims or apologists keep it simple.

Still not thinking about me Wonder Boy? LOL  ;D


And you don't get up my nose. I think you're hilarious. Best laugh tonight that iv'e had in ages.

81% ...  ;D

Yep we all believes ya ;) . ;D ;D ;D

Never the less : -

Islam is NOT a RACE

A Country is NOT a RACE

An ISLAMIC Country is not a RACE.

;D ;D ;D

GordyL wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 7:06pm:

Basically, they need to READ MORE. Printing was banned by Islamic authorities because they believed the Koran would be dishonoured by appearing out of a machine. As a result, Arabs did not acquire printing presses until the 18th century. http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/2009/03/07/printing-banned-by-islam/ AND Greece annually translates five times more books from English than the entire Arab world, and currently, 65 million Arab adults are illiterate. These sobering statistics are thanks to the U.N.’s first Arab Human Development Report published back in 2002 which I found in Thomas Friedman’s recent Op-Ed in the New York Times. AND The oil wealth is matched by social backwardness, and the only other region of the world with an income level lower than ours is sub-Saharan Africa. Productivity is decreasing, scientific research is virtually nonexistent, the region is suffering a brain drain, and illiteracy afflicts half of Arab women. The report was only diplo-matic concerning implicit criticisms of extremist Islamist movements as a cause of the culture of backwardness and absence of fertile ground for democ-racy. Interestingly, the report found that the total number of books translated into Arabic yearly is no more than 330, or one-fifth of those translated in a small country like Greece. Indeed, the total number of books translated into Arabic during the 1,000 years since the age of Caliph Al-Ma’moun [a ninth-century Arab ruler who was a patron of cultural interaction between Arab, Persian, and Greek scholars—WPR] to this day is less than those translated in Spain in one year. The report noted that Arab rulers stay in office all their lives and create dynasties that inherit power, and the peoples are unable to institute change.

Borderline intellectual functioning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Borderline intellectual functioning, also called borderline mental disability, is a categorization of intelligence wherein a person has below average cognitive ability (generally an IQ of 70-85),[1] but the deficit is not as severe as intellectual disability (below 70). It is sometimes called below average IQ (BAIQ). This is technically a cognitive impairment; however, this group is not sufficiently mentally disabled to be eligible for specialized services.[2]

Additionally, the DSM-IV-TR codes borderline intellectual functioning as V62.89,[3] which is generally[citation needed] not a billable code[clarification needed][citation needed], unlike the codes for mental disabilities.

During school years, individuals with borderline intellectual functioning are often "slow learners."[2] Although a large percentage of this group fails to complete high school and can often achieve only a low socioeconomic status, most adults in this group blend in with the rest of the population.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borderline_intellectual_functioning

Having a below average cognitive ability (generally an IQ of 70-85) would explain why muslims do what islam demands of them and why they cannot understand guidance away from it.

Low IQ & Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice


There's no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study that is bound to stir public controversy.

The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.

"Prejudice is extremely complex and multifaceted, making it critical that any factors contributing to bias are uncovered and understood," he said.

Controversy ahead

The findings combine three hot-button topics.

"They've pulled off the trifecta of controversial topics," said Brian Nosek, a social and cognitive psychologist at the University of Virginia who was not involved in the study. "When one selects intelligence, political ideology and racism and looks at any of the relationships between those three variables, it's bound to upset somebody."

Polling data and social and political science research do show that prejudice is more common in those who hold right-wing ideals that those of other political persuasions, Nosek told LiveScience. [7 Thoughts That Are Bad For You]

"The unique contribution here is trying to make some progress on the most challenging aspect of this," Nosek said, referring to the new study. "It's not that a relationship like that exists, but why it exists."

Brains and bias

Earlier studies have found links between low levels of education and higher levels of prejudice, Hodson said, so studying intelligence seemed a logical next step. The researchers turned to two studies of citizens in the United Kingdom, one that has followed babies since their births in March 1958, and another that did the same for babies born in April 1970. The children in the studies had their intelligence assessed at age 10 or 11; as adults ages 30 or 33, their levels of social conservatism and racism were measured. [Life's Extremes: Democrat vs. Republican]

In the first study, verbal and nonverbal intelligence was measured using tests that asked people to find similarities and differences between words, shapes and symbols. The second study measured cognitive abilities in four ways, including number recall, shape-drawing tasks, defining words and identifying patterns and similarities among words. Average IQ is set at 100.

Social conservatives were defined as people who agreed with a laundry list of statements such as "Family life suffers if mum is working full-time," and "Schools should teach children to obey authority." Attitudes toward other races were captured by measuring agreement with statements such as "I wouldn't mind working with people from other races." (These questions measured overt prejudiced attitudes, but most people, no matter how egalitarian, do hold unconscious racial biases; Hodson's work can't speak to this "underground" racism.)

As suspected, low intelligence in childhood corresponded with racism in adulthood. But the factor that explained the relationship between these two variables was political: When researchers included social conservatism in the analysis, those ideologies accounted for much of the link between brains and bias.

People with lower cognitive abilities also had less contact with people of other races.

"This finding is consistent with recent research demonstrating that intergroup contact is mentally challenging and cognitively draining, and consistent with findings that contact reduces prejudice," said Hodson, who along with his colleagues published these results online Jan. 5 in the journal Psychological Science.

A study of averages

Hodson was quick to note that the despite the link found between low intelligence and social conservatism, the researchers aren't implying that all liberals are brilliant and all conservatives stupid. The research is a study of averages over large groups, he said.

"There are multiple examples of very bright conservatives and not-so-bright liberals, and many examples of very principled conservatives and very intolerant liberals," Hodson said.

Nosek gave another example to illustrate the dangers of taking the findings too literally.

"We can say definitively men are taller than women on average," he said. "But you can't say if you take a random man and you take a random woman that the man is going to be taller. There's plenty of overlap."

Nonetheless, there is reason to believe that strict right-wing ideology might appeal to those who have trouble grasping the complexity of the world.

"Socially conservative ideologies tend to offer structure and order," Hodson said, explaining why these beliefs might draw those with low intelligence. "Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice."

In another study, this one in the United States, Hodson and Busseri compared 254 people with the same amount of education but different levels of ability in abstract reasoning. They found that what applies to racism may also apply to homophobia. People who were poorer at abstract reasoning were more likely to exhibit prejudice against gays. As in the U.K. citizens, a lack of contact with gays and more acceptance of right-wing authoritarianism explained the link. [5 Myths About Gay People Debunked]

Simple viewpoints

Hodson and Busseri's explanation of their findings is reasonable, Nosek said, but it is correlational. That means the researchers didn't conclusively prove that the low intelligence caused the later prejudice. To do that, you'd have to somehow randomly assign otherwise identical people to be smart or dumb, liberal or conservative. Those sorts of studies obviously aren't possible.

The researchers controlled for factors such as education and socioeconomic status, making their case stronger, Nosek said. But there are other possible explanations that fit the data. For example, Nosek said, a study of left-wing liberals with stereotypically naïve views like "every kid is a genius in his or her own way," might find that people who hold these attitudes are also less bright. In other words, it might not be a particular ideology that is linked to stupidity, but extremist views in general.

"My speculation is that it's not as simple as their model presents it," Nosek said. "I think that lower cognitive capacity can lead to multiple simple ways to represent the world, and one of those can be embodied in a right-wing ideology where 'People I don't know are threats' and 'The world is a dangerous place'. ... Another simple way would be to just assume everybody is wonderful."

Prejudice is of particular interest because understanding the roots of racism and bias could help eliminate them, Hodson said. For example, he said, many anti-prejudice programs encourage participants to see things from another group's point of view. That mental exercise may be too taxing for people of low IQ.

"There may be cognitive limits in the ability to take the perspective of others, particularly foreigners," Hodson said. "Much of the present research literature suggests that our prejudices are primarily emotional in origin rather than cognitive. These two pieces of information suggest that it might be particularly fruitful for researchers to consider strategies to change feelings toward outgroups," rather than thoughts.
http://www.livescience.com/18132-intelligence-social-conservatism-racism.html

Muslims Aren't a RACE DUMB DUMB ;D ;D ;D

"Prejudice'.

mothra wrote on Apr 16^th, 2016 at 5:55am:

"Prejudice'.

This thread has nothing to do with prejudice DUMB DUMB .

Post your off topic posts somewhere else.

We are only interested in Muslim IQ statistics here.

You know hard FACT's not loon conspiracy theories or people all upset with low iQ's like you sooking over muslims constantly.

Go make a prejudice thread instead of annoying others for once.

Borderline intellectual functioning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Borderline intellectual functioning, also called borderline mental disability, is a categorization of intelligence wherein a person has below average cognitive ability (generally an IQ of 70-85),[1] but the deficit is not as severe as intellectual disability (below 70). It is sometimes called below average IQ (BAIQ). This is technically a cognitive impairment; however, this group is not sufficiently mentally disabled to be eligible for specialized services.[2]

Additionally, the DSM-IV-TR codes borderline intellectual functioning as V62.89,[3] which is generally[citation needed] not a billable code[clarification needed][citation needed], unlike the codes for mental disabilities.

During school years, individuals with borderline intellectual functioning are often "slow learners."[2] Although a large percentage of this group fails to complete high school and can often achieve only a low socioeconomic status, most adults in this group blend in with the rest of the population.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borderline_intellectual_functioning

Having a below average cognitive ability (generally an IQ of 70-85) would explain why muslims do what islam demands of them and why they cannot understand guidance away from it.

Having trouble winning a debate?

Are others disproving or disputing your points?

Do you feel that you cant win?????


CHANGE THE SUBJECT.......GO OFF ON A TANGENT
or

START INSULTING PEOPLE AND START A SLANGING MATCH.

The only way to save face.

mothra wrote on Apr 16^th, 2016 at 5:32am:

Low IQ & Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice

Since most Muslims are socially conservative, the thesis in the thread title seems to be confirmed from various directions.
Well done.

mothra wrote on Apr 16^th, 2016 at 5:55am:

"Prejudice'.

Another measurement of a country’s contribution to science is demonstrated by the number patents issued. “The 57 Islamic countries produce negligibly few patents,” Hoodbhoy writes. “According to official statistics, Pakistan has produced only eight patents in the past 43 years.” There are 1800 universities in the 57 Muslim countries of the world; none of them were ranked in the top 500 in a study undertaken by Shanghai Jiao Tong University

https://bobblincoe.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/measuring-scientific-progress-in-the
-muslim-world%E2%80%94dr-pervez-hoodbhoy-does-the-math/

"81%"      ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 16^th, 2016 at 8:27am:

"81%"      ;D

it's still funny the next morning

;D ;D ;D

Inbreeding and it's associated low I.Q. is one of the many self induced symptoms of a sick evil muslim society.

We all know that islam / muslims are the absolute bottom of the social ladder.

muslims themselves know they are the dregs, but in their stupidity they believe the answer is to have islam as the only religious and political system on this earth.

So they're destined to keep going down hill.

They are aided by the idiocy of their apologists who refuse to criticize islam and get muslims to critically examine themselves and islam.

I like it, the mussies are on a very slippery downhill path, their apologists are pushing them on this downward trend.

Which will result in?

Eventually truth and muslim  / apologist imbecility will destroy islam.

John Smith wrote on Apr 16^th, 2016 at 8:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 16th, 2016 at 8:27am: "81%"      ;D it's still funny the next morning ;D ;D ;D

It certainly is.

"percent"    ;D

... wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 6:16pm:

Sir James wrote on Apr 15th, 2016 at 5:19pm: Possible explanations for this decline include hybridization with sub-Saharan Africans, dysgenic decrease in the more educated Muslims employing birth control as suggested by Meisenberg, the Muslim religion not fostering critical thinking, and the intellectual contributions being both exaggerated and made by non-Muslims. The arab world was utterly devastated by the mongols.  Their repopulation in the last 800 years has included widespread inbreeding - this has become known as a "cultural practice" but it simply reflected necessity.  Their gene pool just doesn't have the depth to thrive otherwise.  A lower average intelligence than other peoples who didnt face such a crisis is to be expected,  how much lower is the question.

The Arabs spent centuries importing millions of sex slaves from Africa. Supposedly the offspring of these sex slaves to Muslim fathers are considered Muslims themselves and should be given equal social standing (not entirely sure on this one as I get conflicting versions). Yet you don't see much evidence of this in modern Arabs.

Quote:

not entirely sure on this one as I get conflicting versions

Ah.

Frank wrote on Apr 15^th, 2016 at 5:59pm:

Noam Chomsky: "Surely people differ in their biologically determined qualities. The world would be too horrible to contemplate if they did not. But discovery of a correlation between some of these qualities is of no scientific interest and of no social significance, except to racists, sexists and the like. Those who argue that there is a correlation between race and IQ and those who deny this claim are contributing to racism and other disorders, because what they are saying is based on the assumption that the answer to the question makes a difference; it does not, except to racists, sexists and the like." Is Chomsky saying that intelligence makes no difference? But if intelligence is important, why does it not matter how it is distributed between populations? Why doesn't the discovery of correlation between some qualities matter, scientifically or socially?

He's acknowledging the error of measurement!

To take a measurement a measuring device has to be made: thus human error and bias is forever ingrained.

Who's making the measuring device?

He is simply positing that racists are unable to distinguish between propaganda and fact implying that the racist is so influential that nothing exists without him and his stupid mother to his racist children.

..as Tom said to Nazim last night: without white people you wouldn't even have racism  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Lucky muslims aren't a race but a rather a particular demographic that has a low mean IQ level that can be measured.

The cause scientifically seems more to be based on inbreeding based on historical data. This data helps us understand their intellectual level for effective communication and why they have trouble understanding more complex issues and learning. Not to mention being easily led into committing suicide, killing other people they do not know and being the most rabid racists on the earth today.

Wow, 13 pages of hyperventilating and not a single person has contradicted any of the claims in the opening post.

Mothra, would you agree that Islam is the ultimate conservative ideology? Do you think it is possible that Islam has become self-reinforcing in some places by creating genetically inferior subgroups that are in turn drawn to Islam because of their low intellect?


mothra wrote on Apr 16^th, 2016 at 5:37am:

A study of averages Hodson was quick to note that the despite the link found between low intelligence and social conservatism, the researchers aren't implying that all liberals are brilliant and all conservatives stupid. The research is a study of averages over large groups, he said. "There are multiple examples of very bright conservatives and not-so-bright liberals, and many examples of very principled conservatives and very intolerant liberals," Hodson said. Nosek gave another example to illustrate the dangers of taking the findings too literally. "We can say definitively men are taller than women on average," he said. "But you can't say if you take a random man and you take a random woman that the man is going to be taller. There's plenty of overlap." Nonetheless, there is reason to believe that strict right-wing ideology might appeal to those who have trouble grasping the complexity of the world. "Socially conservative ideologies tend to offer structure and order," Hodson said, explaining why these beliefs might draw those with low intelligence. "Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice." In another study, this one in the United States, Hodson and Busseri compared 254 people with the same amount of education but different levels of ability in abstract reasoning. They found that what applies to racism may also apply to homophobia. People who were poorer at abstract reasoning were more likely to exhibit prejudice against gays. As in the U.K. citizens, a lack of contact with gays and more acceptance of right-wing authoritarianism explained the link. [5 Myths About Gay People Debunked] Simple viewpoints Hodson and Busseri's explanation of their findings is reasonable, Nosek said, but it is correlational. That means the researchers didn't conclusively prove that the low intelligence caused the later prejudice. To do that, you'd have to somehow randomly assign otherwise identical people to be smart or dumb, liberal or conservative. Those sorts of studies obviously aren't possible. The researchers controlled for factors such as education and socioeconomic status, making their case stronger, Nosek said. But there are other possible explanations that fit the data. For example, Nosek said, a study of left-wing liberals with stereotypically naïve views like "every kid is a genius in his or her own way," might find that people who hold these attitudes are also less bright. In other words, it might not be a particular ideology that is linked to stupidity, but extremist views in general. "My speculation is that it's not as simple as their model presents it," Nosek said. "I think that lower cognitive capacity can lead to multiple simple ways to represent the world, and one of those can be embodied in a right-wing ideology where 'People I don't know are threats' and 'The world is a dangerous place'. ... Another simple way would be to just assume everybody is wonderful." Prejudice is of particular interest because understanding the roots of racism and bias could help eliminate them, Hodson said. For example, he said, many anti-prejudice programs encourage participants to see things from another group's point of view. That mental exercise may be too taxing for people of low IQ. "There may be cognitive limits in the ability to take the perspective of others, particularly foreigners," Hodson said. "Much of the present research literature suggests that our prejudices are primarily emotional in origin rather than cognitive. These two pieces of information suggest that it might be particularly fruitful for researchers to consider strategies to change feelings toward outgroups," rather than thoughts. http://www.livescience.com/18132-intelligence-social-conservatism-racism.html

Quote:

Do you think it is possible that Islam has become self-reinforcing in some places by creating genetically inferior subgroups that are in turn drawn to Islam because of their low intellect?

Do you think this is possible, FD?

I'm curious.

Sure, it's plausible. If the details stack up I might add it to the faith ratchet article.

I've been meaning to add Aceh as an example.

freediver wrote on Apr 16^th, 2016 at 7:26pm:

Do you think it is possible that Islam has become self-reinforcing in some places by creating genetically inferior subgroups that are in turn drawn to Islam because of their low intellect?

By adopting such arguments, would you say it dispels the myth that criticising Islam and muslims has nothing to do with race and racism?