Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1395308458 Message started by progressiveslol on Mar 20th, 2014 at 7:40pm |
Title: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by progressiveslol on Mar 20th, 2014 at 7:40pm
``Let’s be very plain,’’ said xxxxxx. ``Treasury modelling is that under our plan, following the abolition of the carbon tax, average families will be $380 a year better off as opposed to xxxxxxxx's plan, when fully implemented, which will leave them $1200 a year worse off.’’
|
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by Aussie on Mar 20th, 2014 at 7:47pm
Rudd.
So, we can close this redundant Thread. |
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by GeorgeH on Mar 20th, 2014 at 8:44pm
The one that really lies about all this Carbon Price/ETS crap is the simian. Abolish the Carbon Price and there will be no reduction in electricity prices.
|
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by Frances on Mar 20th, 2014 at 9:17pm Quote:
|
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by Frances on Mar 20th, 2014 at 9:18pm
Oh dear - so many that they won't all fit in.....
Continued: Quote:
|
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by Frances on Mar 20th, 2014 at 9:19pm
And again.....
Quote:
|
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by Frances on Mar 20th, 2014 at 9:21pm
And again.....
Quote:
http://www.awu.net.au/news/truth-overboard-35-lies-told-john-howard-and-counting |
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by GeorgeH on Mar 20th, 2014 at 9:24pm
Howard, a terrible Treasurer, a far worse PM: divisive, spending recklessly after 1998 when he lost the popular vote, feeding a credit fuelled real estate boom that is still affecting public finances even NOW! On the remotest possible acquaintance with the truth.
|
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by Setanta on Mar 20th, 2014 at 10:12pm
Kat, Kat, Kat...
Grown men still talk about John Howard in hushed terms . Women faint at his name. Shame Leftards Shame! |
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by cods on Mar 21st, 2014 at 5:44am
its interesting how Howard is still Australias BEST PM.
JOHN Howard has been named Australia’s best prime minister of the past 40 years, followed by Bob Hawke, with Gough Whitlam and Kevin Rudd tying for third place. The poll, conducted last week by Essential Research and provided exclusively to The Australian, shows that 39 per cent of voters ranked Mr Howard, the Liberal prime minister from 1996 to 2007, as the best. Labor’s Mr Hawke was rated as the best prime minister by 14 per cent of voters. A further 8 per cent of voters chose Mr Whitlam while another 8 per cent selected Mr Rudd. Paul Keating was named best prime minister by 7 per cent, placing him fifth overall. In sixth and seventh place, respectively, were Julia Gillard (4 per cent) and Malcolm Fraser (3 per cent). Tony Abbott’s score tied with Mr Fraser. Nearly three-quarters (73 per cent) of Coalition voters selected Mr Howard as the top prime minister among the eight who have served in the position since December 1972. Labor voters spread their choice more widely. Mr Hawke (1983-91) was the choice of 21 per cent of Labor voters, followed by Mr Rudd (2007-10, 2013) with 16 per cent support, Mr Howard (15 per cent) and Mr Keating (1991-96) with 13 per cent. Labor voters rated Mr Howard as a better prime minister than Ms Gillard (2010-13), Mr Keating or Mr Whitlam (1972-75). Coalition voters rated Mr Hawke as better than Mr Fraser (1975-83) and Mr Abbott, in the job for just six months. There is not much love for Ms Gillard or Mr Fraser in their own parties - just 8 per cent of Labor voters nominated Ms Gillard as the best prime minister, while only 4 per cent of Coalition voters named Mr Fraser as the best. Of the 1007 online respondents, 45 per cent nominated a Liberal prime minister and 41 per cent nominated a former Labor prime minister. Fourteen per cent did not nominate anyone. The most popular former prime minister among Greens voters was Mr Whitlam, with 22 per cent support, followed by Mr Hawke (19 per cent) and Ms Gillard (16 per cent). Mr Howard was the most popular choice among men (43 per cent) and women (35 per cent). He was also strongly favoured by all age groups but his biggest support was among respondents aged 55 and older (48 per cent). A January 2012 Essential Research poll, which asked voters to rate prime ministers from 1941 to 2012, saw respondents rate Mr Howard as the best prime minister (33 per cent) followed by Mr Rudd and Mr Hawke, who tied in second place at 15 per cent each. A January 2009 poll found Mr Howard was rated best by 28 per cent of respondents, followed by Mr Rudd (20 per cent) and Mr Hawke (12 per cent). |
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by imcrookonit on Mar 21st, 2014 at 5:52am
Mr Howard was the best PM. Well one cannot imagine why. :(
|
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by Grendel on Mar 21st, 2014 at 6:49am Frances wrote on Mar 20th, 2014 at 9:21pm:
Yeah yeah yeah the famous 35 lies which were all mostly bullshyt... some people are so deluded and ignorant of the real facts it aint funny. Did them over many years ago. :D ::) :D |
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by Frances on Mar 21st, 2014 at 6:56am Grendel wrote on Mar 21st, 2014 at 6:49am:
So you're saying that the passage of time means that they're not lies any more? |
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by cods on Mar 21st, 2014 at 6:59am wrote on Mar 21st, 2014 at 5:52am:
you prefer weak... back stabbing.. debt...ouch another low in the polls.. lets change leaders...no balance balance sheets. fair enough. |
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by Armchair_Politician on Mar 21st, 2014 at 7:00am
Quoting the AWU now Francine??? LMAO!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by Grendel on Mar 21st, 2014 at 7:19am Frances wrote on Mar 21st, 2014 at 6:56am:
No I'm saying even at the time most of them were just ALP propaganda lies oh and yes... they still are. You're not really up on current affairs of politics are you if you actually can't tell lies and propaganda from facts and reality. |
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by aquascoot on Mar 21st, 2014 at 7:32am wrote on Mar 21st, 2014 at 5:52am:
John had very good intuition. He had very good "emotional intelligence" I believe bob hawke also had this. It is the ability to "absorb" by "osmosis" the "mood " of the electorate. You cant teach this stuff. You have it or you dont, Its slightly feminine, like a "womans intuition" I feel shorten has shown he doesnt have it and milne and the greens never have. My gut instincts and i think the gut instincts of all those who are in tune with the electorate would say that labor have made a terrible mistake by siding with the greens and blocking this. They have really played directly into abbotts hands. Amazing that people can make it to the top of the pile and yet have such bad instincts. My instincts tell me labor had a great opportunity to split with the greens and make a statement but they have missed it. Abbott will sleep very well knowing he has a party of "emotionally unintelligent ' people to manipulate. |
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by GeorgeH on Mar 21st, 2014 at 8:29am
Little Johnny led from behind the whole 12 years he was PM. He fanned a credit–fuelled real estate boom, spent taxpayers money recklessly on pork and buying elections and generally mucked up economic management so much his mess is still causing problems.
I will agree the simian doesn’t have Little Johnny’s caution. Just a wrecker is the simian, acting purely from motives of hatred for his infinite betters and wanting to destroy what they built. Hence he is on the low end of 54:46 and never had a honeymoon and 100K people already have marched once to protest his idiotic policies. His destruction of the NBN is going to cause HUGE problems as the Boomers age and grow increasingly frail and need to be supported by a relatively smaller workforce. It is also causing high unemployment and lack of growth in non mining&agriculture. |
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by Frances on Mar 21st, 2014 at 8:39am Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 21st, 2014 at 7:00am:
So? You keep referring to Daily Telegraph articles..... |
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by GeorgeH on Mar 21st, 2014 at 8:51am
hehehehe the little moronic righties here would be lost without the DT ;D
|
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by longweekend58 on Mar 21st, 2014 at 9:03am Frances wrote on Mar 21st, 2014 at 6:56am:
most of them weren't lies in the first place. |
Title: Re: Who said this. Which party lied again. Oh, a clue Post by Frances on Mar 21st, 2014 at 9:21am
Whatever.....
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2022. All Rights Reserved. |