Australian Politics Forum - Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 147923
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #15 - Yesterday at 6:44pm

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 6:37pm:

Frank wrote Yesterday at 6:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 6:23pm:

Ajax wrote Yesterday at 5:59pm:

Example

WW2 german v british dogfight in the air if one plane is hit and the pilot parachutes out it is a war crime for the pilot in the victorious aeroplane to come back and shoot the pilot in the parachute out of the sky.

Where is the evidence that these boats are carrying drugs to the united states?

Have they even got the petrol to go to the USA?

It's been proven now that at least one of the boats was not headed to the USA.

Moreover, there has been zero evidence presented to support the claim that the boats were carrying illicit drugs.

This is quite simply the mass murder of innocent people.

Thank for lying, as usual.

All facts.

It's been proven now that at least one of the boats was not headed to the USA.

Fact

The Trump Administration’s justification for striking a boat in the Caribbean in early September, killing all 11 people on board, was that it was carrying a cargo of potentially deadly drugs that was headed to the United States.

But that justification appears to have been undermined by a briefing from the commander of that operation before lawmakers on Thursday, who reportedly said the boat in question was heading to the coast of Suriname.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 54507
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #16 - Yesterday at 7:49pm

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 6:44pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 6:37pm:

Frank wrote Yesterday at 6:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 6:23pm:

Ajax wrote Yesterday at 5:59pm:

Example

WW2 german v british dogfight in the air if one plane is hit and the pilot parachutes out it is a war crime for the pilot in the victorious aeroplane to come back and shoot the pilot in the parachute out of the sky.

Where is the evidence that these boats are carrying drugs to the united states?

Have they even got the petrol to go to the USA?

It's been proven now that at least one of the boats was not headed to the USA.

Moreover, there has been zero evidence presented to support the claim that the boats were carrying illicit drugs.

This is quite simply the mass murder of innocent people.

Thank for lying, as usual.

All facts.

It's been proven now that at least one of the boats was not headed to the USA.

Fact

The Trump Administration’s justification for striking a boat in the Caribbean in early September, killing all 11 people on board, was that it was carrying a cargo of potentially deadly drugs that was headed to the United States.

But that justification appears to have been undermined by a briefing from the commander of that operation before lawmakers on Thursday, who reportedly said the boat in question was heading to the coast of Suriname.

Appear away, repulsive creep.

Time to go and wash my hands after interacting with you.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 99816

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #17 - Yesterday at 11:08pm

Frank wrote Yesterday at 7:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 6:44pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 6:37pm:

Frank wrote Yesterday at 6:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 6:23pm:

Ajax wrote Yesterday at 5:59pm:

Example

WW2 german v british dogfight in the air if one plane is hit and the pilot parachutes out it is a war crime for the pilot in the victorious aeroplane to come back and shoot the pilot in the parachute out of the sky.

Where is the evidence that these boats are carrying drugs to the united states?

Have they even got the petrol to go to the USA?

It's been proven now that at least one of the boats was not headed to the USA.

Moreover, there has been zero evidence presented to support the claim that the boats were carrying illicit drugs.

This is quite simply the mass murder of innocent people.

Thank for lying, as usual.

All facts.

It's been proven now that at least one of the boats was not headed to the USA.

Fact

The Trump Administration’s justification for striking a boat in the Caribbean in early September, killing all 11 people on board, was that it was carrying a cargo of potentially deadly drugs that was headed to the United States.

But that justification appears to have been undermined by a briefing from the commander of that operation before lawmakers on Thursday, who reportedly said the boat in question was heading to the coast of Suriname.

Appear away, repulsive creep.

Time to go and wash my hands after interacting with you.

Hey, old boy, mind your manners and wash your arse too, yeah?

Other people need to use it when Greggery's done.

Back to top

IP Logged