Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Adelaide pooper (Read 618 times)
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 32385
Gender: male
Re: Adelaide pooper
Reply #45 - Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:18am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:59am:
Gnads wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:50am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:46am:


Irrelevant.



Well, no - it's completely relevant.

The accusation is that some guy did a poo and that the guy filming him was arrested by Federal Police and that Tony Burke defended the arrest.

However, the facts are this: no poo, no police and no Tony Burke comment.

The facts - that's all I'm presenting here.

Not opinion, not racism, not assumptions - just the facts.


And why do you think there was "no poo, therefore no Police, & consequently no Tony Burke comment?

Do you honestly believe this bloke wasn't going to take a dump had he not been challenged?

Can you give a straight answer instead of pretending to be Judge Robert Rinder.(grindr)  Grin
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 32385
Gender: male
Re: Adelaide pooper
Reply #46 - Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:19am
 
##
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 147994
Gender: male
Re: Adelaide pooper
Reply #47 - Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:22am
 
Gnads wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:18am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:59am:
Gnads wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:50am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:46am:


Irrelevant.



Well, no - it's completely relevant.

The accusation is that some guy did a poo and that the guy filming him was arrested by Federal Police and that Tony Burke defended the arrest.

However, the facts are this: no poo, no police and no Tony Burke comment.

The facts - that's all I'm presenting here.

Not opinion, not racism, not assumptions - just the facts.


And why do you think there was "no poo, therefore no Police, & consequently no Tony Burke comment?

Do you honestly believe this bloke wasn't going to take a dump had he not been challenged?



I have no idea what he was going to do.

What we know for a fact though is that there was no poo, no police and no comment from Tony Burke.

It was just a clickbait story.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 114932
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Adelaide pooper
Reply #48 - Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:24am
 

Pecca can't work out what he was going to do:


...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 147994
Gender: male
Re: Adelaide pooper
Reply #49 - Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:27am
 
Bobby. wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:24am:


It could have been staged.

All I know is that there was no poo, no police and no comment from Tony Burke.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Leroy
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 3973
Gender: male
Re: Adelaide pooper
Reply #50 - Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:28am
 
Bobby. wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:24am:


greg thinks toilets are for meeting people.
Back to top
 

Trump derangement syndrome
Fareed Zakaria defined the term as "hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people's judgment"

Lets check in at 5pm on 23rd July 2025 then at 5pm on 30th July
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 114932
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Adelaide pooper
Reply #51 - Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:30am
 
Leroy wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:28am:
Bobby. wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:24am:


greg thinks toilets are for meeting people.



He's from WA - it's normal to do poo poos under a tree there.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 32385
Gender: male
Re: Adelaide pooper
Reply #52 - Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:32am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:22am:
Gnads wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:18am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:59am:
Gnads wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:50am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:46am:


Irrelevant.



Well, no - it's completely relevant.

The accusation is that some guy did a poo and that the guy filming him was arrested by Federal Police and that Tony Burke defended the arrest.

However, the facts are this: no poo, no police and no Tony Burke comment.

The facts - that's all I'm presenting here.

Not opinion, not racism, not assumptions - just the facts.


And why do you think there was "no poo, therefore no Police, & consequently no Tony Burke comment?

Do you honestly believe this bloke wasn't going to take a dump had he not been challenged?



I have no idea what he was going to do.

What we know for a fact though is that there was no poo, no police and no comment from Tony Burke.

It was just a clickbait story.


Was it?

Are you suggesting the bloke with the camera & the shyter were working together just to create outrage?

You're a very repetitious prick Peccar .... seems you have 2 types of syndrome TDS & TAS.

Trump Derangement Syndrome
Turd Arrangement Syndrome
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 147994
Gender: male
Re: Adelaide pooper
Reply #53 - Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:35am
 
Gnads wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:32am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:22am:
Gnads wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:18am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:59am:
Gnads wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:50am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:46am:


Irrelevant.



Well, no - it's completely relevant.

The accusation is that some guy did a poo and that the guy filming him was arrested by Federal Police and that Tony Burke defended the arrest.

However, the facts are this: no poo, no police and no Tony Burke comment.

The facts - that's all I'm presenting here.

Not opinion, not racism, not assumptions - just the facts.


And why do you think there was "no poo, therefore no Police, & consequently no Tony Burke comment?

Do you honestly believe this bloke wasn't going to take a dump had he not been challenged?



I have no idea what he was going to do.

What we know for a fact though is that there was no poo, no police and no comment from Tony Burke.

It was just a clickbait story.


Was it?

Are you suggesting the bloke with the camera & the shyter were working together just to create outrage?



Yes, it was clickbait.

And, there was no shyter.

Moreover, a set-up is plausible.

What we know for sure though is this: no poo, no police and no Tony Burke comment.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 32385
Gender: male
Re: Adelaide pooper
Reply #54 - Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:40am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:35am:
Gnads wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:32am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:22am:
Gnads wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:18am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:59am:
Gnads wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:50am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:46am:


Irrelevant.



Well, no - it's completely relevant.

The accusation is that some guy did a poo and that the guy filming him was arrested by Federal Police and that Tony Burke defended the arrest.

However, the facts are this: no poo, no police and no Tony Burke comment.

The facts - that's all I'm presenting here.

Not opinion, not racism, not assumptions - just the facts.


And why do you think there was "no poo, therefore no Police, & consequently no Tony Burke comment?

Do you honestly believe this bloke wasn't going to take a dump had he not been challenged?



I have no idea what he was going to do.

What we know for a fact though is that there was no poo, no police and no comment from Tony Burke.

It was just a clickbait story.


Was it?

Are you suggesting the bloke with the camera & the shyter were working together just to create outrage?



Yes, it was clickbait.

And, there was no shyter.

Moreover, a set-up is plausible.

What we know for sure though is this: no poo, no police and no Tony Burke comment.



Incorrect - there was a potential shyter -
there was no shyte.

Are you the "clickbait" Commissioner?

Then it's your repetition -- blah blah blah
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 147994
Gender: male
Re: Adelaide pooper
Reply #55 - Dec 7th, 2025 at 11:01am
 
Gnads wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:40am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:35am:
Gnads wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:32am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:22am:
Gnads wrote on Dec 7th, 2025 at 10:18am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:59am:
Gnads wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:50am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 6th, 2025 at 9:46am:


Irrelevant.



Well, no - it's completely relevant.

The accusation is that some guy did a poo and that the guy filming him was arrested by Federal Police and that Tony Burke defended the arrest.

However, the facts are this: no poo, no police and no Tony Burke comment.

The facts - that's all I'm presenting here.

Not opinion, not racism, not assumptions - just the facts.


And why do you think there was "no poo, therefore no Police, & consequently no Tony Burke comment?

Do you honestly believe this bloke wasn't going to take a dump had he not been challenged?



I have no idea what he was going to do.

What we know for a fact though is that there was no poo, no police and no comment from Tony Burke.

It was just a clickbait story.


Was it?

Are you suggesting the bloke with the camera & the shyter were working together just to create outrage?



Yes, it was clickbait.

And, there was no shyter.

Moreover, a set-up is plausible.

What we know for sure though is this: no poo, no police and no Tony Burke comment.



Incorrect - there was a potential shyter -
there was no shyte.



Everyone's a potential shyter.

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print