Frank wrote on Dec 4
th, 2025 at 10:31am:
Dnarever wrote on Dec 4
th, 2025 at 9:19am:
Frank wrote on Dec 4
th, 2025 at 8:25am:
Dnarever wrote on Dec 3
rd, 2025 at 8:50am:
Frank wrote on Dec 3
rd, 2025 at 5:37am:
How is this influence evident? Why do people pay for News publications when they can get the ABC FREE?
why isn't the ABC as influential, in your view?
There have been a series of Australian elections where it has been very even or Labor have been in front leading into an election and then the manic news ltd media campaign over the last weeks of the election has delivered a solid conservative win - time after time - again and again. Late media camaigns often dishonest have produced late election swings always in the same media driven direction.
Silly nonsense. Menzies was the longest serving PM decades before News Corp started (1979).
News Corp backed Hawkie and Kevni.
You old farts are still living in the Whitlam fantasy land. Laughable.
The ABC and The Granuiad, on the other hand, never ever backed or endorsed or even covered impartially a non Labor/Green side.
"They are holding government to account". Very well. What you old cloth-capped proles call ' News corp bias' is simply holding leftie governments to account to balance the ABC/Granuiad/Schwartz Media boosting of them.
Quote:News Corp backed Hawkie and Kevn
Newscorp switched late to Labor on one or two occasions after everything they tried had failed and still many in newscorp stayed with the Liberals. It was already a lost battle when News gave the impression of supporting the winner but right into the last week people like the manic Piers Morgan were still driving Liberal propoganda full speed ahead.
Yes after 75 News limited editors did publicly appologise for their actions through the previous term.
Yeah, ignore the rest....
Anyway, how is expressing a view from the right of centre more persuasive electrically than views from the left?
Because that is what you cloth capped proles are saying. Merely expressing a view not in line with the ABC/Granuiad/Schwartz line of p.c. pwogwessive orthodoxy is 'influencing' and 'manic media campaign'. Disagreeing with you is 'media manipulation'.
Laughable.
They drove children overboard - it was a lie, no children were thrown overboard and they knew it.
They drove panic over the off shore policy
They drone the docks dispute lies and corruption
They drove the better ecanomic managers lie.
They pushed the aboriginal intervention. A fail this time
They were behind the debt truck - no action was ever taken in government.
They even stood behind the never ever GST lie.
They backed up Fraser and Kerr's conspiricy.
There was not a schred of journalitic integrity from them in decades.
They spent years undermining any Labor leader and destabalising Labor.
Many of these lies successfully drove late votes and successful swings to Liberal governments.