Quote:


So you have actual evidence that she has brain damage from head banging?

Or is this another of your CCP-style "not a lie" because you have some weird longwinded excuse for telling lies? What did you mean when you said it was "your own image," if not that you just made it up?

thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 16^th, 2025 at 3:48pm:


I think you are confused. Where does it say that Taiwan is part of China?

freediver wrote on Nov 16^th, 2025 at 3:52pm:


The proof of her brain dead status (mimicking brain damage) is her 'China threat' denial of China's  sovereignty over Taiwan, and promoting war over the matter in the age of MAD.

Brain-dead.   

Quote:


See above, she's brain-dead by any objective standard, for stoking war on (self-projecting)  'threat' nonsense, in the age of MAD.   

Quote:


".....referring to the then Kuomintang regime as the dominant party in the Republic of China, whose central government had retreated to Taiwan from the mainland"

I know your IQ is suspect, but the Nationalists "retreated" to Taiwan, because....Taiwan was and is part of China. 

freediver wrote on Nov 16^th, 2025 at 4:30pm:


No, I'm claiming ALL brain-dead "freedom or death" morons are a threat to world peace.....indeed, world survival, in the age of MAD. 
She's just a particularly egregious example, with real power....

Quote:
.

No, it's saying the ROC retreated to Taiwan - which had been returned to China by the allies at the end of WW2.

And:

1. UN res 2758 (adopted in 1971): "There is only one government of  China"

2. Your error: the ROC kept claiming  they were the sole government of China until recently (in the 2010's) when they decided to confront reality and change their narrative.... to being the government of Taiwan. 

But the UN isn't playing along.

freediver wrote on Nov 16^th, 2025 at 4:56pm:


If using imagery to make a case is "lying", I accept guilt as charged.

Are you a brain-dead "freedom or death" moron? 

edit:

Quote:


Was part of China in 1945, 1971 and - given Taiwan's present status as a non member state of the UN, still is - until the UN says otherwise. 

Good luck with that...


   

freediver wrote on Nov 16^th, 2025 at 5:12pm:


Yes - guilty as charged, I already admitted it.

Quote:


By exercizing the (admittedly limited) neurons you have available  to understand different contextual usages of 'imagery' cf. 'face value' idioms.


Quote:


See the edit in my previous post. 

freediver wrote on Nov 17^th, 2025 at 10:00am:


Not my 'story": the facts are the UN said Taiwan is part of China in 1945, and again in 1971, and the UN hasn't changed its stance on that position.

The only people who have changed their story is the DDP who have given up proclaiming they are the government of China.


Quote:



google to the rescue:

An idiom is a fixed phrase whose meaning is not deducible from its individual words, while a metaphor is a direct comparison where one thing is said to be another to suggest a similarity. A metaphor can become an idiom through common usage, meaning some idioms are also metaphors, but not all idioms are metaphors.

Quote:


Yes it is.

btw, I quite liked my metaphor of (one of Macbeth's)  "toil and trouble" witches, in this case the brain-dead, heavy metal drumming PM witch,  stirring the pot to release the demons of war in the Taiwan Straits.

You? 

Sorry FD. But Taiwan does consider itself as 'China'.

Nope. The National Party of China still recognises itself as the rightful Chinese Party. Even Xi is happy for them to keep running Taiwan if they come under the banner of the Communists as a whole. Taiwan (Nationals) even claim that Mongolia is a part of China.
Personally I believe the Chinese over Lefty Media these days