Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12
Send Topic Print
Mossad? (Read 2418 times)
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 54507
Gender: male
Re: Mossad?
Reply #45 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:13pm
 
John Smith wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:53pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:47pm:
I don't know why this administration is not releasing the files. I guess it is the same reason the previous admin didn't -


The previous administration didn't spend 4 years saying they would release the files. Cheesy



Because there is no dirt on Trump in them.

They DID spend 8 years hounding him with all sorts of legal cases. Never with these files.
None of which achieved the Dems' goal of preventing Trump's reelection.

Please explain.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21332
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: Mossad?
Reply #46 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:14pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:12pm:
Keep your creepy fantasies to yourself creeper


At least you agree that behaviour is creepy.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21332
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: Mossad?
Reply #47 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:17pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:13pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:53pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:47pm:
I don't know why this administration is not releasing the files. I guess it is the same reason the previous admin didn't -


The previous administration didn't spend 4 years saying they would release the files. Cheesy



Because there is no dirt on Trump in them.

They DID spend 8 years hounding him with all sorts of legal cases. Never with these files.
None of which achieved the Dems' goal of preventing Trump's reelection.

Please explain.



So let's release them. Even the lawyer representing Epstein's victims agrees, he supports full disclosure, with redactions only for those victims who wish to remain anonymous. That's the sensible, humane, and just position.

It's a win–win. Transparency, justice, and respect for victims' privacy.

And since your only concern appears to be protecting victim identities, and not shielding anyone named Trump, you should be loudly calling for Trump to sign the executive order and make the files public.

Unless of course, your supposed concern was just a fig leaf for obstruction.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 37069
Gender: male
Re: Mossad?
Reply #48 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:20pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:57am:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:45am:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am:
Quote:
Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover.


If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges.
Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short?


Ockham's razor.



Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister.


Frank, where's the good faith discussion?

I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return.

Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm:
So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why?

Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse.


Thanks.

And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from.

I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't,

Either because they are sealed to protect victims
And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc.

Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects.

Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics.




Exactly right frank. 1400 white teenage runaways taken in a drugged by a Muslim sex ring in rotheram.wiki will inform you if you want to read about true evil. And police powerless because cretins like bwian screamed islamophobia.

Now roo , for the 20 th time, frank is 100 % correct. Biden team had all the Epstein and Maxwell investigations and if there was a shred of evidence incriminating Trump , it would have come out.
It didn't.
Please apologize to frank for saying he is defending pedophiles.
Disgraceful allegation  Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 37069
Gender: male
Re: Mossad?
Reply #49 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:22pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:17pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:13pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:53pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:47pm:
I don't know why this administration is not releasing the files. I guess it is the same reason the previous admin didn't -


The previous administration didn't spend 4 years saying they would release the files. Cheesy



Because there is no dirt on Trump in them.

They DID spend 8 years hounding him with all sorts of legal cases. Never with these files.
None of which achieved the Dems' goal of preventing Trump's reelection.

Please explain.



So let's release them. Even the lawyer representing Epstein's victims agrees, he supports full disclosure, with redactions only for those victims who wish to remain anonymous. That's the sensible, humane, and just position.

It's a win–win. Transparency, justice, and respect for victims' privacy.

And since your only concern appears to be protecting victim identities, and not shielding anyone named Trump, you should be loudly calling for Trump to sign the executive order and make the files public.

Unless of course, your supposed concern was just a fig leaf for obstruction.




For the 20 th time, of this is part of an intelligence operation, ITS NOT GOING TO BE RELEASED
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21332
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: Mossad?
Reply #50 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:27pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:22pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:17pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:13pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:53pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:47pm:
I don't know why this administration is not releasing the files. I guess it is the same reason the previous admin didn't -


The previous administration didn't spend 4 years saying they would release the files. Cheesy



Because there is no dirt on Trump in them.

They DID spend 8 years hounding him with all sorts of legal cases. Never with these files.
None of which achieved the Dems' goal of preventing Trump's reelection.

Please explain.



So let's release them. Even the lawyer representing Epstein's victims agrees, he supports full disclosure, with redactions only for those victims who wish to remain anonymous. That's the sensible, humane, and just position.

It's a win–win. Transparency, justice, and respect for victims' privacy.

And since your only concern appears to be protecting victim identities, and not shielding anyone named Trump, you should be loudly calling for Trump to sign the executive order and make the files public.

Unless of course, your supposed concern was just a fig leaf for obstruction.




For the 20 th time, of this is part of an intelligence operation, ITS NOT GOING TO BE RELEASED


Don't get us wrong, nobody seriously thinks Trump will release the files. His entire political survival hinges on suppressing inconvenient truths. But that doesn't mean the files shouldn't be released.

The disturbing part isn't just his inaction, it's your defence of it. Instead of demanding transparency, you're bending over backwards to excuse why it won't happen. You're not arguing for justice, you're running interference for a man neck-deep in scandal.

And whether you like it or not, that makes you part of the problem. Another apologist. Another defender of paedophiles.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 147923
Gender: male
Re: Mossad?
Reply #51 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 3:06pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:22pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:17pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:13pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:53pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 1:47pm:
I don't know why this administration is not releasing the files. I guess it is the same reason the previous admin didn't -


The previous administration didn't spend 4 years saying they would release the files. Cheesy



Because there is no dirt on Trump in them.

They DID spend 8 years hounding him with all sorts of legal cases. Never with these files.
None of which achieved the Dems' goal of preventing Trump's reelection.

Please explain.



So let's release them. Even the lawyer representing Epstein's victims agrees, he supports full disclosure, with redactions only for those victims who wish to remain anonymous. That's the sensible, humane, and just position.

It's a win–win. Transparency, justice, and respect for victims' privacy.

And since your only concern appears to be protecting victim identities, and not shielding anyone named Trump, you should be loudly calling for Trump to sign the executive order and make the files public.

Unless of course, your supposed concern was just a fig leaf for obstruction.




For the 20 th time, of this is part of an intelligence operation, ITS NOT GOING TO BE RELEASED


So why all the lies?

Why did they say they had the client list on their desk and that they'd release it?

Why all the lies about Epstein's cell?

Why not just tell the truth?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 54507
Gender: male
Re: Mossad?
Reply #52 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 3:40pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:27pm:
Don't get us wrong, nobody seriously thinks Trump will release the files. His entire political survival hinges on suppressing inconvenient truths.



What inconvenient truths are being suppressed here by the Biden and Trump administrations, teapot?

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21332
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: Mossad?
Reply #53 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 4:19pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:20pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:57am:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:45am:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am:
Quote:
Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover.


If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges.
Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short?


Ockham's razor.



Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister.


Frank, where's the good faith discussion?

I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return.

Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm:
So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why?

Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse.


Thanks.

And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from.

I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't,

Either because they are sealed to protect victims
And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc.

Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects.

Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics.




Exactly right frank. 1400 white teenage runaways taken in a drugged by a Muslim sex ring in rotheram.wiki will inform you if you want to read about true evil. And police powerless because cretins like bwian screamed islamophobia.

Now roo , for the 20 th time, frank is 100 % correct. Biden team had all the Epstein and Maxwell investigations and if there was a shred of evidence incriminating Trump , it would have come out.
It didn't.
Please apologize to frank for saying he is defending pedophiles.
Disgraceful allegation  Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed


I won't apologise to him, because he, like you, IS defending paedophiles.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21332
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: Mossad?
Reply #54 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 4:20pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 3:40pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:27pm:
Don't get us wrong, nobody seriously thinks Trump will release the files. His entire political survival hinges on suppressing inconvenient truths.



What inconvenient truths are being suppressed here by the Biden and Trump administrations, teapot?



Who the child abusers are.

I don't think it's unreasonable to want them all brought to justice.

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 37069
Gender: male
Re: Mossad?
Reply #55 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 4:53pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 4:19pm:
aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:20pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:57am:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:45am:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am:
Quote:
Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover.


If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges.
Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short?


Ockham's razor.



Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister.


Frank, where's the good faith discussion?

I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return.

Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm:
So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why?

Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse.


Thanks.

And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from.

I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't,

Either because they are sealed to protect victims
And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc.

Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects.

Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics.




Exactly right frank. 1400 white teenage runaways taken in a drugged by a Muslim sex ring in rotheram.wiki will inform you if you want to read about true evil. And police powerless because cretins like bwian screamed islamophobia.

Now roo , for the 20 th time, frank is 100 % correct. Biden team had all the Epstein and Maxwell investigations and if there was a shred of evidence incriminating Trump , it would have come out.
It didn't.
Please apologize to frank for saying he is defending pedophiles.
Disgraceful allegation  Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed


I won't apologise to him, because he, like you, IS defending paedophiles.




Disgraceful allegation

You should be banned
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 54507
Gender: male
Re: Mossad?
Reply #56 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 5:20pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 4:19pm:
aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:20pm:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:57am:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:45am:
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 11:37am:
Quote:
Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover.


If he is all over the, why did the Dems bother with impeachments, retrospective changes to New York law to enable a civil defamation trial, managing a loan issue into criminal charges.
Why not simply reveal the Trump content of the Epstein docs if they ars as damning as you imagine?? 4 years too short?


Ockham's razor.



Either these files are banal or far more complex and sinister.


Frank, where's the good faith discussion?

I answered your question and I even highlighted mine in return.

Please do the right thing and answer it before asking any further questions.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jul 31st, 2025 at 8:03pm:
So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why?

Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse.


Thanks.

And besides, the answer to your question is in the post you cherry-picked from.

I think Biden didnt release the files for the same reason Trump isn't,

Either because they are sealed to protect victims
And/Or because thee are far more sinister and complex issues that any US administration would want to keep out of the public domain. "Mossad" might be a shorthand for that but where there is Mossad there is CIA, FBI, ASIO, Iran, Russia, etc, etc.

Kiddie fiddling by the rich and famous is terrible but it doesn't have any national security or international powerplay aspects.

Far more under-age girls were gromed and raped by pakis in Britain over two decades but the Muslim angle makes it politically explosive even though no rich and famous are involved. It has been fudged and covered up for political reasons by both sides of British politics.




Exactly right frank. 1400 white teenage runaways taken in a drugged by a Muslim sex ring in rotheram.wiki will inform you if you want to read about true evil. And police powerless because cretins like bwian screamed islamophobia.

Now roo , for the 20 th time, frank is 100 % correct. Biden team had all the Epstein and Maxwell investigations and if there was a shred of evidence incriminating Trump , it would have come out.
It didn't.
Please apologize to frank for saying he is defending pedophiles.
Disgraceful allegation  Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed


I won't apologise to him, because he, like you, IS defending paedophiles.

You are an unmoored, disgraceful, slanderous idiot.

Who are tye pedophiles that are defended here? Who is defending them?


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78267
Gender: male
Re: Mossad?
Reply #57 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 6:45pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:13pm:
Because there is no dirt on Trump in them.



If there was no dirt on trump, there is nothing to stop Trump keeping his word


but something tells me he won't, and you'll just keep making excuses Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78267
Gender: male
Re: Mossad?
Reply #58 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 6:48pm
 
Frank wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:13pm:
They DID spend 8 years hounding him with all sorts of legal cases.



No

It's not the democrats fault trump is a criminal.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78267
Gender: male
Re: Mossad?
Reply #59 - Aug 1st, 2025 at 6:51pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Aug 1st, 2025 at 2:12pm:
Keep your creepy fantasies to yourself creeper



Don't you think it's a bit rich you calling anyone a creeper after you claimed it was normal for rich high status men to sleep with children  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12
Send Topic Print