greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 7:35pm:

No good?




In Australia, there isn't a single, nationally consistent minimum working age. While most states and territories have laws regulating child employment, the specific minimum age varies by location and may also depend on the type of work. Generally, 13 or 14 is the age for casual or part-time work

Frank wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 5:34pm:


I could only speculate.

I wonder, though, why it matters?  Is it not the right thing to do, release the files, no matter who did or didn't release them before you?

If I had to speculate, I know that the justice system controlled access to sealed documents, not the White House. Many of the files were court‑sealed and only became public after legal processes concluded in early 2024.  That would have been right in the middle of the election cycle.

Now I know from a MAGA and Republican point of view, weaponising that would not have required a second thought.  But given we've seen the Democrats, much to their own detriment, act with a certain level of decorum and "following the rules", both tradition and legal, perhaps they decided that releasing the file during the campaign would do more harm than good to the victims?

I know you would immediately dismiss whatever was in the files if they were released under Biden.  Perhaps people like you were a consideration in the decision also?

Hell, you still to this day claim Trump's felony convictions were political.  And if they had released the files and Trump one, he would have escaped justice just like he did for those convictions.

So what changed?  Why the desire for the release of the files now?

Trump campaigned on releasing them, his team said they had them and were reviewing them for release, there were photo ops with right wing influences holding binders of the phase one of the files for release and many people within Trump's circles said they'd be released and vindicate everything they'd been saying about the Democrats and Elites "on the list".

All of that happened entirely without any Democrats, that was all Trump or his people and their supporters.

Now that it's clear that Trump is trying to supress the release of the files after their review, the only plausible reason is he's all over them, cover to cover.

After everything he said he would do around them and all the conspiracies about his enemies in the files and the vindication his base were certain they'd get with the release, everyone but the most loyal and braindead of his supporters want the files released and those with evidence of abusing children within brought to justice, left, right or President.

It's only those braindead Trump supporters, much like yourself, who have chosen to align themselves with these predators, all because they cannot admit they may have been wrong in supporting those predators all this time.

So, do you think what Biden did or didn't do with the files should have any impact on Trump releasing them, and if so, why?

Please give a credible answer, not something you are pulling outa Scoot's arse.

Frank wrote on Jul 31^st, 2025 at 7:47pm:


Children massaging fat old men in a spa?

Nah, no good.

No good at all.

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 11:37am:


"... the justice system controlled access to sealed documents, not the White House. Many of the files were court‑sealed and only became public after legal processes concluded in early 2024."

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 11:39am:

No longer?

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 11:57am:


So just to clarify, are you suggesting that Trump's potential involvement in the Epstein child trafficking network shouldn't be scrutinised or disclosed because there are other examples of systemic abuse elsewhere?

You brought up an unrelated situation in the UK, seemingly to minimise or distract from what we're discussing, allegations of elite-level child abuse in the United States, potentially involving the president.

Your comment raises a serious concern: are you trying to deflect from Trump's accountability by shifting the focus to a different ethnic group in a different country?

If you genuinely believe these crimes are heinous, then surely you'd want full transparency and justice in all cases, regardless of the political or diplomatic fallout. Otherwise, it starts to look like you're not actually interested in protecting children, but in protecting political idols.

Protecting paedophiles.

I see why you've been so reluctant to answer questions now...  Wow.

Frank wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 1:47pm:


The previous administration didn't spend 4 years saying they would release the files.

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 1^st, 2025 at 2:00pm:




Keep your creepy fantasies to yourself creeper