Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
A Powerful Letter? (Read 37 times)
Vic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8354
Melbourne Victoria
Gender: male
A Powerful Letter?
Jul 16th, 2025 at 8:50am
 
I read this today on another social media platform:

"To the Chief of the Australian Defence Force
Admiral David Johnston AC, RAN
Department of Defence
Russell Offices
Canberra ACT 2600
Australia

Dear   Admiral Johnston,

There   comes a moment in every military leader’s career when quiet deference to   political winds and procedural inertia must yield to clarity, moral courage,   and a principled defence of the truth. For you, and for the tri-service   Chiefs of the Australian Defence Force, that moment is now.

I   do not envy the position you now occupy. The legacy of your predecessor   General Angus Campbell, is one of institutional failure — defined by   silence, equivocation, and the betrayal of the very soldiers entrusted to his   care. Under his watch, the Australian Defence Force became paralysed in the   face of media-led condemnation, sacrificing its moral authority and allowing   more than 2,000 veterans to end their own lives in a climate of abandonment   and shame. We do not need more of the same. We need better. We need   leadership that restores honour, courage, and loyalty — not just   on the battlefield, but here at home, where the war for truth and justice is   now being fought.

Australia’s   Special Air Service Regiment (SASR) is under siege — not by an   armed enemy in the field, but by a determined domestic front of ideological   hostility. Its assault weapons are not Kalashnikovs, but carefully curated   headlines, courtroom theatrics, and reputational sabotage. The aggressor is a   faction of the Australian media that has, with unnerving consistency and   ideological fervour, declared war on our most elite soldiers. What has   emerged is not legitimate investigative journalism, but a politically   motivated campaign waged by activists masquerading as reporters — intent on   dismantling the medals, morale, and operational legitimacy of our Special   Forces.

The   threat is grave. And your silence — along with that of your fellow Chiefs — is costing   this nation dearly.

I   urge you to read the article I published: “Spies, Lies, and Envy: How   Our SASR Was Destroyed.”

It   presents a detailed and disquieting exposé of how our military elite have   been abandoned — first by internal cowardice and intrigue, and now by a broader   civilian leadership unwilling to contest the false narratives being sown by a   radicalised media.

The   assault has been waged through a campaign of accusation without evidence,   innuendo without consequence, and insinuation that bypasses every principle   of natural justice. It has led to reputational annihilation for decorated   soldiers such as Corporal Ben Roberts-Smith, VC, MG — despite   the fact that not a single war crimes charge has been laid against him nor   his fellow SASR personnel.

And   yet, what language is being used in the national press? “Disgraced war   veteran.” “War criminal.” “Murderer.” These are not the conclusions of   military courts. They are the fictions of columnists and television producers — none of   whom have ever worn the uniform, never fired a shot in combat, and never   navigated the ethics of lethal force in fluid theatres of war. The damage   being done to the presumption of innocence, to public understanding of the   brutal realities of asymmetric warfare, and to morale within the ADF is   incalculable.

In   the United Kingdom, the same ideological threats were gathering momentum.   Like our own, UK veterans were being dragged through legal purgatory, many   with PTSD, their names tarnished and their futures obliterated.

But   the UK military leadership responded differently.

In   July 2025, as reported in the Daily Mail,   Special Forces officers — including former leaders of the Special Air   Service (SAS), the Special Boat Service (SBS) and the Special Reconnaissance   Regiment (SRR) associations— signed an unprecedented open letter   condemning “a political witch-hunt” against their soldiers. They called out   “malicious” legal pursuits by left-leaning ideologues and affirmed that “the   pursuit of British troops through the courts years after events took place is   damaging to morale, recruitment and retention.” They concluded unequivocally:   “Enough is enough.”

“The   current Director of Special Forces, who is responsible for SAS, SBS and SRR   operations around the world, has also penned a furious letter on the same   issue. Last night these unprecedented moves received emphatic support from   former Commanding Officers (COs) of the SAS, leading defence voices and   shadow ministers.” — Mark Nicol — Defence and Diplomacy Editor, Daily Mail.

This   is leadership. This is solidarity. This is the calibre of moral courage in   the last twenty years that has been fundamentally absent within the ADF.

Part 2 to follow
Back to top
 

Football, Meat Pies, Kangaroos and Liberal Lies
Football, Meat Pies, Kangaroos and Liberal Lies
 
IP Logged
 
Vic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8354
Melbourne Victoria
Gender: male
Re: A Powerful Letter?
Reply #1 - Jul 16th, 2025 at 8:52am
 
Part 2

"This is the calibre of moral courage in   the last twenty years that has been fundamentally absent within the ADF.
In   stark contrast to the powerful response of UK Special Forces leadership, the   senior command of the ADF has remained inert — content to   allow civilian defamation courts, operating outside military context, to   define the ethics, legality, and fate of battlefield decisions. This   abdication is unprecedented in our nation’s history. Your office has ceded   the narrative space entirely, offering neither defence nor clarity. In so   doing, your office has permitted the Australian public to be fed a distorted   view of our soldiers as rogues and murderers, rather than men who kill at the   behest of their country — often in the greyest moral terrain, where   rules of engagement change by the second; where split-second decisions mean   life or death.
Do   you believe it is reasonable that soldiers should volunteer to kill in war,   only to return home and pay millions of dollars to defend their actions in a   civilian defamation court — without institutional support, without public   backing, and in a vacuum of senior command solidarity?
This   silence has demoralised the ranks. It has crippled recruitment and torpedoed   retention. It has made clear to every prospective soldier that, should they   one day face the enemy in combat, their gravest danger may not come from an   insurgent with an IED — but from a journalist with a headline and a   vendetta. What young Australian would now choose a life of military   sacrifice, only to return home and be cannon fodder for a wealthy media class   that profits handsomely from the demonisation of our veterans?
A   treasonous narrative is taking root in the national psyche, fuelled by envy   and opportunism, by ignorance and ideological spite. And in that moral vacuum — the   silence of ADF leadership has been deafening.
Sir,   with respect, it is time to speak. It is time to act. It is time for the   ADF’s senior leadership to follow the example of your British counterparts in   an unequivocal support of your SASR soldiers. This means issuing clear public   statements condemning false and misleading characterisations of soldiers in   the absence of criminal convictions. It means formally calling out the   dangers of politicised litigation. It means ensuring legal, psychological,   and moral support for all soldiers facing vexatious accusations. And it means   defending the honour of those who have defended this country.
Above   all, it means ending the shameful trend whereby suicide becomes the enduring   solution for veterans haunted — not by what they did overseas — but by the   betrayal they experienced when they came home.
Sir   you once told this nation  that “I am extremely proud of the men and women of the ADF. Our people are   fundamental to all we can and must achieve, you are our capability.”  If   you believe that, then show it. The hour is late. The battlefield may have   shifted from Kandahar to Canberra, but make no mistake: we are   still at war. And your soldiers — our   soldiers — are still under fire.
With   respect,
Dr Daniel Mealey
Former Army Medical Officer
Veteran Advocate”

What are your thoughts on this?
Back to top
 

Football, Meat Pies, Kangaroos and Liberal Lies
Football, Meat Pies, Kangaroos and Liberal Lies
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 77082
Gender: male
Re: A Powerful Letter?
Reply #2 - Jul 16th, 2025 at 9:50am
 
Vic wrote on Jul 16th, 2025 at 8:52am:
What are your thoughts on this?


It's a load of poo.

You can't blame the media for going after someone who murdered unarmed civilians. Thats a cop out.

Twenty one of his own colleagues testified against him. If the powers that be in the defense forces had done their job, and held their charges to the standards Australians expect of their soldiers, it would have been dealt with long before it became such a media circus.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Moderator
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44333
Re: A Powerful Letter?
Reply #3 - Jul 16th, 2025 at 11:27am
 
What he says has an element of truth at it's core but in the case of Roberts-Smith he has been condemned by his fellow soldiers.  Yes, it wasn't in a military court but a civil one but it was a case that Roberts-Smith brought himself, not the media.  The media has merely done it's job and reported on court proceedings.  The good Doctor seems to be claiming there is some orchestrated media campaign.  Does he imagine some media mastermind is running it?  Sorry, it doesn't wash with me.  Ben Roberts-Smith has been condemned by a civil court in an action he brought himself against a media doing it's job, reporting events.

The military high command hasn't leapt to Roberts-Smith's defence because it is not meant to in a civil court case.  Roberts-Smith has been hung on his own petard and deserves to be condemn for his actions.  He should surrender, IMO, his Victoria Cross as it seems he did not earn it as rightly through, "... most conspicuous bravery, or some daring or pre-eminent act of valour or self-sacrifice, or extreme devotion to duty in the presence of the enemy".
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print