Radical preachers and extremist organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir have attacked Australia’s democracy and The Muslim Vote campaign, calling it a “shirk” and an insult to Allah, at sermons in southwest Sydney, the geographical heart of a community-led Muslim political movement.

Abu Ousayd, also known as Wissam Haddad, and Hizb ut-Tahrir’s Australian branch took to pulpits in Sydney’s Canterbury-Bankstown area on Friday to call Muslims in parliament “apostates” and order their followers to boycott elections.

They also criticised the Muslim Vote’s leadership for its historical deradicalisation efforts and current political participation, with Mr Ousayd signalling he wanted an ­alternative route to power where Muslims could make sharia the dominant form of law in Australia.

“The system is always going to fail if it is not Allah’s,” Mr Ousayd said.  “We want to get to a position where Muslims have power (so that) we can implement more of the (way) in sharia.”

Radical preachers and extremist organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir have attacked Australia’s democracy and The Muslim Vote campaign, calling it a “shirk” and an insult to Allah, at sermons in southwest Sydney, the geographical heart of a community-led Muslim political movement.

Abu Ousayd, also known as Wissam Haddad, and Hizb ut-Tahrir’s Australian branch took to pulpits in Sydney’s Canterbury-Bankstown area on Friday to call Muslims in parliament “apostates” and order their followers to boycott elections.

They also criticised the Muslim Vote’s leadership for its historical deradicalisation efforts and current political participation, with Mr Ousayd signalling he wanted an ­alternative route to power where Muslims could make sharia the dominant form of law in Australia.

“The system is always going to fail if it is not Allah’s,” Mr Ousayd said. “We want to get to a position where Muslims have power (so that) we can implement more of the (way) in sharia.”

Prominent Hizb ut-Tahrir member Wassim Doureihi told his own audience on Friday that it was “not conspiratorial” to suggest that mainstream leaders who led counter-extremist efforts during the height of ISIS – an effort he criticised – were democracy’s biggest supporters.

At Hizb ut-Tahrir’s headquarters in the electorate of Workplace Relations Minister Tony Burke, Mr Doureihi slammed politicians as “criminals in suits” and called Muslim senator Fatima Payman the “white man’s Orientalist fantasy”.

“(The senator’s) experience has shown us that engaging in the political process is not an option for (the community),” he said, claiming Muslims would be at an “inevitable loss” if they took part.

Hizb ut-Tahrir is recognised as a terrorist organisation in Britain and Germany, although the Albanese government has resisted calls to do the same in Australia.

It comes amid – and stands in contrast to – The Muslim Vote, a community campaign spearheaded by respected Sheik Wesam Charkawi to oust Labor ministers across southwest Sydney and elect pro-Palestine independent candidates.

Senator Payman is not associated with any group or political ­alliance, including The Muslim Vote, and has previously said she would be an independent voice for Western Australia as a crossbencher after abandoning Labor over Palestine.

The Australian revealed how the Muslim Vote campaign had struggled to cement candidates it would endorse in target seats, but last week it ran two volunteer workshops, telling supporters that after a year of preparation it was “ready to launch”.

...
“Every four years they come to us with a new magic trick to convince you to take part in the shirk of democracy,” Mr Ousayd said.  “Sharia (law) is the greatest … there is no need for it to be changed or compromised.”

On Friday, Mr Ousayd – who has boasted of his friendship with men who fought for ISIS – said democracy “opposed Allah”. “If (a Muslim) enters parliament and is sworn in … they ­become apostates,” he said.  “Prime ministers are false gods … (we should) not join and not vote.”

Hizb ut-Tahrir have re-emerged into the public sphere after the October 7 attacks in Israel, notably as part of pro-Palestine university camps.

Mr Doureihi’s rejection of democracy aligns with Hizb ut-Tahrir’s, which released a statement claiming Muslim participation in recent British and upcoming American elections would give those systems false legitimacy.

But it stands in contrast to other Hizb ut-Tahrir supporters, including its regular speaker Sheik Ibrahim Dadoun, who called October 7 a day of “victory” and has expressed his support for The Muslim Vote.

Group activist Mohammad ­Alwahwah told a Lakemba crowd last month that great mass movements never came at the ballot box. “(Large) movements were never gained by voting … (but) through mass movement of ­people on the ground,” he said.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/false-gods-preaching-against-ou...

Frank wrote on Jul 23^rd, 2024 at 4:20pm:


Because the Palestinians - and the Arab world - objected to the confiscation of Muslim land to create Israel.

As explained by fundamentalist Bin Laden many decades later,  as one of his chief disputes with the West.

Of course the Jews claimed sovereignty of half of Palestine, but the UN should never have recognized the Jewish claim, UNTIL the UN was also in a position to  proclaim Palestinian sovereignty as per UN 181.

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 24^th, 2024 at 11:44am:


So why didn't the Arabs accept the UN partition plan?

Why does an Arab state have the right to exist under the UN plan - or to reject the plan- , but a Jewish state cannot accept it?

International rules - ie UN partition plan in this case - applies to everyone or it's a useless whistling in the dark. The Arab response to the UN partition plan was to start a war against the party that accepted the UN plan.

And again on 7 October, they started another war, the 7th or 8th since 1948. Have the Palestinians done anything constructive since 1948? No.

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 24^th, 2024 at 10:38am:


We were not talking about her stated reason for resigning. We were talking about what she wants. Or rather, you were.

How do you know what she wants? Who is feeding you these lines to parrot?

And why are none of her cheerleaders prepared to offer an opinion on what she actually said?

She told us what she wants.

What did she "actually say"....?

thegreatdivide wrote on Jul 25^th, 2024 at 3:26pm:


She said she would abide by caucus and party rules.