Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Soft plastic recycling disaster (Read 58 times)
Jovial Monk
Moderator
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 49242
Gender: male
Soft plastic recycling disaster
Apr 16th, 2023 at 8:16pm
 
Quote:
The collapse of the country’s main soft-plastic recycler exposes vast hidden stockpiles of waste, and leaves supermarkets tasked with curbing the millions of tonnes of plastic that ends up in landfill each year.


That ignores the problem of microplastics, excessive packaging etc.

Quote:
Liz Kasell says her purpose was “simple – reducing the amount of soft plastic packaging going to landfill”.

More than a decade on, though, the execution of her vision has proved more complex than she could have imagined, and 11,000 tonnes of plastic she saved from landfills is instead piled up in dozens of locations around Australia.

REDcycle, the business she founded, is under administration, having racked up debts reportedly totalling $5 million. The big supermarkets that sought to greenwash their profligate packaging practices and those of their suppliers by partnering with her company – apparently without knowing what was being done with their waste – are under pressure from environmental agencies to find safer storage for it, because it is a fire hazard. If a Coles or Woolworths dumps it now – or worse, burns it – they will lose whatever environmental cred they gained from the scheme.


Colesworths have environmental cred?

Quote:
. . .the public’s desire for change was great and growing fast. Between 2019 and REDcycle’s collapse last November, collection volumes ballooned 350 per cent, and Australians were returning five million pieces of soft plastic every day, according to Kasell.

It was more than the company could handle, notwithstanding agreements with several processors and manufacturers to convert the plastic waste into new products – street furniture, bins, shopping trolleys, bollards, concrete aggregate for construction and asphalt additives for roads.


It was a good idea, but:


The supermarkets cover their arses:

Quote:
According to the supermarkets, when REDcycle initially suspended operations it did not tell them the specific locations of its stockpiles or how big they were. They did not even have the full picture when they assumed responsibility for dealing with the unrecycled soft plastics, one day before REDcycle was put into liquidation. More sites kept being identified.

“To date, we have identified a total of 44 sites where REDcycle had been stockpiling soft plastics without our knowledge,” said a spokesperson on behalf of Coles and Woolworths this week.


Yeah right:
Quote:
Jeff Angel doesn’t buy the supermarkets’ line, either.

“The supermarkets are now saying, ‘Oh, we didn’t know they were stockpiling. We didn’t know they weren’t selling it for recycling.’ My response is, you had a responsibility, given you were using that REDcycle logo to enhance your reputation, to really understand what was going on,” he says.

Nor was it just the supermarkets that wanted to bathe in the green glow of the recycling company. The REDcycle website lists a couple of hundred businesses – retailers, food and wine companies, packaging companies, pharmaceutical companies, apparel and appliance makers and sellers, even Australia Post – as “partners”.

But it was the supermarkets that directly engaged the public in the recycling effort that are most culpable – they now own the problem and are seeking a solution through a Soft Plastics Taskforce. It began meeting last December after the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) gave an “interim authorisation” for the Coles, Woolworths and Aldi chains to work together in ways “that could otherwise raise concerns under the competition provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act”.


Problem big and growing:
Quote:
APCO talked big. The 2025 targets, it said, “would require a complete and systemic change to the way Australia creates, collects, and recovers product packaging, and are an important step on Australia’s journey towards a circular economy for packaging”.

But the challenge was huge, as was amply shown in data pulled together for a national plastics summit and subsequent National Plastics Plan put forth by the Morrison government in 2021.

It found 3.5 million tonnes of plastics, including one million tonnes of single use plastics – 70 billion pieces of what it called “scrunchable” plastics – were consumed every year. About 84 per cent of all plastics went to landfill and 130,000 tonnes a year went into the marine environment. Of the 393,800 tonnes of plastics collected for reprocessing, almost half was still exported.


cont’d
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Moderator
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 49242
Gender: male
Re: Soft plastic recycling disaster
Reply #1 - Apr 16th, 2023 at 8:28pm
 
cont’d from OP.

Quote:
And evidence given to an inquiry by the house of representatives standing committee on climate change, energy, environment and water – which began, coincidentally, just as REDcycle fell over in November – showed the problem was only getting worse.

In its submission, the NSW EPA cited 2022 APCO data showing that the total amount of plastic packaging consumed went up more than 5 per cent in the two years to 2019-20. And the amount recovered went down from a paltry 18 per cent to a woeful 16 per cent.

“This data suggests that voluntary targets have not facilitated a large increase in recycling,” said the EPA. “Recovery rates will need to increase significantly to meet the 2025 target of 70 per cent of plastic packaging being recycled.”


Australia one of the worst offenders:
Quote:
Angel’s organisation, the Boomerang Alliance, cited data from a Minderoo Foundation report that showed Australia generated more single-use plastic waste per person than any other country except Singapore, with an estimated 59 kilograms of plastic waste per person annually – compared with a global average of 15 kilograms per person.

In its submission, global conservation group WWF also compared Australia unfavourably to other nations, particularly European ones. But such comparisons are problematic, because “re-use” does not always mean “recycle” when it comes to plastics.


A lousy solution to plastic waste:
Quote:
In a report last year, Energy Tracker Asia detailed a worrying trend in the region to “solving” the plastic waste problem by incinerating it.

“On a macro level,” it said, “the EU and the US already burn around 42 per cent and 12 per cent of their waste respectively. The waste-to-energy sector will grow massively in the coming years, especially in the Asia-Pacific region.”

Energy Tracker Asia noted that China already had more than 300 incinerating plants (known as waste-to-energy plants), with hundreds more in the pipeline.

Plastic is, of course, a product of the fossil fuel industry, and the industry sees opportunity in producing and burning more. The Energy Tracker report said some of the world’s biggest petrochemical and consumer goods companies, including Exxon, Shell, BASF, PepsiCo and Procter & Gamble, were involved in an organisation named the Alliance to End Plastic Waste, and had earmarked $US1.5 billion over five years to finding solutions, one of which is incineration. But it warned that incineration “creates more problems than it solves”.

Already Australia burns a significant amount of its plastic waste. Data from the Morrison government’s National Plastics Plan show that in 2018-19, about 72,000 tonnes was sent to “energy recovery”.

Angel says that in Australia, as elsewhere in the world, “the incineration industry is making a big play to take up more of the plastics being recovered”.

“But that’s not a circular economy and it’s not recycling,” he says. It simply seeks to address one big environmental problem by exacerbating another: climate change.


ALP federal government:
Quote:
Despite all evidence that the voluntary recycling is not producing results, the Australian government persists with it. In fairness though, it should be noted the new Labor government has taken some positive steps.


Good news:
Quote:
And by later this year, says Joe Foster, chief executive of Close the Loop, the company is expecting to produce more than four times the quantity of recycled product it was before the fire. It makes TonerPlas, a material used in road construction that is produced from plastic and printer toner.

The great advantage of the product, Foster told ABC’s RN Breakfast this week, was that it used “material highly contaminated with mixed plastics, and also with food waste”.


We will see, I guess.


https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/environment/2023/04/15/the-soft-plastic...
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print