Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Would you pay $25 to climb Mt Warning?

Yes    
  5 (41.7%)
No    
  7 (58.3%)




Total votes: 12
« Created by: Gordon on: Oct 28th, 2022 at 6:32pm »

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure (Read 2355 times)
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 71961
Gender: male
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #30 - Nov 25th, 2022 at 5:59am
 
Quote:
Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure

Mark Latham finds it challenging to get out of bed, let alone up Mt Warning. It's not like he has any hope of ever making it up to the peak.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 34382
Gender: female
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #31 - Nov 25th, 2022 at 6:06am
 
John Smith wrote on Nov 25th, 2022 at 5:59am:
Quote:
Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure

Mark Latham finds it challenging to get out of bed, let alone up Mt Warning. It's not like he has any hope of ever making it up to the peak.
\

Have you ever watched axolotls? They just swim about until they head but stuff and then swim in a different direction.

Remind me of Mark Latham.

Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39937
Gender: male
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #32 - Nov 25th, 2022 at 8:29am
 
mothra wrote on Nov 25th, 2022 at 5:31am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 24th, 2022 at 9:32pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 28th, 2022 at 8:01am:
freediver wrote on Oct 28th, 2022 at 7:46am:
Mothra do you support excluding people from National Parks on the basis of race and gender?

Why are you afraid to answer the question?




Your question is reductive and dishonest.

Why are you afraid to answer as to why thatis?


What the bugger does being reductive have to do with the question?



Because owing to it's reductive nature, it is not an open and honest question and is in fact, as is a favourable tactic by Fleadriver, a trap.

Ironically, it's a racist and sexist trap. As in, why can't Aboriginal people own land and what is so hard for the average idiot to understand about men's and women's sacred spaces in Aboriginal culture?

A more open and debate worthy question would be is it legal to own land in Australia? And is one free to do on their land as they see fit, be it within the law?

But that's two questions. That might confuse the average Ozpol user.


How is exclusive male Aboriginal access for ceremonia reasons any different to exclusive men-only clubs, Mothra Theresa?  Why are you applauding Aboriginal male chauvinism but deploring non-Aboriginal male chauvinism? What is the difference apart from race?/culture?




Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Bias_2012
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10170
Gender: male
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #33 - Nov 25th, 2022 at 2:26pm
 
mothra wrote on Nov 25th, 2022 at 5:31am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 24th, 2022 at 9:32pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 28th, 2022 at 8:01am:
freediver wrote on Oct 28th, 2022 at 7:46am:
Mothra do you support excluding people from National Parks on the basis of race and gender?

Why are you afraid to answer the question?




Your question is reductive and dishonest.

Why are you afraid to answer as to why thatis?


What the bugger does being reductive have to do with the question?



Because owing to it's reductive nature, it is not an open and honest question and is in fact, as is a favourable tactic by Fleadriver, a trap.

Ironically, it's a racist and sexist trap. As in, why can't Aboriginal people own land and what is so hard for the average idiot to understand about men's and women's sacred spaces in Aboriginal culture?

A more open and debate worthy question would be is it legal to own land in Australia? And is one free to do on their land as they see fit, be it within the law?


But that's two questions. That might confuse the average Ozpol user.



It's legal to own land if you buy it, or it's given to you, and you pay Council rates

Is Mt Warning still Crown land? - Who owns it?

If the Aboriginals don't own it, they are not free to do anything on that land as they see fit ... and even if they do own it, they are still not free to do anything they want on the land


Back to top
 

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 71961
Gender: male
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #34 - Nov 25th, 2022 at 6:05pm
 
The same old ignorant bigots just keep repeating the same old crap no matter how many times their errors have been explained to them  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #35 - Nov 25th, 2022 at 6:20pm
 
mothra wrote on Nov 25th, 2022 at 5:31am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 24th, 2022 at 9:32pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 28th, 2022 at 8:01am:
freediver wrote on Oct 28th, 2022 at 7:46am:
Mothra do you support excluding people from National Parks on the basis of race and gender?

Why are you afraid to answer the question?




Your question is reductive and dishonest.

Why are you afraid to answer as to why thatis?


What the bugger does being reductive have to do with the question?



Because owing to it's reductive nature, it is not an open and honest question and is in fact, as is a favourable tactic by Fleadriver, a trap.

Ironically, it's a racist and sexist trap. As in, why can't Aboriginal people own land and what is so hard for the average idiot to understand about men's and women's sacred spaces in Aboriginal culture?

A more open and debate worthy question would be is it legal to own land in Australia? And is one free to do on their land as they see fit, be it within the law?

But that's two questions. That might confuse the average Ozpol user.


Anyone else know how much land Aboriginals already control? Methra obviously doesn't. Frodo doesn't know anything anyway (hence his online nothingness).
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 25th, 2022 at 6:30pm by Lisa Jones »  

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #36 - Nov 25th, 2022 at 6:28pm
 
John Smith wrote on Nov 25th, 2022 at 6:05pm:
The same old ignorant bigots just keep repeating the same old crap no matter how many times their errors have been explained to them  Roll Eyes


Oh look everyone .... it's the resident moron who never finished Primary School and who hasn't a clue about anything anyway so he merely jumps in to make useless off topic general remarks about others instead.



Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 79567
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #37 - Nov 25th, 2022 at 6:48pm
 
Anyway - after reading about the vandalism war staged there by the obvious ones - I would say flatly NO to any closure and handover to suit them.

You simply do not negotiate with a group who think they can terrorise a government and people into giving them what they want.

Just like the suffragettes way back with their violence and ranting - they are clearly not responsible enough to handle the duties inherent in running that show.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10259
Gender: male
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #38 - Nov 27th, 2022 at 8:24pm
 
.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10259
Gender: male
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #39 - Nov 27th, 2022 at 8:24pm
 
mothra wrote on Nov 25th, 2022 at 5:31am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 24th, 2022 at 9:32pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 28th, 2022 at 8:01am:
freediver wrote on Oct 28th, 2022 at 7:46am:
Mothra do you support excluding people from National Parks on the basis of race and gender?

Why are you afraid to answer the question?





Your question is reductive and dishonest.

Why are you afraid to answer as to why thatis?


What the bugger does being reductive have to do with the question?



Because owing to it's reductive nature, it is not an open and honest question and is in fact, as is a favourable tactic by Fleadriver, a trap.

Ironically, it's a racist and sexist trap. As in, why can't Aboriginal people own land and what is so hard for the average idiot to understand about men's and women's sacred spaces in Aboriginal culture?

A more open and debate worthy question would be is it legal to own land in Australia? And is one free to do on their land as they see fit, be it within the law?

But that's two questions. That might confuse the average Ozpol user.



Diversion and obfuscation. Anyone should be able to climb it. Authoritarian fwits claiming it's sacred for cultural reasons should bugger off.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Redmond Neck
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 20609
ACT
Gender: male
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #40 - Nov 28th, 2022 at 6:50am
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 27th, 2022 at 8:24pm:
mothra wrote on Nov 25th, 2022 at 5:31am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 24th, 2022 at 9:32pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 28th, 2022 at 8:01am:
freediver wrote on Oct 28th, 2022 at 7:46am:
Mothra do you support excluding people from National Parks on the basis of race and gender?

Why are you afraid to answer the question?





Your question is reductive and dishonest.

Why are you afraid to answer as to why thatis?


What the bugger does being reductive have to do with the question?



Because owing to it's reductive nature, it is not an open and honest question and is in fact, as is a favourable tactic by Fleadriver, a trap.

Ironically, it's a racist and sexist trap. As in, why can't Aboriginal people own land and what is so hard for the average idiot to understand about men's and women's sacred spaces in Aboriginal culture?

A more open and debate worthy question would be is it legal to own land in Australia? And is one free to do on their land as they see fit, be it within the law?

But that's two questions. That might confuse the average Ozpol user.



Diversion and obfuscation. Anyone should be able to climb it. Authoritarian fwits claiming it's sacred for cultural reasons should bugger off.


Hear! Hear!

I agree 100%


Back to top
 

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!
 
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #41 - Nov 28th, 2022 at 7:07am
 
Anyone know how the dingoes are going there these days?
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47062
At my desk.
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #42 - Nov 28th, 2022 at 7:54am
 
mothra wrote on Nov 25th, 2022 at 5:31am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 24th, 2022 at 9:32pm:
mothra wrote on Oct 28th, 2022 at 8:01am:
freediver wrote on Oct 28th, 2022 at 7:46am:
Mothra do you support excluding people from National Parks on the basis of race and gender?

Why are you afraid to answer the question?




Your question is reductive and dishonest.

Why are you afraid to answer as to why thatis?


What the bugger does being reductive have to do with the question?



Because owing to it's reductive nature, it is not an open and honest question and is in fact, as is a favourable tactic by Fleadriver, a trap.

Ironically, it's a racist and sexist trap. As in, why can't Aboriginal people own land and what is so hard for the average idiot to understand about men's and women's sacred spaces in Aboriginal culture?

A more open and debate worthy question would be is it legal to own land in Australia? And is one free to do on their land as they see fit, be it within the law?

But that's two questions. That might confuse the average Ozpol user.


Earth to Mothra: Aboriginal people have the same rights as other citizens to own land. In fact, they have additional rights not accessible to other citizens.

What makes you think they can't own land?

And why are you trying to blame me for 'trapping' you into supporting racist, sexist, government policy? Can you not think for yourself?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 28th, 2022 at 8:07am by freediver »  

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #43 - Nov 28th, 2022 at 7:58am
 
Perhaps 50% isn't enough???
Back to top
 

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 13988
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #44 - Nov 28th, 2022 at 1:22pm
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Oct 27th, 2022 at 9:54pm:
Go get 'em Mark ....

Here be a chance to have a say, me darlings... some bloke in Coniston they say ...

https://chng.it/8MYLBhfh




I notice 2 people have signed (yes, that's right,
TWO PEOPLE
) including the person who started the petition.

I'll assume the second name is Mark Latham.

I guess that's a start ?



Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print