Australian Politics Forum - Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 40506
Gender: male

Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #15 - Oct 28^th, 2022 at 5:32pm

Johnnie wrote on Oct 28^th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

One man with the balls to challenge this BS out of the hundreds of other politicians and he speaks i am sure for 98% of Australians, this is my country. Looking forward to the response from Mark's valid objections, where does this BS stop.

It doesn't stop. The process IS the punishment.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Oct 28^th, 2022 at 7:42pm by Frank »

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Johnnie

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male

Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #16 - Oct 28^th, 2022 at 5:46pm

Frank wrote on Oct 28^th, 2022 at 5:32pm:

Johnnie wrote on Oct 28^th, 2022 at 5:06pm:

One man with the balls to challenge this BS out of the hundreds of other politicians and he speaks i am sure for 98% of Australians, this is my country. Looking forward to the response from Mark's valid objections, where does this BS stop.

It doesn't stop. Thee process IS the punishment.

I see this as a line in the sand, this is our country and Mt Warning is where the BS ends thanks to Mark.

Back to top

IP Logged

Belgarion Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 5310 Gender:	Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure Reply #17 - Oct 28^th, 2022 at 6:14pm If I tell the 'progressives' that I identify as an Aboriginal, will they tell their tame Aboriginal activist underlings to allow me access to Mt Warning?
Back to top	"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire.....(possibly) IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20221 Gordon Gender:	Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure Reply #18 - Oct 28^th, 2022 at 6:32pm Poll added $25 for adults, $10 for kids/concession. The money would go towards track/facilities up keep and to employ local boongs as rangers/guides/give mumbojumbo tours.
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

Johnnie Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 12485 Gender:	Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure Reply #19 - Oct 28^th, 2022 at 6:48pm Gordon wrote on Oct 28^th, 2022 at 6:32pm: Poll added $25 for adults, $10 for kids/concession. The money would go towards track/facilities up keep and to employ local boongs as rangers/guides/give mumbojumbo tours. Nobody else will be able to climb it apart from a few blackfellas because of the spirits.
Back to top	IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80193
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #20 - Oct 28^th, 2022 at 7:50pm

mothra wrote on Oct 28^th, 2022 at 7:23am:

Christ Mark Latham is a borf.

No surprises his aggressive, one-eyed, belligerent and underinformed position is endorsed on here.

Laughing stock everywhere else ... but a total hit on Ozpol.

No valid response then? We'll put you down for one UNABLE TO MAKE A CASE .......

BTW................ (wait for it).......Mothra do you support excluding people from National Parks on the basis of race and gender?

https://www.change.org/SaveNationalParks

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Yadda

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20955
A cat with a view

Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #21 - Oct 28^th, 2022 at 9:25pm

IMAGE.....

QUESTION;
Who gets to decide if this person can visit Mt Warning ?
The HIGH COURT of Australia ???

IT IS ABSURD.

QUESTION;

If Bruce Pascoe visits Mt Warning, will he be permitted access to that 'sacred' site ?

‘Bruce Pascoe Is Not Tasmanian Aboriginal’

- Michael Mansell, Chair, Aboriginal Land Council of Tasmania

https://tasmaniantimes.com/2020/01/bruce-pascoe-is-not-aboriginal/

Back to top

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80193
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #22 - Oct 28^th, 2022 at 11:39pm

Yadda wrote on Oct 28^th, 2022 at 9:25pm:

IMAGE.....
https://www.abc.net.au/cm/rimage/8163360-1x1-large.jpg

QUESTION;
Who gets to decide if this person can visit Mt Warning ?
The HIGH COURT of Australia ???

IT IS ABSURD.

QUESTION;

If Bruce Pascoe visits Mt Warning, will he be permitted access to that 'sacred' site ?

‘Bruce Pascoe Is Not Tasmanian Aboriginal’

- Michael Mansell, Chair, Aboriginal Land Council of Tasmania

https://tasmaniantimes.com/2020/01/bruce-pascoe-is-not-aboriginal/

I'm sorry - as soon as I saw that face I laughed....

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47362
At my desk.

Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #23 - Oct 30^th, 2022 at 9:39am

mothra wrote on Oct 28^th, 2022 at 8:20am:

freediver wrote on Oct 28^th, 2022 at 8:07am:

I have no idea why you say that Mothra. Feel free to enlighten us, if you can string a coherent thought together.

Why are you afraid to give a straight answer? Are you ashamed of your own opinion?

Do you support excluding people from National Parks on the basis of race and gender?

Why are you afraid to give a straight answer, FD?

Perhaps you're not even aware that your question is reductive?

Are you?

Should we start from there?

Why are you so eager to descend into mindless gibberish Mothra?

Back to top

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!

IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 46467
Gender: male

Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #24 - Oct 30^th, 2022 at 9:48am

I'm sure some British in red coats with their convict dogs on a chain, along with some American Colonial Free Settlers with their right to own a gun - will just climb Mt Warning without paying the $25 fee anyway.

I'm sure any Aborigine that pipes up about Entry Fee not being paid, will be shot dead anyway.

So what's your problem FD?
Why all your crying?

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 47362 At my desk.	Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure Reply #25 - Oct 30^th, 2022 at 9:51am I don't have a problem with a modest entry fee, especially if it reflects the cost of maintenance. Let me know when you figure out what the thread is about.
Back to top	I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT! IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 46467
Gender: male

Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #26 - Oct 30^th, 2022 at 10:01am

It's about Big Sook Latham from Sadlier crying that the people in charge of Mt Warning are not going about things in a 'political' way, like Big Sook Latham from Sadlier can cope with.

My, my - imagine that. Boongs doing things their way, without consulting a nobody Politician like Big Sook from Sadlier.

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47362
At my desk.

Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #27 - Oct 30^th, 2022 at 10:09am

Jasin wrote on Oct 30^th, 2022 at 10:01am:

It's about Big Sook Latham from Sadlier crying that the people in charge of Mt Warning are not going about things in a 'political' way, like Big Sook Latham from Sadlier can cope with.

My, my - imagine that. Boongs doing things their way, without consulting a nobody Politician like Big Sook from Sadlier.

They are being told exactly what to do. By politicians. This is not some kind of grass roots movement among aboriginal people. It is the opposite.

Back to top

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!

IP Logged

Postmodern Trendoid III

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 10259
Gender: male

Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #28 - Nov 24^th, 2022 at 9:32pm

mothra wrote on Oct 28^th, 2022 at 8:01am:

freediver wrote on Oct 28^th, 2022 at 7:46am:

Mothra do you support excluding people from National Parks on the basis of race and gender?

Why are you afraid to answer the question?

Your question is reductive and dishonest.

Why are you afraid to answer as to why thatis?

What the bugger does being reductive have to do with the question?

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34507
Gender: female

Re: Mark Latham challenges Mt Warning closure
Reply #29 - Nov 25^th, 2022 at 5:31am

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 24^th, 2022 at 9:32pm:

mothra wrote on Oct 28^th, 2022 at 8:01am:

freediver wrote on Oct 28^th, 2022 at 7:46am:

Mothra do you support excluding people from National Parks on the basis of race and gender?

Why are you afraid to answer the question?

Your question is reductive and dishonest.

Why are you afraid to answer as to why thatis?

What the bugger does being reductive have to do with the question?

Because owing to it's reductive nature, it is not an open and honest question and is in fact, as is a favourable tactic by Fleadriver, a trap.

Ironically, it's a racist and sexist trap. As in, why can't Aboriginal people own land and what is so hard for the average idiot to understand about men's and women's sacred spaces in Aboriginal culture?

A more open and debate worthy question would be is it legal to own land in Australia? And is one free to do on their land as they see fit, be it within the law?

But that's two questions. That might confuse the average Ozpol user.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Would you pay $25 to climb Mt Warning?
Yes 5 (41.7%) No 7 (58.3%) Total votes: 12 « Created by: Gordon on: Oct 28^th, 2022 at 6:32pm »