Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Will you vote for a separate Aboriginal Voice in Parliament?

YES    
  11 (28.9%)
NO    
  27 (71.1%)




Total votes: 38
« Created by: Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM on: Jul 30th, 2022 at 7:27pm »

Pages: 1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 ... 113
Send Topic Print
The question about a voice will be asked... (Read 60716 times)
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 13884
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1260 - Oct 10th, 2022 at 2:15pm
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 9th, 2022 at 11:41pm:
Again - this has nothing to do with the issues of a separate 'voice'  Can you address the issue for once and stop whining about CDEP's failures successes...


Already done ages ago. I think the voice is a waste of time, but harmless......remember the designers of the referendum are commited to finding "words which will succeed"...I don't think they can do it.

Although I'm now thinking of voting against it, until the legal pronouncements around the contradictory  issues of British sovereignty and black land rights are more clearly explained by the High Court.

That c.3% of the population can "own" nearly half the Oz continent, on the basis of race,  is ridiculous.

The obvious restitution, to replace 'land rights',  is well-maintained public housing as needed.

Bur fat-cat judges prefer 'land rights', because they don't want to pay taxes to fund public housing. 


Quote:
AND give us your plan to compel assist the Always Believed Original Settlers blacks to lift themselves out of their current situation?


Already done; and fully explored in the 2 links I provided.



Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 10th, 2022 at 2:59pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 87697
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1261 - Oct 10th, 2022 at 4:04pm
 
The question is being answered here and now..... and the answer on the streets is NO... and for good reasons.  We don't want a separate Aboriginal parliament.

They lost.... but the battle for the future began in 1967........ and there is a storm coming in....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 87697
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1262 - Oct 10th, 2022 at 4:06pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Oct 10th, 2022 at 2:15pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 9th, 2022 at 11:41pm:
Again - this has nothing to do with the issues of a separate 'voice'  Can you address the issue for once and stop whining about CDEP's failures successes...


Already done ages ago. I think the voice is a waste of time, but harmless......remember the designers of the referendum are commited to finding "words which will succeed"...I don't think they can do it.

Although I'm now thinking of voting against it, until the legal pronouncements around the contradictory  issues of British sovereignty and black land rights are more clearly explained by the High Court.

That c.3% of the population can "own" nearly half the Oz continent, on the basis of race,  is ridiculous.

The obvious restitution, to replace 'land rights',  is well-maintained public housing as needed.

Bur fat-cat judges prefer 'land rights', because they don't want to pay taxes to fund public housing. 


Quote:
AND give us your plan to compel assist the Always Believed Original Settlers blacks to lift themselves out of their current situation?


Already done; and fully explored in the 2 links I provided.





You are still trying to conscript them to your idea... they will not follow you.  I tell you truly three times - they can get more by continuing the same whining over and over than they can by working for it.  Why would they choose to work for what they can get by complaining constantly?

They learned from the feminists, just as every other whining group did - just keep up the whining and one day everyone will think it was always that way - you just give in to those who whine...

I warned yez all years ago that you need, right here and now and back then, to draw a line in the stone and stick to it.  Now you will bear the fruit of what you have sown in terms of Aborigines, ethnics, women and every other group of whingers, for simply refusing to learn to say NO!

I expect to be on the high seas and you can all rot back here in your own mess..........
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 13884
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1263 - Oct 10th, 2022 at 4:47pm
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 10th, 2022 at 4:04pm:
The question is being answered here and now..... and the answer on the streets is NO... and for good reasons.  We don't want a separate Aboriginal parliament.

They lost.... but the battle for the future began in 1967........ and there is a storm coming in....


Yes well it had to happen, after 1967 (...gosh, they are people ) , and 1992 (...gosh, 'terra nullius' was a 19th century legal fiction...).

Of course the legal profession has changed; "rights" are now a big deal (even though "rights" are merely a legal convention). 

So yes, the fun and games are only just beginning.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 13884
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1264 - Oct 10th, 2022 at 4:55pm
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 10th, 2022 at 4:06pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Oct 10th, 2022 at 2:15pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 9th, 2022 at 11:41pm:
Again - this has nothing to do with the issues of a separate 'voice'  Can you address the issue for once and stop whining about CDEP's failures successes...


Already done ages ago. I think the voice is a waste of time, but harmless......remember the designers of the referendum are commited to finding "words which will succeed"...I don't think they can do it.

Although I'm now thinking of voting against it, until the legal pronouncements around the contradictory  issues of British sovereignty and black land rights are more clearly explained by the High Court.

That c.3% of the population can "own" nearly half the Oz continent, on the basis of race,  is ridiculous.

The obvious restitution, to replace 'land rights',  is well-maintained public housing as needed.

Bur fat-cat judges prefer 'land rights', because they don't want to pay taxes to fund public housing. 


Quote:
AND give us your plan to compel assist the Always Believed Original Settlers blacks to lift themselves out of their current situation?


Already done; and fully explored in the 2 links I provided.





You are still trying to conscript them to your idea...they will not follow you


Nope, the CDEP was was widely appreciated by its participants, its cancellation was experienced as a great loss.  

Quote:
I tell you truly three times - they can get more by continuing the same whining over and over than they can by working for it.  Why would they choose to work for what they can get by complaining constantly?


Already refuted; your insistence on participation in the "general economy", in which  prices are  determined by private sector competiton, is THE problem.

Quote:
They learned from the feminists,


So I'll pass on your following remarks.....

Quote:
just as every other whining group did - just keep up the whining and one day everyone will think it was always that way - you just give in to those who whine...

I warned yez all years ago that you need, right here and now and back then, to draw a line in the stone and stick to it.  Now you will bear the fruit of what you have sown in terms of Aborigines, ethnics, women and every other group of whingers, for simply refusing to learn to say NO!

I expect to be on the high seas and you can all rot back here in your own mess..........

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51479
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1265 - Oct 10th, 2022 at 5:14pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Oct 10th, 2022 at 4:55pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 10th, 2022 at 4:06pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Oct 10th, 2022 at 2:15pm:
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 9th, 2022 at 11:41pm:
Again - this has nothing to do with the issues of a separate 'voice'  Can you address the issue for once and stop whining about CDEP's failures successes...


Already done ages ago. I think the voice is a waste of time, but harmless......remember the designers of the referendum are commited to finding "words which will succeed"...I don't think they can do it.

Although I'm now thinking of voting against it, until the legal pronouncements around the contradictory  issues of British sovereignty and black land rights are more clearly explained by the High Court.

That c.3% of the population can "own" nearly half the Oz continent, on the basis of race,  is ridiculous.

The obvious restitution, to replace 'land rights',  is well-maintained public housing as needed.

Bur fat-cat judges prefer 'land rights', because they don't want to pay taxes to fund public housing. 


Quote:
AND give us your plan to compel assist the Always Believed Original Settlers blacks to lift themselves out of their current situation?


Already done; and fully explored in the 2 links I provided.





You are still trying to conscript them to your idea...they will not follow you


Nope, the CDEP was was widely appreciated by its participants, its cancellation was experienced as a great loss.  

Quote:
I tell you truly three times - they can get more by continuing the same whining over and over than they can by working for it.  Why would they choose to work for what they can get by complaining constantly?


Already refuted; your insistence on participation in the "general economy", in which  prices are  determined by private sector competiton, is THE problem.

Quote:
They learned from the feminists,


So I'll pass on your following remarks.....

Quote:
just as every other whining group did - just keep up the whining and one day everyone will think it was always that way - you just give in to those who whine...

I warned yez all years ago that you need, right here and now and back then, to draw a line in the stone and stick to it.  Now you will bear the fruit of what you have sown in terms of Aborigines, ethnics, women and every other group of whingers, for simply refusing to learn to say NO!

I expect to be on the high seas and you can all rot back here in your own mess..........



The voice referendum proposal is NOT about CDEP, psittacistic maniac. It is about constitutional change.

MOST Aborigines do not live in destitute squalor. Those that do have no Faruqing idea about the Voice, it's meaning, it's purpose. They will be exactly as Faruqid after the voice gets up as they are now because NONE of it is about them. NONE.

The vast phalanx of Aboriginal activists - most of them more European than Aboriginal - would be out of a job pronto if the gap was closed. Their livelihood depends on maintaining the gap, the destitution, the criminality and neglect. SO they propose completely bogus solutions, like the Voice, which gives THEM a voice. Them, not the Faruqid up remote Aborigines. Faruqi them, they say.


If Aborigines were even remotely serious about changing their lot they would pull together, they would truly be a nation, united and they would not let their kin go to rot at such a massive rate while they are kvetching about what happened generations ago.


Politics is downstream from culture.
They need to fix their culture first. And Jacinda Price, Warren Mundene, Anthony Dillon and others are working on that, voicing that. That is where effective change can come from, not from some CCP stooge with a bee in his bonnet about how great the Chinese dictatorship and all its works are.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 87697
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1266 - Oct 10th, 2022 at 5:38pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Oct 10th, 2022 at 4:55pm:
So I'll pass on your following remarks.....

[quote]just as every other whining group did - just keep up the whining and one day everyone will think it was always that way - you just give in to those who whine...

I warned yez all years ago that you need, right here and now and back then, to draw a line in the stone and stick to it.  Now you will bear the fruit of what you have sown in terms of Aborigines, ethnics, women and every other group of whingers, for simply refusing to learn to say NO!

I expect to be on the high seas and you can all rot back here in your own mess..........

 

I forgot to include the Asiatics and their endless whining about how great the CCP is...   Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes  Grin  Grin  Grin  Grin  Grin
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 13884
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1267 - Oct 10th, 2022 at 5:47pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 10th, 2022 at 5:14pm:
The voice referendum proposal is NOT about CDEP, psittacistic maniac. It is about constitutional change.


you are incapable of joining the dots, like many conservative ideologues. 

The gap....engendering the voice......engendering a call by many concerned with "rights"...engendering a call for constitutional change.

Quote:
MOST Aborigines do not live in destitute squalor.


Unemployment rates c.50%,  and av. life expectancy a full decade less than the Oz average say otherwise.

Quote:
Those that do have no Faruqing idea about the Voice, it's meaning, it's purpose. They will be exactly as Faruqid after the voice gets up as they are now because NONE of it is about them. NONE.


Agreed! My point all along.

Quote:
The vast phalanx of Aboriginal activists - most of them more European than Aboriginal - would be out of a job pronto if the gap was closed.


not for long, the Noel Pearsons of this world are pretty bright.


Quote:
Their livelihood depends on maintaining the gap, the destitution, the criminality and neglect. SO they propose completely bogus solutions, like the Voice, which gives THEM a voice. Them, not the Faruqid up remote Aborigines. Faruqi them, they say.


Agreed: so we await YOUR proposals to close the gap. 

Quote:
If Aborigines were even remotely serious about changing their lot they would pull together, they would truly be a nation, united and they would not let their kin go to rot at such a massive rate while they are kvetching about what happened generations ago.


Yes, but history, and the modern 'survival of the fittest', competitive neoliberal economy, has created vast dysfunction among them, cemented by evil grog pushers - a disaster for aborigines. 

Quote:
Politics is downstream from culture.


??.... we are dealing here with a misplaced attempt to resurrect a lost culture.

Quote:
They need to fix their culture first. And Jacinda Price, Warren Mundene, Anthony Dillon and others are working on that, voicing that.


Can you enlighten us re how - or the policies those people intend to employ to close the gap.

Quote:
That is where effective change can come from
.

so please outline how they intend to implement "effective change".

Genuine question.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51479
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1268 - Oct 10th, 2022 at 9:32pm
 
Aborigines are represented at every level. One more level of representation will make zero difference.

Why?

Because the gap is NOT due to the lack of representation, or voice. It is due to the lack of responsibility. Another voice will just muffle that truth for another few generations, constitutionally enshrined.


Aboriginese are given every assistance. They only need to add willingness to get the hell out of their self-imposed mystery. MANY, MANY of them manage it very well. THEY should lift the rest up to their own level.
But they don't.

Can you imagine the Jews, another 'remote' people, being 2% of the population, receiving vast assistance and encouragement, but still being drunken, violent, rapey and neglectful of their children??

Of corse not. Aboriginese have no excuses. Or rather, excuses is all they have. Enough. Lift yourselves out if your Faruqi misery. Nobody else can do it for you.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 87697
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1269 - Oct 11th, 2022 at 10:00am
 
Now then, Albo - before we get too deep into this bullsh1t of Labor and the Greens wanting to stifle discussion of this issue in order to bring about a YES vote -

WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THOSE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS THAT WERE REQUIRED FROM THE ABORIGINAL COMMUNITIES BEFORE ANY SUCH THING COULD GO FORWARD?

Asking for a friend...you know.....
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 13884
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1270 - Oct 11th, 2022 at 4:49pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 10th, 2022 at 9:32pm:
Aborigines are represented at every level. One more level of representation will make zero difference.

Why?

Because the gap is NOT due to the lack of representation, or voice.


we agree on that... like me agreeing with Price on the CWC....

Quote:
It is due to the lack of responsibility. Another voice will just muffle that truth for another few generations, constitutionally enshrined.


So how does the community engender responsibility?
(while our disgusting profit-driven junk consumer economy with its mind-numbing junk advertising remains a hindrance. Travel stops all around Oz are cesspools of discarded poo-food packaging, giving insight into the mentality of the people -mostly whites -  discarding their rubbish in that fashion).

Quote:
Aboriginese are given every assistance. They only need to add willingness to get the hell out of their self-imposed mystery. MANY, MANY of them manage it very well. THEY should lift the rest up to their own level. But they don't.


50% unemployment rate and a decade shorter life span prove many don't manage very well. And as for the  rest of us (non-blacks) in the "general economy", hopefully unemployment remains below 10% most of the time, with the dole supporting those who can't compete in the "general economy".

But there are additional problems of group, as well as individual dysfunction,  among blacks, aided and abetted by a large dysfunctional systems-related dole culture.  (the competitve neoliberal private sector economy in fact  which fails the least advantaged)

Quote:
Aboriginese have no excuses. Or rather, excuses is all they have. Enough. Lift yourselves out if your Faruqi misery. Nobody else can do it for you.


Even Peterson said "we have to ...teach...tell ..young men how to gain personal responsibilty". Vague, without specifying who is going to teach them, and what will be taught. Employment (effort), and secure reward  are powerful teachers of personal responsibility.

You wrote in your prior post:

"They need to fix their culture first. And Jacinda Price, Warren Mundene, Anthony Dillon and others are working on that, voicing that".

You didn't outline how those people are "working on that ", and how they plan to fix their culture. ....
Voicing  is easy, but actually achieving positive change is hard.

From Petseron's viewpoint you need teachers, employed by the state, obviously;   and a goal relentlessly pursued.



Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 11th, 2022 at 4:58pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 51479
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1271 - Oct 11th, 2022 at 8:48pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Oct 11th, 2022 at 4:49pm:
So how does the community engender responsibility?



They ask the CCP to engender it for them.

The CCP is the answer to every question. Communist government know everything and knows everything best.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 87697
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1272 - Oct 11th, 2022 at 11:01pm
 
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THOSE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS THAT WERE REQUIRED FROM THE ABORIGINAL COMMUNITIES BEFORE ANY SUCH THING COULD GO FORWARD?


Me bad... that was just the advertising from Albo to kick start this insanity..... I should have known better than to genuinely accept that Labor would want some genuine positive results before elevating the Indigenous to sainthood...

That was the window dressing to lull the electorate into a false sense of security about the whole thing... make it look as if it was totally above board and responsible and actually would achieve something.... the idea being that these Key Performance Indicators would be the starting point - after the application of Voice Snake Oil - for a forever upward climb in behaviour and standards and values of Indigenous communities.

I should have known better.... of course the actual results are endless ranting and claiming and even shooting one another with cross bows - that traditional weapon....... the reality is that this was just a spur to get them going along the usual lines..... like children - give us what we demand or we play up!!!

The more you kow-tow and say YES the worse it will get..... thank you all for coming... I Told You So!!!
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 13884
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1273 - Oct 12th, 2022 at 8:02pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 11th, 2022 at 8:48pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Oct 11th, 2022 at 4:49pm:
So how does the community engender responsibility?



They ask the CCP to engender it for them.


No, the CCP merely has a goal of common prosperity; personal responsibility remains the purview of the individual, some of whom will need assistance - for any number of reasons.

Oz blacks have particular historical issues to deal with.   

Quote:
The CCP is the answer to every question. Communist government know everything and knows everything best.


Developing an economy which works for all is a desirable goal; whether the CCP has the "answers to everything" is beside the point. 

We know the current neoliberal economic orthodoxy is a disaster for the disadvantaged.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 13884
Gender: male
Re: The question about a voice will be asked...
Reply #1274 - Oct 12th, 2022 at 8:17pm
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Oct 11th, 2022 at 11:01pm:
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THOSE KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS THAT WERE REQUIRED FROM THE ABORIGINAL COMMUNITIES BEFORE ANY SUCH THING COULD GO FORWARD?


Was there ever a requirement for KPIs to improve, before a referendum for a voice would be held?

Last I looked, some KPIs were going backwards.

[quote]Me bad... that was just the advertising from Albo to kick start this insanity..... I should have known better than to genuinely accept that Labor would want some genuine positive results before elevating the Indigenous to sainthood...


Yes, well....."genuine positive results" are proving incredibly elusive (for which I blame neoliberal market ideologues, who can't, or rather refuse to differentiate between the public sector economy and the private sector economy).

Since the ALP are as blinded by neoliberalism as the Coalition, the former is now hoping symbolic changes like recognition of "rights" and a "voice" will close the gap. They won't, of course.

Quote:
That was the window dressing to lull the electorate into a false sense of security about the whole thing... make it look as if it was totally above board and responsible and actually would achieve something.... the idea being that these Key Performance Indicators would be the starting point - after the application of Voice Snake Oil - for a forever upward climb in behaviour and standards and values of Indigenous communities.

I should have known better.... of course the actual results are endless ranting and claiming and even shooting one another with cross bows - that traditional weapon....... the reality is that this was just a spur to get them going along the usual lines..... like children - give us what we demand or we play up!!!

The more you kow-tow and say YES the worse it will get..... thank you all for coming... I Told You So!!!


Good speech on the soap box there: I reckon Webster himself would have approved. .
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 ... 113
Send Topic Print