Greens have mandate to stop new oil and gas projects: Bandt tells Labor

The Age
May 28, 2022


Greens leader Adam Bandt says the party has a mandate to stop new coal and gas mines and warned the Labor government that it will use its balance of power in the Senate to introduce legislation to block new mines.

The Greens look set to quadruple their lower house representation by robbing the LNP of their Queensland seats of Brisbane and Ryan and booting Labor frontbencher Terri Butler from the seat of Griffith.

Greens leader Adam Bandt says Labor must recognise how many people voted for stronger climate action.    


Labor remains one seat shy of securing a 76th seat that it needs to govern in majority and the Greens are expected to hold 12 seats in the Senate, most likely giving the party the balance of power.

This means that wherever Labor failed to secure the support of the opposition – set to be led by Peter Dutton – the government would need the votes of the crossbench to pass laws, making them kingmakers capable of blocking or passing key legislation in the Senate.

Bandt told The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age that the Greens wanted to be constructive at the outset, but the parties that stood for more coal and gas had to recognise that their votes went backwards.

RELATED ARTICLE
Greens leader Adam Bandt (front) with senate candidate Penny Allman-Payne, Ryan candidate Elizabeth Watson-Brown, Griffith candidate Max Chandler-Mather and Brisbane candidate Stephen Bates, who all look likely to be elected.
Australia votes
‘Greensland’ gains creates mandate for end of fossil fuels: Bandt
“Labor may squeak through a majority in the lower house, we’ll see,” he said.

“Less than one in three people voted for them, they’ve got to accept the reality of that, they’re in government but the Greens and the independents, whose presence in parliament went up, were demanding more ambitious climate action and at some point Labor has to recognise that that’s what people want.   

“Our preference is for a cooperative government, but we’re not there to rubber stamp, so they can’t take our votes in the Senate for granted ... our clear, strong preference is to have a productive relationship.



“I’d urge them not to let the perfect be the enemy of the good.”

While approvals for new gas and coal mines are set by the states, they have to pass federal environmental approvals. The federal government also grants permissions for exports.

Labor’s climate spokesman in opposition, Chris Bowen, said polluters that emit more than 100,000 tonnes of emissions per year would be subject to a tightened safeguard mechanism. That could include pollution caps that have not yet been specified.

Bandt said opening any new coal or gas mine would blow Labor’s climate targets, which are for a 43 per cent reduction by 2030 and net zero by 2050.

“Parliament does have power, as does government, to say there will be no new coal and gas projects. Our mandate is to push for that,” he said.

“We’re willing to pass legislation ... we will fight in parliament to stop new coal and gas projects, that’s what people sent us there for and that’s what we will do.”   

RELATED ARTICLE
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Labor energy spokesman Chris Bowen have promised to reform electricity policy to lower power prices.
Bills
Oil price rises and electricity costs put immediate pressure on Labor
Asked if this would see the Greens combining with the Peter Dutton-led opposition to stymie Labor’s carbon policies – as the Greens did in 2009 with Tony Abbott to kill off Kevin Rudd’s emissions trading scheme – Bandt said that was not the approach he wanted to take.

“It is Labor that is saying they will not tolerate any amendments and that it’s their way or the highway,” he said.

“They’re the ones taking a very obstinate approach and I hope that that kind of posturing recedes and I hope that they understand that it’s much better to have a cooperative relationship.

Earlier this week, Bowen, who cannot speak to the media on portfolio matters until he is sworn in as minister, told the ABC that while the Greens had a mandate in their seats: “I would ask them to respect our mandate across the country.”

Yes you are right, the coalition should have done more about climate change, when they were in power.   

Frank wrote on May 28^th, 2022 at 10:07am:


The modelling points to lower prices, meaning manufacturing even with our generous wages would be cheaper here.  It could bring back entire industries we lost and we could process the minerals we dig out of the ground rather than shipping them to China and having to buy them back.

You're preaching from the skynews bible, not actually listening to the experts in those areas.

Won't be much

green

... lots of .

-outs that is. 

So we'll just ignore that it's the non renewables that are pushing the current prices up?

I guess we're picking and choosing our reality after all...

Captain Nemo wrote on May 28^th, 2022 at 11:29am:


They can't yet, nobody is arguing that.

Adding more renewables to the mix will drive prices down and as battery storage improves we can soon see renewables cope with peak demand and when the sun isn't shining.

The industry has a long way to go, but every time we try to start down that path it's stopped by the mouth breathers.

Innovation won't happen without starting.

The economic arguments for moving to renewables should be enough to get the conservatives on board assuming they're not simply bought by lobbyists, which is why so much lies are told about renewable to protect their benefactors.

It's just funny, sad but funny that those who complain the loudest about others being sheep can't see they're being fed exactly what to think and are motivated to spread that out there to pretend that it's some sort of grassroots movement for coal and fossil fuels.

"In early 2008, candidate Obama told the San Francisco Chronicle that "under my plan ... electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.""

"Obama was referring to his plan to cap greenhouse-gas emissions, which would, among other things, effectively choke off coal as an energy source. He was just as fond of high gasoline prices, telling CNBC in June 2008 — as gas prices shot up to $4 a gallon — that he "would have preferred a gradual adjustment.""

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/energy-prices-are-historically-hig...

Greens? Maybe 4 seats out of 151 is a mandate in some alternative universe.

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on May 28^th, 2022 at 3:03pm:



Adam Bandt has Albanese over a barrel -

Albo will do what he's told.

SadKangaroo wrote on May 28^th, 2022 at 5:13pm:


What? A lot of the elite point to China as a champion of renewables. With so much more than us etc.

Dnarever wrote on May 28^th, 2022 at 10:15pm:

Attempt at wit - fail. Lame. You dont even approach dad joke level cringe.
But it is a glimpse into the gauche simplicity of your mind.

SadKangaroo wrote on May 28^th, 2022 at 5:13pm:


Still no concrete evidence that prices will go down

Albanese Labor will inevitably seek the relative stability of a deal with the 12 balance-of-power Greens. But for the majority of Australians, the prospect of the new Labor government having to be beholden for its legislative program to the far-left dogma of the Green agenda should be a matter of great concern. The Green wish-list of conditions if it is to work with Labor is incapable of being met without bankrupting the nation, quite apart from the economic consequences of ‘real climate action’ that will mean no new coal, oil or gas and a slashing of defence in a more pacifist approach. Funding a welfare and wages spending spree will be by ‘taxing the billionaires and big corporations to provide all the things we need for a better life’, restoring healthcare, electricity, transport, education to public ownership, wiping out student debt – a cornucopia of goodies for everyone, along with an emporium of wokeness.
Michael Baume


Teal climate policies are trophies for rich women, diamond necklaces to flaunt at harbourside parties. They are not signs of virtue; they are vanities. Ordinary Australians can no more afford them, than they can afford to replace their Toyota with a Tesla (interestingly, an anagram of teals). Or fork out the $100 million paid by green rich-lister Mike Cannon-Brookes for his Point Piper mansion ‘Fairwater’ in 2018.

The teal targets of 50 to 60 per cent emissions reductions by 2030 and 80 to 85 per cent renewables by 2030 should have been eviscerated.  Instead, the commitment to net zero emissions by 2050 has been a bugbear to both sides of the Liberal party, not enough for the left, too much for the right. Both sides should rethink. 2050 is 28 years in the future. To put that in perspective, 28 years ago, Bill Clinton was president of the United States, Boris Yeltsin was president of Russia, Paul Keating was prime minister in Australia, China gots its first connection to the internet and the Rwandan genocide occurred.

Imagine locking in energy policy for 2022 back then.
Rebecca Wesser


A real, arctic freezing wind is coming next week. Will people be able to afford the heating bill? Will the electricity grid cope?

The rush to "net zero" and "climate action" are unmoored vanities of the doctors' wives and their children at uni.

SadKangaroo wrote on May 29^th, 2022 at 5:17pm:

Soooo... are energy prices going up or not?
If yes  - why?
If not - well, forget that, they are going up.


Could Australia have cheaper, more reliable energy NOW???

Yes.

Who stands in the way??

Greens and teals and assorted other ideologues.


The Geens are the pavement of "goodish" inventions on the way to hell. And Bandt is the Mr Tumnus.