Who are you to say what the British can do with 'their' actions and titles here?
The Royal Family do not dictate to either the British Parliament/Government, or any other government.... get a life.
As for Mugabe, he looked after his people - the ones that starved are the ones the British didn't provide for, for their loyalty to them.
As Mugabe once said
"If you serve the British, then go ask them for food." The British imposed sanctions and starved the nation, not Mugabe.
So according to Mugabe the mass murderer, these people were not Zimbabweans/Indonesians at all, but vermin to be genocided? Clearly under British rule they were better off. Get a life.
But hey, the British in Africa were always 'evil'.
As evil as mass murderers and genociders such as the Zulus and Mugabe and for other nations the Rwandans? I think not....
In Australia though - they're pretty good.
They're not 'invaders' - they're packing up and leaving with the words
"Thank god for that!"Again, they have no right to command British Parliament or any other.. if they 'pack up and leave' it's nothing to us at all. At that point WE make OUR decision - not some clown idea of the 3% Koners taking over.
I know a lot of British who hate Australian 'spongers' who whinge and whine about the Union Jack on the Australian Flag. They are more than happy to remove it, unchain you convicts and say
"There you go, you're free. Now f*uck off!"Hell, they couldn't wait to get you lot out of their country and dump you here.
Name them! The only 'whiners' about the Union Jack on our flag are those who follow the same silly lines as your position stated here.... the losers and enemies of the state and johnny-come latelys and the twerps who want to bring everything down, but not their own luscious little lifestyle here which they imagine will just go on if they get rid of it (well DUH!). Go get your life in a humpy with your Kooner masters... you'll love it....
Get off that stuff, Jas, and get back on your meds... I asked for a link to Wills' statement - where is it?