|
greggerypeccary
|
Frank wrote on May 28 th, 2022 at 10:55am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 28 th, 2022 at 10:52am: Frank wrote on May 28 th, 2022 at 10:51am: OP greggerypeccary wrote on May 28 th, 2022 at 10:46am: Frank wrote on May 28 th, 2022 at 10:40am: greggerypeccary wrote on May 28 th, 2022 at 10:36am: Frank wrote on May 28 th, 2022 at 10:16am: SadKangaroo wrote on May 28 th, 2022 at 9:45am: Frank wrote on May 27 th, 2022 at 9:21pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 27 th, 2022 at 7:45pm: Frank wrote on May 27 th, 2022 at 11:30am: Another country = one other country, not many other countries.
Says who? Can you provide a link to the law you're referring to? Dictionary Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more another /əˈnʌšə/ determiner 1. used to refer to an additional person or thing of the same type as one already mentioned or known about; one more; a further. "have another drink" Singular. One other. An other. Different in Slovenian? Does 'one' mean 'all you want', in Slovenian? Now even grammar is contested by the freaking pwoggy mongs. 'One'?? what do you mean 'one'??? Maths is wacist!!! 'One' is a white supwemacist construct!! It's an interesting semantic you've decided to hang your entire argument on. And from Amnesty International? What about the UNHCR which we as Australia are a signatory to their convention on Refugees? Wouldn't that be a better definition to adhere to given our legal obligations under the convention? https://www.unhcr.org/en-au/asylum-seekers.html Quote:An asylum-seeker is someone whose request for sanctuary has yet to be processed. Every year, around one million people seek asylum.
National asylum systems are in place to determine who qualifies for international protection. However, during mass movements of refugees, usually as a result of conflict or violence, it is not always possible or necessary to conduct individual interviews with every asylum seeker who crosses a border. These groups are often called ‘prima facie’ refugees.
At UNHCR, we believe that everyone has a right to seek asylum from persecution, and we do our best to protect those who need it. I can see why you don't want to use that one because it throws your semantics argument out the window. Africans crossing The Channel to England from France to claim asylum - explain to me how that is not a massive and blatant rort of the Refugee Convention' s intentions and spirit. They entered Europe illegally via Italy, Spain or Greece, travelled across several countries illegally, ALL of which are signatories to the convention, paid people smugglers to transport them across The Channel illegally and then they claim asylum in England. An asylum seeker can legally pass through as many countries as they wish. Ah, but they are NOT claiming asylum in Spain, Italy, Greece, France. So they are NOT asylum seekers, only common illegals. You have to claim asylum to be an asylum seeker, until then you are an illegal entrant into several countries. They don't have to claim asylum in the countries they pass through in order to be an asylum seeker.  So what is the legal basis of their crossing into and out of countries illegally? It's not illegal - they're seeking asylum. They are not seeking asylum in Spain, Italy, Greece, France. They are entering and leaving each of these countries illegally. They don't have to claim asylum in the countries they pass through in order to be an asylum seeker.
|
Forum
Pages: 
