Baronvonrort wrote on May 26
th, 2022 at 12:40am:
Kinetic energy is 1/2 mass times velocity squared, Since velocity is squared it's the most significant factor for wind energy. In summer we have sea breezes along the coast resulting in pretty good wind which is why our sailors do well we are used to stronger winds. This wind drops off with velocity less than 10km inland.
Ha... now you have avoided swapping the terms "speed" and "velocity" in your paragraph; I see there is no mention of
speed at all.
So..now it says: "in summer, coastal sea breezes are pretty good, while inland, wind speeds drop off".
Irrelevant. Fact is off shore wind is always blowing somewhere around Oz; you are still attempting to claim electricity cannot be transmitted over long distances.
So your teal argument is nonsense.
Quote:The only confusion would be for people like you who don't understand science.
Refuted above, your paragraph expounding on kinetic energy is irrelevant to the existence of a more or less permanent wind resource - somewhere offshore or onshore around the vast Oz continent.
Quote:Here is the equation for Kinetic Energy= 1/2 MV^2
M= Mass is Kg
Velocity = metres per second
Do you understand what squared is it's primary school maths like 3 squared=9
Since air is 1.2 Kg per cubic M the equation shows Kinetic energy increases dramatically because velocity is squared
All irrelevant, as shown above.
Quote:The rest of your garbage has been addressed above
Garbage? You don't like your 'teal theory' being exposed as nonsense, obviously.
Fact is your obsolete classical economics based on self interest in 'invisible hand' free markets is THE problem in all this.
It remains to be seen how 'economically conservative' these climate-change teals really are; the private sector is too conflicted to stump up the vast sums of necessary investment capital required, so long as private fossil companies are raking in $billions from fossil energy.
Will the teals be demanding a price on carbon, as called for by classical/orthodox neoliberal free market economists?