Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy (Read 1694 times)
Lisa Jones
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #30 - May 16th, 2022 at 4:17pm
 
lee wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 3:40pm:
"Paul Keating, who poured scorn on Treasurer Joe Hockey last week for raising the idea of allowing young Australians to buy their first home by tapping into their super, briefly promised the same thing in 1993."

https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/paul-keating-promised-first-home-buyers-acces...



Yep. Ohh how well I remember the 1990's. I was so involved in Uni politics back then. So many of us were pro Labor students when we first started Uni. Then Keating started screwing with Uni funding and making us pay fees whilst selling off Uni places all around us to Chinese overseas students making future domestic students unable to get into Uni because all Uni entrance marks went through the roof. And the fees kept increasing every semester too. Aussie students were forced into lower ranking degrees which they didn't really want to get into but had no choice but to accept. Many just had no money to afford the fees so they went to TAFE which was more affordable when they should have been in Uni. What a disgraceful dhead Keating was.

Keating also introduced the idea of using your super to help fund your home loan during a period where he was struggling to find an excuse for the interest rates he ushered in and which were hurting so many Australian families (they were around 17% ffs)! Mortgagee sales were taking place EVERYWHERE! Parents who had gone guarantor for their kids loans lost their homes too! Older parents AND their kids found themselves bankrupt and on the streets.

The recession Australia HAD to have (his words). Pathetic arsehole!

So many pro Labor Uni students like myself became Liberal Party supporters. And it was more out of disgust after we found ourselves protesting and getting arrested for the right for all Australians to access a University education with reasonable entrance marks and no fees. As was the case prior to Keating's grubby fingers getting into higher education.

I know I'm supposed to shut up and pretend I don't know any of this but it's pretty hard to because I was there holding a placard and watching my Uni friends being thrown to the ground and getting arrested for protesting against a govt which no longer cared about its own kids who were fighting for the right to continue to access higher education without further financial stress.

Back to top
« Last Edit: May 16th, 2022 at 4:29pm by Lisa Jones »  

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 19930
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #31 - May 16th, 2022 at 5:11pm
 
At the end of the day we need to decide what is important.

Keeping property prices artificially high so first home buyers will always need help entering the market, or do we help people currently priced out now in the short terms while making longer term plans to improve supply and affordability, wages and support for families so both parents can continue to work and earn without half their pay going to child care?

I'd choose the latter which is more in line with Labor's platform rather than the Libs treating housing like a financial market first and housing second.

"Can't afford to rent, just buy!"

Or we could just talk about past Labor policy to deflect away from the enormous shortcomings in the current liberal policy and avoid entirely identifying their fingerprints all over the current mess we're in.

Play politics or put Australia first?

Why do the conservatives always choose play politics...?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18853
Gender: male
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #32 - May 16th, 2022 at 5:18pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 5:11pm:
Why do the conservatives always choose play politics...?



Because the left try forget about past policy. ; Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36190
Gender: male
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #33 - May 16th, 2022 at 5:21pm
 
super is really going to suffer over the next few years.

a trillion dollars in printed money devalues the value of saved money.

the aussie dollar is already dropping.

inflation is not going to be able to be stopped.

you would need interest rates at 5 % to slow it and that number would see so much mortgage stress, it would translate into bank stress and the government cant see bank failures.

so they are stuck , unable to fight inflation at a time they are running budget deficits (ie printing money which is pure inflation) and when fuel and energy prices are about to sky rocket.

energy security is economic security .

we could have it but we would rather export coal and gas to asia to be burnt  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes.

china is being very sneaky.

they are going to benefit from cheap gas as russia wont be able to sell it anywhere else and they are creating weird lockdowns which , it appears, are designed to bugger up supply chains and cause a lot of stress in western economies.

when we no longer make cars, computers, whitegoods, clothes, shoes, electronics and furniture as well as steel and building materials,pharmaceuticals  we are going to be totally screwed if china simply stops producing that stuff, even temporarily /

i think thats what they are doing

they have about 15 trillion in savings on their books.

they can starve us out.

the days of abundance and the days of entitlement are over.

and about time.

the trouble is the politicians wont come clean to the electorate and tell it the way it is
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 19930
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #34 - May 16th, 2022 at 5:43pm
 
lee wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 5:18pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 5:11pm:
Why do the conservatives always choose play politics...?



Because the left try forget about past policy. ; Wink


Past policy is important, but you're trying to dismiss any criticism Labor have because of a past position they took, that no longer applies today, so you don't have to deal with those criticisms, that's simply playing politics.

The landscape today is very different to Keating's day. We're living longer and Super is more important, especially as the population continues to age and the nationalism pushed by the current Government is keeping immigration levels low.

Taking 40% of someones super now makes a huge difference.

Especially with interest rates rising making repayments higher and the Liberals plan designed to basically be seen as doing something about housing affordability while at the same time the primary goal is to keep the current market high, not more affordable.

It's smoke and mirrors when very real and lasting consequences to us the people.

But Labor once held a similar position so who cares?

Please...

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 77082
Gender: male
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #35 - May 16th, 2022 at 5:52pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 1:00pm:
Captain Nemo wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 12:38pm:
Under Labor's scheme, a home buyer could end up almost half a $Million worse off.


First-home buyers could save about $1000 a month on their mortgage repayments by choosing Labor’s Help to Buy scheme over the government’s First Home Guarantee, but may trade off up to $455,000 in equity gains, new modelling shows.

https://i.imgur.com/UBKhnE6.jpg


https://www.theage.com.au/property/news/will-first-home-buyers-be-better-off-usi...


Half a million worse off, if they can afford to buy today which in turn would see them not needing this assistance anyway.

You understand that right?

If they don't buy today without Labor's help they'll be $1.5 million worse off.

The point is to help them get into the market.  If they're not in the market they lose all the gains, so they're 1 million better off with Labor's help.

It just depends on what point you want to make by how you look at it...

We know what point you're trying to make.



I heard on the radio today that Labors policy is based on a similar scheme which has been running successfully in WA for almost 30 yrs now.

The libtards are looking desperate trying to shoot it down Grin Grin
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 77082
Gender: male
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #36 - May 16th, 2022 at 5:53pm
 
Captain Nemo wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 1:50pm:
If they buy under ScoMo's plan they could be $450,000 better off than under the Albo plan.





Only if you ignore the jump in house prices this will cause in the first place
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 77082
Gender: male
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #37 - May 16th, 2022 at 5:54pm
 
aquascoot wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 8:32am:
The only way to reduce house prices sto increase supply



Finally horse crap gets something right

Everything else is just tinkering around the edges
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 77082
Gender: male
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #38 - May 16th, 2022 at 5:58pm
 
Captain Nemo wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 2:09pm:
Also, you would not have the government owning part of your home.  Cool Cool


No one will be forced to take labor up on their offer. if you want 100% ownership you can still have it.

I'm betting the majority of people trying to get into the marker won't mind.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 77082
Gender: male
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #39 - May 16th, 2022 at 6:02pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 5:43pm:
The landscape today is very different to Keating's day.



Did lee mention that Keating also planned on raising super to 15%, or did he leave that bit out  Cheesy Cheesy

Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18853
Gender: male
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #40 - May 16th, 2022 at 6:05pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 5:43pm:
We're living longer and Super is more important, especially as the population continues to age and the nationalism pushed by the current Government is keeping immigration levels low.



Wow a whole 6 years longer.ProudKangaroo wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 5:43pm:
Taking 40% of someones super now makes a huge difference.



And I never said anything different. I have always believed super should b e for retirement. You take 30K out now and that is 30k at 6% compounded pa lost. Over 24 years about a 120k shortfall. Over 36 years about 240k.

And that was the same in 1993.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21057
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #41 - May 16th, 2022 at 6:07pm
 
Abolish negative gearing and thousands of homes will flood the market....The Government (State) needs to build more social housing???

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
UnSubRocky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Crocodile Hunter: Origins

Posts: 25067
Rockhampton
Gender: male
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #42 - May 16th, 2022 at 6:28pm
 


Part 1 of a 5 part series on Paul Keating in power. 5 hours worth of documentaries. Some episodes on John Howard afterwards.
Back to top
 

At this stage...
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12215
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #43 - May 16th, 2022 at 7:43pm
 
lee wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 6:05pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 5:43pm:
We're living longer and Super is more important, especially as the population continues to age and the nationalism pushed by the current Government is keeping immigration levels low.



Wow a whole 6 years longer.ProudKangaroo wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 5:43pm:
Taking 40% of someones super now makes a huge difference.



And I never said anything different. I have always believed super should b e for retirement. You take 30K out now and that is 30k at 6% compounded pa lost. Over 24 years about a 120k shortfall. Over 36 years about 240k.

And that was the same in 1993.



When I bought my home almost 30 years ago it was about $103,000


Now, it is worth about $700,000


The other point being ... once the home is sold, the money taken out from Super has to go back into Super and the capital gain and it will not be taxed.  Cool

This is a great bonus to Super in the end and the saving in lost rent money that would be gone forever.

The ScoMo plan is actually a good one compared to the Albo plan, especially when you see that Albo's plan could end up costing $450,000 of lost equity at the time of sale.






Back to top
 

The 2025 election WAS a shocker.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21133
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Paul Keating Slams Coalition's Super Policy
Reply #44 - May 16th, 2022 at 8:41pm
 
lee wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 6:05pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 5:43pm:
We're living longer and Super is more important, especially as the population continues to age and the nationalism pushed by the current Government is keeping immigration levels low.



Wow a whole 6 years longer.ProudKangaroo wrote on May 16th, 2022 at 5:43pm:
Taking 40% of someones super now makes a huge difference.



And I never said anything different. I have always believed super should b e for retirement. You take 30K out now and that is 30k at 6% compounded pa lost. Over 24 years about a 120k shortfall. Over 36 years about 240k.

And that was the same in 1993.




But you're putting money into another appreciating asset, one that often out performs shares.

Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print