How does neutering a cat work any better than shooting it, if you are worried about them already having a litter?
Neutering programs are crueler than shooting a cat, are no better than shooting a cat at dealing with litters they have already had, fail to stop the cat killing endangered animals the way that a bullet does, and are prohibitively expensive.
By any measure you choose, they are worse. So why do you persist with this idiocy?
Quote:That is the item you will not accept
I accept that it is your moronic argument.
Quote:So shoot—don’t pretend you are making the slightest difference to feral cat numbers tho.
Shooting feral cats helps to save endangered species going extinct. Given our ability to hunt a species to extinction ourselves,
it would take a complete moron to argue that hunting does not affect numbers of the target animal. For many animals targeted by hunters, careful management is needed to prevent the population crashing.
Again, why do you persist with your idiocy?
Did not work with rabbits. That sort of strategy works only with large animals that are fewer in numbers than cats or rabbits! Hell, foxes are still a big menace to sheep growers and they get hunted too.
Try actually thinking FD, it may hurt the old noggin for a bit but you may, perhaps, learn something.
Nothing I have said means people can’t or shouldn’t hunt feral cats. It just does SFA to reduce feral cat numbers.