Dnarever
Gold Member
Offline
Australian Politics
Posts: 57159
Here
Gender:
|
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 29 th, 2022 at 2:07pm: Mortdooley wrote on Jan 29 th, 2022 at 12:53am: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 28 th, 2022 at 11:58am: Mortdooley wrote on Jan 28 th, 2022 at 1:07am: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 27 th, 2022 at 12:17pm: Mortdooley wrote on Jan 27 th, 2022 at 12:02am: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 25 th, 2022 at 12:54pm: Mortdooley wrote on Jan 24 th, 2022 at 11:58pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 24 th, 2022 at 9:27am: Mort you are full of contradictions. You like most Americans rail against socialism while enjoy the benefits of it. You drive on roads, cross bridges, travel by trains, go to hospitals when you're ill, send your kids to public schools, etc. all paid and maintained by government through collective action - ie "socialism". When are you going to stop? You Socialist! Public Works that build infrastructure isn't Socialism any more than a Nations Military. The job of government is to do those things that are not practical or possible to do at an individual level. However our government would be more efficient if the workforce were reduced to 10% of its current size. The reality of the federal tax system is that our taxes only pay some of the interest on the national debt, if our government had been able to live within its means we would not need to pay any income tax! Our Hospitals are not government owned and our Public Schools collect a heavy tax from all home owners to support them. Public transportation isn't real practical here. The only Trains I have ever used were about 100 year old restored or reproduction ones for tourists. The only buses were also tour or transportation to a specific event. If I don't fly, I rent or use my own private vehicles. I never use public transportation. What is socialism but "collective action", Mort? I am sure most hospitals/ schools/etc. take Government money when they need it. To pay for extra wings/classrooms/books/etc. You quite gladly use those facilities when the time is ripe, you Socialist! You really stretch to call something socialism, charities and the lottery seem to be socialist by your definition. A non-answer, Mort. I am disappointed in you. Charities and the lottery are a marginal form of re-distribution of wealth, not very Socialistic at all... I never considered paying taxes as participating in Socialism, I pay a higher portion then some and less then others. We all have access to the same roads and bridges but I don't see that as an example of socialism. It is a perfect example of it, if you really understood what you are talking about. It is "socialism" because it is a collective response. Ownership is vested in the collective. They are created by the collective, funded by the collective, all for the use of the collective. Socialism at it's most basic, Mort. You socialist! You cannot even recognise it for what it is. Tsk, tsk, tsk... I understand your point, I just disagree with it. Taking fees and taxes from those who produce to pay for infrastructure everyone uses isn't socialism. Roads, bridges and government buildings don't belong to the citizens collectively. Whether City, State or Federal it all belongs to government. Where does government get the funds that it uses to construct/maintain things, Mort? The people of course. Who is ownership of said things vested. The people of course. It is owned, collectively in the people, the citizens. You really seem to have some idea that the Government is separate to the citizenry. Where do they come from? Mars? Tsk, tsk, tsk... We have a lot of Martian hospitals and busses.
|