random wrote on Sep 21
st, 2022 at 9:09am:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 21
st, 2022 at 8:47am:
random wrote on Sep 21
st, 2022 at 6:10am:
As a young worker, I eagerly bought Windows 1.0
Here's what it did.
Loaded into RAM and displayed a GUI and mouse interface that only showed icons of applications you defined
If you clicked on an icon it launched the app, which were all character based.
But the Win 1.0 occupied almost all of the available 640K Ram so some of the apps could no load at all.
I kicked it off, dumped the purchase in the bin.
But because I worked for organisations that were MS based I had to use it at work. The only two versions that were stable and half usable were 95 and Windows 7.
You cannot polish a turd.
Win95 was the most unstable OS in human history -
Exactly, but it was the best of the Microsoft systems.
Wat I sed.
I remember doing some CAD design at work back in the mid 90s using Win95
and a new CAD package of software.
I had to save the results every 30 minutes as a file with a new name -
in case the computer failed with that "blue screen of death" -
that everyone saw on Win95 - usually once per day.
That saved me losing all my work many times.
If you didn't you could lose a whole week of design as
even the file you saved could be corrupted as well -
hence the need to keep multiple updated versions.
WinXP was a lot better and then Win7 - 64 bit was better still.
I now have Win10 - 64 bit and it's not bad but really no better than Win7.
I shudder to think of loading Win11 as I know
many of my important legacy programs won't work.