Ajax wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2021 at 3:22pm:



The presence of blood clots has nothing to do with intravenous delivery. Vaccines are delivered intramuscularly.



Please educate yourself as to drug delivery techniques. Your inability to grasp basic science is not my fault or problem.

Ajax wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2021 at 3:38pm:



ou John Dillermand can guarantee that these vaccines donot enter the blood stream....???

You have heard of blood clots right...... Wink


Vaccines entering bloodstream is not intravenous delivery. Any drug you take has to get into the blood stream. Thats how they work. Take aspirin? It has to enter the blood stream. IM delivery slows down the movement of any of the components in a drug/vaccine compared to IV.

Again pharmacology, learn it.

John Dillermand wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2021 at 3:41pm:


LOL you're an idiot imo.

So a vaccine that is delivered intramuscular and enters the blood stream will not have the same effect as a vaccine that is delivered intravenously if they were given this way.

Please explain I'm all ears......LOL

The poison enters the blood stream even with intramuscular injection, slower delivery to be sure but it still enters.

John Dillermand wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2021 at 3:50pm:

Also tell me how mRNA vaccines alter your DNA. Astound me.

John Dillermand wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2021 at 3:55pm:

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and most mRNA vaccine scientists, the buck then stops there — mRNA vaccines “do not affect or interact with our DNA in any way,” the CDC says. The CDC asserts first, that the mRNA cannot enter the cell’s nucleus (where DNA resides), and second, that the cell — Mission-Impossible-style — “gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished using the instructions.”

A December preprint about SARS-CoV-2, by scientists at Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), produced findings about wild coronavirus that raise questions about how viral RNA operates.

The scientists conducted the analysis because they were “puzzled by the fact that there is a respectable number of people who are testing positive for COVID-19 by PCR long after the infection was gone.”

Their key findings were as follows: SARS-CoV-2 RNAs “can be reverse transcribed in human cells,” “these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed” (a phenomenon called “retro-integration”) — and there are viable cellular pathways to explain how this happens.

According to Ph.D. biochemist and molecular biologist Dr. Doug Corrigan, these important findings (which run contrary to “current biological dogma”) belong to the category of “Things We Were Absolutely and Unequivocally Certain Couldn’t Happen Which Actually Happened.”

The findings of the Harvard and MIT researchers also put the CDC’s assumptions about mRNA vaccines on shakier ground, according to Corrigan. In fact, a month before the Harvard-MIT preprint appeared, Corrigan had already written a blog outlining possible mechanisms and pathways whereby mRNA vaccines could produce the identical phenomenon.

In a second blog post, written after the preprint came out, Corrigan emphasized that the Harvard-MIT findings about coronavirus RNA have major implications for mRNA vaccines — a fact he describes as “the big elephant in the room.” While not claiming that vaccine RNA will necessarily behave in the same way as coronavirus RNA — that is, permanently altering genomic DNA — Corrigan believes that the possibility exists and deserves close scrutiny.

In Corrigan’s view, the preprint’s contribution is that it “validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable.”

John Smith wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2021 at 4:05pm:


well you were obviously born brain dead to allow a poison to be injected into you LOL

Sir lastnail wrote on Aug 2^nd, 2021 at 11:08pm:




Almost nothing to do with how mRNA doesn't alter your DNA.