freediver wrote on Jul 24
th, 2021 at 8:43am:
Lee are you able to explain how to measure atmospheric temperature with a satellite or not? Right now the only possible conclusion is that you are way out of your depth and have no clue what you are talking about.
Already been done.It s not my fault it is beyond your comprehension.
freediver wrote on Jul 24
th, 2021 at 8:43am:
It is not maths Lee. It is plain English. Read what I actually posted.
Yep. And again the plot is up to 2018. Not decades.
freediver wrote on Jul 24
th, 2021 at 8:43am:
What do you think zero offset means?
It means petal that the anomalies are not centred so that they cannot be compared. Now if you have another please tell us.
freediver wrote on Jul 24
th, 2021 at 8:43am:
You cannot offer a rational explanation for why you posted ten year old plots that look like they were done by a primary school students. The reason is that even the people who came up with those "measurements" think they are bunk.
Which ten year old plots petal?
But you haven't posted a link so you don't have that. Just another lie.
freediver wrote on Jul 24
th, 2021 at 8:43am:
But in any case, see the examples from wikipedia below where they admit a long series of errors.
"Yesterday it was reported that Sanger now believes no one should believe Wikipedia.
Wikipedia can no longer be trusted as a source of unbiased information since the online encyclopedia’s left-leaning volunteers cut out any news that doesn’t fit their agenda, according to the site’s co-founder.
Larry Sanger, 52, co-founded Wikipedia in 2001 alongside Jimmy Wales, said the crowdsourcing project has betrayed its original mission by reflecting the views of the ‘establishment.’ "
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/07/nobody-trust-wikipedia-co-founder-wikip...Wiki?
BTW - Nothing there about "mistakes".
You really are getting desperate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_temperature_measurementsfreediver wrote on Jul 24
th, 2021 at 8:43am:
It is a mistake (one of many) if they do not correct for it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UAH_satellite_temperature_dataset
Mistake not mentioned there either.
freediver wrote on Jul 24
th, 2021 at 8:43am:
Pre-1998 results published by UAH showed no warming of the atmosphere. In a 1998 paper, Wentz and Schabel showed this (along with other discrepancies) was due to the orbital decay of the NOAA satellites.[10] With these errors corrected, the UAH data showed a 0.07 °C/decade increase in lower troposphere temperature.
So no mistake. And corrected. Oh dear.
freediver wrote on Jul 24
th, 2021 at 8:43am:
Some discrepancies between the UAH temperature measurements and temperatures measured by other groups remain, with (as of 2019) the lower troposphere temperature trend from 1979-2019 calculated as +0.13 °C/decade by UAH,[6][7] and calculated at +0.208 °C/decade by RSS.
So which is correct?
freediver wrote on Jul 24
th, 2021 at 8:43am:
Much of the difference, at least in the Lower troposphere global average decadal trend between UAH and RSS, had been removed with the release of RSS version 3.3 in January 2011, at which time the RSS and UAH TLT were now within 0.003 K/decade of one another.
Wow that far back.