a bit unfair... its protocol valkie  polite in other words for a team mate not to do that...dont you see how the labs and greens want to divide.or are you ok with that??...

I'll bet he is laughing all the way to the money and could not care less about not being a Member of the Liberal Party!

So Liberal St Gladys is also a closet feminist?  Sheilas first or nothing - get in ahead of one and suffer the consequences..... stuff the vote of the majority .......

Well gentlemen - you know who your enemy are for true - all of them.    Best we beat to quarters.

Bias_2012 wrote on May 6^th, 2021 at 3:16pm:


You are so right.....

This shows more than clearly that the sisterhood push trumps everything else... all bullshit in an alleged democracy, of course.

Told yez that the greatest danger to democracy is government... even 'right wing' Gladys is on board with this bullshit about women....

Time you all woke up and stopped making like sitting ducks on the water whenever these feminist bullshit things come along.  Of course, that darling little girl of yours would never do those things to you, not after all the fine times you had together building a family and home etc.. of course not... and boys falling drastically behind in education means they are all stupid, right?

Did you see that Q & A thing where some sheila was going on about Oppressive Control or something in the home?  Of course no woman would ever do that.... so it was all about men.... what a load of bullshit, when all they want is guilt by accusation over anything the poor little girlie feels bad about.

Jesus - who ever promised them a rose garden - especially when men get all the thorns.

cods wrote on May 6^th, 2021 at 8:19am:


Blaming Labor and the Greens WHO ARE IN OPPOSITION for the actions of the Liberals WHO ARE IN GOVERNMENT.
Gladys is a politician so it is her job to put spin on everything, but Cods, are you really that ignorant?

That's it - Coercive Control - they want a new definition so that people can be criminals if they 'coercively control' their partner - as I said - that dear little girl of yours would never do that, would she, so it is clearly aimed at those nasty men again?

That was always a problem when you set out on a 'first step' in controlling violence of 'controlling male v female violence' - while ever you cling to that so desperately and allow never-ending increments in what can be labeled 'violence', it will always be men who are guilty of everything regardless of facts.

How exactly do you go about proving 'coercive control' - or is this to be just another star chamber episode where the accused is guilty without any chance of a successful defence... what it comes down to is - if the woman doesn't get her way, she is being controlled etc - but if the man doesn't get his way, he is not.... amazing.... simply amazing.... forget about a normal balance of power within any relationship ......

Somebody needs to tell these women that they can't have everything their own way - life simply doesn't work like that.

Warned yez in 1992.... ever since those idiots in Parliaments thought it was a good idea to install Keating's 'uniform domestic violence laws' and saw benefit for themselves in power and control in doing so, the 'feminists' have struggled mightily to extend and extend the 'meaning' of violence and such... and to reduce the standard of proof required in any issue concerning a woman.

Now we have people, time after time, being convicted of ancient stories of wrongdoing when no evidence is left of any substantial value.... and you reckon the Rule of Law is not under threat, and is being steadily replaced with 'guilt by accusation'?  Hundreds of years of upward seeking after enlightenment in the West trashed in a generation by feminists....

If you do not stop this rot, it is your sons and grandsons who will be in the firing line of it...

I dont reckon some of you blokes have ever had a root.