Australian Politics Forum - The “Climate Skeptics” thread in the Dubyne MRB

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › Member Run Boards › Relationships › The “Climate Skeptics” thread in the Dubyne MRB

(Moderator: Mod.)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6

The “Climate Skeptics” thread in the Dubyne MRB (Read 3413 times)

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16405
Gender: male

Re: The “Climate Skeptics” thread in the Dubyne MRB
Reply #75 - Apr 4^th, 2021 at 2:16pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 4^th, 2021 at 10:18am:

We know the mechanism: the sun warms the earth, the surface emits IR which if it reached space would cool the globe, GHG molecules increasingly absorb IR and spread the energy to the nitrogen molecules which move faster because of it. This is heat and is how AGW works.

First the CO2 molecules (410 ppm) have to be in close proximity to spread this (heat). Wink

Also I think you mean N2O. That's at 0.3 ppm. So we have 410ppm vainly chasing 0.3ppm.

If it were CO2 to N2 then the opposite reaction occurs as well and no net heat transfer.

IP Logged

Jovial Monk

Gold Member

Offline

Dogs not cats!

Posts: 43614
Gender: male

Re: The “Climate Skeptics” thread in the Dubyne MRB
Reply #76 - Apr 4^th, 2021 at 2:17pm

Ajax, the GWPF—the Global Warming Policy Forum—is a bunch of deniers. They accepted, lapped up, Zharkova’s faulty paper.

Ajax, without CO2 and H2O the globe would have an average temperature of -18°C. Are you not glad the average global temperature is +15°C?

Given that, is it not likely more CO2 would drive more warming?

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16405
Gender: male

Re: The “Climate Skeptics” thread in the Dubyne MRB
Reply #77 - Apr 4^th, 2021 at 2:24pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 4^th, 2021 at 2:17pm:

Ajax, the GWPF—the Global Warming Policy Forum—is a bunch of deniers. They accepted, lapped up, Zharkova’s faulty paper.

So did Nature's Science. Before it got criticised and they folded. I guess they are deniers who can be pressured into backtracking. Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 4^th, 2021 at 2:17pm:

Ajax, without CO2 and H2O the globe would have an average temperature of -18°C. Are you not glad the average global temperature is +15°C?

Given that, is it not likely more CO2 would drive more warming?

Wow how to conflate two issues. Grin

4% H20 to 410ppm CO2?

IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Forum

‹ Board

Top of this page