LOLOLOLOLOLOL!

The idiot has copied Ajax’s post here to the Dubyne MRB. Alzheimer's Booby? You would have posted that ripe old heap of fish entrails before.

Her paper was withdrawn, her model did not work. So much for needing extraordinary evidence, Booby never uses evidence at all! 

No, you said all heat escaped and that CERES supported that. It doesn’t of course—the globe is still warming and CO2 is still increasing.

Why not show the picture of the earths radiation budget? You seem reluctant for some reason?

The stone age didn't end because they ran outta stones, technology moved us forward and the same will happen here, because the big carbon producers are not going to stop their use of coal and oil,

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2021 at 2:19pm:



And? If we didn't we would freeze?

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2021 at 2:19pm:



And I never said it did Liar.

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2021 at 2:19pm:



Rubbish.  It merely proves that we have a livable planet.

BTW - I found that Trenberth Diagram.



I was wrong the uncertainty is only 17W/m2. And they can find about .5W/m2 in other papers.

Just think if their was no imbalance we wouldn't have climate.

lee wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2021 at 2:25pm:


If CO2 and H2O didn’t exist here night time temperatures would go down to -173°C, just like the moon. (Well, not quite as low, we do have an atmosphere but pretty close.) Without the levels of CO2 and consequent H2O of the preindustrial age the average global temperature would have been -18°C instead of the +15°C it was back then. The science of shortwave incoming radiation, warming of the surface, emission of IR, capture of IR by GHGs is sound.

Furthermore, the atmosphere is not saturated with respect to carbon: with more CO2 the spectral lines widen and the height where the long wave IR is released to space increases with increases in CO2. At these atmospheric heights water vapor has largely condensed out and CO2 does the emitting. It is cold up there, hard to release IR and the surface warms more.


This is what, the third merry-go-round about AGW? I am now only interested in researching and discussing the effect of AGW on critters and the plants, predators and diseases of critters or the diseases and other ecological harm the effect of AGW on critters brings.

I cannot do that until I have been assured that posts of mine will not get moved from Critters and Gardens just because they mention or discuss something about AGW.

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2021 at 2:39pm:



That's not what you have been saying.

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2021 at 2:39pm:


Because you are a failure.

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2021 at 2:39pm:



Your own little circle jerk world where anyone who criticises aspects is banned.

Ajax, I am sorry but the Mann hockey stick has NOT been refuted. Several other studies have confirmed it. The latest is a paleoclimate study that has pushed back the climate record to 24,000 years before now. It too includes a hockey stick.

It is inevitable: the declining Milankovitch Cycle caused some cooling until the increasing amount of CO2 started the rise in temperatures.

We know the mechanism: the sun warms the earth, the surface emits IR which if it reached space would cool the globe, GHG molecules increasingly absorb IR and spread the energy to the nitrogen molecules which move faster because of it. This is heat and is how AGW works.

Without GHG molecules in the air the world would have a mean temperature of -18°C! Now we have way too much GHGs in the atmosphere and so we have warmed.

This nonsense about ice age coming just ignores how much we have warmed and how little even the Maunder cooled global temperatures. No mini ice age is going to happen as AGW just keeps on warming the globe.