Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
COVID19 came from animals at a wet market (Read 2491 times)
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 43272
Gender: male
Re: COVID19 came from animals at a wet market
Reply #60 - Apr 3rd, 2021 at 7:39pm
 
We know it MAY have been COVID.
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16343
Gender: male
Re: COVID19 came from animals at a wet market
Reply #61 - Apr 3rd, 2021 at 7:45pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 3rd, 2021 at 7:39pm:
We know it MAY have been COVID.


So perhaps he wants to give the stats on pneumonia in China during that period. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: COVID19 came from animals at a wet market
Reply #62 - Apr 4th, 2021 at 9:27am
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Apr 2nd, 2021 at 9:40pm:
It did not start in the wet market why do you keep posting CCP propaganda are you a silly old fool?

Quote:
Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spreading globally


Jan. 26, 2020

As confirmed cases of a novel virus surge around the world with worrisome speed, all eyes have so far focused on a seafood market in Wuhan, China, as the origin of the outbreak. But a description of the first clinical cases published in The Lancet on Friday challenges that hypothesis.

The paper, written by a large group of Chinese researchers from several institutions, offers details about the first 41 hospitalized patients who had confirmed infections with what has been dubbed 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV).[highlight]In the earliest case, the patient became ill on 1 December 2019 and had no reported link to the seafood market, the authors report. “No epidemiological link was found between the first patient and later cases,” they state. Their data also show that, in total, 13 of the 41 cases had no link to the marketplace. “That’s a big number, 13, with no link,” says Daniel Lucey, an infectious disease specialist at Georgetown University.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/wuhan-seafood-market-may-not-be-source-n...





You do realise that the CCP don't believe that it started in a wet market either.
They believe that it started outside of China

However it's interesting you would posts the results of a CHINESE study after you have dismissed Monk's.    Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10952
Australia
Gender: male
Re: COVID19 came from animals at a wet market
Reply #63 - Apr 4th, 2021 at 9:48am
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Apr 4th, 2021 at 9:27am:
Baronvonrort wrote on Apr 2nd, 2021 at 9:40pm:
It did not start in the wet market why do you keep posting CCP propaganda are you a silly old fool?

Quote:
Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spreading globally


Jan. 26, 2020

As confirmed cases of a novel virus surge around the world with worrisome speed, all eyes have so far focused on a seafood market in Wuhan, China, as the origin of the outbreak. But a description of the first clinical cases published in The Lancet on Friday challenges that hypothesis.

The paper, written by a large group of Chinese researchers from several institutions, offers details about the first 41 hospitalized patients who had confirmed infections with what has been dubbed 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV).[highlight]In the earliest case, the patient became ill on 1 December 2019 and had no reported link to the seafood market, the authors report. “No epidemiological link was found between the first patient and later cases,” they state. Their data also show that, in total, 13 of the 41 cases had no link to the marketplace. “That’s a big number, 13, with no link,” says Daniel Lucey, an infectious disease specialist at Georgetown University.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/wuhan-seafood-market-may-not-be-source-n...





You do realise that the CCP don't believe that it started in a wet market either.
They believe that it started outside of China

However it's interesting you would posts the results of a CHINESE study after you have dismissed Monk's.    Grin Grin Grin


With enough money anything is possible for a profit.

From pandemics to altering the Earth's atmosphere and anywhere in between.

That's the world we live in today.
Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16343
Gender: male
Re: COVID19 came from animals at a wet market
Reply #64 - Apr 4th, 2021 at 1:33pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Apr 4th, 2021 at 9:27am:
You do realise that the CCP don't believe that it started in a wet market either.
They believe that it started outside of China



That's for outside consumption. What the CCP actually believes may be entirely different. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17387
Gender: male
Re: COVID19 came from animals at a wet market
Reply #65 - Apr 5th, 2021 at 11:00pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Apr 4th, 2021 at 9:27am:
Baronvonrort wrote on Apr 2nd, 2021 at 9:40pm:
It did not start in the wet market why do you keep posting CCP propaganda are you a silly old fool?

Quote:
Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spreading globally


Jan. 26, 2020

As confirmed cases of a novel virus surge around the world with worrisome speed, all eyes have so far focused on a seafood market in Wuhan, China, as the origin of the outbreak. But a description of the first clinical cases published in The Lancet on Friday challenges that hypothesis.

The paper, written by a large group of Chinese researchers from several institutions, offers details about the first 41 hospitalized patients who had confirmed infections with what has been dubbed 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV).[highlight]In the earliest case, the patient became ill on 1 December 2019 and had no reported link to the seafood market, the authors report. “No epidemiological link was found between the first patient and later cases,” they state. Their data also show that, in total, 13 of the 41 cases had no link to the marketplace. “That’s a big number, 13, with no link,” says Daniel Lucey, an infectious disease specialist at Georgetown University.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/wuhan-seafood-market-may-not-be-source-n...





You do realise that the CCP don't believe that it started in a wet market either.
They believe that it started outside of China

However it's interesting you would posts the results of a CHINESE study after you have dismissed Monk's.    Grin Grin Grin


Perhaps you should tell that old fool who started this thread the CCP don't believe in wet market origins for kung flu.

The first reported case in China was ill on 1st december which means they were infected early to mid november.

There are some good Chinese people reporting on this look at how the CCP tried to silence Dr Ai Fen and Dr Li Wenliang who were the first doctors to report on this kung flu. Try google or duckduckgo on those 2 and see what you get.
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print