Yet another brilliant rebuttal from the resident islamophile.

How does he come up with this stuff?

It's simply amazing how incontrovertible and concise his debating statements are.

Truely brilliant in it's form and delivery.

The way he puts forward the incredible "tsk tsk"

The exemplary use of  "islamophobe"

And that marvellous "dearie dearie me" sends shivers up my spine.

He is really showing his maturity and knowledge.......that of a child pretending to be an adult.

issue,

Well said, in the OP.


n.b.
All followers of ISLAM [notwithstanding their deceit] absolutely reject the ethic of the tolerance and acceptance of the other.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 20^th, 2021 at 8:47pm:


Weren't there some classes in your university years, where someone taught you     the value     of engaging in reasoned debate,
and of critical [logical] thinking ?

Well, apparently not.



If some person gives expression to an opinion or a worldview which you disagree with, well, they must just be,   ....wrong !

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 20^th, 2021 at 9:08pm:


1/ Every person who self-identifies as a moslem, is a follower of ISLAM.

2/ And ISLAM is a philosophy which mandates that its followers must HATE, and **fight and kill people who reject ISLAM, and reject the primacy of ISLAMIC law.

[** or at the very least, must support those directly engaged in that warfare]

3/ If a person did not want to associate themselves with what ISLAM is, that person would CHOOSE to [at least within his own heart!] renounce ISLAM, and to denounce what ISLAM is, and leave it.


Q.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 20^th, 2021 at 9:40pm:


According to your thought process,      ....anyone who has the audacity to criticise ISLAM [and to criticise what ISLAM is], is somehow making a 'victim' of every moslem.




QUESTION;


------ >

https://www.jihadwatch.org/category/jihad-doctrine

https://www.jihadwatch.org/category/jihad-in-the-west



Critical thinking.

I don't see murderers, and their wana-be-accomplices, as victims.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Islamophobia it seems.  Tsk, tsk.  Persecuting innocent people merely because they worship a different god to you, Yadda?  Shame on you, shame on you. 

rhino wrote on Mar 20^th, 2021 at 10:13pm:


After comparing the Allah of the Qur’an and the Yahweh of the Bible, it should be apparent that they could not be referring to the same God.

Either the Muslim Allah is the true God or the Christian Yahweh is the true God, or neither is true.

As the Law of non-Contradiction teaches, they both cannot be true.

One thing should be sure, though, the God of Muhammad cannot be the Father of Jesus.

John Smith wrote on Mar 20^th, 2021 at 7:06pm:

issuevoter wrote on Mar 21^st, 2021 at 7:57am:


I do not have to 'identify with Islam' to call out your bigotry about Islam. I just have to read your posts and recognise the bullshit for what it is.

John Smith wrote on Mar 21^st, 2021 at 7:02pm:

Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Islamophobia.  So much democracy, hey?  Tsk, tsk. 

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2021 at 8:37pm:

Different god?? Elsewhere you keep saying it's  the same god.
Inaccurate posts? You have never once demonstrated that.
Persecution - am I persecuting you by disagreeing with you and pointing out your idiocies and absurdities and how unmoored you are? And if that's  persecution - what's  wrong with it????
Can't idiots and frauds like you be pilloried? Can't other ideologues like, say, Muslims, commies, progs, Gretas, etc  be ridiculed and exposed?

Tsk tsk and     are not arguments, idiot, no matter how much you put them up INSTEAD OF an argument.

rhino wrote on Mar 20^th, 2021 at 10:13pm:


I suggest you ask, Moses, that question, Rhino.  He'll have an interesting answer for, I don't doubt.  Yadda has never proclaimed his beliefs but I rather suspect because of his continual quoting from the Bible and his condemnation of Islam that he is a Christian.  Personally, I couldn't give a stuff what he says except he seeks to persecute innocent Muslims for no other reason than that they worship a god he doesn't like.  Silly, really but what have I come to expect from the Islamophobes that I have encountered... 

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2021 at 8:37pm:
Not sure funny is the correct term. Can I suggest dishonest? If you acquaint yourself with the hate filled passages in the Koran listing how infidels should be treated you need to ask why these law-abiding, peaceful, mainstream Muslims never object to such blood thirsty urgings. Granted similar encouragement to religious violence can easily be found in the Bible but at least most christians have managed to criticise such passages. 

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2021 at 10:05am:

How very convenient for Muslims to ignore large passages of violence inducing hatred whilst continuing to view the Koran as a ‘Holy' text. Yes, the ravings of Moses, Yadda et al may be spiritually neanderthal but there are literally thousands of today’s biblical scholars who openly criticise many of the passages in the Bible and nobody from any church has even suggested they be stoned to death. Try that anywhere in the Middle East.
Central to these issues is the delusional concept any text can be claimed to be ’The Word of God’. 

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2021 at 11:41am:

Congratulations on having obtained a Doctor of Divinity degree. Sadly today that’s absolutely no guarantee of intellectual respectability. You could have some catching up to do. May I suggest you obtain a copy of 'Theology & Biblical Studies' published bi-annually by Bloomsbury Press?

From a post on DEGREE INFO forum <https://www.degreeinfo.com/index.php?threads/what-is-the-best-or-worst-seminary-to-attend.51317/>

Depends. Do they offer a legitimate, rigorous education commensurate with the labels they attach to their degrees? Do they have a faculty with excellent academic credentials? 

I don't even have a problem with a religious institution offering certifications that would not qualify as legitimate academic degrees to train up people for their churches. They can do whatever they want, why would I care? The problem is when they make their educations out to be something they're not, calling light correspondence courses M.Divs or Th.Ds or the like. Degree titles have a meaning independent of any given educational institution, and that's why there are standards established by legitimate accrediting bodies. When an institution like Andersonville plays dishonest games with this, they become worse than the most ugly of secular mills, because "in the name of God" they're misleading a lot of people and producing unqualified people allegedly capable of filling ministry positions. And if a person claims "Well, the good Lord qualified me!", I'll answer "Then why are you seeking validation of this qualification by the Creator of the Universe from a cheap and tawdry human-made correspondence mill?"

I suppose the hate being cited in the Bible is the Mosaic law of the O.T.

Why do the anti-Christian brigade all try to tap dance around the fact that the Mosaic law was done away with 2021 years ago?

Quote:


The Law became defunct  2021 years ago

Why are the anti-Christian brigade so afraid to admit this fact?

moses wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2021 at 3:27pm:

So why are such passages still read from the pulpit and still regarded by many as God’s holy word? And why do you imagine Mosaic law is the only evil doctrine contained in that book?

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2021 at 11:41am:




You were guessing ignorantly before your mail order divinity degree, you are guessing ignorantly after it. Yet you boast about it because you guess, ignorantly, that your guesses thereby would be seen as 'educated' ones.

Funny how few Christians recognise that, Moses 'cause they still preach from the Old Testament, they still obey the lore from the Old Testament.  Tsk, tsk, Moses stumbles once up against what most Christians believe today... 

moses wrote on Mar 24^th, 2021 at 6:00pm:


How...convenient.  Typical of the dissemblers and the liars who make up the hard-core Christians on this webboard.  Tsk, tsk, much easier to disown them than accept responsibility for their actions, even if it is staring you in the face, hey?   

The Ten Commandments

The Ten Commandments are an essential part of both Jewish and Christian theology.  They form the core of the beliefs in both religions.  In Christianity, they are taught to Christians as part of the "intro" to the religion.  It is taught by all Christian Churches and held by Christian Clergy to be central to the religion. 

Quote:

[Source]

Guess which part of the Bible this passage occurs in?  Yes, the Old Testament.  Moses maintains that the Old Testament has been abandoned by Christianity.  Has it though?  Ask a Christian Priest.  He'll tell a different story...   

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2021 at 10:05am:


What is an Islamist brian does it have anything to do with Islam? 

Do you agree with Ali Sina that all a muslim needs is a spark of faith to become a terrorist?

Ask any muslim if they can pick and choose what parts of the Quran they believe in.

Quote:


If muslims are good towards the Kuffar they are doing it in spite of Islam not because of Islam.

issuevoter wrote on Mar 25^th, 2021 at 6:39am:


No.

There is a text in ISLAMIC writing somewhere, prohibiting a moslem from criticising another moslem.

They shouldn't do it !

They do not do it !!!


I think Anjem Choudary was making a passing reference to that ISLAMIC 'rule' [when speaking after London 7/7 bombing], he said;

Quote:

Reply #46 - Mar 24th, 2021 at 8:34pm
Quote:


Why do the loony leftards use lies to debate?

Any one who has read my numerous posts on this subject, if they are honest, would say that I continuously post N.T. verses which clearly say one thing e.g..

Romans 10:4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.

Hebrews 9:12 Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.

Rom 3:20  Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

Rom 3:28  Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.


Gal 2:16  Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.


Gal 3:11  But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.

Quiet obviously the Law was done away with 2021 years ago.

The law is a segment of the O.T..

One component of the O.T. (the law) has been superseded by faith in Christ.

The rest of the O.T. is relevant if used in the the setting that was meant.

None of them preach that the Mosaic law must be conformed to.

Why do you incessantly lie?

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 29^th, 2021 at 9:44pm:



Because the NT would be incomprehensible without the OT,  thicko Bbwian.  What do you have against the Psalms, thicko. Against the Book of Job, Song of Songs, the books of the major and minor prophets,  etc? There is indeed much to learn from these books. That's why ghey are regarded as part of wisdom literature.  You are het up by the historic books, telling the story of the various wars. Chronicles, not action plans or instruction for future conduct.

As someone supposedly trained in history and a doctor of divinity, you must know this but pretend otherwise. You must also know that the status of the Bible is not the same for Christians as the status of the Koran is for Muslims: unalterable, eternal word of god, dictated directly by an angel to one man.  You know that no such laughable claim is made for any of the books of the Bible but you will, nevertheless, pretend otherwise to your dying day.

In short, you KNOW you are lying yet yo go on and insist on lying more.  Tsk, tsk, lying Bbwian, tsk, tsk. 

moses wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 10:57am:


They preach from it.  They use it's lessons to illustrate the message they are conveying, they speak it's language.  Who says they do not adhere to it's law?  The 10 Commandments are a piece of that law.  Are you denying they adhere to the 10 Commandments, Moses?  Really? 

Valkie wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 12:55pm:


Oh? you must have missed Genesis and Leviticus in Bible Study, Matty.

It demands beheading, burning and hanging, and not just for humans.

Animals who walked upon Yehovah's sacred mountain were to be put to death, along with any slaves, wives or first born sons.

That'll teach them to fear the Lord, no?

You?

It's law, and it's in the Bible - the Old Testament - and it is taught as being important by Christian churches, Moses.  You lose out on two major points.  Tsk, tsk. 

It's law, and it's in the Bible - the Old Testament - and it is taught as being important by Christian churches, Moses.  You lose out on two major points.  Tsk, tsk.