Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9
Send Topic Print
Harry and Meghan (Read 14443 times)
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #45 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 6:43am
 
Quote:
Meghan and Harry's sensational claims fact-checked:
How friend contradicted Meghan's claim she never Googled Harry, the truth about that secret wedding and whether Archie really should have been a prince

    They made jaw-dropping claims of brazen racism from within the royal family
    Meghan contradicted claims in biography that she had never researched royals
    Couple claimed they secretly wed three days earlier in private ceremony


They told lots of "fibs" on the TV show, by the sound of it!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9338421/Royal-revelations-test.html
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 52776
Gender: male
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #46 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 7:26am
 
Going by the Media's record, even with the USA elections.
I'll believe Harry & Megs over anything so-called 'others' come out with these days. Big Brother Media in Britain and America - I'm surprised that Oprah managed to show the Media she works in, how fraudulent it can be.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 52776
Gender: male
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #47 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 7:34am
 
Neferti wrote on Mar 9th, 2021 at 6:24am:
Did anybody watch it? I am not even sure when it is on in Australia.  Roll Eyes

I think the Queen should remove the Duke and Duchess titles. Let them be FREE and away from all the "royal paparazzi".


I watched it. Not much of a choice. If they remained, their 'duty' was to be condemned with all negativity, to make the William and Kate look better and more empowered. To be the wind beneath their wings. Either way they lose, because doing an 'exit' from the whole show also makes them look bad. Damned if they did, damned if they didn't.
Can't have them being more popular than the Chosen Ones.
The ugly side of Media has been revealed a bit more.

Even Bernie Sanders still feels ripped off that he and fellow Candidate challengers had to forfeit for sympathy Joe to take on Trump.  The Media 'Firm' is truly in Power over both Royalty and Politics in USA/UK.

The Media doesn't like Ranga Males. Been giving it to Harry since he was born because of his ranga looks. Then you've got the 'Fat Orange Man' in the USA.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 111597
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #48 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 10:33am
 
Neferti wrote on Mar 9th, 2021 at 6:24am:
Did anybody watch it? I am not even sure when it is on in Australia.  Roll Eyes

I think the Queen should remove the Duke and Duchess titles. Let them be FREE and away from all the "royal paparazzi".



I saw bits and pieces of it.
I saw the bit about whether the baby would be tinted.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21133
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #49 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 10:44am
 
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 111597
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #50 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 11:42am
 
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56323906

Oprah Winfrey: Skin colour remark 'not Queen nor Duke'

Oprah Winfrey has said Prince Harry clarified it was neither the Queen nor the Duke of Edinburgh who questioned what his son's skin colour would be.

Winfrey told CBS News on Monday the prince "did not tell me who was part of those conversations".

The revelation that a family member wondered "how dark" Archie's complexion might be came during a TV interview that aired overnight in the US.

The Duchess of Sussex had described the remarks as a low point.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21133
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #51 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 11:48am
 
Bobby. wrote on Mar 9th, 2021 at 11:42am:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56323906

Oprah Winfrey: Skin colour remark 'not Queen nor Duke'

Oprah Winfrey has said Prince Harry clarified it was neither the Queen nor the Duke of Edinburgh who questioned what his son's skin colour would be.

Winfrey told CBS News on Monday the prince "did not tell me who was part of those conversations".

The revelation that a family member wondered "how dark" Archie's complexion might be came during a TV interview that aired overnight in the US.

The Duchess of Sussex had described the remarks as a low point.



He's not even a prince so we can't call him The Black Prince.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 52776
Gender: male
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #52 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 12:58pm
 
Your Memes Bobby contradicts that Megan and the Queen got on really well and still do.
I think 90% of the Media now is negative and condemning of the pair.
Sums it all up really. Basically squeezed out of the Royal Show and now being squeezed out of the Media too.
They may indeed have to leave America too and come to Australia with the rest of us criminals and rejects of the Western underclass.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 143967
Gender: male
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #53 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 2:16pm
 
Redmond Neck wrote on Mar 8th, 2021 at 4:07pm:
Bobby. wrote on Mar 8th, 2021 at 3:54pm:
Neferti wrote on Mar 8th, 2021 at 2:20pm:
Meghan Markle says in Oprah Winfrey interview there were concerns within palace about how dark Archie's skin would be

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-08/meghan-markle-oprah-winfrey-catherine-duc...




Didn't Megan understand about royal blood?
What if the baby was as black as coal? 


I hate the smacking  royal family , as soon as we become a republic the better imo!!




The tell-all interview given by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex overnight hasn’t just rocked Buckingham Palace, it has also reignited talk of Australian independence.

Speaking to ABC News Breakfast this morning, the former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said it was time for Australians to consider breaking away from the commonwealth.

“Our head of state should be an Australian citizen, should be one of us. Not the queen or king of the United Kingdom,” Turnbull said.

“We should be so proud of our country and our fellow countrymen and women that we should say only an Australian should be eligible to be our head of state.

“Only an Australian is eligible to be our prime minister, so why should it be any different?”
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Online


OzPolitic

Posts: 39227
Gender: male
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #54 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 2:28pm
 
I have only seen the freebie small bites on TV but I have read the entire transcript....every word.  I conclude that the only thing they wanted to achieve out of it was to encourage public sympathy for themselves, put schit of Harry's Family, and perhaps it was even an attempt to extort the Palace.  Nah.  Stuff her, and stuff Harry until he gets the courage to grab his balls back and remember who he is.  He has led a life of privilege, all paid for by anybody other than himself, and now he is tossing sand in faces.  Fuq both of them.  It is there in the interview.  Both said that if they had been given greater support from the Palace, they'd still be there.  I don't believe that for one second.

Meghan even played the suicide card in the interview.

You tell me what they thought they would gain from that interview.  They did not have to do it.  They chose to do it.  Other than for the reasons I have posted......why?

Vindication?  Nah....they will never get that.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #55 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 5:49pm
 
Neferti wrote on Mar 9th, 2021 at 6:24am:
Did anybody watch it? I am not even sure when it is on in Australia.  Roll Eyes

I think the Queen should remove the Duke and Duchess titles. Let them be FREE and away from all the "royal paparazzi".




I watch it nef  I thought it was badly edited....presumed to get rid of the bits they had already shown like Oprah asking did they silence you....we have learned the interview went for 3.and a qtr hours.. so maybe Oprah is planning to reel in more money....

as for the baby crack,...they have now tarnished the whole family....seriously that did cross my mind when the baby was born...more or less in secret   not in hospital  and nothing said for quiet a long time  from memory after he was born.......I did wonder if that was in case of a shock..

otherwise why all the secrecy?....

as for Archie not having a title  neither do Princess Annes children....

seems odd Meg made a big thing about him not having a title when all they have done is whinge about the FIRM...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 52776
Gender: male
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #56 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 6:45pm
 
Considering Harry has been copping it since he was born because of a belief that he is not the son of Charles, but one of Diana's tools of the trade.

The Spencer v Windsor rift (Lannisters v Starks).
...which detached Diana as a concubine.
...Harry to another as a 'bastard'.
...now Megan being 'coloured'
...now Archie coming out like a dirty stain.

Remember that the UK is a BIPOLAR nation that doesn't know if it is part American or part European.

As for Turnbull twatface.
Well, has he asked Aboriginal permission to do what he wants to do?
As for head of State... well, we've been through this and the Australian head of state will be the weakest link in our Politics beyond being a dirty little rooter with a harem on taxpayer's money. This is the Southern Hemisphere folks, things are the 'reverse' (of especially the USA).

Is Turnbull going to fire the first shot against the Aboriginals?

Turnbull has no idea about anything except his tax report.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Bertie
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 785
Gender: male
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #57 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 7:45pm
 
A mulatto woman complaining about nobody telling her about the British anthem as she was marrying into the British royal family.

She had to Google it.


What a liberty

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #58 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 8:13pm
 
I wonder if she pats Harry on the head and calls him a "good boy", like that type of female tends to do?   She manipulated him, that's for sure! Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 111597
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Harry and Meghan
Reply #59 - Mar 9th, 2021 at 8:49pm
 
Jasin wrote on Mar 9th, 2021 at 12:58pm:
Your Memes Bobby contradicts that Megan and the Queen got on really well and still do.
I think 90% of the Media now is negative and condemning of the pair.
Sums it all up really. Basically squeezed out of the Royal Show and now being squeezed out of the Media too.
They may indeed have to leave America too and come to Australia with the rest of us criminals and rejects of the Western underclass.



My memes say nothing about the relationship to her majesty the Queen.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9
Send Topic Print