Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 4
th, 2021 at 12:59pm:
So - this 'eminent jurist' is he/she or his/her findings going to satisfy the blood lust of the mob outside tearing at the castle gates?
Dunno, but it is far better than leaving this very dark cloud over the AG's head.
Quote:If the rule of law is followed and the rules of evidence.... there is only one conclusion...... and I'm sure that will start another witch hunt....
Only one conclusion, ey? Do you have all the available evidence Grappler?
Right now, there are two options, TWO only. 1. Porter is as inncocent as the driven snow despite his tawdry record in this area. 2. He is a rapist prick, and, no surprise, given his tawdry record.
You happy with that? You happy to have Porter carve his signature into your grand piano as an honourable man, and worthy Senior Law Officer as a person accused of rape, and allowed to walk without any decent attempt at transparency?
Setting up an Inquiry every time someone makes an allegation is a gross injustice. There needs to be some substance to the allegations and some prospect of a conviction. Even the lawyers said there is hardly any prospect of a conviction here. And its a total furphy to say oh but the allegations are so serious (oh right, next time i want to drag someones name through the mud make sure I allege something serious - good plan) . Yes but he occupies such a high office. But that doesnt mean that the allegation doesnt have to meet some basic standard of prospects of finding guilt and this case does not look like it comes any where near close