lee wrote on Jan 6
th, 2021 at 12:14pm:
Ayn Marx wrote on Jan 6
th, 2021 at 7:52am:
To the simple minded on both sides of this debate there are only two alternatives, oil & coal against wind and solar. A little awareness of other possibilities needs to be taken into the equation.
https://scitechdaily.com/korean-artificial-sun-kstar-fusion-reactor-sets-new-wor
ld-record/
Yes I have seen that. Of course getting it to run more than 20 seconds is the next challenge. Fusion is always about 40 years away. Unfortunately. I am a believer in nuclear.
But the naysayers say "what about Chernobyl". An old design, and dodgy maintenance.
"What about Fukushima"? - built on unstable ground, and a 15 metre tsunami knocked out the power supply (battery backup would have kept system power online), the cooling system didn't cover the reactors.
"What about Three Mile Island"? Another old design, mechanical and human error.
So what has changed? New designs, new Programmable Logic Controllers to take the human error out of it.
Chernobyl was caused by human error with safety drill.
Fukishima was earthquake which it survived yet had design flaw with backup generators for coolant placed in basement which was flooded by tsunami which drowned them.
Earthquakes aren't really a problem here fault line is east of here from NZ up to Indonesia.
Uranium is radioactive while it's in the ground before it's mined for some reason people ignore this fact.
Nuclear runs flat out for fuel cycle which means cheaper off peak electricity at night when cars will be recharged it also means people could stop burning gas and wood for fires to heat in winter and allow airconditioning to be used at night in summer.