Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Dec 4
th, 2020 at 10:08am:
Now history shows that many 'vaccines' have not been 100% beneficial
Which ones are you thinking of?
Ok. Let's start with a big one. Thalidomide.
Definitely 'pushed' onto a public with very dire consequences.
That one example more than justifies 'caution'.
There are many others, like Champ-Ex when it first came out and people were throwing themselves off buildings and into oncoming traffic, etc. There are many others. Not saying 'everything'.
But if I have the luxury of 'time' that a successful Lock Down has given me. Then I will use that for 'caution' for as long as I can get, before taking a Jab that could easily be pumped out and 'marketed' just like Thalidomide was.
If Australia was 'very infected' then I would take any necessary action with that. At the moment - no. Lock Down has worked as a 'prevention' so far.
I have 'time' up my sleeve and not for an injection just yet.
What if a vaccination was rolled out and Australians were all forced to take it. Then it gives a false sense of security for Australians, works more as a cure, than a prevention. Has dire side effects down the track. Etc, etc.
Sorry, but I'm not going to volunteer for the Guinea Pig phase. This is coming from someone who often was (volunteer) used as a 'test dummy' for many Hyperbaric and Depth experiments for Medical Students and Professionals.
I'm cautious.
Australia has the highest ratio of narcotic users per population here in the most virulent region of the world.
It has a higher death rate than Corona.
I think we need to start curing this problem than the Corona first.