Frank wrote on Oct 22^nd, 2020 at 1:30pm:



Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Soren, we shall I suspect, never see eye to eye.  You are too far gone in your intolerance of other people and their practices.  Your thinking is that of a six year old.  When you can't get your way you resort to argument ad hominem, call your opponent every name under the sun, rather than actually addressing what they are saying.  I admit I am not perfect but I act far more adult than you do.  I rarely insult in crude terms my opponent.  I rarely bother resorting to argument ad hominem.  Time for you admit that it is you who acts like a pre-adolescent child.  I'm sure you feel better for letting fly with your vehement inarticulate nonsense but really?  Does it fulfil any other function than satisfy your narcissism?    Time to grow up and actually think of an articulate, sensible argument...   

Christianity was spawned in bloodshed and violence.

Jesus decided to push his moon god Yahweh as the monotheistic god of the world.

This reinvented moon god Yahweh became a god of hate rape torture and bloodshed.

The Bible focused on these inhumanities as being the sanctified religious duties of Christians, in the quest to install the Christianityic caliphate on a global basis.

The world wide problem we face right now is the depravity in the Bible.

In the last 2020 odd years, millions upon millions of innocent people have deliberately been subjected to the most degenerate forms of human rights atrocities, by Christians who are told to commit them by the filth in the Bible.

The problem is that Christianity is a death cult, Christians are performing the foulest of deeds imaginable, because [b]their Bible tells them to do it.

Christianity is not about compassion love and peace, the teachings of Christianity use the words KILL, MURDER, FIGHT, COMBAT, SLAY, PUT TO DEATH, SLAUGHTER, ETC., about 700 times more than the word love is used.

The answer to our problems is not with guns bombs and bullets, we must tell the truth about the putridly evil teachings of Jesus, Christianity is the problem, truth is the peaceful solution (with the added benefit that Christianity will also be destroyed by truth).

Amount of Text Devoted to the infidel

The Bible says that the infidel may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse. The word is usually translated as “unbeliever” but this translation is wrong. The word “unbeliever” is logically and emotionally neutral, whereas, infidel is the most abusive, prejudiced and hateful word in any language.

Christianity devotes a great amount of energy to the infidel. The majority (64%) of the Bible is devoted to the infidel, and nearly all of the testaments (81%) deals with Jesus’s struggle with them. The Hadith (Traditions) devotes 32% of the text to infidels1. Overall, the Trilogy devotes 60% of its content to the infidel.

Hatred for the sake of Yahweh and love for the sake of Yahweh is wonderful, a fundamental principle of Christianity ethics and the Bible. A Christian is to hate what Yahweh hates and love what Yahweh loves. Yahweh hates the infidel, therefore, a Christian is to act accordingly

Christianity is a death cult based on hatred of non Christians and Christian supremacy.

Naziism is the mirror image of Christianity.

Christians have been practicing Naziism for 2020 odd years.

Hitler only came into power in the 1930s Christianity in the 0s, Hitler actually followed the example set by Christians over a thousand years before he was spawned.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Tsk, tsk.  Do I look worried, Yadda?  Really?   

moses wrote on Oct 23^rd, 2020 at 3:12pm:


They are completely different belief systems.  Naziism (please note the correct spelling) is basically humanistic if not stemming in part from belief in the "occult" which is complete anathema to Islam.  Stop telling lies, Moses.  Tsk, tsk.   

What were the ideals of Nazism?

NSDAP or National Socialist German Workers’ Party was organized by Drexler. Later on, Hitler joined it and both Drexler and Hitler changed its name to Nazi Party.

In the beginning the Nazi ideals remained vague. But in course of time the ideals became clear.

The following may be stated to be the ideals of Nazis:

(1) the individual to be subservient to the state and the state being subservient to the Party.

(2) The dream of a vast German empire and supremacy of the German nation.

(3) Hatred towards the Jews, and opposition to democracy and communism.

(4) Besides, anti-Semitism and racialism, etc. remained as the ideals of the Nazis.

O.K. what is the difference to islamic ideology?

Which is:

(1) islam demands that the individual be subservient to islam / sharia law.

(2) The dream of a global muslim caliphate, with the caliphate being subservient to islam.

(3)  muslims are commanded to hate subdue and slaughter Jews and Christians in the qur'an.

(4) muslims are anti - Semitic and practice racialism with their teachings of dhimmitude and the non believers are second class citizens.

There is absolutely no difference between the ideology of the Nazis and muslims.

Nazism and  islam are the synonymity of each other.

freediver wrote on Oct 21^st, 2020 at 3:50pm:


The logic of you using the specific words "the only real difference" in your historical interpretation of how the nazis treated jews compared to how the muslims treated jews. And when you said the muslims were "less successful" than the nazis in implementing their final solution - how else is this to be interpreted other than suggesting the muslims really wanted to kill (at least) as many jews as the nazis, but couldn't? Because an objective interpretation of the history is that the muslims were actually more "successful" - if the measure is getting rid of their jewish populations permanently. Its just that they did it bloodlessly, which you tellingly label as "less successful". Why is that FD?

Its your story FD. I'm not the one claiming they wanted to kill any.

Now back on topic, is there any other way of interpreting your words "the only real difference" in your historical interpretation between muslim and nazi treatment of jews - as saying they were both morally (as opposed to competently) "the same" in this respect?

Good point FD, I "made up" a question. Feel free to answer it.

I'm asking how else to interpret your words. If you think its the wrong interpretation, just say so. Preferably with an explanation of why.