freediver wrote on Jan 3
rd, 2021 at 10:11am:
Gandalf, why is it that every time you quote from this Freeman paper and criticise me for not reading the whole thing, it seems to have been published in a different year, says something different to the previous time you quoted it, and there is no link to where you got it from?
a) it is not a "Freeman paper", but merely quotes Freeman to support its overall argument - which I have conveyed to you multiple times now.
b) the link to the paper was given to you, but as usual you miss it and/or ignore it and then pretend that was all my fault.
c) rather than just doing what a normal person would do and simply read the damn paper for yourself to allay your obvious confusion about what it says - you instead opt for second guessing it, insisting I have not spoonfed you enough, and generally absolve yourself from needing to understand any of the relevant facts that directly refute the BS claims you base this thread on. But of course we all know you only do this because you know the article directly refutes your BS, and you cannot deny this.
d) all of a, b - but mostly c, is why I criticise you.