freediver
Gold Member
Online
www.ozpolitic.com
Posts: 47366
At my desk.
|
Johnnie wrote on Sep 20 th, 2020 at 10:38pm: freediver wrote on Sep 20 th, 2020 at 7:17pm: Jasin wrote on Sep 20 th, 2020 at 7:07pm: FD wrote: Harari anthropomorphises broad human institutions, such as religion, science, and modernity, and ascribes them with personal agendas such as the pursuit of power or social order. He occasionally reminds me of Jasin, making these claims without sufficient context. ________________________________
Now, now. I can't help it if I have the best strike rate of predictions on this Forum. Aye, you are right twice a day. Johnnie wrote on Sep 20 th, 2020 at 7:08pm: freediver wrote on Sep 20 th, 2020 at 6:35pm: It makes sense with code. Not so sure about DNA, as it is both an algorithm and a chemical compound. You cannot write it with another material, because the chemical reaction and the algorithm are inseparable. Code on the other hand requires you to first break everything down into entirely human constructs (integers, floating point values, logicals etc). Only after this step is completed can the algorithm be treated as platform agnostic. An algorithm is an exact thing, it's maths, an organism requires chemical and electrical actions and interactions, i would like to see an algorithm take that into account. DNA is an exact algorithm. At least, when it works.We could for example create a computer model of DNA, predict all the chemical reactions it would create, etc. If the computer had enough power, we could theoretically create an entirely simulated, yet also real, human. You could never call DNA an exact algorithm, that would mean there are are no variables. All Algorithms have variables. AiA, you are right, I read the book, not the reviews.
|