Australian Politics Forum - The left continue to sexualise children

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

The left continue to sexualise children
Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:10am

Hypocritical agenda driven scum.... BLM included.

Quote:

An NBC News article defends Netflix’s Cuties premised on the idea that only a right-wing conspiracy theorist could oppose soft-core child pornography.

Quote:

So Netflix releases a movie with countless scenes off 11-year-olds dressed like hookers twerking, which includes countless shots of the camera lingering on 11-year-old butts shaking in short-shorts, 11-year-old legs spread wide-open wearing only bikini shorts, 11-years old girls dry-humping the ground; and NBC believes criticism of such a thing can only come from “the pedophile-obsessed American right, driven by QAnon.”

Quote:

We’re told by the left “Baby It’s Cold Outside” is dangerous. So it’s blacklisted.

We’re told by the left Kindergarten Cop is dangerous. So it’s blacklisted.

And then we’re told by the left only a TrumpTard could be outraged by close-up crotch shots of 11-year-old girls in Daisy Dukes.

The piece is some 1200 words long and nowhere does it suggest that Cuties’ critics are anything other cynically motivated right-wingers, are anything other than “a hodgepodge of insane far-right conspiracy theories called QAnon, a movement that posits that senior Democrats, Hollywood executives and media barons feast, quite literally, on children, whom they also molest.”

Nowhere does the NBC piece leave open the possibility that well-intentioned people are horrified by a movie that sexually exploits children.

Quote:

There is no bottom.

Democrats, Hollywood, and the elite media are actively looking to normalize child pornography for the vilest of reasons.

https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/09/17/nolte-nbc-article-defends-cut...

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20231 Gordon Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #1 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 8:00am why didn't the NBC article also report that Muslims have a problem with the same film. https://www.cair.com/press_releases/action-alert-cair-joins-calls-for-netflix-to...
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

Valkie Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 16096 Central Coast Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #2 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 8:09am We really need to drive these LGBTIQSELFISH perverts back underground or to their graves
Back to top	I HAVE A DREAM A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM. A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM. SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU IP Logged

Jest

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1399
NSW South Coast
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #3 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 8:13am

Gnads wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:10am:

Hypocritical agenda driven scum.... BLM included.

Quote:

An NBC News article defends Netflix’s Cuties premised on the idea that only a right-wing conspiracy theorist could oppose soft-core child pornography.

Quote:

So Netflix releases a movie with countless scenes off 11-year-olds dressed like hookers twerking, which includes countless shots of the camera lingering on 11-year-old butts shaking in short-shorts, 11-year-old legs spread wide-open wearing only bikini shorts, 11-years old girls dry-humping the ground; and NBC believes criticism of such a thing can only come from “the pedophile-obsessed American right, driven by QAnon.”

Quote:

We’re told by the left “Baby It’s Cold Outside” is dangerous. So it’s blacklisted.

We’re told by the left Kindergarten Cop is dangerous. So it’s blacklisted.

And then we’re told by the left only a TrumpTard could be outraged by close-up crotch shots of 11-year-old girls in Daisy Dukes.

The piece is some 1200 words long and nowhere does it suggest that Cuties’ critics are anything other cynically motivated right-wingers, are anything other than “a hodgepodge of insane far-right conspiracy theories called QAnon, a movement that posits that senior Democrats, Hollywood executives and media barons feast, quite literally, on children, whom they also molest.”

Nowhere does the NBC piece leave open the possibility that well-intentioned people are horrified by a movie that sexually exploits children.

Quote:

There is no bottom.

Democrats, Hollywood, and the elite media are actively looking to normalize child pornography for the vilest of reasons.

https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/09/17/nolte-nbc-article-defends-cut...

Many yrs ago I recall a person interviewed on a trashy current events program arguing that we should decriminalise sex with children.

What the left needs to realise is that those people have not gone away and that they're most probably much better orgasnised and funded then ever. Lots of very rich pedophiles out there sick of being scared of being caught, Im sure.

As you point out, whats insidious about this is that its characterised as something the "Left" considers harmless so that all the stupid, impressionable kids on the Left immediately adopt it as their attitude, otherwise people might think they're fascist, racist, white supremacist, homophobic, transphobic, Islamophobic dickwads.And what kid wants to be thought of as that.

Back to top

Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #4 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 8:35am

Gordon wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 8:00am:

why didn't the NBC article also report that Muslims have a problem with the same film.

https://www.cair.com/press_releases/action-alert-cair-joins-calls-for-netflix-to...

Probably because it only mentions the left & the right aka Republican conservatives v Democrat liberals in politics, the entertainment industry & the media .......... not religions per se.

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20231
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #5 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 8:49am

Gnads wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 8:35am:

Gordon wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 8:00am:

why didn't the NBC article also report that Muslims have a problem with the same film.

https://www.cair.com/press_releases/action-alert-cair-joins-calls-for-netflix-to...

Probably because it only mentions the left & the right aka Republican conservatives v Democrat liberals in politics, the entertainment industry & the media .......... not religions per se.

That article is trying to make it about the right being silly for having issues with the film but it's inconvenient if they have to criticise Muslims for not liking it either.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20231
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #6 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 9:00am

Here's the thing with this film. The underlying story is actually really good and deals with important issues, namely sexualistion of young girls and a bit about the mysogony of Islam but the execution of the film is terrible.

The dance scene at the end is actually confronting and about 100 times worse than described in the NBC article. 11 year old girls in skimpy dance outfits, lying down with bums in the air doing simulated handjob gesture with mouths open.

Lets just for a moment they wanted to make the final dance scene it shocking to prove a point, I could get that but the the way the rest of the film was shot looks like a porno. Every single shot has been crafted to make it look overtly sexulised, even in parts that have no real context to the story.

For example there is a bit where some of the girls are walking up stairs wearing shorts shorter than anyone I'd know would allow an 11 year old to leave the house in.
The camera from a low angle zooms in close in lingers right on their behinds. It actually looks like it was directed by porn or rap song producer.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #7 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 9:21am

Gordon wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 9:00am:

Here's the thing with this film. The underlying story is actually really good and deals with important issues, namely sexualistion of young girls and a bit about the mysogony of Islam but the execution of the film is terrible.

The dance scene at the end is actually confronting and about 100 times worse than described in the NBC article. 11 year old girls in skimpy dance outfits, lying down with bums in the air doing simulated handjob gesture with mouths open.

Lets just for a moment they wanted to make the final dance scene it shocking to prove a point, I could get that but the the way the rest of the film was shot looks like a porno. Every single shot has been crafted to make it look overtly sexulised, even in parts that have no real context to the story.

For example there is a bit where some of the girls are walking up stairs wearing shorts shorter than anyone I'd know would allow an 11 year old to leave the house in.
The camera from a low angle zooms in close in lingers right on their behinds. It actually looks like it was directed by porn or rap song producer.

So despite the good intentions of the underlying story regarding sexualisation of children & misogyny in Islam .......

the over riding issue is that it strays far from it & looks overtly like a soft porn film and that's the complaint being made as far as I can see from the article & from you & me.

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

The_Barnacle

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #8 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 10:46am

Gnads wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:10am:

The left continue to sexualise children

According to Breitbart?
Grin

Quote:

On Aug. 18, Netflix accidentally fired the first shot in what may be the single dumbest battle of the culture wars, this one over “Cuties,” Maïmouna Doucouré’s sweet-spirited French coming-of-age drama about Amy, an 11-year-old Muslim girl in Paris looking for friendship among the competitive dancers in her class at school.

Netflix briefly promoted the film, a Sundance directing prize winner, with a digital “poster” that made it look a bit like a horrible American reality TV series — the notorious "Dance Moms," perhaps, which ran for eight seasons on Lifetime, or Netflix's own "Dancing Queen," or "Bring It," which had five seasons on Lifetime, or its companion show "Step It Up," which got only one season, all of which came and went without protracted public objection. Within hours of that first trailer for “Cuties,” the pedophile-obsessed American right, driven by QAnon, had a new target.

It’s legitimately upsetting to see this movie so cynically hijacked. It’s a very witty indie film — impeccably framed and shot — about the tug-of-war between Amy’s Sengalese Muslim heritage (which is brutally subjugating her mother) and her new French friends’ brazenness as they compete with older girls in dance competitions where they borrow choreography from sexy American music videos.

It is, annoyingly, important to state plainly that “Cuties” does not portray child abuse, it does not glorify or countenance pedophilia in any way, and it does not “sexualize” its characters — which is, to put it plainly, a favorite description of people so disturbed by their own reaction to a piece of art that they have to quickly plant the blame for that reaction on the artist before anyone notices. Doucouré’s movie is about platonic relationships between women and girls; there is no sexuality to be had anywhere in this movie, which makes the outrage over it seem all the more extraterrestrial.
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/criticism-netflix-s-cuties-isn-t-about-mov...

Did any of the permanently outraged Right actually watch the movie?

Back to top

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.

IP Logged

Sir Spot of Borg

Gold Member

Offline

WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26460
Australia

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #9 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 11:44am

Gnads wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:10am:

Hypocritical agenda driven scum.... BLM included.

Quote:

An NBC News article defends Netflix’s Cuties premised on the idea that only a right-wing conspiracy theorist could oppose soft-core child pornography.

Quote:

So Netflix releases a movie with countless scenes off 11-year-olds dressed like hookers twerking, which includes countless shots of the camera lingering on 11-year-old butts shaking in short-shorts, 11-year-old legs spread wide-open wearing only bikini shorts, 11-years old girls dry-humping the ground; and NBC believes criticism of such a thing can only come from “the pedophile-obsessed American right, driven by QAnon.”

Quote:

We’re told by the left “Baby It’s Cold Outside” is dangerous. So it’s blacklisted.

We’re told by the left Kindergarten Cop is dangerous. So it’s blacklisted.

And then we’re told by the left only a TrumpTard could be outraged by close-up crotch shots of 11-year-old girls in Daisy Dukes.

The piece is some 1200 words long and nowhere does it suggest that Cuties’ critics are anything other cynically motivated right-wingers, are anything other than “a hodgepodge of insane far-right conspiracy theories called QAnon, a movement that posits that senior Democrats, Hollywood executives and media barons feast, quite literally, on children, whom they also molest.”

Nowhere does the NBC piece leave open the possibility that well-intentioned people are horrified by a movie that sexually exploits children.

Quote:

There is no bottom.

Democrats, Hollywood, and the elite media are actively looking to normalize child pornography for the vilest of reasons.

https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/09/17/nolte-nbc-article-defends-cut...

Where exactly was there twerking?

Spot

Back to top

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a
Moron!

- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #10 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 11:53am

For once, reading this, I was left with my mouth hanging open at the sheer audacity and vileness of people who would even entertain such things. When will this insanity be stopped once and for all?

For once I am totally on Valkie's side.

Bobby? What's the answer here...???

BTW - thanks to Gordon for the clear explanation of what this garbage actually is about.

There ya go - anyone who objects to sexualisation of a young girl must be a Travis Bickle ready to gun everyone down to 'free' her... that's the idea of this article.... loathe what is loathsome and you are a guy with a solid moral compass but an irrational way of working it out = Right Wing nutter.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:06pm by Grappler Truth Teller Feller »

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 46588 Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #11 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:03pm .
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #12 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:07pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:00pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:10am:

Hypocritical agenda driven scum.... BLM included.

Quote:

There is no bottom.

Democrats, Hollywood, and the elite media are actively looking to normalize child pornography for the vilest of reasons.

The Democrats, you say?

Trump Campaign Adviser Pleads Guilty to Child Porn, Sex Trafficking

"ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CN) – An adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign who testified in the Mueller probe pleaded guilty Monday to charges of child sex trafficking and possessing child pornography.

"George Nader, 60, entered his plea before U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Virginia’s Eastern District."

So you're defending left wing child abusers now?

Stick to the subject.

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131547
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #13 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:10pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:00pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:10am:

Hypocritical agenda driven scum.... BLM included.

Quote:

There is no bottom.

Democrats, Hollywood, and the elite media are actively looking to normalize child pornography for the vilest of reasons.

The Democrats, you say?

Trump Campaign Adviser Pleads Guilty to Child Porn, Sex Trafficking

"ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CN) – An adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign who testified in the Mueller probe pleaded guilty Monday to charges of child sex trafficking and possessing child pornography.

"George Nader, 60, entered his plea before U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Virginia’s Eastern District."

So you're defending left wing child abusers now?

No.

I'm showing you that it's not just Democrats.

Trump Campaign Adviser Pleads Guilty to Child Porn, Sex Trafficking

"ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CN) – An adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign who testified in the Mueller probe pleaded guilty Monday to charges of child sex trafficking and possessing child pornography.

"George Nader, 60, entered his plea before U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Virginia’s Eastern District."

Donald Trump caught saying he will date 10-year-old girl 'in ten years'

"New footage has emerged in which Donald Trump predicts he would be dating a 10-year-old girl in ten years' time -- the latest sleaze claim to hit his presidential campaign."

Donald Trump boasted about meeting semi-naked teenagers in beauty pageants

"Donald Trump used to “stroll right in” to the dressing room of beauty pageants while the contestants - some of whom were teenagers - were naked or half-dressed".

Back to top

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #14 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:25pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:10pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:00pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:10am:

Hypocritical agenda driven scum.... BLM included.

Quote:

There is no bottom.

Democrats, Hollywood, and the elite media are actively looking to normalize child pornography for the vilest of reasons.

The Democrats, you say?

Trump Campaign Adviser Pleads Guilty to Child Porn, Sex Trafficking

"ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CN) – An adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign who testified in the Mueller probe pleaded guilty Monday to charges of child sex trafficking and possessing child pornography.

"George Nader, 60, entered his plea before U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Virginia’s Eastern District."

So you're defending left wing child abusers now?

No.

I'm showing you that it's not just Democrats.

Trump Campaign Adviser Pleads Guilty to Child Porn, Sex Trafficking

"ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CN) – An adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign who testified in the Mueller probe pleaded guilty Monday to charges of child sex trafficking and possessing child pornography.

"George Nader, 60, entered his plea before U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Virginia’s Eastern District."

Donald Trump caught saying he will date 10-year-old girl 'in ten years'

"New footage has emerged in which Donald Trump predicts he would be dating a 10-year-old girl in ten years' time -- the latest sleaze claim to hit his presidential campaign."

Donald Trump boasted about meeting semi-naked teenagers in beauty pageants

"Donald Trump used to “stroll right in” to the dressing room of beauty pageants while the contestants - some of whom were teenagers - were naked or half-dressed".

Well - most of us would be happy to follow Bobby's lead here - and maybe commute their sentences to life on a prison island populated by giant anacondas and flesh eating crabs ...

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #15 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:31pm

P'S. If this keeps up, everyone, 'man' or 'woman' or 'whatever', will be Entitled™ to date a 10 year old in ten year's time....

.....was Trump just making that point - that perhaps given this endless drive towards sexualisation of minors for the gratification of certain twisted groups, it is Inevitable™ that dating children will be 'legal' and 'normal'?

Call me an old fogey, but I even find dopey 'legal size' 16 year olds going to hotel rooms with football players reprehensible and clearly indicative of the general stupidity of young females, let alone of the same dopey players etc. The NRL has agreed with me in some cases and has canceled some contracts for this kind of behaviour - but the stupidity of the young female and even some older ones can never be under-estimated.

Women handling the moral standards for the West? Give me a break......

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20231 Gordon Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #16 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:32pm I stumbled upon this review of the film. It appears to be from an American collage website but this guy can write and he absolutely nails it. Please take some time to read it. https://theseahawk.org/28292/culture/review-cuties-is-the-opposite-of-cute/
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #17 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:32pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:25pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:10pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:00pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:10am:

Hypocritical agenda driven scum.... BLM included.

Quote:

There is no bottom.

Democrats, Hollywood, and the elite media are actively looking to normalize child pornography for the vilest of reasons.

The Democrats, you say?

Trump Campaign Adviser Pleads Guilty to Child Porn, Sex Trafficking

"ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CN) – An adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign who testified in the Mueller probe pleaded guilty Monday to charges of child sex trafficking and possessing child pornography.

"George Nader, 60, entered his plea before U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Virginia’s Eastern District."

So you're defending left wing child abusers now?

No.

I'm showing you that it's not just Democrats.

Trump Campaign Adviser Pleads Guilty to Child Porn, Sex Trafficking

"ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CN) – An adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign who testified in the Mueller probe pleaded guilty Monday to charges of child sex trafficking and possessing child pornography.

"George Nader, 60, entered his plea before U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Virginia’s Eastern District."

Donald Trump caught saying he will date 10-year-old girl 'in ten years'

"New footage has emerged in which Donald Trump predicts he would be dating a 10-year-old girl in ten years' time -- the latest sleaze claim to hit his presidential campaign."

Donald Trump boasted about meeting semi-naked teenagers in beauty pageants

"Donald Trump used to “stroll right in” to the dressing room of beauty pageants while the contestants - some of whom were teenagers - were naked or half-dressed".

Well - most of us would be happy to follow Bobby's lead here - and maybe commute their sentences to life on a prison island populated by giant anacondas and flesh eating crabs ...

.. don't forget the trained sharks endlessly circling....

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 80318 Proud pre-1850's NO Voter Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #18 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:47pm
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

Jest

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1399
NSW South Coast
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #19 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 2:06pm

Gordon wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:32pm:

I stumbled upon this review of the film. It appears to be from an American collage website but this guy can write and he absolutely nails it. Please take some time to read it.

https://theseahawk.org/28292/culture/review-cuties-is-the-opposite-of-cute/

Yes I read it thanks. Sounds like a really awful film. It burns me up that they're trying to characterise this as a leftist film.

Back to top

Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.

IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 46588
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #20 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 2:27pm

Gordon wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:32pm:

I stumbled upon this review of the film. It appears to be from an American collage website but this guy can write and he absolutely nails it. Please take some time to read it.

https://theseahawk.org/28292/culture/review-cuties-is-the-opposite-of-cute/

Some people are just 'over-achievers'. Roll Eyes

I find this all quite disturbing.

...but hey, if you only have 'outbreeding' the enemy as the only chance to defeat the tanks with stones to preserve your race and people. Then the acceleration of impregnation of females at an even younger age than normal is amplified. Child brides emerge in cultures as the 'breeding frenzy' gives rise to a survival mechanism to be pushed lower than a Slave as being genocided and destroyed is the only other option.

America is no different. Capitalism brings about a great divide between those who seek to attain wealth and power and those who just want to tweak and breed like a processing plant. That is a power unto itself. Throughout history - it was the greater number of warriors that won the battles, not the individual warriors... mostly. The Hordes, the Migrations, the influx of thousands to dilute and overwhelm the original and eventually take over. It's always been the way.

Sad to see though. It's like seeing someone who is so obsessed with Trump or Money like an addiction that is like a tornado destroying everything in its path to get it.

I guess theres some parts of town you just don't want to venture around. I'm outta of this topic. Tongue

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 32848
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #21 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 6:15pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 2:32pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:31pm:

P'S. If this keeps up, everyone, 'man' or 'woman' or 'whatever', will be Entitled™ to date a 10 year old in ten year's time....

.....was Trump just making that point - that perhaps given this endless drive towards sexualisation of minors for the gratification of certain twisted groups, it is Inevitable™ that dating children will be 'legal' and 'normal'?

Or, was he making the point that he's a sexual predator always on the lookout for young victims?

[url]https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-A0FPcDHSvYE/XS2WmKF2IiI/AAAAAAAALbk/SNd6vU
UGHKsQeMw64I48sbBD2g0FWieiACK4BGAYYCw/s1600/image.png[/url]

donald trump had a falling out with epstein in 2003 and they did not talk after that.

bill clinton had a falling out as well.

he fell out of epsteins plane onto the tarmac at "child abuse island " some 27 times.

jeffrey thought bill was such a hound dog he put this picture in his foyer

(note gwegs pic is 18 years old Roll Eyes

)

Back to top

bill_2_001.jpg (7 KB | 2 )

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 15928
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #22 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:27pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:10pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:00pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:10am:

Hypocritical agenda driven scum.... BLM included.

Quote:

There is no bottom.

Democrats, Hollywood, and the elite media are actively looking to normalize child pornography for the vilest of reasons.

The Democrats, you say?

Trump Campaign Adviser Pleads Guilty to Child Porn, Sex Trafficking

"ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CN) – An adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign who testified in the Mueller probe pleaded guilty Monday to charges of child sex trafficking and possessing child pornography.

"George Nader, 60, entered his plea before U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Virginia’s Eastern District."

So you're defending left wing child abusers now?

No.

I'm showing you that it's not just Democrats.

Trump Campaign Adviser Pleads Guilty to Child Porn, Sex Trafficking

"ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CN) – An adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign who testified in the Mueller probe pleaded guilty Monday to charges of child sex trafficking and possessing child pornography.

"George Nader, 60, entered his plea before U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Virginia’s Eastern District."

Donald Trump caught saying he will date 10-year-old girl 'in ten years'

"New footage has emerged in which Donald Trump predicts he would be dating a 10-year-old girl in ten years' time -- the latest sleaze claim to hit his presidential campaign."

Donald Trump boasted about meeting semi-naked teenagers in beauty pageants

"Donald Trump used to “stroll right in” to the dressing room of beauty pageants while the contestants - some of whom were teenagers - were naked or half-dressed".

So he said he would date a 20yo? Shock... Horror.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20231
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #23 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:35pm

Setanta wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:10pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:00pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:10am:

Hypocritical agenda driven scum.... BLM included.

Quote:

There is no bottom.

Democrats, Hollywood, and the elite media are actively looking to normalize child pornography for the vilest of reasons.

The Democrats, you say?

Trump Campaign Adviser Pleads Guilty to Child Porn, Sex Trafficking

"ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CN) – An adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign who testified in the Mueller probe pleaded guilty Monday to charges of child sex trafficking and possessing child pornography.

"George Nader, 60, entered his plea before U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Virginia’s Eastern District."

So you're defending left wing child abusers now?

No.

I'm showing you that it's not just Democrats.

Trump Campaign Adviser Pleads Guilty to Child Porn, Sex Trafficking

"ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CN) – An adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign who testified in the Mueller probe pleaded guilty Monday to charges of child sex trafficking and possessing child pornography.

"George Nader, 60, entered his plea before U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Virginia’s Eastern District."

Donald Trump caught saying he will date 10-year-old girl 'in ten years'

"New footage has emerged in which Donald Trump predicts he would be dating a 10-year-old girl in ten years' time -- the latest sleaze claim to hit his presidential campaign."

Donald Trump boasted about meeting semi-naked teenagers in beauty pageants

"Donald Trump used to “stroll right in” to the dressing room of beauty pageants while the contestants - some of whom were teenagers - were naked or half-dressed".

So he said he would date a 20yo? Shock... Horror.

He was probably a registered Democrat when he said it

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20231
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #24 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:40pm

Jest wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 2:06pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:32pm:

I stumbled upon this review of the film. It appears to be from an American collage website but this guy can write and he absolutely nails it. Please take some time to read it.

https://theseahawk.org/28292/culture/review-cuties-is-the-opposite-of-cute/

Yes I read it thanks. Sounds like a really awful film. It burns me up that they're trying to characterise this as a leftist film.

My take is that because Ted Cruz and conservative christians who are detested by the left spoke out against it, and in a way without much nuance, the left are reflexively taking a contrary opinion.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20231 Gordon Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #25 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 7:55pm Anyone who posts an image such as the one above and implies anything inappropriate...lets just say it's a bit freudian and very sus.
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131547
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #26 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 8:03pm

Trump Campaign Adviser Pleads Guilty to Child Porn, Sex Trafficking

"ALEXANDRIA, Va. (CN) – An adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign who testified in the Mueller probe pleaded guilty Monday to charges of child sex trafficking and possessing child pornography.

"George Nader, 60, entered his plea before U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Virginia’s Eastern District."

Donald Trump caught saying he will date 10-year-old girl 'in ten years'

"New footage has emerged in which Donald Trump predicts he would be dating a 10-year-old girl in ten years' time -- the latest sleaze claim to hit his presidential campaign."

Donald Trump boasted about meeting semi-naked teenagers in beauty pageants

"Donald Trump used to “stroll right in” to the dressing room of beauty pageants while the contestants - some of whom were teenagers - were naked or half-dressed".

Back to top

IP Logged

Setanta Gold Member Offline \/ Peace man! Posts: 15928 Northern NSW Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #27 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 9:20pm Shock! Horror! Politician kisses baby!
Back to top	IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20231 Gordon Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #28 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 9:22pm Setanta wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 9:20pm: Shock! Horror! Politician kisses baby! Shock! Horror! Dads kiss and cuddle their kids!
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 80318 Proud pre-1850's NO Voter Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #29 - Sep 19^th, 2020 at 11:59pm Anyway - I say hang 'em and hang 'em high!
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

rhino Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17179 Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #30 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:38am Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 11:59pm: Anyway - I say hang 'em and hang 'em high! yeah, bugger the fair trial, all men are guilty by default.
Back to top	IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #31 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 1:59am

rhino wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:38am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 11:59pm:

Anyway - I say hang 'em and hang 'em high!

yeah, bugger the fair trial, all men are guilty by default.

A. I didn't say men exclusively - if you read back I say:- "men", "women" and "others" could be Entitled™ to date a ten year old in ten years.... none of those includes Men or Women or even some Others. See the difference? That's why I carefully use Men for real men, Women for real women, and Others for real Others - I have no real beef with Gays as long as they leave me and others alone, but the perverts are on their own.

B. At no point did I not say they should be fairly tried..... or properly found guilty or innocent on fact. I do, after all, run Australia's Wrongfully Convicted....helpless as it is in the face of government and falsely-based judiciary in too many cases.

C. I am one of the greatest defenders of Men - have been for forty odd years now, and anyone who reads what I post will know that. Some creatures, however, are not Men, but are "men" only by default of having male apparatus. That applies across not only sexual, but also some social values. A Man is as a Man behaves.... others take a hike.

I am very careful about that kind of thing.... what I say I mean and I mean what I say.

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #32 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 6:48am

Gordon wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:32pm:

I stumbled upon this review of the film. It appears to be from an American collage website but this guy can write and he absolutely nails it. Please take some time to read it.

https://theseahawk.org/28292/culture/review-cuties-is-the-opposite-of-cute/

Quote:

After sitting down with an open mind and watching “Cuties,” I can attest to the fact that whoever wrote that apology is a bad liar. If you cut out all of the skimpy clothing, genital grabbing, dressing/undressing scenes, and shots that are focused on the gyrating crotches of 11-year-old girls, you have a poorly acted, poorly paced, hamfisted mess of a coming-of-age film at absolute best. I was hoping that people might be overreacting to how bad it is, but no, it might actually be worse than most people have been saying.

The film is strange in that it is defended by the makers as a critique of the sexualization of children, but that’s the equivalent of burning down a forest to showcase the damage of forest fires. If your way of protesting is to do the very thing you are complaining about, then you are not achieving something meaningful.

Gordo this review is much in the same vein as the one I posted don't you think?

Lets see if Barnacle can find a connection to some right wing journal? Grin

I find it disturbing that he or anyone else would think this movie & the type of dancing that symbolises having sex, giving handjobs & blowjobs therein is acceptable for 11 yr old girls.

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Gnads Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 28107 Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #33 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 6:52am This sort of thing has been bought up before...... but last time it wasn't 11 yr old girls it was 7 yr old girls at some dance competition in the US and the crowd was cheering this shyte on Speaks volumes as to the character of the mothers/parents.
Back to top	"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais IP Logged

Neferti Gold Member Offline Posts: 7965 Canberra Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #34 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 7:47am Awful stuff. Back in the day, an 11 year old wouldn't understand what all the actions mean, but who knows what they know (or find out behind the shelter shed) these days? For God's sake, let them be children, you are an adult for long enough!
Back to top	IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20231
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #35 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:37am

Gnads wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 6:48am:

Gordon wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:32pm:

I stumbled upon this review of the film. It appears to be from an American collage website but this guy can write and he absolutely nails it. Please take some time to read it.

https://theseahawk.org/28292/culture/review-cuties-is-the-opposite-of-cute/

Quote:

After sitting down with an open mind and watching “Cuties,” I can attest to the fact that whoever wrote that apology is a bad liar. If you cut out all of the skimpy clothing, genital grabbing, dressing/undressing scenes, and shots that are focused on the gyrating crotches of 11-year-old girls, you have a poorly acted, poorly paced, hamfisted mess of a coming-of-age film at absolute best. I was hoping that people might be overreacting to how bad it is, but no, it might actually be worse than most people have been saying.

The film is strange in that it is defended by the makers as a critique of the sexualization of children, but that’s the equivalent of burning down a forest to showcase the damage of forest fires. If your way of protesting is to do the very thing you are complaining about, then you are not achieving something meaningful.

Gordo this review is much in the same vein as the one I posted don't you think?

Lets see if Barnacle can find a connection to some right wing journal? Grin

I find it disturbing that he or anyone else would think this movie & the type of dancing that symbolises having sex, giving handjobs & blowjobs therein is acceptable for 11 yr old girls.

There are actually loads of negative reviews from all over the political spectrum. The guy from NBC is a dickhead and as I said before, he's politicising it because Ted Cruz spoke out against it.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Ajax Gold Member Offline CO2 has never controlled temperature on Earth Posts: 10958 Australia Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #36 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:41am The sexualisation of children begins at the UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENHOOD FEDERATION (IPPF) which is spreading this nonsense into every corner of the world. https://www.ippf.org/our-approach
Back to top	« Last Edit: Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:48am by Ajax » 1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax 2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos IP Logged

Ajax Gold Member Offline CO2 has never controlled temperature on Earth Posts: 10958 Australia Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #37 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:41am
Back to top	1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax 2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos IP Logged

Ajax Gold Member Offline CO2 has never controlled temperature on Earth Posts: 10958 Australia Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #38 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:41am
Back to top	1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax 2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos IP Logged

Ajax Gold Member Offline CO2 has never controlled temperature on Earth Posts: 10958 Australia Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #39 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:44am In Australia they fly under the banner of Family Planning Alliance Australia. https://www.lgbtihealth.org.au/88
Back to top	1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax 2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos IP Logged

Ajax Gold Member Offline CO2 has never controlled temperature on Earth Posts: 10958 Australia Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #40 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 9:15am IN A NUT SHELL....!
Back to top	1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax 2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos IP Logged

Ajax Gold Member Offline CO2 has never controlled temperature on Earth Posts: 10958 Australia Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #41 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 9:18am DETAILS...!
Back to top	1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax 2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos IP Logged

The_Barnacle Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6205 Melbourne Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #42 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:08pm Gordon wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:37am: There are actually loads of negative reviews from all over the political spectrum. The guy from NBC is a dickhead and as I said before, he's politicising it because Ted Cruz spoke out against it. Which is actually an argument against the title of this thread.
Back to top	The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said. IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 80318 Proud pre-1850's NO Voter Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #43 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:15pm Well, if my son or daughter-in-law had their girls in something like that, I'd be up there like a shot from a gun, lockdown or no lockdown. Of course, that would never happen - they are well bred.
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #44 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:23pm

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:08pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:37am:

There are actually loads of negative reviews from all over the political spectrum. The guy from NBC is a dickhead and as I said before, he's politicising it because Ted Cruz spoke out against it.

Which is actually an argument against the title of this thread.

Nooot really - he's discussing criticism of the film - not the kind who promote it and think it acceptable. That critics come from all sides shows that it is only minor little enclaves/ghettos (social ghettoes) of like-minded PERVERTS who go around making this kind of stuff, and that even the good people of the left reject it.

Many times I've said that most people, of left or right, are pretty much in the middle and can hold views that superficially appear to be 'on the other side'... most people are simply not made to be fanatics and fringe lunatics with severe personality disorders who have somehow grabbed the reins of discussion

(tell it to 'em straight there, boy)...

I hope they are all on a list somewhere... waiting for the roundup. Once upon a time someone would have launched a law suit against this kind of thing, but I suppose Mary Whitehouse et ilk ruined that for many, making it into a conservative crusade kind of thing.

Word for today:-

GRAG:- (n) - the act of grabbing discussion so as to gag any dissent

see "gragging", "gragged" .. i.e. the fanatic gragged discussion so as to quell dissent, controlled the flow of discussion by gragging the paremeters under discussion, thus excluding opposition thoughts

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20231
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #45 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:31pm

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:08pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:37am:

There are actually loads of negative reviews from all over the political spectrum. The guy from NBC is a dickhead and as I said before, he's politicising it because Ted Cruz spoke out against it.

Which is actually an argument against the title of this thread.

So far the only people arguing in favour of this film are from the left and not one from the right. The title of this thread is therefore accurate, with caveats.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #46 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:40pm

Ajax wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 9:15am:

IN A NUT SHELL....!

The problem with the intervention of 'governing bodies' such as the UN etc - is that they always base their ideas and thoughts on the most extreme areas, and then extrapolate their 'findings' to the entire population

(same as our 'governments' did with 'dv' etc - look at the worst case scenario which is the vast minority, and they say any man accused should be bashed socially, legally and even physically)

.

Thus in these cases, these 'UN governing bodies' look at the extremes of children forced into sexual behaviour, abused sexually, treated as available sexual objects in disease-ridden countries etc at a very early age and thus perhaps NEEDING to be able to access advice services, contraception, and treatment for illnesses. Hence the thing about not having to advise 'partners' about HIV etc as a right - what Booga Looga stoned out of his tree gives a tinker's curse about some sweet little poon tang that he's about to possess any way he can by force etc.

The point is - these are the EXTREME cases, where protection of children is practically non-existent anyway - they do NOT apply to the majority of the CIVILISED world, such as most in the West are - but we all know the UN will pander to the idea that by pointing out clearly those nations where this does occur - and let us never forget the AIDS epidemic in Africa - they will be 'discriminating' and making some 'statement' about the 'superiority' of some cultures over others....

(well.... some ARE superior, aren't they - or were until the scum started to sexualise young girls particularly for their own gratification in one or more ways and make 'everyone equal' across the globe - so now you can be 'equal' with the gun-toting, khatt-stoned child rapist/murderer 6'3" and 15 stone who 'has sex' with an eight year old or anyone else, man or woman, when he wants to) .....

Utter garbage, of course, but that is how the UN (and governments) work... or don't work.... there is no merit in being anything reliable or solid or decent since you will still be 'equal' under their paradigms with the lowest of the low....

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

The_Barnacle

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #47 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 1:12pm

Gordon wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:31pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:08pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:37am:

There are actually loads of negative reviews from all over the political spectrum. The guy from NBC is a dickhead and as I said before, he's politicising it because Ted Cruz spoke out against it.

Which is actually an argument against the title of this thread.

So far the only people arguing in favour of this film are from the left and not one from the right. The title of this thread is therefore accurate, with caveats.

Well actually thats wrong also.
The title claim is that the left is sexualising children but the only evidence for that is an NBC article defending a film.

I haven't seen the film and I'm guessing none of the people on this thread have either. Breitbart have just turned it into a political football.
Here's my take on this

There was barely a word said about series such as Dance Moms, Dancing Queen or Step It Up, all of which had pre pubescent girls doing "sexy" dances.

Along comes Cuties which has a Muslim girl as the main character. This immediately puts it on the radar of the far Right and, as always happens with modern identity politics, it became a pawn in the culture wars.

The picture below is from Dance Moms which had 8 seasons

Back to top

dance-moms-c012d3fecd86f13e.jpg (186 KB | 5 )

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20231
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #48 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 1:22pm

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 1:12pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:31pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:08pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:37am:

There are actually loads of negative reviews from all over the political spectrum. The guy from NBC is a dickhead and as I said before, he's politicising it because Ted Cruz spoke out against it.

Which is actually an argument against the title of this thread.

So far the only people arguing in favour of this film are from the left and not one from the right. The title of this thread is therefore accurate, with caveats.

Well actually thats wrong also.
The title claim is that the left is sexualising children but the only evidence for that is an NBC article defending a film.

I haven't seen the film and I'm guessing none of the people on this thread have either. Breitbart have just turned it into a political football.
Here's my take on this

There was barely a word said about series such as Dance Moms, Dancing Queen or Step It Up, all of which had pre pubescent girls doing "sexy" dances.

Along comes Cuties which has a Muslim girl as the main character. This immediately puts it on the radar of the far Right and, as always happens with modern identity politics, it became a pawn in the culture wars.

The picture below is from Dance Moms which had 8 seasons

Read the Breitbart with enhanced comprehension skills this time. It's a direct response to the NBC article which says criticism of the movie is only coming from right wing crackpots.

Here is the NBC article for your reading pleasure.

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/criticism-netflix-s-cuties-isn-t-about-mov...

Now to Dance Moms, visually Cuties takes it ten levels up from that.

In the last scene, girls cast as 11 year olds are on stage spreading their legs, camera zooming in, lying on the floor dry humping the floor why doing handjob gestures with their mouths wide open.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #49 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 1:57pm

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 1:12pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:31pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:08pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:37am:

There are actually loads of negative reviews from all over the political spectrum. The guy from NBC is a dickhead and as I said before, he's politicising it because Ted Cruz spoke out against it.

Which is actually an argument against the title of this thread.

So far the only people arguing in favour of this film are from the left and not one from the right. The title of this thread is therefore accurate, with caveats.

Well actually thats wrong also.
The title claim is that the left is sexualising children but the only evidence for that is an NBC article defending a film.

I haven't seen the film and I'm guessing none of the people on this thread have either. Breitbart have just turned it into a political football.
Here's my take on this

There was barely a word said about series such as Dance Moms, Dancing Queen or Step It Up, all of which had pre pubescent girls doing "sexy" dances.

Along comes Cuties which has a Muslim girl as the main character. This immediately puts it on the radar of the far Right and, as always happens with modern identity politics, it became a pawn in the culture wars.

The picture below is from Dance Moms which had 8 seasons

I wouldn't waste a single second on that - how did it get any ratings? Fraud, like most of the rubbish on TV must get these days to have ratings?

So now little Sally-Anne cavorting on stage is normal and approved by Mums International. Jezuz - no wonder women should not be permitted to be the final arbiters of anything moral....

Dance Mums - take names and put them on the list, Igor....

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 131547 Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #50 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 2:50pm
Back to top	IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 80318 Proud pre-1850's NO Voter Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #51 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:08pm Trump Obsession Disorder..... he's still going to win this election no matter how much mud is thrown around...
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131547
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #52 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:21pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:08pm:

Trump Obsession Disorder..... he's still going to win this election no matter how much mud is thrown around...

That's correct.

And I've never said anything to the contrary.

Another video of Donald Trump has surfaced. This time, he is sexualising a child.

Back to top

IP Logged

Fuzzball

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 6381
Australia
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #53 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:34pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:21pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:08pm:

Trump Obsession Disorder..... he's still going to win this election no matter how much mud is thrown around...

That's correct.

And I've never said anything to the contrary.

Another video of Donald Trump has surfaced. This time, he is sexualising a child.

Seems to me that YOU are the one who is continually 'sexualising children'.........you certainly mention it often enough in your posts....

Back to top

Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting,
"Holy Sh!t ... What a Ride!"

IP Logged

UnSubRocky

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Legend

Posts: 21743
Rockhampton, Q
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #54 - Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:45pm

25+ years ago, they had a Hey Hey, it's Saturday Red Faces skit with some kid doing a parody of "Simply Irresistible", the Robert Palmer song. It featured some 10 or 11-year-old boy playing the role of Robert. Whilst teen girls dressed up as the back up dancers as featured in the original song. After the song was over, there was some concern about the sexualisation of the back up dancers. Daryl asked their ages. The ages of the girls ranged from 16 to 17 years of age. That was not enough to keep some of the audience appeased. But they had no choice but to accept this situation.

Whilst there is an age limit to what people should be allowed to do, there will never be any agreement on allowing children to dance around sexually.

Back to top

IP Logged

The_Barnacle

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #55 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 7:05am

UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:45pm:

25+ years ago, they had a Hey Hey, it's Saturday Red Faces skit with some kid doing a parody of "Simply Irresistible", the Robert Palmer song. It featured some 10 or 11-year-old boy playing the role of Robert. Whilst teen girls dressed up as the back up dancers as featured in the original song. After the song was over, there was some concern about the sexualisation of the back up dancers. Daryl asked their ages. The ages of the girls ranged from 16 to 17 years of age. That was not enough to keep some of the audience appeased. But they had no choice but to accept this situation.

Whilst there is an age limit to what people should be allowed to do, there will never be any agreement on allowing children to dance around sexually.

Thats right, as with most things it's a judgement call
The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children.

Back to top

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.

IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 46588
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #56 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 8:31am

16 is the Legal 'sexual' age of 'kids' - because 16 years of age is still 'kid' age. If 16 year old girls wanna dress provacative and gyrate their bodies to sexual explicit actions... because they do it in the American Black style only Media of the USA which is a Porn Industry attacking a President's personal life mostly.
Young Aussie females of 16 years of age should be attending College orgies like they do in USA. Where every white girl has to have a black male so as not to come across as racist. Black boy needs his free white sex like Aboriginals get $$$ hand-outs and benefits.

Pimp your kids for the Media's Porn Show.

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #57 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 9:59am

Gordon wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:37am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 6:48am:

Gordon wrote on Sep 19^th, 2020 at 12:32pm:

I stumbled upon this review of the film. It appears to be from an American collage website but this guy can write and he absolutely nails it. Please take some time to read it.

https://theseahawk.org/28292/culture/review-cuties-is-the-opposite-of-cute/

Quote:

After sitting down with an open mind and watching “Cuties,” I can attest to the fact that whoever wrote that apology is a bad liar. If you cut out all of the skimpy clothing, genital grabbing, dressing/undressing scenes, and shots that are focused on the gyrating crotches of 11-year-old girls, you have a poorly acted, poorly paced, hamfisted mess of a coming-of-age film at absolute best. I was hoping that people might be overreacting to how bad it is, but no, it might actually be worse than most people have been saying.

The film is strange in that it is defended by the makers as a critique of the sexualization of children, but that’s the equivalent of burning down a forest to showcase the damage of forest fires. If your way of protesting is to do the very thing you are complaining about, then you are not achieving something meaningful.

Gordo this review is much in the same vein as the one I posted don't you think?

Lets see if Barnacle can find a connection to some right wing journal? Grin

I find it disturbing that he or anyone else would think this movie & the type of dancing that symbolises having sex, giving handjobs & blowjobs therein is acceptable for 11 yr old girls.

There are actually loads of negative reviews from all over the political spectrum. The guy from NBC is a dickhead and as I said before, he's politicising it because Ted Cruz spoke out against it.

Does it matter?

As long as it brings it further to the attention of people who haven't seen it & other examples?

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #58 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:04am

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 1:12pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:31pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:08pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:37am:

There are actually loads of negative reviews from all over the political spectrum. The guy from NBC is a dickhead and as I said before, he's politicising it because Ted Cruz spoke out against it.

Which is actually an argument against the title of this thread.

So far the only people arguing in favour of this film are from the left and not one from the right. The title of this thread is therefore accurate, with caveats.

Well actually thats wrong also.
The title claim is that the left is sexualising children but the only evidence for that is an NBC article defending a film.

I haven't seen the film and I'm guessing none of the people on this thread have either. Breitbart have just turned it into a political football.
Here's my take on this

There was barely a word said about series such as Dance Moms, Dancing Queen or Step It Up, all of which had pre pubescent girls doing "sexy" dances.

Along comes Cuties which has a Muslim girl as the main character. This immediately puts it on the radar of the far Right and, as always happens with modern identity politics, it became a pawn in the culture wars.

The picture below is from Dance Moms which had 8 seasons

Nit picking pedantics.

And the Dance Mom thing is another prime example .... if they have their even younger daughters dancing like the girls in Cuties & the 7 yr olds in the other video I posted.

I don't care that you want to judge it OK because the show ran for 8 seasons. Roll Eyes

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131547
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #59 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:07am

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 7:05am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:45pm:

25+ years ago, they had a Hey Hey, it's Saturday Red Faces skit with some kid doing a parody of "Simply Irresistible", the Robert Palmer song. It featured some 10 or 11-year-old boy playing the role of Robert. Whilst teen girls dressed up as the back up dancers as featured in the original song. After the song was over, there was some concern about the sexualisation of the back up dancers. Daryl asked their ages. The ages of the girls ranged from 16 to 17 years of age. That was not enough to keep some of the audience appeased. But they had no choice but to accept this situation.

Whilst there is an age limit to what people should be allowed to do, there will never be any agreement on allowing children to dance around sexually.

Thats right, as with most things it's a judgement call
The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children.

The conservative right in the US is "led" by a "man" who has sexualised children his entire life.

Just remember, he's on video grooming a 10 year old girl.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #60 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:09am

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 1:12pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:31pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 12:08pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 8:37am:

There are actually loads of negative reviews from all over the political spectrum. The guy from NBC is a dickhead and as I said before, he's politicising it because Ted Cruz spoke out against it.

Which is actually an argument against the title of this thread.

So far the only people arguing in favour of this film are from the left and not one from the right. The title of this thread is therefore accurate, with caveats.

Well actually thats wrong also.
The title claim is that the left is sexualising children but the only evidence for that is an NBC article defending a film.

I haven't seen the film and I'm guessing none of the people on this thread have either. Breitbart have just turned it into a political football.
Here's my take on this

There was barely a word said about series such as Dance Moms, Dancing Queen or Step It Up, all of which had pre pubescent girls doing "sexy" dances.

Along comes Cuties which has a Muslim girl as the main character. This immediately puts it on the radar of the far Right and, as always happens with modern identity politics, it became a pawn in the culture wars.

The picture below is from Dance Moms which had 8 seasons

Oh & btw that the story line has a Muslim girl in it is not the problem or the reason for comment.

It's because they are all children .. 11 yr old children.

The story line is lost as a paltry excuse in the concentration of camera close ups of young girls arses, crotches & the simulated sexual gyrations, humping, handjobs & blowjob movements.

You have a problem if you don't see that.

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 46588 Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #61 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:10am Peccary's daughters live as far from him as they can get.
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 131547 Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #62 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:11am I'll give you a chance to remove/edit the above post. You have two minutes.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 46588
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #63 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:14am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:11am:

I'll give you a chance to remove/edit the above post.

You have two minutes.

Are you offended because your own personal life bites you in the arse about what you have to say about everyone else?

You find it ok to call a USA President a paedophile because he is not your everyday 'Media' Politician?

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 46588 Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #64 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:15am Maybe you need to have a cry to the Mods when you don't get your own way. Go have a cry weener.
Back to top	AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131547
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #65 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:16am

Jasin wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:11am:

I'll give you a chance to remove/edit the above post.

You have two minutes.

Are you offended because your own personal life bites you in the arse about what you have to say about everyone else?

You find it ok to call a USA President a paedophile because he is not your everyday 'Media' Politician?

I have never called the US President a paedophile.

I gave you a chance.

It's now reported.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 131547 Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #66 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:17am Jasin wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:10am: Peccary's daughters live as far from him as they can get. Reported to Mods. I asked you nicely to remove/edit the post.
Back to top	IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #67 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:17am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:07am:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 7:05am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:45pm:

25+ years ago, they had a Hey Hey, it's Saturday Red Faces skit with some kid doing a parody of "Simply Irresistible", the Robert Palmer song. It featured some 10 or 11-year-old boy playing the role of Robert. Whilst teen girls dressed up as the back up dancers as featured in the original song. After the song was over, there was some concern about the sexualisation of the back up dancers. Daryl asked their ages. The ages of the girls ranged from 16 to 17 years of age. That was not enough to keep some of the audience appeased. But they had no choice but to accept this situation.

Whilst there is an age limit to what people should be allowed to do, there will never be any agreement on allowing children to dance around sexually.

Thats right, as with most things it's a judgement call
The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children.

The conservative right in the US is "led" by a "man" who has sexualised children his entire life.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bf/0f/c9/bf0fc936212556aa3e7716205c20fb20.jpg

Just remember, he's on video grooming a 10 year old girl.

Quote:

Two photos taken 12 years apart have been combined to show Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy money manager charged with sex trafficking, smiling as he stands in front of Donald Trump kissing a young girl on the side of the head. The girl in the photo with Trump is his then 11-year-old daughter Ivanka, and Epstein’s image was added later.

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/07/bogus-photo-combines-trump-epstein-images/

Being dishonest again are we Peccar?

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131547
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #68 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:19am

Gnads wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:17am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:07am:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 7:05am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:45pm:

25+ years ago, they had a Hey Hey, it's Saturday Red Faces skit with some kid doing a parody of "Simply Irresistible", the Robert Palmer song. It featured some 10 or 11-year-old boy playing the role of Robert. Whilst teen girls dressed up as the back up dancers as featured in the original song. After the song was over, there was some concern about the sexualisation of the back up dancers. Daryl asked their ages. The ages of the girls ranged from 16 to 17 years of age. That was not enough to keep some of the audience appeased. But they had no choice but to accept this situation.

Whilst there is an age limit to what people should be allowed to do, there will never be any agreement on allowing children to dance around sexually.

Thats right, as with most things it's a judgement call
The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children.

The conservative right in the US is "led" by a "man" who has sexualised children his entire life.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bf/0f/c9/bf0fc936212556aa3e7716205c20fb20.jpg

Just remember, he's on video grooming a 10 year old girl.

Quote:

Two photos taken 12 years apart have been combined to show Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy money manager charged with sex trafficking, smiling as he stands in front of Donald Trump kissing a young girl on the side of the head. The girl in the photo with Trump is his then 11-year-old daughter Ivanka, and Epstein’s image was added later.

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/07/bogus-photo-combines-trump-epstein-images/

Being dishonest again are we Peccar?

Lol

How am I being dishonest?

Epstein isn't in the photo I posted.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 46588
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #69 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:32am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:17am:

Jasin wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:10am:

Peccary's daughters live as far from him as they can get.

Reported to Mods.

I asked you nicely to remove/edit the post.

You're just a cry baby when you don't get your way. You're a Liar and a Fraud. You're a Troll and a Pratt.
You personally attack members - but cry like a weener when someone gives you a dose.

You're the only 'complaint' on this Forum. You should be banned for all your rubbish and crap. You crack a fat about other member's 'anus' and sexually insult other members here. You're a hypocrite and a cry-baby.

Mods should ban you for even trying to have others banned.
It's an insult to this Forum.
You're the one who should be banned.

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131547
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #70 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:34am

Jasin wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:32am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:17am:

Jasin wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:10am:

Peccary's daughters live as far from him as they can get.

Reported to Mods.

I asked you nicely to remove/edit the post.

You're just a cry baby when you don't get your way. You're a Liar and a Fraud. You're a Troll and a Pratt.
You personally attack members - but cry like a weener when someone gives you a dose.

You're the only 'complaint' on this Forum. You should be banned for all your rubbish and crap. You crack a fat about other member's 'anus' and sexually insult other members here. You're a hypocrite and a cry-baby.

Mods should ban you for even trying to have others banned.
It's an insult to this Forum.
You're the one who should be banned.

I asked you nicely to edit the post.

You refused.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #71 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:54am

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:19am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:17am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:07am:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 7:05am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:45pm:

25+ years ago, they had a Hey Hey, it's Saturday Red Faces skit with some kid doing a parody of "Simply Irresistible", the Robert Palmer song. It featured some 10 or 11-year-old boy playing the role of Robert. Whilst teen girls dressed up as the back up dancers as featured in the original song. After the song was over, there was some concern about the sexualisation of the back up dancers. Daryl asked their ages. The ages of the girls ranged from 16 to 17 years of age. That was not enough to keep some of the audience appeased. But they had no choice but to accept this situation.

Whilst there is an age limit to what people should be allowed to do, there will never be any agreement on allowing children to dance around sexually.

Thats right, as with most things it's a judgement call
The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children.

The conservative right in the US is "led" by a "man" who has sexualised children his entire life.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bf/0f/c9/bf0fc936212556aa3e7716205c20fb20.jpg

Just remember, he's on video grooming a 10 year old girl.

Quote:

Two photos taken 12 years apart have been combined to show Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy money manager charged with sex trafficking, smiling as he stands in front of Donald Trump kissing a young girl on the side of the head. The girl in the photo with Trump is his then 11-year-old daughter Ivanka, and Epstein’s image was added later.

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/07/bogus-photo-combines-trump-epstein-images/

Being dishonest again are we Peccar?

Lol

How am I being dishonest?

Epstein isn't in the photo I posted.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bf/0f/c9/bf0fc936212556aa3e7716205c20fb20.jpg

And that's not Trump grooming a 10 yr old girl either .... is it?

Being dishonest Roll Eyes

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Neferti

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #72 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 11:03am

Gnads wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:54am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:19am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:17am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:07am:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 7:05am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:45pm:

25+ years ago, they had a Hey Hey, it's Saturday Red Faces skit with some kid doing a parody of "Simply Irresistible", the Robert Palmer song. It featured some 10 or 11-year-old boy playing the role of Robert. Whilst teen girls dressed up as the back up dancers as featured in the original song. After the song was over, there was some concern about the sexualisation of the back up dancers. Daryl asked their ages. The ages of the girls ranged from 16 to 17 years of age. That was not enough to keep some of the audience appeased. But they had no choice but to accept this situation.

Whilst there is an age limit to what people should be allowed to do, there will never be any agreement on allowing children to dance around sexually.

Thats right, as with most things it's a judgement call
The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children.

The conservative right in the US is "led" by a "man" who has sexualised children his entire life.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bf/0f/c9/bf0fc936212556aa3e7716205c20fb20.jpg

Just remember, he's on video grooming a 10 year old girl.

Quote:

Two photos taken 12 years apart have been combined to show Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy money manager charged with sex trafficking, smiling as he stands in front of Donald Trump kissing a young girl on the side of the head. The girl in the photo with Trump is his then 11-year-old daughter Ivanka, and Epstein’s image was added later.

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/07/bogus-photo-combines-trump-epstein-images/

Being dishonest again are we Peccar?

Lol

How am I being dishonest?

Epstein isn't in the photo I posted.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bf/0f/c9/bf0fc936212556aa3e7716205c20fb20.jpg

And that's not Trump grooming a 10 yr old girl either .... is it?

Being dishonest Roll Eyes

Men love their daughters and kiss them on the head and put their arm around them, being a protective Dad. Nothing whatsoever to do with "sex". Grow Up.

Women love their sons and do the same. Nothing to do with "sex". It's all in somebody's mind and that is NOT normal.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131547
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #73 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 11:09am

Gnads wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:54am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:19am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:17am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:07am:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 7:05am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:45pm:

25+ years ago, they had a Hey Hey, it's Saturday Red Faces skit with some kid doing a parody of "Simply Irresistible", the Robert Palmer song. It featured some 10 or 11-year-old boy playing the role of Robert. Whilst teen girls dressed up as the back up dancers as featured in the original song. After the song was over, there was some concern about the sexualisation of the back up dancers. Daryl asked their ages. The ages of the girls ranged from 16 to 17 years of age. That was not enough to keep some of the audience appeased. But they had no choice but to accept this situation.

Whilst there is an age limit to what people should be allowed to do, there will never be any agreement on allowing children to dance around sexually.

Thats right, as with most things it's a judgement call
The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children.

The conservative right in the US is "led" by a "man" who has sexualised children his entire life.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bf/0f/c9/bf0fc936212556aa3e7716205c20fb20.jpg

Just remember, he's on video grooming a 10 year old girl.

Quote:

Two photos taken 12 years apart have been combined to show Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy money manager charged with sex trafficking, smiling as he stands in front of Donald Trump kissing a young girl on the side of the head. The girl in the photo with Trump is his then 11-year-old daughter Ivanka, and Epstein’s image was added later.

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/07/bogus-photo-combines-trump-epstein-images/

Being dishonest again are we Peccar?

Lol

How am I being dishonest?

Epstein isn't in the photo I posted.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bf/0f/c9/bf0fc936212556aa3e7716205c20fb20.jpg

And that's not Trump grooming a 10 yr old girl either .... is it?

Being dishonest Roll Eyes

No, that's Trump with his daughter.

I didn't say it was him grooming a 10 year old.

Seeing as you asked though:

Donald Trump caught saying he will date 10-year-old girl

"New footage has emerged in which Donald Trump predicts he would be dating a 10-year-old girl in ten years' time -- the latest sleaze claim to hit his presidential campaign."

Video and audio proof.

Nothing dishonest about that.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20231
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #74 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 11:16am

Neferti wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 11:03am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:54am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:19am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:17am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 10:07am:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 7:05am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:45pm:

25+ years ago, they had a Hey Hey, it's Saturday Red Faces skit with some kid doing a parody of "Simply Irresistible", the Robert Palmer song. It featured some 10 or 11-year-old boy playing the role of Robert. Whilst teen girls dressed up as the back up dancers as featured in the original song. After the song was over, there was some concern about the sexualisation of the back up dancers. Daryl asked their ages. The ages of the girls ranged from 16 to 17 years of age. That was not enough to keep some of the audience appeased. But they had no choice but to accept this situation.

Whilst there is an age limit to what people should be allowed to do, there will never be any agreement on allowing children to dance around sexually.

Thats right, as with most things it's a judgement call
The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children.

The conservative right in the US is "led" by a "man" who has sexualised children his entire life.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bf/0f/c9/bf0fc936212556aa3e7716205c20fb20.jpg

Just remember, he's on video grooming a 10 year old girl.

Quote:

Two photos taken 12 years apart have been combined to show Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy money manager charged with sex trafficking, smiling as he stands in front of Donald Trump kissing a young girl on the side of the head. The girl in the photo with Trump is his then 11-year-old daughter Ivanka, and Epstein’s image was added later.

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/07/bogus-photo-combines-trump-epstein-images/

Being dishonest again are we Peccar?

Lol

How am I being dishonest?

Epstein isn't in the photo I posted.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bf/0f/c9/bf0fc936212556aa3e7716205c20fb20.jpg

And that's not Trump grooming a 10 yr old girl either .... is it?

Being dishonest Roll Eyes

Men love their daughters and kiss them on the head and put their arm around them, being a protective Dad. Nothing whatsoever to do with "sex". Grow Up.

Women love their sons and do the same. Nothing to do with "sex". It's all in somebody's mind and that is NOT normal.

I reckon my boy is smoochier than my girl was!! If someone was to take a single photo and misconstrue the context into something disgusting is speaks more about them than anything else.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #75 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 12:35pm

"The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children."

So now the discussion is not about under aged girls cavorting on stage in suggestive postures - which is something that actually has happened time and again - and is all about some strange concept that the 'side' that apparently opposes such things is saying 'with us or against us' on the gross sexualisation of minors?

You got a link? Anyone yet posted a link to show where the criticism of this vile practice comes exclusively from 'the conservative right'?

WHERE have 'the conservative right' said that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children? Is that like saying that if you oppose DV laws, you support violence (real) against women and against men and their children, which is much more a province of the rabid feminist-deluded 'left'?

Just an aside here - spare a thought for young boys - not only caught up in 'boy soldiering' but also boy prostitution:-

https://www.themonsoonproject.org/increasing-boys-prostitution-in-indonesia/

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

UnSubRocky

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Legend

Posts: 21743
Rockhampton, Q
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #76 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 1:20pm

Jasin wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 8:31am:

16 is the Legal 'sexual' age of 'kids' - because 16 years of age is still 'kid' age. If 16 year old girls wanna dress provacative and gyrate their bodies to sexual explicit actions... because they do it in the American Black style only Media of the USA which is a Porn Industry attacking a President's personal life mostly.
Young Aussie females of 16 years of age should be attending College orgies like they do in USA. Where every white girl has to have a black male so as not to come across as racist. Black boy needs his free white sex like Aboriginals get $$$ hand-outs and benefits.

Pimp your kids for the Media's Porn Show.

My own daughter turned 16 some months ago. She is practically as tall as I and is quite athletic -- she takes after her mother. I recall being in her store some months just before she turned 16. A guy I know, who is married and with two children of his own, told me about how hot my daughter was -- not knowing that he was referring to my daughter. I took his comment to mean that he was trying to get my approval that he could flirt with girls years younger than him. He could not.

If any guy out there thought that they could get with my teen daughter just to use her as a sex object, then there is going to be a lot of problems for him. My daughter does not go through developing her personality, education, health, financial independence and charm just be pood on by some sleaze out there looking to big-note himself.

That is about the only problem I have with provocative dress of teens. Provocative dress of pre-teens I would shun completely.

Back to top

IP Logged

Valkie

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16096
Central Coast
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #77 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 1:29pm

The day we gave the pooftahs the right to marry.

The world took it's last step to total immorality.

Now that the pooftahs think they can do this disgusting thing and be considered normal.

They will push the boundaries of sick, perverted and weird sexual practices to the limit.

Dogs, cats, sheep, you name it.
These sick perverts will start pushing that soon.

And when the world hits it's lowest point
The sick perverts will push for children to be sexual , just like they are now.

DRIVE THESE PERVERTS AWAY AND BACK INTO THEIR PERVERSIONS.

Back to top

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #78 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 1:41pm

Valkie wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 1:29pm:

The day we gave the pooftahs the right to marry.

The world took it's last step to total immorality.

Now that the pooftahs think they can do this disgusting thing and be considered normal.

They will push the boundaries of sick, perverted and weird sexual practices to the limit.

Dogs, cats, sheep, you name it.
These sick perverts will start pushing that soon.

And when the world hits it's lowest point
The sick perverts will push for children to be sexual , just like they are now.

DRIVE THESE PERVERTS AWAY AND BACK INTO THEIR PERVERSIONS.

This has nothing to do with SSM.

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

The_Barnacle

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #79 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 4:03pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 12:35pm:

"The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children."

So now the discussion is not about under aged girls cavorting on stage in suggestive postures - which is something that actually has happened time and again - and is all about some strange concept that the 'side' that apparently opposes such things is saying 'with us or against us' on the gross sexualisation of minors?

You got a link? Anyone yet posted a link to show where the criticism of this vile practice comes exclusively from 'the conservative right'?

WHERE have 'the conservative right' said that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children? Is that like saying that if you oppose DV laws, you support violence (real) against women and against men and their children, which is much more a province of the rabid feminist-deluded 'left'?

Just look at the title of this thread

Back to top

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131547
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #80 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 4:04pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 1:41pm:

Valkie wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 1:29pm:

The day we gave the pooftahs the right to marry.

The world took it's last step to total immorality.

Now that the pooftahs think they can do this disgusting thing and be considered normal.

They will push the boundaries of sick, perverted and weird sexual practices to the limit.

Dogs, cats, sheep, you name it.
These sick perverts will start pushing that soon.

And when the world hits it's lowest point
The sick perverts will push for children to be sexual , just like they are now.

DRIVE THESE PERVERTS AWAY AND BACK INTO THEIR PERVERSIONS.

This has nothing to do with SSM.

Indeed.

It appears that he strayed into the wrong thread Undecided

Back to top

IP Logged

Valkie

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16096
Central Coast
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #81 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 5:29pm

Pooftahs sex

Or SSM as they like to say.

Is just a symptom of the PERVERSIONS these animals stray to.

First it's accept poofta marriage.

Then it's goats, sheep, dogs and cats.

They will begin to expand their PERVERSIONS even further necrophilia, and child sex will follow.

The perverted criminals are already pushing for sexualizing children to further their options and normalize their PERVERSIONS.

Safe school program is being pushed by the perverts in the LGBTIQSELFISH weirdos,

All designed to normalize their sick PERVERSIONS.

They think that in a few years they will get their perverted hands on children without repercussions.

They need to be taught otherwise.

Back to top

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #82 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 5:51pm

Valkie wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 5:29pm:

Pooftahs sex

Or SSM as they like to say.

Is just a symptom of the PERVERSIONS these animals stray to.

First it's accept poofta marriage.

Then it's goats, sheep, dogs and cats.

They will begin to expand their PERVERSIONS even further necrophilia, and child sex will follow.

The perverted criminals are already pushing for sexualizing children to further their options and normalize their PERVERSIONS.

Safe school program is being pushed by the perverts in the LGBTIQSELFISH weirdos,

All designed to normalize their sick PERVERSIONS.

They think that in a few years they will get their perverted hands on children without repercussions.

They need to be taught otherwise.

Ever considered counselling for your obsession?

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #83 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 5:57pm

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 5:51pm:

Valkie wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 5:29pm:

Pooftahs sex

Or SSM as they like to say.

Is just a symptom of the PERVERSIONS these animals stray to.

First it's accept poofta marriage.

Then it's goats, sheep, dogs and cats.

They will begin to expand their PERVERSIONS even further necrophilia, and child sex will follow.

The perverted criminals are already pushing for sexualizing children to further their options and normalize their PERVERSIONS.

Safe school program is being pushed by the perverts in the LGBTIQSELFISH weirdos,

All designed to normalize their sick PERVERSIONS.

They think that in a few years they will get their perverted hands on children without repercussions.

They need to be taught otherwise.

Ever considered counselling for your obsession?

have you asked Peccar that over his obsession with Trump? Roll Eyes

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #84 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 6:00pm

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 4:03pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 12:35pm:

"The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children."

So now the discussion is not about under aged girls cavorting on stage in suggestive postures - which is something that actually has happened time and again - and is all about some strange concept that the 'side' that apparently opposes such things is saying 'with us or against us' on the gross sexualisation of minors?

You got a link? Anyone yet posted a link to show where the criticism of this vile practice comes exclusively from 'the conservative right'?

WHERE have 'the conservative right' said that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children? Is that like saying that if you oppose DV laws, you support violence (real) against women and against men and their children, which is much more a province of the rabid feminist-deluded 'left'?

Just look at the title of this thread

Lessee now .... "The left continue to sexualise children"........

So... ahhhh.. where does it say this comes from the conservative right? All the links and posts show it comes from a very wide span of society and people in it... across a very broad band of 'political' inclination.... that is - from left to right.....

I'm reputed to be way to the left of the Dalai Lama - and I find sexualisation of young people reprehensible... enough time through life to find out the hard parts....

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #85 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 6:02pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 6:00pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 4:03pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 12:35pm:

"The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children."

So now the discussion is not about under aged girls cavorting on stage in suggestive postures - which is something that actually has happened time and again - and is all about some strange concept that the 'side' that apparently opposes such things is saying 'with us or against us' on the gross sexualisation of minors?

You got a link? Anyone yet posted a link to show where the criticism of this vile practice comes exclusively from 'the conservative right'?

WHERE have 'the conservative right' said that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children? Is that like saying that if you oppose DV laws, you support violence (real) against women and against men and their children, which is much more a province of the rabid feminist-deluded 'left'?

Just look at the title of this thread

Lessee now .... "The left continue to sexualise children"........

So... ahhhh.. where does it say this comes from the conservative right? All the links and posts show it comes from a very wide span of society and people in it... across a very broad band of 'political' inclination.... that is - from left to right.....

I'm reputed to be way to the left of the Dalai Lama - and I find sexualisation of young people reprehensible... enough time through life to find out the hard parts....

I don't consider myself "left" or "right".

Hows that equate?

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #86 - Sep 21^st, 2020 at 6:41pm

Gnads wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 6:02pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 6:00pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 4:03pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 12:35pm:

"The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children."

So now the discussion is not about under aged girls cavorting on stage in suggestive postures - which is something that actually has happened time and again - and is all about some strange concept that the 'side' that apparently opposes such things is saying 'with us or against us' on the gross sexualisation of minors?

You got a link? Anyone yet posted a link to show where the criticism of this vile practice comes exclusively from 'the conservative right'?

WHERE have 'the conservative right' said that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children? Is that like saying that if you oppose DV laws, you support violence (real) against women and against men and their children, which is much more a province of the rabid feminist-deluded 'left'?

Just look at the title of this thread

Lessee now .... "The left continue to sexualise children"........

So... ahhhh.. where does it say this comes from the conservative right? All the links and posts show it comes from a very wide span of society and people in it... across a very broad band of 'political' inclination.... that is - from left to right.....

I'm reputed to be way to the left of the Dalai Lama - and I find sexualisation of young people reprehensible... enough time through life to find out the hard parts....

I don't consider myself "left" or "right".

Hows that equate?

I'm the same - all good people and true stand together against such things... political 'colour' is irrelevant... now all we need is a few good people......

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Valkie

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16096
Central Coast
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #87 - Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 7:30am

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 5:51pm:

Valkie wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 5:29pm:

Pooftahs sex

Or SSM as they like to say.

Is just a symptom of the PERVERSIONS these animals stray to.

First it's accept poofta marriage.

Then it's goats, sheep, dogs and cats.

They will begin to expand their PERVERSIONS even further necrophilia, and child sex will follow.

The perverted criminals are already pushing for sexualizing children to further their options and normalize their PERVERSIONS.

Safe school program is being pushed by the perverts in the LGBTIQSELFISH weirdos,

All designed to normalize their sick PERVERSIONS.

They think that in a few years they will get their perverted hands on children without repercussions.

They need to be taught otherwise.

Ever considered counselling for your obsession?

Perhaps had the 97% normals forced the perverted mentally ill 3% to get counselling for their mental illness.

There wouldn't be a problem?

Homosexuality, bestiality, necrophilia, LHGBTIQSELFISH, pedophilia.

As all symptoms of the same mental illness.

They are so focussed on their own perverted sexual needs that they see nothing wrong with their illness.

And by allowing them to continue, we have helped them to get worse.

Back to top

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131547
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #88 - Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 8:44am

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 5:51pm:

Valkie wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 5:29pm:

Pooftahs sex

Or SSM as they like to say.

Is just a symptom of the PERVERSIONS these animals stray to.

First it's accept poofta marriage.

Then it's goats, sheep, dogs and cats.

They will begin to expand their PERVERSIONS even further necrophilia, and child sex will follow.

The perverted criminals are already pushing for sexualizing children to further their options and normalize their PERVERSIONS.

Safe school program is being pushed by the perverts in the LGBTIQSELFISH weirdos,

All designed to normalize their sick PERVERSIONS.

They think that in a few years they will get their perverted hands on children without repercussions.

They need to be taught otherwise.

Ever considered counselling for your obsession?

And some education wouldn't be a bad thing either.

His ignorance is rather alarming.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mix_Master

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 999
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #89 - Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 9:46am

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:08pm:

Trump Obsession Disorder..... he's still going to win this election no matter how much mud is thrown around...

Good for him. No, I mean really.

8 years in office will do two things:

1) Leave him and his "inner circle" vastly enriched, and

2) Leave the U.S vastly poorer.

And all the while, gullible people will be cheering for him, and his "draining the swamp" con job.

20 years from now, the apologists will all be busy doing the whole "revisionism" thing... Roll Eyes

They can start by pointing out just how many rust belt jobs he brought back on the way to "MAGA".

Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

The_Barnacle

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #90 - Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 4:13pm

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 6:00pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 4:03pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 12:35pm:

"The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children."

So now the discussion is not about under aged girls cavorting on stage in suggestive postures - which is something that actually has happened time and again - and is all about some strange concept that the 'side' that apparently opposes such things is saying 'with us or against us' on the gross sexualisation of minors?

You got a link? Anyone yet posted a link to show where the criticism of this vile practice comes exclusively from 'the conservative right'?

WHERE have 'the conservative right' said that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children? Is that like saying that if you oppose DV laws, you support violence (real) against women and against men and their children, which is much more a province of the rabid feminist-deluded 'left'?

Just look at the title of this thread

Lessee now .... "The left continue to sexualise children"........

So... ahhhh.. where does it say this comes from the conservative right? All the links and posts show it comes from a very wide span of society and people in it... across a very broad band of 'political' inclination.... that is - from left to right.....

I'm reputed to be way to the left of the Dalai Lama - and I find sexualisation of young people reprehensible... enough time through life to find out the hard parts....

Gees Grap do I have to spoon feed you?
The opening post is titled "The left continue to sexualise children" and contains a link to Breitbart which also accuses the Left of this.

I think everyone would reject the sexualisation of children but unless we dress them in a burka and ban them from dancing it's going to be a judgement call on what is "sexualisation".

Back to top

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #91 - Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 6:31pm

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 4:13pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 6:00pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 4:03pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 12:35pm:

"The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children."

So now the discussion is not about under aged girls cavorting on stage in suggestive postures - which is something that actually has happened time and again - and is all about some strange concept that the 'side' that apparently opposes such things is saying 'with us or against us' on the gross sexualisation of minors?

You got a link? Anyone yet posted a link to show where the criticism of this vile practice comes exclusively from 'the conservative right'?

WHERE have 'the conservative right' said that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children? Is that like saying that if you oppose DV laws, you support violence (real) against women and against men and their children, which is much more a province of the rabid feminist-deluded 'left'?

Just look at the title of this thread

Lessee now .... "The left continue to sexualise children"........

So... ahhhh.. where does it say this comes from the conservative right? All the links and posts show it comes from a very wide span of society and people in it... across a very broad band of 'political' inclination.... that is - from left to right.....

I'm reputed to be way to the left of the Dalai Lama - and I find sexualisation of young people reprehensible... enough time through life to find out the hard parts....

Gees Grap do I have to spoon feed you?
The opening post is titled "The left continue to sexualise children" and contains a link to Breitbart which also accuses the Left of this.

I think everyone would reject the sexualisation of children but unless we dress them in a burka and ban them from dancing it's going to be a judgement call on what is "sexualisation".

Precisely my point - pointing the finger to left or right has no value... my view of parents who permit this kind of this is that they are abysmally stupid. The criticism comes from all areas of civilised society.... and it is not a political inclination thing, but rather a level of intelligence and morality thing.

I would hate my two grand-daughters to be dragged into that kind of thing...

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20231
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #92 - Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 6:40pm

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 4:13pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 6:00pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 4:03pm:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 21^st, 2020 at 12:35pm:

"The conservative right however are simplistically saying that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children."

So now the discussion is not about under aged girls cavorting on stage in suggestive postures - which is something that actually has happened time and again - and is all about some strange concept that the 'side' that apparently opposes such things is saying 'with us or against us' on the gross sexualisation of minors?

You got a link? Anyone yet posted a link to show where the criticism of this vile practice comes exclusively from 'the conservative right'?

WHERE have 'the conservative right' said that you either agree with them or you support sexualisation of children? Is that like saying that if you oppose DV laws, you support violence (real) against women and against men and their children, which is much more a province of the rabid feminist-deluded 'left'?

Just look at the title of this thread

Lessee now .... "The left continue to sexualise children"........

So... ahhhh.. where does it say this comes from the conservative right? All the links and posts show it comes from a very wide span of society and people in it... across a very broad band of 'political' inclination.... that is - from left to right.....

I'm reputed to be way to the left of the Dalai Lama - and I find sexualisation of young people reprehensible... enough time through life to find out the hard parts....

Gees Grap do I have to spoon feed you?
The opening post is titled "The left continue to sexualise children" and contains a link to Breitbart which also accuses the Left of this.

I think everyone would reject the sexualisation of children but unless we dress them in a burka and ban them from dancing it's going to be a judgement call on what is "sexualisation".

I brought this up before but you conveniently ignored it.

The breitbart article was taking NBC to task for saying only right wing crackpots or Qanon could possibly have a problem with this movie.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 80318 Proud pre-1850's NO Voter Gender:	Re: The left continue to sexualise children Reply #93 - Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 8:04pm I'm reputed to be way to the left of the Dalai Lama.. Why would anyone line that through? It's a simple fact based on some test of viewpoints... Some people......!!!
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #94 - Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 6:01am

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 9:46am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:08pm:

Trump Obsession Disorder..... he's still going to win this election no matter how much mud is thrown around...

Good for him. No, I mean really.

8 years in office will do two things:

1) Leave him and his "inner circle" vastly enriched, and

2) Leave the U.S vastly poorer.

And all the while, gullible people will be cheering for him, and his "draining the swamp" con job.

20 years from now, the apologists will all be busy doing the whole "revisionism" thing... Roll Eyes

They can start by pointing out just how many rust belt jobs he brought back on the way to "MAGA".

Roll Eyes

And that didn't happen under 2 term Obama? Grin

The same bloke who came in after the GFC & re-employed all the crooks responsible for the creation of said GFC.

He had a chance to drain that swamp but did the exact opposite & refilled it with the same thieving corrupt self interested snakes. Roll Eyes

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Mix_Master

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 999
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #95 - Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 7:15am

Gnads wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 6:01am:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 9:46am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:08pm:

Trump Obsession Disorder..... he's still going to win this election no matter how much mud is thrown around...

Good for him. No, I mean really.

8 years in office will do two things:

1) Leave him and his "inner circle" vastly enriched, and

2) Leave the U.S vastly poorer.

And all the while, gullible people will be cheering for him, and his "draining the swamp" con job.

20 years from now, the apologists will all be busy doing the whole "revisionism" thing... Roll Eyes

They can start by pointing out just how many rust belt jobs he brought back on the way to "MAGA".

Roll Eyes

And that didn't happen under 2 term Obama? Grin

The same bloke who came in after the GFC & re-employed all the crooks responsible for the creation of said GFC.

He had a chance to drain that swamp but did the exact opposite & refilled it with the same thieving corrupt self interested snakes. Roll Eyes

Obama actually tried to improve the lives of the majority, and at least retained the U.S' International standing. The current incumbent - the one who came in promising to "drain the swamp" and "MAGA" - has done neither...

Just on the "drain the swamp" thing...

Was "draining the swamp" supposed to involve nepotism, and hiring people patently unsuitable for their roles what "draining the swamp" meant?

Was firing effectively anyone who disagrees with Trump (irrespective of whether they are in the right or not), also part of "draining the swamp"?

On the "MAGA" thing...

How's that going? Many rust belt jobs brought back?

No?

How come?

The bloke is a narcissistic fraud (on a good day).

Many Americans will look back at this period in history with face palms, and the question "How did we let this happen?"

Hopefully Biden will get in and appoint an independent electoral commission, so that (hopefully) it won't happen again.

Surely, people will eventually get fed up with the Right Wing gerrymandering of elections...????

Back to top

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #96 - Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 9:00am

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 7:15am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 6:01am:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 9:46am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:08pm:

Trump Obsession Disorder..... he's still going to win this election no matter how much mud is thrown around...

Good for him. No, I mean really.

8 years in office will do two things:

1) Leave him and his "inner circle" vastly enriched, and

2) Leave the U.S vastly poorer.

And all the while, gullible people will be cheering for him, and his "draining the swamp" con job.

20 years from now, the apologists will all be busy doing the whole "revisionism" thing... Roll Eyes

They can start by pointing out just how many rust belt jobs he brought back on the way to "MAGA".

Roll Eyes

And that didn't happen under 2 term Obama? Grin

The same bloke who came in after the GFC & re-employed all the crooks responsible for the creation of said GFC.

He had a chance to drain that swamp but did the exact opposite & refilled it with the same thieving corrupt self interested snakes. Roll Eyes

Obama actually tried to improve the lives of the majority, and at least retained the U.S' International standing. The current incumbent - the one who came in promising to "drain the swamp" and "MAGA" - has done neither...

Just on the "drain the swamp" thing...

Was "draining the swamp" supposed to involve nepotism, and hiring people patently unsuitable for their roles what "draining the swamp" meant?

Was firing effectively anyone who disagrees with Trump (irrespective of whether they are in the right or not), also part of "draining the swamp"?

On the "MAGA" thing...

How's that going? Many rust belt jobs brought back?

No?

How come?

The bloke is a narcissistic fraud (on a good day).

Many Americans will look back at this period in history with face palms, and the question "How did we let this happen?"

Hopefully Biden will get in and appoint an independent electoral commission, so that (hopefully) it won't happen again.

Surely, people will eventually get fed up with the Right Wing gerrymandering of elections...????

I hope not ...... you worry about Trump being a narcissist .... Biden is demented.

Obama hired or rehired & appointed people directly responsible for the regulations or lack there of that allowed the rampant fraudulent banking practices that caused the GFC.

In the investigations not one of those bastards or executives of the major banks that went arse up & got bail out money that they frittered away on executive bonuses went to jail.

However in Iceland where their bankers were involved in the outfalls of such behaviours they all went to jail.

As the US system only allows for a President to serve 2 consectutive terms I'd say Trump has every right to serve them if re-elected based on Obamas liberal achievements.

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131547
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #97 - Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 9:26am

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 7:15am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 6:01am:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 9:46am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 20^th, 2020 at 3:08pm:

Trump Obsession Disorder..... he's still going to win this election no matter how much mud is thrown around...

Good for him. No, I mean really.

8 years in office will do two things:

1) Leave him and his "inner circle" vastly enriched, and

2) Leave the U.S vastly poorer.

And all the while, gullible people will be cheering for him, and his "draining the swamp" con job.

20 years from now, the apologists will all be busy doing the whole "revisionism" thing... Roll Eyes

They can start by pointing out just how many rust belt jobs he brought back on the way to "MAGA".

Roll Eyes

And that didn't happen under 2 term Obama? Grin

The same bloke who came in after the GFC & re-employed all the crooks responsible for the creation of said GFC.

He had a chance to drain that swamp but did the exact opposite & refilled it with the same thieving corrupt self interested snakes. Roll Eyes

Obama actually tried to improve the lives of the majority, and at least retained the U.S' International standing. The current incumbent - the one who came in promising to "drain the swamp" and "MAGA" - has done neither...

Just on the "drain the swamp" thing...

Was "draining the swamp" supposed to involve nepotism, and hiring people patently unsuitable for their roles what "draining the swamp" meant?

Was firing effectively anyone who disagrees with Trump (irrespective of whether they are in the right or not), also part of "draining the swamp"?

On the "MAGA" thing...

How's that going? Many rust belt jobs brought back?

No?

How come?

The bloke is a narcissistic fraud (on a good day).

Many Americans will look back at this period in history with face palms, and the question "How did we let this happen?"

Hopefully Biden will get in and appoint an independent electoral commission, so that (hopefully) it won't happen again.

Surely, people will eventually get fed up with the Right Wing gerrymandering of elections...????

Back to top

IP Logged

Mix_Master

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 999
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #98 - Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 11:57am

I could not have said it better myself!

Note the right wing apologists always argue for Trump, by arguing against - or denigrating - someone else.

Not one of them has addressed the issues this bloke talks about in that video.

Seems all is "normal" in right wing land.

"Do as I say, not as I do".

"Convention and Rules don't apply to me" (Tax returns).
Funnily enough, that comes from the same side of Politics which routinely spouts the "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" bullsh*t.

So, what does Trump have to hide. We'll find out, eventually. All to bleatings of "witch hunt".

To me, Trump is sounding increasingly strident and desperate, in his bid to retain Office.

So he should be.

Why?

Because Prosecutors are circling...

On the plus side, if he does get soundly beaten in November, at least he'll still be in the news...

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131547
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #99 - Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 12:45pm

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 11:57am:

I could not have said it better myself!

Note the right wing apologists always argue for Trump, by arguing against - or denigrating - someone else.

Not one of them has addressed the issues this bloke talks about in that video.

Seems all is "normal" in right wing land.

"Do as I say, not as I do".

"Convention and Rules don't apply to me" (Tax returns).
Funnily enough, that comes from the same side of Politics which routinely spouts the "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" bullsh*t.

So, what does Trump have to hide. We'll find out, eventually. All to bleatings of "witch hunt".

To me, Trump is sounding increasingly strident and desperate, in his bid to retain Office.

So he should be.

Why?

Because Prosecutors are circling...

On the plus side, if he does get soundly beaten in November, at least he'll still be in the news...

That's right.

And they've got the little Jewish Princess and Beavis & Butthead in their sights too.

If Daddy loses in November, some of his kids might end up doing time.

Moreover, Daddy might be in a cell next to them.

The more likely scenario though, is that Tiny Hands Don will be tied up in court for the rest of his life.

Melania will ditch his orange ass too.

She'll take Barron with her and move to Europe.

Back to top

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #100 - Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 1:12pm

Now on the issue of sexualising young children... in this case specifically young girls...

The link shown at the start clearly says someone was calling out - in advance - some amorphous 'right wing' sentiment as somehow being the only thing against this gross over-sexualisation of young girls and sometimes boys - NOT that some amorphous 'right wing' group or individual had actually done so....

Sort of like crying wolf before the wolf is even awake fifty miles away in the forest and then saying that anyone who says you are silly is attacking you and is a wolf ... pre-emptive strike to cover your own misdeeds, same as Pearl Harbour... if only America hadn't forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbour ..... if only the mysterious 'right wing' hadn't said nothing first about this tawdry film, the apologists for this vile practice wouldn't have needed to not respond, but to make a statement against that mysterious right wing in advance out of the real concern someone might call this filth out...

Now, of course, when anyone gives negative feedback to this filthy film etc - they are automatically dismissed as being part of that mysterious right wing... The Gang Of Twelve etc...

Jesus - some of you have mysterious ways of thinking - or of avoiding thinking...

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 1:23pm by Grappler Truth Teller Feller »

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

The_Barnacle

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #101 - Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 5:57pm

Gordon wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 6:40pm:

I brought this up before but you conveniently ignored it.

The breitbart article was taking NBC to task for saying only right wing crackpots or Qanon could possibly have a problem with this movie.

I ignored it because you are wrong

From the breitbart link in the opening post

Quote:

The left are not only vigorously defending the hyper-sexualization of prepubescent girls, they are attacking anyone horrified by what was done to a handful of very young actresses as wackos and liars who just like trolling the librallllz.

After same sex marriage, we asked ourselves what the left’s nonstop envelope-pushing would attempt to normalize next.

Well, we found out. We’re now required to have our daughters share a restroom with a 45-year-old man wearing a wig and pantyhose.

And this from a related Breitbart article

Quote:

If the uproar over Netflix’s Cuties tells us anything, it’s that we’re now at a point where the political left and the national media want to normalize child pornography.
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/09/14/why-left-normalizing-child-po...

Kind of ironic considering they accuse the Left of being easily offended and promoting "cancel culture"

Back to top

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #102 - Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:28am

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 1:12pm:

Now on the issue of sexualising young children... in this case specifically young girls...

The link shown at the start clearly says someone was calling out - in advance - some amorphous 'right wing' sentiment as somehow being the only thing against this gross over-sexualisation of young girls and sometimes boys - NOT that some amorphous 'right wing' group or individual had actually done so....

Sort of like crying wolf before the wolf is even awake fifty miles away in the forest and then saying that anyone who says you are silly is attacking you and is a wolf ... pre-emptive strike to cover your own misdeeds, same as Pearl Harbour... if only America hadn't forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbour ..... if only the mysterious 'right wing' hadn't said nothing first about this tawdry film, the apologists for this vile practice wouldn't have needed to not respond, but to make a statement against that mysterious right wing in advance out of the real concern someone might call this filth out...

Now, of course, when anyone gives negative feedback to this filthy film etc - they are automatically dismissed as being part of that mysterious right wing... The Gang Of Twelve etc...

Jesus - some of you have mysterious ways of thinking - or of avoiding thinking...

Exactly..... just as Peccar & his peanut gallery Mix Masterbater have side tracked the thread to make it about Trump.

BTW the film in question is still being shown on Netflix.

All in the name of artistic expression ....no? Grin

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Mix_Master

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 999
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #103 - Sep 24^th, 2020 at 7:37am

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:28am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 1:12pm:

Now on the issue of sexualising young children... in this case specifically young girls...

The link shown at the start clearly says someone was calling out - in advance - some amorphous 'right wing' sentiment as somehow being the only thing against this gross over-sexualisation of young girls and sometimes boys - NOT that some amorphous 'right wing' group or individual had actually done so....

Sort of like crying wolf before the wolf is even awake fifty miles away in the forest and then saying that anyone who says you are silly is attacking you and is a wolf ... pre-emptive strike to cover your own misdeeds, same as Pearl Harbour... if only America hadn't forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbour ..... if only the mysterious 'right wing' hadn't said nothing first about this tawdry film, the apologists for this vile practice wouldn't have needed to not respond, but to make a statement against that mysterious right wing in advance out of the real concern someone might call this filth out...

Now, of course, when anyone gives negative feedback to this filthy film etc - they are automatically dismissed as being part of that mysterious right wing... The Gang Of Twelve etc...

Jesus - some of you have mysterious ways of thinking - or of avoiding thinking...

Exactly..... just as Peccar & his peanut gallery Mix Masterbater have side tracked the thread to make it about Trump.

BTW the film in question is still being shown on Netflix.

All in the name of artistic expression ....no? Grin

Yeah...

Good one, dick head.

We get it.

"If" you're on the "left", you agree with the "sexualising" of children.

And if you're critical of the film in question, you're immediately targeted as some right wing nut job.

Roll Eyes

Both premises are equally stupid, BTW. But that's the level of so-called debate, these days.

Back to top

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #104 - Sep 24^th, 2020 at 9:49am

Now - now - don't ever allow that ordinary decent people might object to this kind of thing - they just have to be some kind of right wing old white man extremists to say this is objectionable. You know - the same Old White Men who built the universities and all the other institutions - the nice easy work - the pay and conditions - all the improvements in society and standards of living in the West...

Somebody bring on Greta again - we need a good laugh.... as she sails away in her Old
White Man's boat crewed by her Old White Men and their male offspring, etc after delivering a puerile broadside at everyone not young, sallow or female....D'UH!

She's into Nadal at the tennis over something or other... maybe he doesn't think tennis has anything to do with climate change but is good exercise etc...

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131547
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #105 - Sep 24^th, 2020 at 10:47am

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:28am:

Exactly..... just as Peccar & his peanut gallery Mix Masterbater have side tracked the thread to make it about Trump.

Hardly a side-track.

Donald Trump owned a pageant that sexualised children.

Moreover, he used to walk in on those children while they were in various states of undress.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mix_Master

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 999
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #106 - Sep 24^th, 2020 at 12:43pm

Quote:

Now - now - don't ever allow that ordinary decent people might object to this kind of thing - they just have to be some kind of right wing old white man extremists to say this is objectionable. You know - the same Old White Men who built the universities and all the other institutions - the nice easy work - the pay and conditions - all the improvements in society and standards of living in the West...

Quote:

"If" you're on the "left", you agree with the "sexualising" of children.

And if you're critical of the film in question, you're immediately targeted as some right wing nut job.
Both premises are equally stupid, BTW. But that's the level of so-called debate, these days.

In case you missed it first time 'round.

Quote:

Somebody bring on Greta again - we need a good laugh.... as she sails away in her Old
White Man's boat crewed by her Old White Men and their male offspring, etc after delivering a puerile broadside at everyone not young, sallow or female....D'UH!

She's into Nadal at the tennis over something or other... maybe he doesn't think tennis has anything to do with climate change but is good exercise etc...

Speaking of side tracking... Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 32848
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #107 - Sep 24^th, 2020 at 12:44pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 10:47am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:28am:

Exactly..... just as Peccar & his peanut gallery Mix Masterbater have side tracked the thread to make it about Trump.

Hardly a side-track.

Donald Trump owned a pageant that sexualised children.

Moreover, he used to walk in on those children while they were in various states of undress.

why the need to keep fantasising about that?
why are young undressed children constantly on YOUR mind .
disturbing

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131547
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #108 - Sep 24^th, 2020 at 12:58pm

aquascoot wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 12:44pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 10:47am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:28am:

Exactly..... just as Peccar & his peanut gallery Mix Masterbater have side tracked the thread to make it about Trump.

Hardly a side-track.

Donald Trump owned a pageant that sexualised children.

Moreover, he used to walk in on those children while they were in various states of undress.

why the need to keep fantasising about that?
why are young undressed children constantly on YOUR mind .
disturbing

I'm not fantasising about it.

But if you don't believe me, we can let the GMods decide - your choice.

Bringing up Trump's pageant which sexualised children is completely appropriate in this thread.

Perhaps you should read the OP and reacquaint yourself with what's being discussed.

Moreover, the fact that Trump used to walk in on the children in various states of undress is also quite relevant to the subject matter of this thread.

Donald Trump boasted about meeting semi-naked teenagers in beauty pageants

"Four women who competed in the 1997 Miss Teen USA beauty pageant also said the Republican used to walk in. Some of the girls were as young as 15."

I'm offering a valid counterargument to the thread title, which clearly demonstrates that the right are guilty of sexualising children.

It's completely relevant information, and has nothing to do with any fantasies of mine - it's discussing what Donald Trump actually did (he's a right-winger who sexualised children in pageants he owned and ran).

But hey, if you want to continue going down the road you're starting to travel on I'm more than happy to hand it over to Vic for adjudication.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #109 - Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:29pm

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 7:37am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:28am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 1:12pm:

Now on the issue of sexualising young children... in this case specifically young girls...

The link shown at the start clearly says someone was calling out - in advance - some amorphous 'right wing' sentiment as somehow being the only thing against this gross over-sexualisation of young girls and sometimes boys - NOT that some amorphous 'right wing' group or individual had actually done so....

Sort of like crying wolf before the wolf is even awake fifty miles away in the forest and then saying that anyone who says you are silly is attacking you and is a wolf ... pre-emptive strike to cover your own misdeeds, same as Pearl Harbour... if only America hadn't forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbour ..... if only the mysterious 'right wing' hadn't said nothing first about this tawdry film, the apologists for this vile practice wouldn't have needed to not respond, but to make a statement against that mysterious right wing in advance out of the real concern someone might call this filth out...

Now, of course, when anyone gives negative feedback to this filthy film etc - they are automatically dismissed as being part of that mysterious right wing... The Gang Of Twelve etc...

Jesus - some of you have mysterious ways of thinking - or of avoiding thinking...

Exactly..... just as Peccar & his peanut gallery Mix Masterbater have side tracked the thread to make it about Trump.

BTW the film in question is still being shown on Netflix.

All in the name of artistic expression ....no? Grin

Yeah...

Good one, dick head.

We get it.

"If" you're on the "left", you agree with the "sexualising" of children.

And if you're critical of the film in question, you're immediately targeted as some right wing nut job.

Roll Eyes

Both premises are equally stupid, BTW. But that's the level of so-called debate, these days.

You're all over the place like a mix masters brew... dickhead. Roll Eyes

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Mix_Master

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 999
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #110 - Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:41pm

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:29pm:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 7:37am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:28am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 1:12pm:

Now on the issue of sexualising young children... in this case specifically young girls...

The link shown at the start clearly says someone was calling out - in advance - some amorphous 'right wing' sentiment as somehow being the only thing against this gross over-sexualisation of young girls and sometimes boys - NOT that some amorphous 'right wing' group or individual had actually done so....

Sort of like crying wolf before the wolf is even awake fifty miles away in the forest and then saying that anyone who says you are silly is attacking you and is a wolf ... pre-emptive strike to cover your own misdeeds, same as Pearl Harbour... if only America hadn't forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbour ..... if only the mysterious 'right wing' hadn't said nothing first about this tawdry film, the apologists for this vile practice wouldn't have needed to not respond, but to make a statement against that mysterious right wing in advance out of the real concern someone might call this filth out...

Now, of course, when anyone gives negative feedback to this filthy film etc - they are automatically dismissed as being part of that mysterious right wing... The Gang Of Twelve etc...

Jesus - some of you have mysterious ways of thinking - or of avoiding thinking...

Exactly..... just as Peccar & his peanut gallery Mix Masterbater have side tracked the thread to make it about Trump.

BTW the film in question is still being shown on Netflix.

All in the name of artistic expression ....no? Grin

Yeah...

Good one, dick head.

We get it.

"If" you're on the "left", you agree with the "sexualising" of children.

And if you're critical of the film in question, you're immediately targeted as some right wing nut job.

Roll Eyes

Both premises are equally stupid, BTW. But that's the level of so-called debate, these days.

You're all over the place like a mix masters brew... dickhead. Roll Eyes

Comprehension not a strong suit...?

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20231
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #111 - Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:42pm

The_Barnacle wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 5:57pm:

Gordon wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2020 at 6:40pm:

I brought this up before but you conveniently ignored it.

The breitbart article was taking NBC to task for saying only right wing crackpots or Qanon could possibly have a problem with this movie.

I ignored it because you are wrong

From the breitbart link in the opening post

Quote:

The left are not only vigorously defending the hyper-sexualization of prepubescent girls, they are attacking anyone horrified by what was done to a handful of very young actresses as wackos and liars who just like trolling the librallllz.

After same sex marriage, we asked ourselves what the left’s nonstop envelope-pushing would attempt to normalize next.

Well, we found out. We’re now required to have our daughters share a restroom with a 45-year-old man wearing a wig and pantyhose.

And this from a related Breitbart article

Quote:

If the uproar over Netflix’s Cuties tells us anything, it’s that we’re now at a point where the political left and the national media want to normalize child pornography.
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/09/14/why-left-normalizing-child-po...

Kind of ironic considering they accuse the Left of being easily offended and promoting "cancel culture"

No, you're wrong and spectacularly so. The NBC article was written first and they accused anyone who has an issue with the film of being a right wing nutjob.
Breitbart replied by saying the left exclusively promotes child sexulisation.

I don't agree with either article, but you're too fixated on MY SIDE IS RIGHT to make an actual well thought out critical opinion.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #112 - Sep 24^th, 2020 at 11:06pm

It's called controlling the discussion by establishing the parameters to suit yourself only - a feminist specialty, and passed on now to all the upset groups in the West (but nowhere else where they are kept under control, sometimes by hanging or throwing off a building).

Understand my reference to Pearl Harbour - lay down your position, then say that anyone who opposes it is attacking you - not discussing or taking action against any wrong you've committed, or with the oft-times utter stupidity of your claims etc, or challenging the basis on which you post them - but attacking you!

That makes it a whole new ball game - somehow the original positer of some position (hereinafter to be titled The Aggressor) is cast as the 'victim', rather than as the aggressor.... and since the Aggressor has posited the initial position - anyone who disagrees is now the aggressor.

You there yet? This is a sheila specialty, and has been in play for centuries... feminists have taken this to an art form.... look around you ... open your eyes....

Been rolling the eyes at the latest series of worn-out ads about 'relationship violence' - usual suspect stuff and all one way - men are the nasty ones.... ALWAYS! Personally I've never checked a girlfriend's phone for numbers or controlled her spending etc.... but I've had them do it to me..... and even call me out on an 1800 number once re 'porn sites' - the truth is it was a shot at winning a competition with Rugby Australia for free tickets to a Test match... but don't let that get in the way of a good slagging... Roll Eyes

Oh - Look! Here's another one seeking normality/normalisation:-

https://au.news.yahoo.com/woman-makes-relationship-with-cousin-public-to-normali...

"Woman makes relationship with cousin public to 'normalise incest'"

Back to top

« Last Edit: Sep 24^th, 2020 at 11:29pm by Grappler Truth Teller Feller »

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

Valkie

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16096
Central Coast
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #113 - Sep 25^th, 2020 at 7:21am

And yet again.

The twisted, mentally ill, perverted 3% of the population do everything in their power to "Normalize" their sickness and force it upon the normal healthy 97% of the population.

Bringing out their perverted practices and "allegedly" accepting SSM has given these perverted retards the go ahead to push their perversions further.

They sexualize young children in schools with clandestine "bully training" and when caught out, they go behind the backs of parents.

The instigators of these sick practices ae simply "grooming" children for their own ends.

So again, allowing their perversions and sickness to be dragged out of the sewers and into the open.
Allowing them to promote their perversions as "normal"
We have given them the freedom to use their perverted sickness as a tool to destroy normal, healthy society to further their sickness.

We now have so many ridiculous concepts around sexuality and deviate sexual behaviour that it is creating a society of imbecilic who don't even know man from woman.

This is not, IN ANY WAY, normal.

This is a sickness and needs to be treated as such

Back to top

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #114 - Sep 25^th, 2020 at 7:23am

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:41pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:29pm:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 7:37am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:28am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 1:12pm:

Now on the issue of sexualising young children... in this case specifically young girls...

The link shown at the start clearly says someone was calling out - in advance - some amorphous 'right wing' sentiment as somehow being the only thing against this gross over-sexualisation of young girls and sometimes boys - NOT that some amorphous 'right wing' group or individual had actually done so....

Sort of like crying wolf before the wolf is even awake fifty miles away in the forest and then saying that anyone who says you are silly is attacking you and is a wolf ... pre-emptive strike to cover your own misdeeds, same as Pearl Harbour... if only America hadn't forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbour ..... if only the mysterious 'right wing' hadn't said nothing first about this tawdry film, the apologists for this vile practice wouldn't have needed to not respond, but to make a statement against that mysterious right wing in advance out of the real concern someone might call this filth out...

Now, of course, when anyone gives negative feedback to this filthy film etc - they are automatically dismissed as being part of that mysterious right wing... The Gang Of Twelve etc...

Jesus - some of you have mysterious ways of thinking - or of avoiding thinking...

Exactly..... just as Peccar & his peanut gallery Mix Masterbater have side tracked the thread to make it about Trump.

BTW the film in question is still being shown on Netflix.

All in the name of artistic expression ....no? Grin

Yeah...

Good one, dick head.

We get it.

"If" you're on the "left", you agree with the "sexualising" of children.

And if you're critical of the film in question, you're immediately targeted as some right wing nut job.

Roll Eyes

Both premises are equally stupid, BTW. But that's the level of so-called debate, these days.

You're all over the place like a mix masters brew... dickhead. Roll Eyes

Comprehension not a strong suit...?

Another 5 min knowall with a overly inflated notion of their own intelligence. Roll Eyes

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Valkie

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16096
Central Coast
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #115 - Sep 25^th, 2020 at 7:54am

If this isnt a sign that the sickness that is LGBTIQSELFISH isnt well overstepping its sick perversion.

I dont know what is?

Quote:

They just want to play
Anyone asking a five-yearold questions about their sexual identity would reasonably enough be suspected of having an extremely unhealthy interest in children.

Yet kids as young as five are being asked if they are “gender fluid” or “non-binary” when signing up for their local clubs.

Under Cricket Australia’s Transgender and Gender Diverse guidelines, Cricket Australia requires local clubs to provide the option of selecting a “Non-binary Gender Identity” and a “gender non-specific title” on registration forms.

Additionally, children are advised: “Some people prefer to use gender neutral pronouns, such as ‘they/them/their/ze’.”

And some just want to bat. To balance matters, perhaps gender studies courses should include cricket questions.

“What is the maximum number of fielders behind square leg?” might stump a few gender students. “When was the frontfoot no-ball rule introduced?” could prove unanswerable, too. And anything to do with LBW laws is out of the question.

Let’s just leave cricket to cricketers — of all genders.

Back to top

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU

IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10958
Australia
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #116 - Sep 25^th, 2020 at 3:56pm

Valkie wrote on Sep 25^th, 2020 at 7:54am:

If this isnt a sign that the sickness that is LGBTIQSELFISH isnt well overstepping its sick perversion.

I dont know what is?

Quote:

They just want to play
Anyone asking a five-yearold questions about their sexual identity would reasonably enough be suspected of having an extremely unhealthy interest in children.

Yet kids as young as five are being asked if they are “gender fluid” or “non-binary” when signing up for their local clubs.

Under Cricket Australia’s Transgender and Gender Diverse guidelines, Cricket Australia requires local clubs to provide the option of selecting a “Non-binary Gender Identity” and a “gender non-specific title” on registration forms.

Additionally, children are advised: “Some people prefer to use gender neutral pronouns, such as ‘they/them/their/ze’.”

And some just want to bat. To balance matters, perhaps gender studies courses should include cricket questions.

“What is the maximum number of fielders behind square leg?” might stump a few gender students. “When was the frontfoot no-ball rule introduced?” could prove unanswerable, too. And anything to do with LBW laws is out of the question.

Let’s just leave cricket to cricketers — of all genders.

Two words,

First words starts with U

Second word starts with N

Enough already.....!

UNITED NATIONS........!!!!!

This is their policy...!!!!!

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

Mix_Master

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 999
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #117 - Sep 25^th, 2020 at 4:03pm

Gnads wrote on Sep 25^th, 2020 at 7:23am:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:41pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:29pm:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 7:37am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:28am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 1:12pm:

Now on the issue of sexualising young children... in this case specifically young girls...

The link shown at the start clearly says someone was calling out - in advance - some amorphous 'right wing' sentiment as somehow being the only thing against this gross over-sexualisation of young girls and sometimes boys - NOT that some amorphous 'right wing' group or individual had actually done so....

Sort of like crying wolf before the wolf is even awake fifty miles away in the forest and then saying that anyone who says you are silly is attacking you and is a wolf ... pre-emptive strike to cover your own misdeeds, same as Pearl Harbour... if only America hadn't forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbour ..... if only the mysterious 'right wing' hadn't said nothing first about this tawdry film, the apologists for this vile practice wouldn't have needed to not respond, but to make a statement against that mysterious right wing in advance out of the real concern someone might call this filth out...

Now, of course, when anyone gives negative feedback to this filthy film etc - they are automatically dismissed as being part of that mysterious right wing... The Gang Of Twelve etc...

Jesus - some of you have mysterious ways of thinking - or of avoiding thinking...

Exactly..... just as Peccar & his peanut gallery Mix Masterbater have side tracked the thread to make it about Trump.

BTW the film in question is still being shown on Netflix.

All in the name of artistic expression ....no? Grin

Yeah...

Good one, dick head.

We get it.

"If" you're on the "left", you agree with the "sexualising" of children.

And if you're critical of the film in question, you're immediately targeted as some right wing nut job.

Roll Eyes

Both premises are equally stupid, BTW. But that's the level of so-called debate, these days.

You're all over the place like a mix masters brew... dickhead. Roll Eyes

Comprehension not a strong suit...?

Another 5 min knowall with a overly inflated notion of their own intelligence. Roll Eyes

Says the person with poor grammar, trying to denigrate someone else's apparent lack of intelligence.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #118 - Sep 26^th, 2020 at 4:52am

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 25^th, 2020 at 4:03pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 25^th, 2020 at 7:23am:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:41pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:29pm:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 7:37am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:28am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 1:12pm:

Now on the issue of sexualising young children... in this case specifically young girls...

The link shown at the start clearly says someone was calling out - in advance - some amorphous 'right wing' sentiment as somehow being the only thing against this gross over-sexualisation of young girls and sometimes boys - NOT that some amorphous 'right wing' group or individual had actually done so....

Sort of like crying wolf before the wolf is even awake fifty miles away in the forest and then saying that anyone who says you are silly is attacking you and is a wolf ... pre-emptive strike to cover your own misdeeds, same as Pearl Harbour... if only America hadn't forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbour ..... if only the mysterious 'right wing' hadn't said nothing first about this tawdry film, the apologists for this vile practice wouldn't have needed to not respond, but to make a statement against that mysterious right wing in advance out of the real concern someone might call this filth out...

Now, of course, when anyone gives negative feedback to this filthy film etc - they are automatically dismissed as being part of that mysterious right wing... The Gang Of Twelve etc...

Jesus - some of you have mysterious ways of thinking - or of avoiding thinking...

Exactly..... just as Peccar & his peanut gallery Mix Masterbater have side tracked the thread to make it about Trump.

BTW the film in question is still being shown on Netflix.

All in the name of artistic expression ....no? Grin

Yeah...

Good one, dick head.

We get it.

"If" you're on the "left", you agree with the "sexualising" of children.

And if you're critical of the film in question, you're immediately targeted as some right wing nut job.

Roll Eyes

Both premises are equally stupid, BTW. But that's the level of so-called debate, these days.

You're all over the place like a mix masters brew... dickhead. Roll Eyes

Comprehension not a strong suit...?

Another 5 min knowall with a overly inflated notion of their own intelligence. Roll Eyes

Says the person with poor grammar, trying to denigrate someone else's apparent lack of intelligence.

Sorry I didn't spell check that for you Knowall.

It wasn't me denigrating anyones intelligence .... you want to start the name calling & get off scott free ...... ey dickhead?

Quote - Quote:

Yeah...

Good one, dick head.

We get it.

"If" you're on the "left", you agree with the "sexualising" of children.

And if you're critical of the film in question, you're immediately targeted as some right wing nut job.

Pharque off

how do you like the spelling? Roll Eyes

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Mix_Master

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 999
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #119 - Sep 26^th, 2020 at 6:18am

Gnads wrote on Sep 26^th, 2020 at 4:52am:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 25^th, 2020 at 4:03pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 25^th, 2020 at 7:23am:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:41pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:29pm:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 7:37am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:28am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 1:12pm:

Now on the issue of sexualising young children... in this case specifically young girls...

The link shown at the start clearly says someone was calling out - in advance - some amorphous 'right wing' sentiment as somehow being the only thing against this gross over-sexualisation of young girls and sometimes boys - NOT that some amorphous 'right wing' group or individual had actually done so....

Sort of like crying wolf before the wolf is even awake fifty miles away in the forest and then saying that anyone who says you are silly is attacking you and is a wolf ... pre-emptive strike to cover your own misdeeds, same as Pearl Harbour... if only America hadn't forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbour ..... if only the mysterious 'right wing' hadn't said nothing first about this tawdry film, the apologists for this vile practice wouldn't have needed to not respond, but to make a statement against that mysterious right wing in advance out of the real concern someone might call this filth out...

Now, of course, when anyone gives negative feedback to this filthy film etc - they are automatically dismissed as being part of that mysterious right wing... The Gang Of Twelve etc...

Jesus - some of you have mysterious ways of thinking - or of avoiding thinking...

Exactly..... just as Peccar & his peanut gallery Mix Masterbater have side tracked the thread to make it about Trump.

BTW the film in question is still being shown on Netflix.

All in the name of artistic expression ....no? Grin

Yeah...

Good one, dick head.

We get it.

"If" you're on the "left", you agree with the "sexualising" of children.

And if you're critical of the film in question, you're immediately targeted as some right wing nut job.

Roll Eyes

Both premises are equally stupid, BTW. But that's the level of so-called debate, these days.

You're all over the place like a mix masters brew... dickhead. Roll Eyes

Comprehension not a strong suit...?

Another 5 min knowall with a overly inflated notion of their own intelligence. Roll Eyes

Says the person with poor grammar, trying to denigrate someone else's apparent lack of intelligence.

Sorry I didn't spell check that for you Knowall.

It wasn't me denigrating anyones intelligence .... you want to start the name calling & get off scott free ...... ey dickhead?

Quote - Quote:

Yeah...

Good one, dick head.

We get it.

"If" you're on the "left", you agree with the "sexualising" of children.

And if you're critical of the film in question, you're immediately targeted as some right wing nut job.

Pharque off

how do you like the spelling? Roll Eyes

You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you?

Maybe the biggest.

But not the sharpest.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 28107
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #120 - Sep 26^th, 2020 at 6:39am

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 26^th, 2020 at 6:18am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 26^th, 2020 at 4:52am:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 25^th, 2020 at 4:03pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 25^th, 2020 at 7:23am:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:41pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:29pm:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 7:37am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:28am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 1:12pm:

Now on the issue of sexualising young children... in this case specifically young girls...

The link shown at the start clearly says someone was calling out - in advance - some amorphous 'right wing' sentiment as somehow being the only thing against this gross over-sexualisation of young girls and sometimes boys - NOT that some amorphous 'right wing' group or individual had actually done so....

Sort of like crying wolf before the wolf is even awake fifty miles away in the forest and then saying that anyone who says you are silly is attacking you and is a wolf ... pre-emptive strike to cover your own misdeeds, same as Pearl Harbour... if only America hadn't forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbour ..... if only the mysterious 'right wing' hadn't said nothing first about this tawdry film, the apologists for this vile practice wouldn't have needed to not respond, but to make a statement against that mysterious right wing in advance out of the real concern someone might call this filth out...

Now, of course, when anyone gives negative feedback to this filthy film etc - they are automatically dismissed as being part of that mysterious right wing... The Gang Of Twelve etc...

Jesus - some of you have mysterious ways of thinking - or of avoiding thinking...

Exactly..... just as Peccar & his peanut gallery Mix Masterbater have side tracked the thread to make it about Trump.

BTW the film in question is still being shown on Netflix.

All in the name of artistic expression ....no? Grin

Yeah...

Good one, dick head.

We get it.

"If" you're on the "left", you agree with the "sexualising" of children.

And if you're critical of the film in question, you're immediately targeted as some right wing nut job.

Roll Eyes

Both premises are equally stupid, BTW. But that's the level of so-called debate, these days.

You're all over the place like a mix masters brew... dickhead. Roll Eyes

Comprehension not a strong suit...?

Another 5 min knowall with a overly inflated notion of their own intelligence. Roll Eyes

Says the person with poor grammar, trying to denigrate someone else's apparent lack of intelligence.

Sorry I didn't spell check that for you Knowall.

It wasn't me denigrating anyones intelligence .... you want to start the name calling & get off scott free ...... ey dickhead?

Quote - Quote:

Yeah...

Good one, dick head.

We get it.

"If" you're on the "left", you agree with the "sexualising" of children.

And if you're critical of the film in question, you're immediately targeted as some right wing nut job.

Pharque off

how do you like the spelling? Roll Eyes

You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you?

Maybe the biggest.

But not the sharpest.

So cliche

No 2nd prizes for being a twerp.

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Mix_Master

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 999
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #121 - Sep 26^th, 2020 at 7:37am

Gnads wrote on Sep 26^th, 2020 at 6:39am:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 26^th, 2020 at 6:18am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 26^th, 2020 at 4:52am:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 25^th, 2020 at 4:03pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 25^th, 2020 at 7:23am:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:41pm:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:29pm:

Mix_Master wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 7:37am:

Gnads wrote on Sep 24^th, 2020 at 6:28am:

Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Sep 23^rd, 2020 at 1:12pm:

Now on the issue of sexualising young children... in this case specifically young girls...

The link shown at the start clearly says someone was calling out - in advance - some amorphous 'right wing' sentiment as somehow being the only thing against this gross over-sexualisation of young girls and sometimes boys - NOT that some amorphous 'right wing' group or individual had actually done so....

Sort of like crying wolf before the wolf is even awake fifty miles away in the forest and then saying that anyone who says you are silly is attacking you and is a wolf ... pre-emptive strike to cover your own misdeeds, same as Pearl Harbour... if only America hadn't forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbour ..... if only the mysterious 'right wing' hadn't said nothing first about this tawdry film, the apologists for this vile practice wouldn't have needed to not respond, but to make a statement against that mysterious right wing in advance out of the real concern someone might call this filth out...

Now, of course, when anyone gives negative feedback to this filthy film etc - they are automatically dismissed as being part of that mysterious right wing... The Gang Of Twelve etc...

Jesus - some of you have mysterious ways of thinking - or of avoiding thinking...

Exactly..... just as Peccar & his peanut gallery Mix Masterbater have side tracked the thread to make it about Trump.

BTW the film in question is still being shown on Netflix.

All in the name of artistic expression ....no? Grin

Yeah...

Good one, dick head.

We get it.

"If" you're on the "left", you agree with the "sexualising" of children.

And if you're critical of the film in question, you're immediately targeted as some right wing nut job.

Roll Eyes

Both premises are equally stupid, BTW. But that's the level of so-called debate, these days.

You're all over the place like a mix masters brew... dickhead. Roll Eyes

Comprehension not a strong suit...?

Another 5 min knowall with a overly inflated notion of their own intelligence. Roll Eyes

Says the person with poor grammar, trying to denigrate someone else's apparent lack of intelligence.

Sorry I didn't spell check that for you Knowall.

It wasn't me denigrating anyones intelligence .... you want to start the name calling & get off scott free ...... ey dickhead?

Quote - Quote:

Yeah...

Good one, dick head.

We get it.

"If" you're on the "left", you agree with the "sexualising" of children.

And if you're critical of the film in question, you're immediately targeted as some right wing nut job.

Pharque off

how do you like the spelling? Roll Eyes

You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you?

Maybe the biggest.

But not the sharpest.

So cliche

No 2nd prizes for being a twerp.

All too true. I agree that you are miles in front in the "twerp" category.

Enjoy your prize.

Back to top

IP Logged

Grappler Truth Teller Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 80318
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male

Re: The left continue to sexualise children
Reply #122 - Sep 26^th, 2020 at 9:12am

This kind of rubbish should be banned...

"Ooooh!", screeched the squeakers, "CENSORSHIP!!" ... and the educated acolytes of everything against society joined in, and so the fearless legislators, sworn to uphold the right without fear or favour, bowed down and backed down for fear of offending a threesome of idiots pushing a stupid agenda ... and the dopey school kids thought it was good and they could start rooting one another at age ten or so.....
Roll Eyes

.............

instead of waiting until they were at least twelve before getting pregnant .....

Welcome to The Third (Turd) World:-

Approximately 12 million girls aged 15–19 years and at least 777,000 girls under 15 years give birth each year in developing regions.
At least 10 million unintended pregnancies occur each year among adolescent girls aged 15–19 years in the developing world.
Complications during pregnancy and childbirth are the leading cause of death for 15–19-year-old girls globally.
Of the estimated 5.6 million abortions that occur each year among adolescent girls aged 15–19 years, 3.9 million are unsafe, contributing to maternal mortality, morbidity and lasting health problems.
Adolescent mothers (ages 10–19 years) face higher risks of eclampsia, puerperal endometritis, and systemic infections than women aged 20 to 24 years, and babies of adolescent mothers face higher risks of low birth weight, preterm delivery and severe neonatal conditions.

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-pregnancy

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged