freediver wrote on Nov 12
th, 2020 at 6:29pm:
Basically, you assumed it was a random sample, for no reason whatsoever, other than your own ignorance and you inability to think about that the point of the "sampling" process was. I'll give you a hint, they were not conducting a scientific experiment.
Or perhaps it was because I actually read it?
From the report:
Quote:The majority of employers involved in the Inquiry were selected randomly. A smaller number of employers were selected on the basis of intelligence gathered from industry stakeholders, other government agencies and departments, media, community members and workplace participants. The FWO revisited noncompliant employers in subsequent seasons to assess compliance.
(page 4)
Do you have any more bullshit left to continue your deflection?
Or would you like to address the actual issue for once?
- Do you concede the report refutes your BS claim that farmers were complying with the law?
- Do you think this report vindicates the union's insistence on getting involved in this matter, and that it demonstrates that they were interested in something other than simply "wanting to kill non-union industries"?