Australian Politics Forum - Sexual demeaning women

The Ungulate Who Said No

New Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 47
Gender: female

Sexual demeaning women
May 20^th, 2020 at 3:48pm

I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board.

I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany.

This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads.

To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women.

Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because She's a lying, hypocritical POS.

Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even asex doll, merely a mannequin.

Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS.

So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie.

I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary.

It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates.

The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131414
Gender: male

Re: Sexual demeaning women
Reply #1 - May 20^th, 2020 at 3:59pm

The Ungulate Who Said No wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 3:48pm:

I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board.

I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany.

This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads.

To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women.

Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because She's a lying, hypocritical POS.

Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even asex doll, merely a mannequin.

Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS.

So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie.

I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary.

It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates.

The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary.

Goodness.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 72209 Gender:	Re: Sexual demeaning women Reply #2 - May 20^th, 2020 at 4:29pm at least he's no longer claiming it incites rape
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Sexual demeaning women
Reply #3 - May 20^th, 2020 at 5:26pm

The Ungulate Who Said No wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 3:48pm:

I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board.

I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany.

This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads.

To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women.

Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because She's a lying, hypocritical POS.

Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even asex doll, merely a mannequin.

Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS.

So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie.

I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary.

It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates.

The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary.

oh dear... yes avoid at all costs...sadly we have a few members here who also belong to another forum that is best not mentioned.. safe to say its an anything goes forum.... the two members who replied to you are members of said forum Roll Eyes

consider yourself warned....

you will find very few females taking part on ozpol.....I am sure there is no need to explain WHY?..

I now expect a barrage from those who see no wrong in the constant demeaning of women.. Roll Eyes

but I am used to it ungulate...

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 72209 Gender:	Re: Sexual demeaning women Reply #4 - May 20^th, 2020 at 5:33pm codsie, you think Vic will delete this thread now you've again broken his new rule? Time will tell ehhh!
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 32802
Gender: male

Re: Sexual demeaning women
Reply #5 - May 20^th, 2020 at 5:47pm

The Ungulate Who Said No wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 3:48pm:

I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board.

I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany.

This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads.

To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women.

Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because She's a lying, hypocritical POS.

Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even asex doll, merely a mannequin.

Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS.

So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie.

I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary.

It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates.

The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary.

correct.

freud called this "reaction formation"

Back to top

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17452
Gender: male

Re: Sexual demeaning women
Reply #6 - May 20^th, 2020 at 5:52pm

The Ungulate Who Said No wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 3:48pm:

I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board.

I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany.

This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads.

To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women.

Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because She's a lying, hypocritical POS.

Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even asex doll, merely a mannequin.

Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS.

So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie.

I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary.

It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates.

The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary.

greggy made a bet with Bias that he would leave this forum if Trump won the election.

He is still here hasn't honoured his bet which shows what type of person he is.

He is a troll who doesn't have a life outside of this forum

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20217
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Sexual demeaning women
Reply #7 - May 20^th, 2020 at 5:53pm

aquascoot wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 5:47pm:

The Ungulate Who Said No wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 3:48pm:

I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board.

I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany.

This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads.

To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women.

Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because She's a lying, hypocritical POS.

Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even asex doll, merely a mannequin.

Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS.

So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie.

I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary.

It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates.

The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary.

correct.

freud called this "reaction formation"

Exactly like the fire and brimstone anti gay preachers who always get caught with a rent boy.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 32802
Gender: male

Re: Sexual demeaning women
Reply #8 - May 20^th, 2020 at 6:16pm

Gordon wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 5:53pm:

aquascoot wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 5:47pm:

The Ungulate Who Said No wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 3:48pm:

I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board.

I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany.

This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads.

To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women.

Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because She's a lying, hypocritical POS.

Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even asex doll, merely a mannequin.

Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS.

So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie.

I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary.

It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates.

The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary.

correct.

freud called this "reaction formation"

Exactly like the fire and brimstone anti gay preachers who always get caught with a rent boy.

yes gordon.

A popular figure of speech is the phrase 'the lady doth protest too much.' Taken from Shakespeare's Hamlet, the saying is often used to refer to people who appear to be dramatically, and emphatically, opposed to something in an effort to hide their true feelings or desires.

In psychology, this type of behavior is known as a reaction formation, and it can, at times, be very confusing. Reaction formation is a kind of psychological defense mechanism in which a person perceives their true feelings or desires to be socially or, in some cases, legally unacceptable, and so they attempt to convince themselves or others that the opposite is true--often in a very exaggerated performance.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20217
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Sexual demeaning women
Reply #9 - May 20^th, 2020 at 6:23pm

aquascoot wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 6:16pm:

Gordon wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 5:53pm:

aquascoot wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 5:47pm:

The Ungulate Who Said No wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 3:48pm:

I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board.

I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany.

This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads.

To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women.

Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because She's a lying, hypocritical POS.

Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even asex doll, merely a mannequin.

Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS.

So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie.

I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary.

It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates.

The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary.

correct.

freud called this "reaction formation"

Exactly like the fire and brimstone anti gay preachers who always get caught with a rent boy.

yes gordon.

A popular figure of speech is the phrase 'the lady doth protest too much.' Taken from Shakespeare's Hamlet, the saying is often used to refer to people who appear to be dramatically, and emphatically, opposed to something in an effort to hide their true feelings or desires.

In psychology, this type of behavior is known as a reaction formation, and it can, at times, be very confusing. Reaction formation is a kind of psychological defense mechanism in which a person perceives their true feelings or desires to be socially or, in some cases, legally unacceptable, and so they attempt to convince themselves or others that the opposite is true--often in a very exaggerated performance.

Interesting. I worked with a bloke who was a typical Northern Beaches dude. Cute blond girlfriend, good surfer, out fishing 5 days a week. He was the kind of bloke who without prompting would turn the conversation to how disgusting gays are.

He's now married to a very lovely fella Grin

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Setanta Gold Member Offline \/ Peace man! Posts: 15909 Northern NSW Gender:	Re: Sexual demeaning women Reply #10 - May 20^th, 2020 at 6:54pm I wonder if Mothra will be along to back up and tag-team with PETApeccary on this.
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 72209 Gender:	Re: Sexual demeaning women Reply #11 - May 20^th, 2020 at 7:05pm Setanta wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 6:54pm: I wonder if Mothra will be along to back up and tag-team with PETApeccary on this. why? you afraid to fight your own battles?
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

AiA Gold Member Offline Posts: 18405 Gender:	Re: Sexual demeaning women Reply #12 - May 20^th, 2020 at 7:10pm John Smith wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 7:05pm: Setanta wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 6:54pm: I wonder if Mothra will be along to back up and tag-team with PETApeccary on this. why? you afraid to fight your own battles? A hag needs fags, John, and Mothra has you.
Back to top	“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 72209
Gender: male

Re: Sexual demeaning women
Reply #13 - May 20^th, 2020 at 7:10pm

AiA wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 7:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 7:05pm:

Setanta wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 6:54pm:

I wonder if Mothra will be along to back up and tag-team with PETApeccary on this.

why? you afraid to fight your own battles?

A hag needs fags, John, and Mothra has you.

and you've got setanta

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Setanta Gold Member Offline \/ Peace man! Posts: 15909 Northern NSW Gender:	Re: Sexual demeaning women Reply #14 - May 20^th, 2020 at 7:13pm John Smith wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 7:05pm: Setanta wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 6:54pm: I wonder if Mothra will be along to back up and tag-team with PETApeccary on this. why? you afraid to fight your own battles? What battle might I be fighting, Mimo?
Back to top	IP Logged