Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA (Read 1543 times)
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
May 1st, 2020 at 7:45pm
 
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-30/china-in-antarctica-inspection-regime/10858486?nw=0

"China’s most audaciously located station — at the high point of Antarctica’s vast ice sheet at the heart of Australian Antarctic Territory — has seen 10 summers.

This is a decade marked by incredible expansion of Chinese activity. Yet this station, as well as one another Chinese base within Australia’s claim, have never been inspected.

Many are saying it’s time for a check-up."

We are surrounded, we know they want to be the global naval super power, they are building islands 3.5hrs from us, they control the port of Darwin, they are trying to muscle in on the port of Hobart, through a crazy immigration system its just a sea of Asians now in our cities buying all of our property resources everything, its an invasion from within.

There should be a thorough investigation into not just their sus bat virus.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 46543
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #1 - May 1st, 2020 at 9:27pm
 
Gutless Australian Politicians.

Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #2 - May 2nd, 2020 at 12:25am
 
Jasin wrote on May 1st, 2020 at 9:27pm:
Gutless Australian Politicians.


Dirty filthy rotten underhanded self preserving short sighted politically correct mongrels.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 80265
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #3 - May 2nd, 2020 at 2:16am
 
Jasin wrote on May 1st, 2020 at 9:27pm:
Gutless Australian Politicians.



Always said you were right some of the time.... congratulations and thanks for supporting my views...
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Truth Teller Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 80265
Proud pre-1850's NO Voter
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #4 - May 2nd, 2020 at 2:17am
 
Johnnie wrote on May 2nd, 2020 at 12:25am:
Jasin wrote on May 1st, 2020 at 9:27pm:
Gutless Australian Politicians.


Dirty filthy rotten underhanded self preserving short sighted politically correct mongrels.


So right.... can't challenge one thing you say.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 46543
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #5 - May 2nd, 2020 at 3:01pm
 
When China discovered Australia's little spying effort, Chinese Hackers came down hard and scuttled a lot of important 'electronic' aspects of ASIO, Australian Politics and other important Computer supported efforts high up.
It was much worse than the Australian Media let on to the Public.
Australia got trounced in that little battle.

Now you know why ASIO 'unofficially' got things moving with a Hackerthon to invite our 'young genius's' and Hackers to get paid working for the 'good guys'. One was highly sought after by the Police for scamming, but being so good - ASIO made contact and he is now putting his 'gift' towards our National Security.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Black Orchid
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5802
Gender: female
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #6 - May 2nd, 2020 at 3:33pm
 
Johnnie wrote on May 2nd, 2020 at 12:25am:
Jasin wrote on May 1st, 2020 at 9:27pm:
Gutless Australian Politicians.


Dirty filthy rotten underhanded self preserving short sighted politically correct mongrels.


My sentiments exactly although I would toss in a hypocritical and note they are all the same.

Some worse than others but basically all the same.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 46543
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #7 - May 2nd, 2020 at 3:36pm
 
Black Orchid wrote on May 2nd, 2020 at 3:33pm:
Johnnie wrote on May 2nd, 2020 at 12:25am:
Jasin wrote on May 1st, 2020 at 9:27pm:
Gutless Australian Politicians.


Dirty filthy rotten underhanded self preserving short sighted politically correct mongrels.


My sentiments exactly although I would toss in a hypocritical and note they are all the same.

Some worse than others but basically all the same.



Reckon ol' Don Chipp would be the only one that would keep the bastards honest.
Don Chipp would have loved Trump who is too 'Honest' for the Media's liking. He calls a Spade a Fake Media and tweets 'directly' to the American People via his Tweets.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Black Orchid
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5802
Gender: female
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #8 - May 2nd, 2020 at 3:45pm
 
It's necessary when 96% of the media is a false and nasty narrative against him.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 46543
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #9 - May 2nd, 2020 at 4:01pm
 
Black Orchid wrote on May 2nd, 2020 at 3:45pm:
It's necessary when 96% of the media is a false and nasty narrative against him.


Trolls like Pecca who try to make Trump out as a Troll.
Trump isn't perfect, he's just a Business Man american style trying to offer the power of Presidency something new beyond the colour of his skin. Besides Bush Snr's CIA background, Trump is the only President who brought something worthwhile to the table. Ronny Reagan was just a movie star and dreamed of Star Wars satellites in our skies shooting back down at us.

By Tweeting directly to the People of America. He cuts out the 'sanitising' Big Brother Media and leaves himself vulnerable to the People's opinion of him. He is putting the People of America 'before' that of the Media and that's another reason why the Media RESENTS Trump - because they can't own him, because they didn't 'create' him.
He's the Red Strip in the American Flag - a Mr Hobbit sized man who is doing his bit for his Nation. China respects (because they are just 'little people' too) Trump and fears 'his' America. He's on their Level and can scrap just as good as them. Hence Trump's show of Military Power on Independence Day, much  to the ire of the Media.

If only Frankie Goes to Hollywood did a remake of Two Tribes with  Trump and Jinping impersonators going the State of Origin Biff! That's how good that one would be.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
tickleandrose
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3867
Gender: female
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #10 - May 2nd, 2020 at 8:24pm
 
Yet another complicated territorial situation being 'watered' down by tabloid newspaper for the commoners to consume.  Lets begin...

1. The initial claim on these Antartica territory was by the United Kingdom in 1841, and later on transferred to Australia.   In 1961, the Antarctic treaty came into force through UN.  And article 4 specifically deal with territorial claims.

Article IV

    1. Nothing contained in the present treaty shall be interpreted as:

        (a) a renunciation by any Contracting Party of previously asserted rights of or claims to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica;

        (b) a renunciation or diminution by any Contracting Party of any basis of claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica which it may have whether as a result of its activities or those of its nationals in Antarctica, or otherwise;

        (c) prejudicing the position of any Contracting Party as regards its recognition or non-recognition of any other States right of or claim or basis of claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica.

    2. No acts or activities taking place while the present treaty is in force shall constitute a basis for asserting, supporting or denying a claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica or create any rights of sovereignty in Antarctica. No new claim, or enlargement of an existing claim, to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica shall be asserted while the present treaty is in force.

So in a nut shell, the article pretty much said you can claim your land, may be, but you cant prohibit others from claiming land.   As a result, only four countries in the world recognized Australia's claim in Antartica, and these are: New Zealand, United Kingdom, France and Norway.   The rest of the world does not.  So if you have any notion that the Chinese is building on 'our' land, then.. think again. 

Currently there are total of 8 stations in the Australian antarctic territory.  Australia has 3 stations (Mawson, Davis, Casey), Russia has 3 (Mirny, Vostok, progress station), Romania has 1, France/Italy has 1, and China 1 (Zhongshan).  So where is the outrage against Russia and Romania?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #11 - May 3rd, 2020 at 12:33pm
 
tickleandrose wrote on May 2nd, 2020 at 8:24pm:
Yet another complicated territorial situation being 'watered' down by tabloid newspaper for the commoners to consume.  Lets begin...

1. The initial claim on these Antartica territory was by the United Kingdom in 1841, and later on transferred to Australia.   In 1961, the Antarctic treaty came into force through UN.  And article 4 specifically deal with territorial claims.

Article IV

    1. Nothing contained in the present treaty shall be interpreted as:

        (a) a renunciation by any Contracting Party of previously asserted rights of or claims to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica;

        (b) a renunciation or diminution by any Contracting Party of any basis of claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica which it may have whether as a result of its activities or those of its nationals in Antarctica, or otherwise;

        (c) prejudicing the position of any Contracting Party as regards its recognition or non-recognition of any other States right of or claim or basis of claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica.

    2. No acts or activities taking place while the present treaty is in force shall constitute a basis for asserting, supporting or denying a claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica or create any rights of sovereignty in Antarctica. No new claim, or enlargement of an existing claim, to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica shall be asserted while the present treaty is in force.

So in a nut shell, the article pretty much said you can claim your land, may be, but you cant prohibit others from claiming land.   As a result, only four countries in the world recognized Australia's claim in Antartica, and these are: New Zealand, United Kingdom, France and Norway.   The rest of the world does not.  So if you have any notion that the Chinese is building on 'our' land, then.. think again. 

Currently there are total of 8 stations in the Australian antarctic territory.  Australia has 3 stations (Mawson, Davis, Casey), Russia has 3 (Mirny, Vostok, progress station), Romania has 1, France/Italy has 1, and China 1 (Zhongshan).  So where is the outrage against Russia and Romania? 

All true except China doesn't give a rats about any international law or treaty as clearly shown in the South China sea.

By far the Chinese have more presence down there than anyone else, tens of thousands of Chinese tourists every year, massive amounts of krill fishing and building stations smack in the middle of Australia's claimed territory.

"Given Beijing’s track record in moving rapidly on a broad front, as it’s done in the South China Sea, we need to be prepared to respond to a rapid increase in the speed and scale of its actions in Antarctica.

We shouldn’t help China use Antarctic research for resource exploitation, to gather information on advanced technology with clear potential for military purposes, or to act in environmentally harmful ways. Australia should regularly inspect Chinese facilities (and China can inspect ours)."

China is using the old rule which states: Possession is nine tenths of the law!


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39566
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #12 - May 3rd, 2020 at 1:17pm
 
What a load of faux outrage.  Have you ever visited Antarctica?  No, I didn't think so.  Few Australians have.  I have.  Twice.   China is welcome to their base in the frozen continent.  They won't be attempting anything other than research.

As for China refusing to obey treaties.  Actually it does.  Even better than Australia.  The South China Sea is an effort to improve their defences against encroaching American forces.   The PRC has long standing, dating back to the days of the Chinese Empire of seeking to control events on it's periphery.  The Korean War was one aspect of that as was the Chinese border dispute with the fUSSR and invasion of Vietnam.  They don't like hostile forces on their borders.

The US Navy is an overly aggressive force.  It used to upset the fUSSR with numerous border incursions.  It still sails it's submarines into Russian waters.  It still carries out similar antics against the PRC.  The PRC has attempted to do something about that by building islands.  Get the US to behave and the PRC will behave.  QED.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 8611
armidale
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #13 - May 3rd, 2020 at 1:35pm
 
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 12:33pm:
building stations smack in the middle of Australia's claimed territory.




As all Antarctica is within somebody's territory and a building needs a foundation on land to stay in one piece , then a building has to be on claimed territory, even if it's the best location in the middle.
The middle has views , ice , snow and is handy to the near-middle , so it's the best place obviously.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #14 - May 3rd, 2020 at 1:43pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:17pm:
What a load of faux outrage.  Have you ever visited Antarctica?  No, I didn't think so.  Few Australians have.  I have.  Twice.   China is welcome to their base in the frozen continent.  They won't be attempting anything other than research.

As for China refusing to obey treaties.  Actually it does.  Even better than Australia.  The South China Sea is an effort to improve their defences against encroaching American forces.   The PRC has long standing, dating back to the days of the Chinese Empire of seeking to control events on it's periphery.  The Korean War was one aspect of that as was the Chinese border dispute with the fUSSR and invasion of Vietnam.  They don't like hostile forces on their borders.

The US Navy is an overly aggressive force.  It used to upset the fUSSR with numerous border incursions.  It still sails it's submarines into Russian waters.  It still carries out similar antics against the PRC.  The PRC has attempted to do something about that by building islands.  Get the US to behave and the PRC will behave.  QED.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Good one, so China goes against international laws to teach the US a lesson and your fine with that.

China can POQ out of Antarctica, they are not to be trusted.

Hey, you been everywhere man!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39566
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #15 - May 3rd, 2020 at 7:18pm
 
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:43pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:17pm:
What a load of faux outrage.  Have you ever visited Antarctica?  No, I didn't think so.  Few Australians have.  I have.  Twice.   China is welcome to their base in the frozen continent.  They won't be attempting anything other than research.

As for China refusing to obey treaties.  Actually it does.  Even better than Australia.  The South China Sea is an effort to improve their defences against encroaching American forces.   The PRC has long standing, dating back to the days of the Chinese Empire of seeking to control events on it's periphery.  The Korean War was one aspect of that as was the Chinese border dispute with the fUSSR and invasion of Vietnam.  They don't like hostile forces on their borders.

The US Navy is an overly aggressive force.  It used to upset the fUSSR with numerous border incursions.  It still sails it's submarines into Russian waters.  It still carries out similar antics against the PRC.  The PRC has attempted to do something about that by building islands.  Get the US to behave and the PRC will behave.  QED.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Good one, so China goes against international laws to teach the US a lesson and your fine with that.

China can POQ out of Antarctica, they are not to be trusted.

Hey, you been everywhere man!


Jealousy is a curse, little man.  So you've  never been anywhere except to Google?  Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Perhaps you'd care to demonstrate what treaties/conventions the Chinese have contravened?  I'd be interested to find out exactly what you do know.  Otherwise this is just another example of a Sinophobic troll.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #16 - May 3rd, 2020 at 9:36pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 7:18pm:
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:43pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:17pm:
What a load of faux outrage.  Have you ever visited Antarctica?  No, I didn't think so.  Few Australians have.  I have.  Twice.   China is welcome to their base in the frozen continent.  They won't be attempting anything other than research.

As for China refusing to obey treaties.  Actually it does.  Even better than Australia.  The South China Sea is an effort to improve their defences against encroaching American forces.   The PRC has long standing, dating back to the days of the Chinese Empire of seeking to control events on it's periphery.  The Korean War was one aspect of that as was the Chinese border dispute with the fUSSR and invasion of Vietnam.  They don't like hostile forces on their borders.

The US Navy is an overly aggressive force.  It used to upset the fUSSR with numerous border incursions.  It still sails it's submarines into Russian waters.  It still carries out similar antics against the PRC.  The PRC has attempted to do something about that by building islands.  Get the US to behave and the PRC will behave.  QED.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Good one, so China goes against international laws to teach the US a lesson and your fine with that.

China can POQ out of Antarctica, they are not to be trusted.

Hey, you been everywhere man!


Jealousy is a curse, little man.  So you've  never been anywhere except to Google?  Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Perhaps you'd care to demonstrate what treaties/conventions the Chinese have contravened?  I'd be interested to find out exactly what you do know.  Otherwise this is just another example of a Sinophobic troll.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Building islands in the South China sea clearly for military might  is a clear breach of international law, unless you think they built them for peaceful purposes.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AiA
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 18405
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #17 - May 3rd, 2020 at 9:57pm
 
The same thing will happen on the moon one day over resources there.
Back to top
 

“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #18 - May 3rd, 2020 at 10:03pm
 
AiA wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 9:57pm:
The same thing will happen on the moon one day over resources there.

Pluto will not be spared.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AiA
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 18405
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #19 - May 3rd, 2020 at 10:10pm
 
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 10:03pm:
AiA wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 9:57pm:
The same thing will happen on the moon one day over resources there.

Pluto will not be spared.


Neither will ur anus.
Back to top
 

“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #20 - May 3rd, 2020 at 10:21pm
 
AiA wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 10:10pm:
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 10:03pm:
AiA wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 9:57pm:
The same thing will happen on the moon one day over resources there.

Pluto will not be spared.


Neither will ur anus.

Probably not, we are all in this together though, you me the solar system the universe everything
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AiA
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 18405
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #21 - May 3rd, 2020 at 10:26pm
 
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 10:21pm:
AiA wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 10:10pm:
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 10:03pm:
AiA wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 9:57pm:
The same thing will happen on the moon one day over resources there.

Pluto will not be spared.


Neither will ur anus.

Probably not, we are all in this together though, you me the solar system the universe everything


No, we are not all together in your anus. Yuck.
Back to top
 

“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #22 - May 3rd, 2020 at 10:38pm
 
AiA wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 10:26pm:
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 10:21pm:
AiA wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 10:10pm:
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 10:03pm:
AiA wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 9:57pm:
The same thing will happen on the moon one day over resources there.

Pluto will not be spared.


Neither will ur anus.

Probably not, we are all in this together though, you me the solar system the universe everything


No, we are not all together in your anus. Yuck.

That's a relief, now go look at the big picture like China surrounding us.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39566
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #23 - May 3rd, 2020 at 10:42pm
 
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 9:36pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 7:18pm:
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:43pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:17pm:
What a load of faux outrage.  Have you ever visited Antarctica?  No, I didn't think so.  Few Australians have.  I have.  Twice.   China is welcome to their base in the frozen continent.  They won't be attempting anything other than research.

As for China refusing to obey treaties.  Actually it does.  Even better than Australia.  The South China Sea is an effort to improve their defences against encroaching American forces.   The PRC has long standing, dating back to the days of the Chinese Empire of seeking to control events on it's periphery.  The Korean War was one aspect of that as was the Chinese border dispute with the fUSSR and invasion of Vietnam.  They don't like hostile forces on their borders.

The US Navy is an overly aggressive force.  It used to upset the fUSSR with numerous border incursions.  It still sails it's submarines into Russian waters.  It still carries out similar antics against the PRC.  The PRC has attempted to do something about that by building islands.  Get the US to behave and the PRC will behave.  QED.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Good one, so China goes against international laws to teach the US a lesson and your fine with that.

China can POQ out of Antarctica, they are not to be trusted.

Hey, you been everywhere man!


Jealousy is a curse, little man.  So you've  never been anywhere except to Google?  Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Perhaps you'd care to demonstrate what treaties/conventions the Chinese have contravened?  I'd be interested to find out exactly what you do know.  Otherwise this is just another example of a Sinophobic troll.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Building islands in the South China sea clearly for military might  is a clear breach of international law, unless you think they built them for peaceful purposes.


Actually they are a perfect demonstration of what International Law is - through the application of force.  Might makes right.  Roll Eyes
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 3rd, 2020 at 10:47pm by Brian Ross »  

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #24 - May 3rd, 2020 at 11:11pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 10:42pm:
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 9:36pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 7:18pm:
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:43pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:17pm:
What a load of faux outrage.  Have you ever visited Antarctica?  No, I didn't think so.  Few Australians have.  I have.  Twice.   China is welcome to their base in the frozen continent.  They won't be attempting anything other than research.

As for China refusing to obey treaties.  Actually it does.  Even better than Australia.  The South China Sea is an effort to improve their defences against encroaching American forces.   The PRC has long standing, dating back to the days of the Chinese Empire of seeking to control events on it's periphery.  The Korean War was one aspect of that as was the Chinese border dispute with the fUSSR and invasion of Vietnam.  They don't like hostile forces on their borders.

The US Navy is an overly aggressive force.  It used to upset the fUSSR with numerous border incursions.  It still sails it's submarines into Russian waters.  It still carries out similar antics against the PRC.  The PRC has attempted to do something about that by building islands.  Get the US to behave and the PRC will behave.  QED.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Good one, so China goes against international laws to teach the US a lesson and your fine with that.

China can POQ out of Antarctica, they are not to be trusted.

Hey, you been everywhere man!


Jealousy is a curse, little man.  So you've  never been anywhere except to Google?  Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Perhaps you'd care to demonstrate what treaties/conventions the Chinese have contravened?  I'd be interested to find out exactly what you do know.  Otherwise this is just another example of a Sinophobic troll.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Building islands in the South China sea clearly for military might  is a clear breach of international law, unless you think they built them for peaceful purposes.


Actually they are a perfect demonstration of what International Law is - through the application of force.  Might makes right.  Roll Eyes

Are you serious, i actually think you are, well blow those islands right out of the sea,, or let them build more islands.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39566
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #25 - May 4th, 2020 at 1:21pm
 
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 11:11pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 10:42pm:
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 9:36pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 7:18pm:
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:43pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:17pm:
What a load of faux outrage.  Have you ever visited Antarctica?  No, I didn't think so.  Few Australians have.  I have.  Twice.   China is welcome to their base in the frozen continent.  They won't be attempting anything other than research.

As for China refusing to obey treaties.  Actually it does.  Even better than Australia.  The South China Sea is an effort to improve their defences against encroaching American forces.   The PRC has long standing, dating back to the days of the Chinese Empire of seeking to control events on it's periphery.  The Korean War was one aspect of that as was the Chinese border dispute with the fUSSR and invasion of Vietnam.  They don't like hostile forces on their borders.

The US Navy is an overly aggressive force.  It used to upset the fUSSR with numerous border incursions.  It still sails it's submarines into Russian waters.  It still carries out similar antics against the PRC.  The PRC has attempted to do something about that by building islands.  Get the US to behave and the PRC will behave.  QED.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Good one, so China goes against international laws to teach the US a lesson and your fine with that.

China can POQ out of Antarctica, they are not to be trusted.

Hey, you been everywhere man!


Jealousy is a curse, little man.  So you've  never been anywhere except to Google?  Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Perhaps you'd care to demonstrate what treaties/conventions the Chinese have contravened?  I'd be interested to find out exactly what you do know.  Otherwise this is just another example of a Sinophobic troll.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Building islands in the South China sea clearly for military might  is a clear breach of international law, unless you think they built them for peaceful purposes.


Actually they are a perfect demonstration of what International Law is - through the application of force.  Might makes right.  Roll Eyes

Are you serious, i actually think you are, well blow those islands right out of the sea,, or let them build more islands.


Only a naive person who is being a troll believes otherwise.  Time to wake up and smell the coffee.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
tickleandrose
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3867
Gender: female
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #26 - May 4th, 2020 at 1:45pm
 
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 12:33pm:
tickleandrose wrote on May 2nd, 2020 at 8:24pm:
Yet another complicated territorial situation being 'watered' down by tabloid newspaper for the commoners to consume.  Lets begin...

1. The initial claim on these Antartica territory was by the United Kingdom in 1841, and later on transferred to Australia.   In 1961, the Antarctic treaty came into force through UN.  And article 4 specifically deal with territorial claims.

Article IV

    1. Nothing contained in the present treaty shall be interpreted as:

        (a) a renunciation by any Contracting Party of previously asserted rights of or claims to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica;

        (b) a renunciation or diminution by any Contracting Party of any basis of claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica which it may have whether as a result of its activities or those of its nationals in Antarctica, or otherwise;

        (c) prejudicing the position of any Contracting Party as regards its recognition or non-recognition of any other States right of or claim or basis of claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica.

    2. No acts or activities taking place while the present treaty is in force shall constitute a basis for asserting, supporting or denying a claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica or create any rights of sovereignty in Antarctica. No new claim, or enlargement of an existing claim, to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica shall be asserted while the present treaty is in force.

So in a nut shell, the article pretty much said you can claim your land, may be, but you cant prohibit others from claiming land.   As a result, only four countries in the world recognized Australia's claim in Antartica, and these are: New Zealand, United Kingdom, France and Norway.   The rest of the world does not.  So if you have any notion that the Chinese is building on 'our' land, then.. think again. 

Currently there are total of 8 stations in the Australian antarctic territory.  Australia has 3 stations (Mawson, Davis, Casey), Russia has 3 (Mirny, Vostok, progress station), Romania has 1, France/Italy has 1, and China 1 (Zhongshan).  So where is the outrage against Russia and Romania? 

All true except China doesn't give a rats about any international law or treaty as clearly shown in the South China sea.

By far the Chinese have more presence down there than anyone else, tens of thousands of Chinese tourists every year, massive amounts of krill fishing and building stations smack in the middle of Australia's claimed territory.

"Given Beijing’s track record in moving rapidly on a broad front, as it’s done in the South China Sea, we need to be prepared to respond to a rapid increase in the speed and scale of its actions in Antarctica.

We shouldn’t help China use Antarctic research for resource exploitation, to gather information on advanced technology with clear potential for military purposes, or to act in environmentally harmful ways. Australia should regularly inspect Chinese facilities (and China can inspect ours)."

China is using the old rule which states: Possession is nine tenths of the law!




First of all, as my post states clearly, only four other countries in the world recognizes Australia's claim to the territory.  Now, if today, Australia or even UK is the Empire it was 200 years ago, then, this should not be a problem.  The world is alot different now.   Without the aid of USA (america first), and the sleek worded article 4. We can protest all we like, and there is nothing we can do about it.   The old terra nullis of European era is well and truly behind us. 

As to the south China sea.  These issues are again much more complicated, and this dates back to world war 2 after Japanese occupation.  Suffice to say that we all made to believe China is the only aggressor, but the actually territory is in dispute by many countries around the region, not only against China, but also against each other.  You need to read more into that. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 8611
armidale
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #27 - May 4th, 2020 at 2:20pm
 
" Zheng He , a Chinese admiral in 14th century, made maps. In the Atlas of Ancient Maps in China that was published in 1994 is evidence that some of his charts did survive. Cao Wanru published the maps and indirectly allows that some charts remain. "

The map of a great south land gives China the military right to the southern China ocean , islands , glaciers and huts.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 40617
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #28 - May 4th, 2020 at 6:49pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 4th, 2020 at 1:21pm:
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 11:11pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 10:42pm:
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 9:36pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 7:18pm:
Johnnie wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:43pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:17pm:
What a load of faux outrage.  Have you ever visited Antarctica?  No, I didn't think so.  Few Australians have.  I have.  Twice.   China is welcome to their base in the frozen continent.  They won't be attempting anything other than research.

As for China refusing to obey treaties.  Actually it does.  Even better than Australia.  The South China Sea is an effort to improve their defences against encroaching American forces.   The PRC has long standing, dating back to the days of the Chinese Empire of seeking to control events on it's periphery.  The Korean War was one aspect of that as was the Chinese border dispute with the fUSSR and invasion of Vietnam.  They don't like hostile forces on their borders.

The US Navy is an overly aggressive force.  It used to upset the fUSSR with numerous border incursions.  It still sails it's submarines into Russian waters.  It still carries out similar antics against the PRC.  The PRC has attempted to do something about that by building islands.  Get the US to behave and the PRC will behave.  QED.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Good one, so China goes against international laws to teach the US a lesson and your fine with that.

China can POQ out of Antarctica, they are not to be trusted.

Hey, you been everywhere man!


Jealousy is a curse, little man.  So you've  never been anywhere except to Google?  Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Perhaps you'd care to demonstrate what treaties/conventions the Chinese have contravened?  I'd be interested to find out exactly what you do know.  Otherwise this is just another example of a Sinophobic troll.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Building islands in the South China sea clearly for military might  is a clear breach of international law, unless you think they built them for peaceful purposes.


Actually they are a perfect demonstration of what International Law is - through the application of force.  Might makes right.  Roll Eyes

Are you serious, i actually think you are, well blow those islands right out of the sea,, or let them build more islands.


Only a naive person who is being a troll believes otherwise.  Time to wake up and smell the coffee.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


What a sh!thead you are, Bwian. A true Chinese propagandist:



Reply #120 - Apr 29th, 2020 at 11:46pm

Brian Ross   Offline
Moderator
Representative of the
Maximegalon Institute

Posts: 22711
*****
NorthOfNorth wrote on Apr 29th, 2020 at 11:34pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Apr 29th, 2020 at 10:11pm:
Frank wrote on Apr 29th, 2020 at 8:35pm:
China  - the CCP - will never live it down.

A blind eye has been turned to their lying, corrupt ways while things were going OK. Now that they made world grind to a halt - it will never be forgiven or forgotten. The bully has been caught out and there is no way he can spend hiss way out of this by bribing poor countries.

China is f***d. Their word is worthless.

Chinese culture, BTW, is also f***d - all this 'bat heart is good for you in Traditional Chinese medicine' crap is discredited. They are shown to be a bunch of un-reconstructed superstitious ijits - add Communist dictatorial attitude to their own people and the world - and you have China in the 21st century: superstitious bullies.


They said the same thing about Tienanmen Square...

Again... Tienanmen Square did not plunge the world into a global crisis...

To date, most countries will, or are moving to exit from, or limit their exposure to, China economically...

Demands for an independent inquiry into the virus's origin terrifies the CCP (for obvious reasons)... And why? If they're telling us the truth, as best they can, then an independent inquiry will confirm (or largely confirm) what the CCP has been telling us...

Likely an independent inquiry would report a situation exponentially worse than we can imagine...


If it reveals anything.  You forget, the PRC is a separate, independent, sovereign state.  It also has a population equaled by only one other nation.  Anything the world does, is immaterial to the PRC.  It might hurt it in the short term but over time, the PRC will survive.

However this has no bearing really on the question of Tibet.  This thread has, IMO run it's course.  I will be locking it.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39566
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #29 - May 4th, 2020 at 8:56pm
 
So if I am a Chinese propagandist, what are you, Soren a mud propagandist?  After all, all you post is mud, pure a simple.  No intelligence, no rationality, just Racism/Xenophobia/Islamophobia/Homophobia and of course your resorting to mud all the time.  Time you woke up to yourself.  You're a joke.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 40617
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #30 - May 5th, 2020 at 5:56pm
 
Spoken like a Chinese propagandists - opposing Chinese lies and misinformation is 'mud and xenophobia and wacisms' and whatever other BS buzz word you can come up with.

But no reasoned argument - because neither you nor the Chinese have any. Over the top mindless rhetoric and idiotic bluster is what you share with the Chinese.

If the Chinese really believed their own line - that the virus was brought to China by Americans - they would be supporting an investigation into the source and spread of the virus wholeheartedly.   But they are lying, like you, and they talk about 'mud' when caught out lying.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 8611
armidale
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #31 - May 5th, 2020 at 6:45pm
 
Frank wrote on May 4th, 2020 at 6:49pm:
However this has no bearing really on the question of Tibet. 


Good point. And no bearing on Antarctica. If China acts the way Britain did in south China , Australia and Antarctica , we're in trouble.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39566
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #32 - May 5th, 2020 at 7:52pm
 
Frank wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 5:56pm:
Spoken like a Chinese propagandists - opposing Chinese lies and misinformation is 'mud and xenophobia and wacisms' and whatever other BS buzz word you can come up with.

But no reasoned argument - because neither you nor the Chinese have any. Over the top mindless rhetoric and idiotic bluster is what you share with the Chinese.

If the Chinese really believed their own line - that the virus was brought to China by Americans - they would be supporting an investigation into the source and spread of the virus wholeheartedly.   But they are lying, like you, and they talk about 'mud' when caught out lying.


Actually engaging in pointless ad hominem debate is a waste of time, Soren.  China deserves to be criticised for many things but your attitude is rooted in your Sinophobia, rather than reality.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28095
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #33 - May 7th, 2020 at 12:06pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:17pm:
What a load of faux outrage.  Have you ever visited Antarctica?  No, I didn't think so.  Few Australians have.  I have.  Twice.   China is welcome to their base in the frozen continent.  They won't be attempting anything other than research.

As for China refusing to obey treaties.  Actually it does.  Even better than Australia.  The South China Sea is an effort to improve their defences against encroaching American forces.   The PRC has long standing, dating back to the days of the Chinese Empire of seeking to control events on it's periphery.  The Korean War was one aspect of that as was the Chinese border dispute with the fUSSR and invasion of Vietnam.  They don't like hostile forces on their borders.

The US Navy is an overly aggressive force.  It used to upset the fUSSR with numerous border incursions.  It still sails it's submarines into Russian waters.  It still carries out similar antics against the PRC.  The PRC has attempted to do something about that by building islands.  Get the US to behave and the PRC will behave.  QED.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


There's nothing you haven't done & nowhere you haven't been & there's nothing you don't know.

You're truly remarkable. Roll Eyes

How old did you say you were......650yrs?
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28095
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #34 - May 7th, 2020 at 12:13pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 7:52pm:
Frank wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 5:56pm:
Spoken like a Chinese propagandists - opposing Chinese lies and misinformation is 'mud and xenophobia and wacisms' and whatever other BS buzz word you can come up with.

But no reasoned argument - because neither you nor the Chinese have any. Over the top mindless rhetoric and idiotic bluster is what you share with the Chinese.

If the Chinese really believed their own line - that the virus was brought to China by Americans - they would be supporting an investigation into the source and spread of the virus wholeheartedly.   But they are lying, like you, and they talk about 'mud' when caught out lying.


Actually engaging in pointless ad hominem debate is a waste of time, Soren.  China deserves to be criticised for many things but your attitude is rooted in your Sinophobia, rather than reality.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Grin another prefixed "phobia".

Anyone who disagrees with your BS is a phobe of some sort.

You pithy little person.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39566
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #35 - May 7th, 2020 at 12:49pm
 
Gnads wrote on May 7th, 2020 at 12:06pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 3rd, 2020 at 1:17pm:
What a load of faux outrage.  Have you ever visited Antarctica?  No, I didn't think so.  Few Australians have.  I have.  Twice.   China is welcome to their base in the frozen continent.  They won't be attempting anything other than research.

As for China refusing to obey treaties.  Actually it does.  Even better than Australia.  The South China Sea is an effort to improve their defences against encroaching American forces.   The PRC has long standing, dating back to the days of the Chinese Empire of seeking to control events on it's periphery.  The Korean War was one aspect of that as was the Chinese border dispute with the fUSSR and invasion of Vietnam.  They don't like hostile forces on their borders.

The US Navy is an overly aggressive force.  It used to upset the fUSSR with numerous border incursions.  It still sails it's submarines into Russian waters.  It still carries out similar antics against the PRC.  The PRC has attempted to do something about that by building islands.  Get the US to behave and the PRC will behave.  QED.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


There's nothing you haven't done & nowhere you haven't been & there's nothing you don't know.

You're truly remarkable. Roll Eyes

How old did you say you were......650yrs?


...

Jealousy is such a curse...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39566
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #36 - May 7th, 2020 at 12:50pm
 
Gnads wrote on May 7th, 2020 at 12:13pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 7:52pm:
Frank wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 5:56pm:
Spoken like a Chinese propagandists - opposing Chinese lies and misinformation is 'mud and xenophobia and wacisms' and whatever other BS buzz word you can come up with.

But no reasoned argument - because neither you nor the Chinese have any. Over the top mindless rhetoric and idiotic bluster is what you share with the Chinese.

If the Chinese really believed their own line - that the virus was brought to China by Americans - they would be supporting an investigation into the source and spread of the virus wholeheartedly.   But they are lying, like you, and they talk about 'mud' when caught out lying.


Actually engaging in pointless ad hominem debate is a waste of time, Soren.  China deserves to be criticised for many things but your attitude is rooted in your Sinophobia, rather than reality.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Grin another prefixed "phobia".

Anyone who disagrees with your BS is a phobe of some sort.

You pithy little person.


Spoken by another Siniphobe...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28095
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #37 - May 9th, 2020 at 10:25am
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 7th, 2020 at 12:50pm:
Gnads wrote on May 7th, 2020 at 12:13pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 7:52pm:
Frank wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 5:56pm:
Spoken like a Chinese propagandists - opposing Chinese lies and misinformation is 'mud and xenophobia and wacisms' and whatever other BS buzz word you can come up with.

But no reasoned argument - because neither you nor the Chinese have any. Over the top mindless rhetoric and idiotic bluster is what you share with the Chinese.

If the Chinese really believed their own line - that the virus was brought to China by Americans - they would be supporting an investigation into the source and spread of the virus wholeheartedly.   But they are lying, like you, and they talk about 'mud' when caught out lying.


Actually engaging in pointless ad hominem debate is a waste of time, Soren.  China deserves to be criticised for many things but your attitude is rooted in your Sinophobia, rather than reality.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Grin another prefixed "phobia".

Anyone who disagrees with your BS is a phobe of some sort.

You pithy little person.


Spoken by another Siniphobe...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Pithy & a wanker
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39566
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #38 - May 9th, 2020 at 5:33pm
 
Gnads wrote on May 9th, 2020 at 10:25am:
Brian Ross wrote on May 7th, 2020 at 12:50pm:
Gnads wrote on May 7th, 2020 at 12:13pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 7:52pm:
Frank wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 5:56pm:
Spoken like a Chinese propagandists - opposing Chinese lies and misinformation is 'mud and xenophobia and wacisms' and whatever other BS buzz word you can come up with.

But no reasoned argument - because neither you nor the Chinese have any. Over the top mindless rhetoric and idiotic bluster is what you share with the Chinese.

If the Chinese really believed their own line - that the virus was brought to China by Americans - they would be supporting an investigation into the source and spread of the virus wholeheartedly.   But they are lying, like you, and they talk about 'mud' when caught out lying.


Actually engaging in pointless ad hominem debate is a waste of time, Soren.  China deserves to be criticised for many things but your attitude is rooted in your Sinophobia, rather than reality.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Grin another prefixed "phobia".

Anyone who disagrees with your BS is a phobe of some sort.

You pithy little person.


Spoken by another Siniphobe...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Pithy & a wanker


...

Yeah, yeah, whatever you say.  Seems strange to call yourself a "wanker" though. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28095
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #39 - May 9th, 2020 at 7:22pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 9th, 2020 at 5:33pm:
Gnads wrote on May 9th, 2020 at 10:25am:
Brian Ross wrote on May 7th, 2020 at 12:50pm:
Gnads wrote on May 7th, 2020 at 12:13pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 7:52pm:
Frank wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 5:56pm:
Spoken like a Chinese propagandists - opposing Chinese lies and misinformation is 'mud and xenophobia and wacisms' and whatever other BS buzz word you can come up with.

But no reasoned argument - because neither you nor the Chinese have any. Over the top mindless rhetoric and idiotic bluster is what you share with the Chinese.

If the Chinese really believed their own line - that the virus was brought to China by Americans - they would be supporting an investigation into the source and spread of the virus wholeheartedly.   But they are lying, like you, and they talk about 'mud' when caught out lying.


Actually engaging in pointless ad hominem debate is a waste of time, Soren.  China deserves to be criticised for many things but your attitude is rooted in your Sinophobia, rather than reality.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Grin another prefixed "phobia".

Anyone who disagrees with your BS is a phobe of some sort.

You pithy little person.


Spoken by another Siniphobe...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Pithy & a wanker


https://emojipedia-us.s3.dualstack.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/thumbs/120/google/223...

Yeah, yeah, whatever you say.  Seems strange to call yourself a "wanker" though. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Nice try & no cigar

You know where it was directed  ... solely at you.  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 39566
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #40 - May 9th, 2020 at 8:10pm
 
Gnads wrote on May 9th, 2020 at 7:22pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 9th, 2020 at 5:33pm:
Gnads wrote on May 9th, 2020 at 10:25am:
Brian Ross wrote on May 7th, 2020 at 12:50pm:
Gnads wrote on May 7th, 2020 at 12:13pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 7:52pm:
Frank wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 5:56pm:
Spoken like a Chinese propagandists - opposing Chinese lies and misinformation is 'mud and xenophobia and wacisms' and whatever other BS buzz word you can come up with.

But no reasoned argument - because neither you nor the Chinese have any. Over the top mindless rhetoric and idiotic bluster is what you share with the Chinese.

If the Chinese really believed their own line - that the virus was brought to China by Americans - they would be supporting an investigation into the source and spread of the virus wholeheartedly.   But they are lying, like you, and they talk about 'mud' when caught out lying.


Actually engaging in pointless ad hominem debate is a waste of time, Soren.  China deserves to be criticised for many things but your attitude is rooted in your Sinophobia, rather than reality.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Grin another prefixed "phobia".

Anyone who disagrees with your BS is a phobe of some sort.

You pithy little person.


Spoken by another Siniphobe...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Pithy & a wanker


https://emojipedia-us.s3.dualstack.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/thumbs/120/google/223...

Yeah, yeah, whatever you say.  Seems strange to call yourself a "wanker" though. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Nice try & no cigar

You know where it was directed  ... solely at you.  Roll Eyes


...

Yeah, yeah, whatever you say.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #41 - May 9th, 2020 at 9:58pm
 
Someone should go check up on those sleazebag Chinese, Australian scientists are questioning their motives.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AiA
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 18405
Gender: male
Re: CHINA GET OUT OF ANTARCTICA
Reply #42 - May 9th, 2020 at 10:17pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 7th, 2020 at 12:50pm:
Gnads wrote on May 7th, 2020 at 12:13pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 7:52pm:
Frank wrote on May 5th, 2020 at 5:56pm:
Spoken like a Chinese propagandists - opposing Chinese lies and misinformation is 'mud and xenophobia and wacisms' and whatever other BS buzz word you can come up with.

But no reasoned argument - because neither you nor the Chinese have any. Over the top mindless rhetoric and idiotic bluster is what you share with the Chinese.

If the Chinese really believed their own line - that the virus was brought to China by Americans - they would be supporting an investigation into the source and spread of the virus wholeheartedly.   But they are lying, like you, and they talk about 'mud' when caught out lying.


Actually engaging in pointless ad hominem debate is a waste of time, Soren.  China deserves to be criticised for many things but your attitude is rooted in your Sinophobia, rather than reality.  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Grin another prefixed "phobia".

Anyone who disagrees with your BS is a phobe of some sort.

You pithy little person.


Spoken by another Siniphobe...  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Sinophobia? I am not so sure.

The governments of China and Russia recognize that they are heirs to civilization-states and the governments of both those countries are aggressively promoting the interests of Russosphere and Sinosphere.

But English-speakers are claimed to be "racists" when they make that same distinction, that English-speaking nations share a common identity and values.
Back to top
 

“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print